Cécile Pages

Vemurafenib-induced neutrophilic panniculitis.

Vemurafenib is a targeted therapy, used in patients with metastatic cutaneous melanoma who carry the BRAF V600E mutation, with a relative reduction of 63% in the risk of death. Several adverse events have been described previously, such as photosensitivity or squamous-cell carcinomas. Two cases of panniculitis have been reported recently with two different selective BRAF inhibitors. We report two cases of neutrophilic panniculitis in patients treated by vemurafenib for a metastatic melanoma. Clinical and biological examinations showed no indications for an immune nor an infectious cause of neutrophilic panniculitis. Thus, we believe that vemurafenib caused this panniculitis. Treatment with vemurafenib was maintained in both patients because of the clinical and radiological tumoral responses. One patient showed spontaneous recovery, whereas the other patient presented several recurrences of panniculitis. We believe that physicians should be aware of this cutaneous side effect of vemurafenib, but it should not lead to discontinuation of this treatment.

Anti-PD1-induced collagenous colitis in a melanoma patient.

Targeted immunotherapy has markedly improved the survival of melanoma patients. We report the case of a melanoma patient who developed a collagenous colitis under an anti-PD1 regimen. A 68-year-old woman was treated for a stage IV melanoma. An anti-PD1, pembrolizumab, was introduced after the failure of a first-line therapy with an anti-CTLA4. At cycle 14, pembrolizumab was interrupted because of grade 3 diarrhea. Histologic analysis of colon mucosa showed a thickened apical subepithelial collagen layer with irregular collagen deposition of more than 25 µm thickness. Budesonide 9 mg/day and cholestyramin 8 g/day were then introduced, leading to a decrease in the number of stools to grade 2. Because of the prognosis of the disease, the efficacy of pembrolizumab in this patient and the lack of other efficient treatments, pembrolizumab was restarted, with no worsening of the diarrhea after a follow-up of 8 weeks. In the era of immunotherapy, a new type of drug-induced colitis has emerged because of monoclonal antibodies targeting immune checkpoints such as CTLA-4 and PD1. Gastrointestinal tract immune-mediated adverse effects are now well described with ipilimumab. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a collagenous colitis in a patient treated with pembrolizumab, thus suggesting a new mechanism of toxicity. Classically, collagenous colitis first-line treatment is based on discontinuation of the suspected treatment. However, there may be a strong benefit to maintaining an anti-PD1 regimen in our patients. In this case, symptomatic management associated with budesonide and cholestyramin enabled continuation of pembrolizumab.

Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV8) Sequentially Shapes the NK Cell Repertoire during the Course of Asymptomatic Infection and Kaposi Sarcoma

The contribution of innate immunity to immunosurveillance of the oncogenic Human Herpes Virus 8 (HHV8) has not been studied in depth. We investigated NK cell phenotype and function in 70 HHV8-infected subjects, either asymptomatic carriers or having developed Kaposis sarcoma (KS). Our results revealed substantial alterations of the NK cell receptor repertoire in healthy HHV8 carriers, with reduced expression of NKp30, NKp46 and CD161 receptors. In addition, down-modulation of the activating NKG2D receptor, associated with impaired NK-cell lytic capacity, was observed in patients with active KS. Resolution of KS after treatment was accompanied with restoration of NKG2D levels and NK cell activity. HHV8-latently infected endothelial cells overexpressed ligands of several NK cell receptors, including NKG2D ligands. The strong expression of NKG2D ligands by tumor cells was confirmed in situ by immunohistochemical staining of KS biopsies. However, no tumor-infiltrating NK cells were detected, suggesting a defect in NK cell homing or survival in the KS microenvironment. Among the known KS-derived immunoregulatory factors, we identified prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) as a critical element responsible for the down-modulation of NKG2D expression on resting NK cells. Moreover, PGE2 prevented up-regulation of the NKG2D and NKp30 receptors on IL-15-activated NK cells, and inhibited the IL-15-induced proliferation and survival of NK cells. Altogether, our observations are consistent with distinct immunoevasion mechanisms that allow HHV8 to escape NK cell responses stepwise, first at early stages of infection to facilitate the maintenance of viral latency, and later to promote tumor cell growth through suppression of NKG2D-mediated functions. Importantly, our results provide additional support to the use of PGE2 inhibitors as an attractive approach to treat aggressive KS, as they could restore activation and survival of tumoricidal NK cells.

