Celine Adessi

First-in-Human Phase I Study of Lumretuzumab, a Glycoengineered Humanized Anti-HER3 Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Metastatic or Advanced HER3-Positive Solid Tumors.

Purpose: A first-in-human phase I study was conducted to characterize safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of lumretuzumab, a humanized and glycoengineered anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced cancer. Experimental Design: Twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed HER3-expressing tumors received lumretuzumab (100, 200, 400, 800, 1,600, and 2,000 mg) every two weeks (q2w) in 3+3 dose-escalation phase. In addition, 22 patients were enrolled into an extension cohort at 2,000 mg q2w. Results: There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Common adverse events (any grade) included diarrhea (22 patients, 46.8%), fatigue (21 patients, 44.7%), decreased appetite (15 patients, 31.9%), infusion-related reactions (13 patients, 27.7%), and constipation (10 patients, 21.3%). The peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUClast) of lumretuzumab increased more than dose proportionally from 100 mg up to 400 mg. Linear PK was observed with doses ≥400 mg q2w indicating target-mediated drug disposition saturation. Downregulation of HER3 membranous protein was observed in on-treatment tumor biopsies from 200 mg, and was maximal at and above 400 mg. An ex vivo assay demonstrated increased activation potential of peripheral NK lymphocytes with lumretuzumab compared with a non-glycoengineered anti-HER3 antibody. Ten patients (21.3%) had stable disease and remained on study at a median of 111 days (range, 80–225 days). Conclusions: Lumretuzumab was well tolerated and showed evidence of clinical activity. Linear serum PK properties and plateauing of PD effects in serial tumor biopsies indicate optimal biologically active doses of lumretuzumab from 400 mg onwards. Clin Cancer Res; 22(4); 877–85. ©2015 AACR.

A 13 kDa carboxy-terminal fragment of ApoE stabilizes Abeta hexamers

The pathological role of ApoE4 in Alzheimers disease (AD) is not fully elucidated yet but there is strong evidence that ApoE is involved in Abeta deposition, which is an early hallmark of AD neuropathology. Overexpression of ApoE in neuroblastoma cells (Neuro2a) leads to the generation of an intracellular 13 kDa carboxy‐terminal fragment of ApoE comparable to fragments seen in brains of AD patients. ApoE4 generates more of this fragment than ApoE2 and E3 suggesting a potential pathological role of these fragments in Alzheimers disease. Analysis of this intracellular ApoE4 fragment by protease digest followed by MALDI‐TOF mass spectrometry showed the proteolytic cleavage site close to residue 187 of ApoE. We have engineered and expressed the corresponding ApoE fragments in vitro. The recombinant 13 kDa carboxy‐terminal fragment inhibited fibril formation of Abeta; this contrasts with the full‐length ApoE and the corresponding amino‐terminal ApoE fragment. Moreover, we show that the 13 kDa carboxy‐terminal fragment of ApoE stabilizes the formation of Abeta hexamers. Complexes of Abeta with the 13 kDa carboxy‐terminal ApoE fragment show toxicity in PC12 cells comparable to Abeta fibrils. These data suggest that cleavage of ApoE, leading to the generation of this fragment, contributes to the pathogenic effect of ApoE4 in AD.

Phase Ib study of lumretuzumab plus cetuximab or erlotinib in solid tumor patients and evaluation of HER3 and heregulin as potential biomarkers of clinical activity

Purpose: This study investigated the safety, clinical activity, and target-associated biomarkers of lumretuzumab, a humanized, glycoengineered, anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody (mAb), in combination with the EGFR-blocking agents erlotinib or cetuximab in patients with advanced HER3-positive carcinomas. Experimental Design: The study included two parts: dose escalation and dose extension phases with lumretuzumab in combination with either cetuximab or erlotinib, respectively. In both parts, patients received lumretuzumab doses from 400 to 2,000 mg plus cetuximab or erlotinib according to standard posology, respectively. The effect of HRG mRNA and HER3 mRNA and protein expression were investigated in a dedicated extension cohort of squamous non–small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) patients treated with lumretuzumab and erlotinib. Results: Altogether, 120 patients were treated. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the cetuximab part and two DLTs in the erlotinib part were reported. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal and skin toxicities, which were manageable. The objective response rate (ORR) was 6.1% in the cetuximab part and 4.2% in the erlotinib part. In the sqNSCLC extension cohort of the erlotinib part, higher tumor HRG and HER3 mRNA levels were associated with a numerically higher disease control rate but not ORR. Conclusions: The toxicity profile of lumretuzumab in combination with cetuximab and erlotinib was manageable, but only modest clinical activity was observed across tumor types. In the sqNSCLC cohort, there was no evidence of meaningful clinical benefit despite enriching for tumors with higher HRG mRNA expression levels. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5406–15. ©2017 AACR.

