Stephen Heffler
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Stephen Heffler.
Health Affairs | 2008
Aaron Catlin; Cathy A. Cowan; Micah Hartman; Stephen Heffler
In 2006, U.S. health care spending increased 6.7 percent to
Medicare & Medicaid Research Review | 2012
Didem Bernard; Cathy A. Cowan; Thomas M. Selden; Liming Cai; Aaron Catlin; Stephen Heffler
2.1 trillion, or
Medical Care | 2009
Stephen Heffler; Olivia Nuccio; Mark S. Freeland
7,026 per person. The health care portion of gross domestic product (GDP) was 16.0 percent, slightly higher than in 2005. Prescription drug spending growth accelerated in 2006 to 8.5 percent, partly as a result of Medicare Part Ds impact. Most of the other major health care services and public payers experienced slower growth in 2006 than in prior years. The implementation of Medicare Part D caused a major shift in the distribution of payers for prescription drugs, as Medicare played a larger role in drug purchases than it had before.
Health Affairs | 2006
Cynthia Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; Stephen Heffler; Aaron Catlin
OBJECTIVE Provide a comparison of health care expenditure estimates for 2007 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and the National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA). Reconciling these estimates serves two important purposes. First, it is an important quality assurance exercise for improving and ensuring the integrity of each sources estimates. Second, the reconciliation provides a consistent baseline of health expenditure data for policy simulations. Our results assist researchers to adjust MEPS to be consistent with the NHEA so that the projected costs as well as budgetary and tax implications of any policy change are consistent with national health spending estimates. DATA SOURCES The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey produced by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and the National Health Center for Health Statistics and the National Health Expenditures produced by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Office of the Actuary. RESULTS In this study, we focus on the personal health care (PHC) sector, which includes the goods and services rendered to treat or prevent a specific disease or condition in an individual. The official 2007 NHEA estimate for PHC spending is
Health Affairs | 2007
Aaron Catlin; Cathy A. Cowan; Stephen Heffler; Benjamin Washington
1,915 billion and the MEPS estimate is
Health Affairs | 2001
Stephen Heffler; Katharine R. Levit; Sheila Smith; Cynthia Smith; Cathy A. Cowan; Mark S. Freeland
1,126 billion. Adjusting the NHEA estimates for differences in underlying populations, covered services, and other measurement concepts reduces the NHEA estimate for 2007 to
Health Affairs | 2004
Stephen Heffler; Sheila Smith; Sean Keehan; M. Kent Clemens; Mark Zezza; Christopher Truffer
1,366 billion. As a result, MEPS is
Health Affairs | 2002
Stephen Heffler; Sheila Smith; Greg Won; M. Kent Clemens; Sean Keehan; Mark Zezza
240 billion, or 17.6 percent, less than the adjusted NHEA total.
Health Affairs | 1998
Sheila Smith; Mark S. Freeland; Stephen Heffler; David R. McKusick
Background/Objective:The National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) are the official government estimates of aggregate US health care spending. We summarize the data sources, methods, strengths, limitations, and applications of the NHEA. Methods:To compile this article, we provide background on the NHEA, a description of the data sources and methods used to produce them, some recent findings that the NHEA produced, as well a discussion of their strengths, limitations, and applications drawn from several different sources, both internal and external to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Results:The NHEA have a multitude of applications, including comparison with other economic data such as the Gross Domestic Product, reconciliation with other health spending data sources, and use in predictive and analytic models. The NHEA adhere to national income accounting standards and are comprehensive, mutually exclusive, multidimensional, and consistent over time. The NHEA do not contain microlevel detailed data and are subject to both sampling and nonsampling errors during the interim census years, although this is the case for all available data sources. Conclusions:Determining the correct method for measuring health care costs depends on one’s purpose, and analysis of health care cost data that requires aggregate-level statistics should consider use of the NHEA.
Health Affairs | 2005
Stephen Heffler; Sheila Smith; Sean Keehan; Christine Borger; Clemens Mk; Christopher Truffer