Vemurafenib in the French temporary authorization for use metastatic melanoma cohort: a single-centre trial.

Vemurafenib, a selective BRAF inhibitor, has recently shown an improved overall survival (OS) in metastatic melanoma with V600E mutation in phase 2 and 3 trials. Patients with BRAF V600E metastatic melanoma received vemurafenib orally, in the French temporary authorization for use program from April 2011 to April 2012. We analysed the clinical benefit and safety of vemurafenib. Secondary analyses included the impact of brain metastases on median OS and progression-free survival (PFS). Fifty patients were enrolled, of whom 20% had stage IIIC and 80% stage IV disease. The majority were men (58%), with a median age of 58 years (51–69). Forty-three patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 (86%). Twenty patients had brain metastases (40%). Overall response rate was 53%. Complete response was achieved in five patients (10%), partial response in 21 patients (43%) and stable disease in seven patients (14%). Median OS was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval 5.6–12.7) and PFS was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval 2.9–5.9). Patients with brain metastasis had a response rate of 50% (nine partial response, one complete response), and median OS and PFS were, respectively, 4.3 and 3.1 months. Common adverse events were fatigue, arthralgia and cutaneous side effects. Sixteen per cent developed squamous cell carcinoma. Grade 3/4 was observed in 11 patients (22%). Six per cent required temporary discontinuation and/or dose reduction because of toxic effects. This study confirms the considerable clinical benefit of vemurafenib for patients with brain metastasis, with manageable toxicity.

Ipilimumab reshapes T cell memory subsets in melanoma patients with clinical response.

ABSTRACT Purpose: Therapy targeting CTLA-4 immune checkpoint provides increased survival in patients with advanced melanoma. However, immunotherapy is frequently associated with delayed and heterogeneous clinical responses and it is important to identify prognostic immunological correlates of clinical endpoints. Experimental design: 77 patients with stage III/IV melanoma were treated with ipilimumab alone every 3 weeks, during 9 weeks. Blood samples were collected at the baseline and before each dose for in depth immune monitoring. Results: The median follow-up was 28 mo with a median survival of 7 mo. Survival and clinical benefit were significantly improved when absolute lymphocyte count at the baseline was above 1 × 109/L. Notably, ipilimumab had a global effect on memory T cells, with an early increase of central and effector subsets in patients with disease control. By contrast, percentages of stem cell memory T cells (TSCM) gradually decreased despite stable absolute counts and sustained proliferation, suggesting a process of differentiation. Higher proportions of eomes+ and Ki-67+ T cells were observed, with enhanced skin homing potential and induction of cytotoxic markers. Conclusion: These results suggest that CTLA-4 blockade is able to reshape the memory subset with the potential involvement of Eomes and memory subsets including TSCM.

Mechanisms Underpinning Increased Plasma Creatinine Levels in Patients Receiving Vemurafenib for Advanced Melanoma

Context Serum creatinine has been reported to increase in patients receiving Vemurafenib, yet neither the prevalence nor the mechanism of this adverse event are known. Objective We aimed to evaluate the frequency and the mechanisms of increases in plasma creatinine level in patients receiving Vemurafenib for advanced melanoma. Methods We performed a retrospective monocentric study including consecutive patients treated with Vemurafenib for an advanced melanoma. We collected clinical and biological data concerning renal function before introduction of Vemurafenib and in the course of monthly follow-up visits from March 2013 to December 2014. Cystatin C-derived glomerular filtration rate was evaluated before and after Vemurafenib initiation, as increase in serum cystatin C is specific to a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate. We also performed thorough renal explorations in 3 patients, with measurement of tubular secretion of creatinine before and after Vemurafenib initiation and a renal biopsy in 2 patients. Results 70 patients were included: 97% of them displayed an immediate, and thereafter stable, increase in creatinine (+22.8%) after Vemurafenib initiation. In 44/52 patients in whom Vemurafenib was discontinued, creatinine levels returned to baseline. Serum cystatin C increased, although proportionally less than serum creatinine, showing that creatinine increase under vemurafenib was indeed partly due to a renal function impairment. In addition, renal explorations demonstrated that Vemurafenib induced an inhibition of creatinine tubular secretion. Conclusion Thus, Vemurafenib induces a dual mechanism of increase in plasma creatinine with both an inhibition of creatinine tubular secretion and slight renal function impairment. However, this side effect is mostly reversible when Vemurafenib is discontinued, and should not lead physicians to discontinue the treatment if it is effective.