Zr-89-Lumretuzumab PET Imaging before and during HER3 Antibody Lumretuzumab Treatment in Patients with Solid Tumors

Purpose: We evaluated biodistribution and tumor targeting of 89Zr-lumretuzumab before and during treatment with lumretuzumab, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3)–targeting monoclonal antibody. Experimental Design: Twenty patients with histologically confirmed HER3-expressing tumors received 89Zr-lumretuzumab and underwent positron emission tomography (PET). In part A, 89Zr-lumretuzumab was given with additional, escalating doses of unlabeled lumretuzumab, and scans were performed 2, 4, and 7 days after injection to determine optimal imaging conditions. In part B, patients were scanned following tracer injection before (baseline) and after a pharmacodynamic (PD)-active lumretuzumab dose for saturation analysis. HER3 expression was determined immunohistochemically in skin biopsies. Tracer uptake was calculated as standardized uptake value (SUV). Results: Optimal PET conditions were found to be 4 and 7 days after administration of 89Zr-lumretuzumab with 100-mg unlabeled lumretuzumab. At baseline using 100-mg unlabeled lumretuzumab, the tumor SUVmax was 3.4 (±1.9) at 4 days after injection. SUVmean values for normal blood, liver, lung, and brain tissues were 4.9, 6.4, 0.9 and 0.2, respectively. Saturation analysis (n = 7) showed that 4 days after lumretuzumab administration, tumor uptake decreased by 11.9% (±8.2), 10.0% (±16.5), and 24.6% (±20.9) at PD-active doses of 400, 800, and 1,600 mg, respectively, when compared with baseline. Membranous HER3 was completely downregulated in paired skin biopsies already at and above 400-mg lumretuzumab. Conclusions: PET imaging showed biodistribution and tumor-specific 89Zr-lumretuzumab uptake. Although, PD-active lumretuzumab doses decreased 89Zr-lumretuzumab uptake, there was no clear evidence of tumor saturation by PET imaging as the tumor SUV did not plateau with increasing doses. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6128–37. ©2017 AACR.

444OPHASE IB TRIAL TRIAL OF RG7116, A GLYCOENGINEERED MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY TARGETING HER3, IN COMBINATION WITH CETUXIMAB OR ERLOTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED/METASTATIC TUMORS OF EPITHELIAL CELL ORIGIN EXPRESSING HER3 PROTEIN

ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the safety profile of RG7116 in combination with cetuximab or erlotinib. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic carcinomas with centrally confirmed HER3 protein expression were included. RG7116 plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 qw IV) and RG7116 plus erlotinib (150 mg/day p.o.) combinations were evaluated in a dose escalation study with “3 + 3” design at a starting dose of 400 mg IV of RG7116 in a q2w regimen. Results: Twenty-seven pts were enrolled in 5 cohorts (400 to 2000 mg) in the cetuximab arm. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 dehydration was reported in the 800-mg cohort. Twenty-seven pts were enrolled in 4 cohorts (400 to 2000 mg) in the erlotinib arm. One DLT was reported in the 1600-mg cohort (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hypokalemia) and one DLT was reported in the 2000-mg cohort (grade 3 blood bilirubin increase). No maximum tolerated dose was reached. The most frequently reported adverse events of any grade were diarrhea (78%) and rash (59%) for the cetuximab arm and diarrhea (82%) and decreased appetite (48%) for the erlotinib arm. In the erlotinib arm treatment-related grade 3 diarrhea was observed more frequently at higher doses of RG7116 (400 mg: 0%; 800 mg: 17%; 1600 mg: 43%; 2000 mg: 33%). Overall, infusion-related reactions related to RG7116 occurred in 11% of pts. Two of these were grade 3 (4%). The pharmacokinetic profile of RG7116 in combination with cetuximab and erlotinib was comparable to that in the monotherapy setting (Meulendijks et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 suppl; abstr 2522). HER3 membranous protein down-regulation was observed from 400 mg onwards in on-treatment tumor and skin tissue. In the cetuximab arm, two pts with colorectal carcinoma had a confirmed partial response (PR). In the erlotinib arm, one patient with ovarian carcinoma had a confirmed PR. Metabolic PR on FDG-PET occurred in 42% of pts in the cetuximab arm and in 28% of pts in the erlotinib arm. Conclusions: RG7116 combination with cetuximab or erlotinib was well tolerated, and demonstrated preliminary signs of clinical activity. Disclosure: U.N. Lassen: discloses Research grants from Roche; A. Cervantes Ruiperez: discloses Research grants, advisory boards and lectures for Roche; C. Adessi, A. Keelara, F. Michielin, B. Bossenmaier, G. Meneses-Lorente, I. James, W. Jacob and M. Weisser: Employee of Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Mechanistic Investigations of Diarrhea Toxicity Induced by anti-HER2/3 Combination Therapy

Combination of targeted therapies is expected to provide superior efficacy in the treatment of cancer either by enhanced antitumor activity or by preventing or delaying the development of resistance. Common challenges in developing combination therapies include the potential of additive and aggravated toxicities associated with pharmacologically related adverse effects. We have recently reported that combination of anti-HER2 and anti-HER3 antibodies, pertuzumab and lumretuzumab, along with paclitaxel chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, resulted in a high incidence of diarrhea that ultimately limited further clinical development of this combination. Here, we further dissected the diarrhea profile of the various patient dose cohorts and carried out in vitro investigations in human colon cell lines and explants to decipher the contribution and the mechanism of anti-HER2/3 therapeutic antibodies to intestinal epithelium malfunction. Our clinical investigations in patients revealed that while dose reduction of lumretuzumab, omission of pertuzumab loading dose, and introduction of a prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment reduced most severe adverse events, patients still suffered from persistent diarrhea during the treatment. Our in vitro investigations showed that pertuzumab and lumretuzumab combination treatment resulted in upregulation of chloride channel activity without indication of intestinal barrier disruption. Overall, our findings provide a mechanistic rationale to explore alternative of conventional antigut motility using medication targeting chloride channel activity to mitigate diarrhea of HER combination therapies. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(7); 1464–74. ©2018 AACR.

A continuous-time multistate Markov model to describe the occurrence and severity of diarrhea events in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with lumretuzumab in combination with pertuzumab and paclitaxel

PurposeTo inform lumretuzumab and pertuzumab dose modifications in order to decrease the incidence, severity, and duration of the diarrhea events in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with a combination therapy of lumretuzumab (anti-HER3) in combination with pertuzumab (anti-HER2) and paclitaxel using quantitative clinical pharmacology modeling approaches.MethodsThe safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) data from three clinical trials (lumretuzumab monotherapy n = 47, pertuzumab monotherapy n = 78, and the combination therapy of lumretuzumab, pertuzumab and paclitaxel n = 35) were pooled together to develop a continuous-time discrete states Markov model describing the dynamics of the diarrhea events.ResultsThe model was able to capture the time course of different severities of diarrhea reasonably well. The effect of lumretuzumab and pertuzumab was well described by an Emax function indicating an increased rate of transition from moderate to mild or more severe diarrhea with higher doses. The concentration needed to trigger or worsen diarrhea episodes was estimated to be 120-fold lower in combination therapy compared to monotherapy, suggesting strong synergy between the two monoclonal antibodies. The prophylactic effect of loperamide in a subset of patients was also well captured by the model with a clear tendency to reduce the occurrence of diarrhea events.ConclusionsThis work shows that PK-toxicity modeling provides insight into how the severity of key adverse events evolves over time and highlights the potential use to support decision making in drug development.