Cecil S. Qiu

Surgical Duration Impacts Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

Background Increased surgical duration can impact patient outcomes and operative efficiency metrics. In particular, there are studies suggesting that increased surgical duration can increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). One of the longer duration plastic surgery procedures commonly performed is microsurgical breast reconstruction. With the widening indications for multiple and “stacked” free flaps to reconstruct breasts, we endeavored to assess (1) the relationship between duration of microsurgical breast reconstruction and VTE; and (2) determine if a threshold operative time exists that connotes VTE higher risk. Methods Patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS‐NSQIP) between 2005 and 2014 who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction were identified by Current Procedural Terminology code. Three models of multivariate logistic regression were used to characterize the adjusted risk for VTE by operative duration, bilaterality, the length of stay, and patient demographics. Results A total of 4,782 patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction were identified. Overall VTE incidence was 1.13%. The mean operative duration was 8:31 hours:minutes (standard deviation: 2:59). Operative duration was statistically associated with VTE in continuous, quintile, and dichotomized risk models. Beyond an operative duration of 11 hours, adjusted VTE risk increases fourfold corresponding to a number needed to harm of 45.8. Conclusions Increasing surgical duration heightens the risk of VTE in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Increasing body mass index and age enhances this VTE risk. Moreover, limiting surgical duration to 11 hours or less can decrease VTE risk by fourfold vis‐à‐vis baseline. Level of Evidence Risk, II.

The Effect of Implant Type on Nipple Position Geometry and Aesthetics Following Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy

Background While recent studies have reported modest to no difference in breast aesthetics for shaped and round implant types in breast augmentations, the anatomy and biomechanics in the setting of breast reconstruction is different. Objectives Accordingly, we endeavored to evaluate whether two implant types impacted nipple position and aesthetic features in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Methods A retrospective chart review was carried out on patients who underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction. Patients were divided into two cohorts: smooth round implants and textured shaped implants. Postoperative photographs were evaluated to assess nipple displacement vis-à-vis a vector of maximal projection and aesthetic outcome for features of breast shape. Results Of 102 breasts meeting the inclusion criteria, 41 had tissue expander-implant reconstruction with anatomical shaped implants, and 61 had reconstruction with smooth round implants. The shaped implant cohort had less nipple deviation from the point of maximal projection (3.69 ± 6.24 vs 7.52 ± 10.50; P < 0.0001). Graded semi-quantitative aesthetic scores were also higher (4.04 ± 0.67 vs 3.72 ± 0.93; P = 0.0044) in the shaped implants than in the round cohort. Conclusions Unlike breast augmentation, there is a paucity of overlying breast tissue and larger dissected spaces in prosthetic breast reconstruction. Our analysis suggests that in this setting, textured anatomic implants result in less nipple deviation from the point of maximum projection and improved aesthetic outcomes compared to round implants. When considering implant choice in NSM reconstruction, the manifold risks of shaped textured implants must thus be informed by potential aesthetic benefits with respect to shape and enhanced nipple sensation. Level of Evidence 4

External validation of the breast reconstruction risk assessment calculator

INTRODUCTION The Breast reconstruction Risk Assessment (BRA) Score estimates patient-specific risk for postsurgical complications using an individuals unique combination of preoperative variables. In this report, we externally validate the BRA Score models for surgical site infection, seroma, and explantation in a large sample of intra-institutional patients who underwent prosthetic breast reconstruction. METHODS We reviewed all initiated tissue expander/implant reconstructions by the senior authors from January 2004 to December 2015. BRA Score risk estimates were computed for each patient and compared against observed rates of complications. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, concordance statistic, and Brier score were used to assess the calibration, discrimination, and accuracy of the models, respectively. RESULTS Of the 1152 patients (1743 breasts) reviewed, 855 patients (1333 breasts) had complete data for BRA-score calculations and were included for analysis. Hosmer-Lemeshow tests for calibration demonstrated a good agreement between observed and predicted outcomes for surgical site infection (SSI) and seroma models (P-values of 0.33 and 0.16, respectively). In contrast, predicted rates of explantation deviated from observed rates (Hosmer-Lemeshow P-value of 0.04). C statistics demonstrated good discrimination for SSI, seroma, and explantation (0.73, 0.69, and 0.78, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this external validation study, the BRA Score tissue expander/implant reconstruction models performed with generally good calibration, discrimination, and accuracy. Some weaknesses in certain models were identified as targets for future improvement. Taken together, these analyses validate the clinical utility of the BRA score risk models in predicting 30-day outcomes.

Abstract: Animation Deformity in Breast Reconstruction Patients

PURPOSE: Surgical-site infection is a major concern in prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. Some infections are mild, resolving with outpatient antibiotic treatment, and others are more severe, requiring hospital readmission for treatment with IV antibiotics. Explant of the tissue expander or implant is one of the most feared complications. Thirtyday postoperative readmission rates are a common quality metric, but little is known about readmission rates for later infection after prosthetic-based breast reconstruction. We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to determine the rates and predictors of early and late hospital readmissions associated with infection and explantation after prosthetic-based breast reconstruction.