Atypical severe immune-related adverse effects resulting from sequenced immunotherapy in melanoma.

We report unusual severe toxicity in three patients treated at our institution with sequenced immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma. These three patients illustrate the unusual potential toxicity of sequential administration of anti-programmed cell death 1 followed by ipilimumab, and the need for careful monitoring of these toxicities associated with sequential immunotherapies. Data from forthcoming trials and national databases such as MELBASE, recently implemented in France, will be helpful in providing further insights into the risks and benefits of sequential immunotherapy schedules.

Remitting seronegative symmetrical synovitis with pitting edema (RS3PE) syndrome induced by nivolumab

INTRODUCTION A new articular syndrome described as immunrelated side effect of immunotherapy: PD-1 inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of advanced melanoma but are responsible for immune-related toxicity. We report a case of remitting seronegative symetrical synovitis with pitting edema (RS3PE) syndrome induced by nivolumab. CASE REPORT A 80 year-old man with stage IV BRAF-wild type and NRAS exon 2-mutated melanoma was treated first line by nivolumab 3mg/kg every 2 weeks. At week 4, before the 3rd infusion, he presented with inflammatory arthralgia, synovitis of proximal interphalangeal, wrist and ankle joints, and edema of both hands and forearms. Laboratory tests showed inflammatory syndrome (CRP = 8.4mg/dL), negative rheumatoid factor, and anti-CCP antibodies. Radiographs did not show any joint erosion but joint ultrasound displayed intra-articular effusion and tenosynovitis. PET/CT performed 6 and 3 months before treatment for melanoma work-up showed an isolated hypermetabolism of the shoulder girdle. The diagnosis of RS3PE was retained. A systemic corticosteroid treatment (0.5mg/kg/d) was initiated; nivolumab was hold during 4 weeks leading to remission of clinical symptoms within 10 days, CRP level normalization and without relapse when nivolumab was resumed. Corticosteroids were progressively tapered and stopped after 9 months. After 5 months, anti-PD1 was definitively stopped because of disease progression. CONCLUSION With this atypical case, clinicians should remain alert on a whole range of autoimmune diseases susceptible to be induced.

Relevance of serum biomarkers associated with melanoma during follow-up of anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy.

Metastatic melanoma is a rapidly spreading cancer whose prognosis remains poor although important therapy advances in recent years. Ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy used in advanced melanoma, is an effective immunotherapy alone or combined with other agents but with few predictive biomarkers of response. Here, we sought to analyze the potential of S100B, MIA, soluble MICA, anti-MICA antibodies and LDH as serum biomarkers of response and survival in a cohort of 77 advanced melanoma patients subjected to ipilimumab. Lower levels of S100B, and LDH at baseline and at weeks 3 and 6 correlated to a better response and survival. After multivariate analysis LDH maintained its independence at baseline and week 6, whereas S100B might be a useful tool for anti-CTLA-4 treatment monitoring after the first two doses of ipilimumab (W6). In addition, higher sMICA serum levels at baseline were associated with less frequency of irAEs.

Four cases of rituximab-associated melanoma.

Biological agents have transformed the management of inflammatory and proliferative disorders. Safety issues have been raised, particularly the increased risk of opportunistic infections and secondary cancers. We report four cases of melanoma worsening or occurring after rituximab treatment for associated B-cell lymphoma, and discuss the accountability of the molecule in this process. In three cases, melanoma was diagnosed before or at the same time as a B-cell lymphoma treated with rituximab associated with chemotherapy and we observed rapid metastatic progression. In the last case, melanoma appeared after 5 years treatment with rituximab for a follicular lymphoma. Although it is premature to conclude on the role of rituximab in melanoma, careful follow-up and registration of such cases are important to gain further insight on this topic.