Wolfgang Jacob

Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitors in cancer therapy

The tumor-permissive and immunosuppressive characteristics of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) have fueled interest in therapeutically targeting these cells. In this context, the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1)/colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) axis has gained the most attention, and various approaches targeting either the ligands or the receptor are currently in clinical development. Emerging data on the tolerability of CSF1/CSF1R-targeting agents suggest a favorable safety profile, making them attractive combination partners for both standard treatment modalities and immunotherapeutic agents. The specificity of these agents and their potent blocking activity has been substantiated by impressive response rates in diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors, a benign connective tissue disorder driven by CSF1 in an autocrine fashion. In the malignant disease setting, data on the clinical activity of immunotherapy combinations with CSF1/CSF1R-targeting agents are pending. As our knowledge of macrophage biology expands, it becomes apparent that the complex phenotypic and functional properties of macrophages are heavily influenced by a continuum of survival, differentiation, recruitment, and polarization signals within their specific tissue environment. Thus, the role of macrophages in regulating tumorigenesis and the impact of depleting and/or reprogramming TAM as therapeutic approaches for cancer patients may vary greatly depending on organ-specific characteristics of these cells. We review the currently available clinical safety and efficacy data with CSF1/CSF1R-targeting agents and provide a comprehensive overview of ongoing clinical studies. Furthermore, we discuss the local tissue macrophage and tumor-type specificities and their potential impact on CSF1/CSF1R-targeting treatment strategies for the future.The tumor-permissive and immunosuppressive characteristics of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) have fueled interest in therapeutically targeting these cells. In this context, the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1)/colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) axis has gained the most attention, and various approaches targeting either the ligands or the receptor are currently in clinical development. Emerging data on the tolerability of CSF1/CSF1R-targeting agents suggest a favorable safety profile, making them attractive combination partners for both standard treatment modalities and immunotherapeutic agents. The specificity of these agents and their potent blocking activity has been substantiated by impressive response rates in diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors, a benign connective tissue disorder driven by CSF1 in an autocrine fashion. In the malignant disease setting, data on the clinical activity of immunotherapy combinations with CSF1/CSF1R-targeting agents are pending. As our knowledge of macrophage biology expands, it becomes apparent that the complex phenotypic and functional properties of macrophages are heavily influenced by a continuum of survival, differentiation, recruitment, and polarization signals within their specific tissue environment. Thus, the role of macrophages in regulating tumorigenesis and the impact of depleting and/or reprogramming TAM as therapeutic approaches for cancer patients may vary greatly depending on organ-specific characteristics of these cells. We review the currently available clinical safety and efficacy data with CSF1/CSF1R-targeting agents and provide a comprehensive overview of ongoing clinical studies. Furthermore, we discuss the local tissue macrophage and tumor-type specificities and their potential impact on CSF1/CSF1R-targeting treatment strategies for the future.

First-in-Human Phase I Study of Lumretuzumab, a Glycoengineered Humanized Anti-HER3 Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Metastatic or Advanced HER3-Positive Solid Tumors.

Purpose: A first-in-human phase I study was conducted to characterize safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of lumretuzumab, a humanized and glycoengineered anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced cancer. Experimental Design: Twenty-five patients with histologically confirmed HER3-expressing tumors received lumretuzumab (100, 200, 400, 800, 1,600, and 2,000 mg) every two weeks (q2w) in 3+3 dose-escalation phase. In addition, 22 patients were enrolled into an extension cohort at 2,000 mg q2w. Results: There were no dose-limiting toxicities. Common adverse events (any grade) included diarrhea (22 patients, 46.8%), fatigue (21 patients, 44.7%), decreased appetite (15 patients, 31.9%), infusion-related reactions (13 patients, 27.7%), and constipation (10 patients, 21.3%). The peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration–time curve up to the last measurable concentration (AUClast) of lumretuzumab increased more than dose proportionally from 100 mg up to 400 mg. Linear PK was observed with doses ≥400 mg q2w indicating target-mediated drug disposition saturation. Downregulation of HER3 membranous protein was observed in on-treatment tumor biopsies from 200 mg, and was maximal at and above 400 mg. An ex vivo assay demonstrated increased activation potential of peripheral NK lymphocytes with lumretuzumab compared with a non-glycoengineered anti-HER3 antibody. Ten patients (21.3%) had stable disease and remained on study at a median of 111 days (range, 80–225 days). Conclusions: Lumretuzumab was well tolerated and showed evidence of clinical activity. Linear serum PK properties and plateauing of PD effects in serial tumor biopsies indicate optimal biologically active doses of lumretuzumab from 400 mg onwards. Clin Cancer Res; 22(4); 877–85. ©2015 AACR.

Phase Ib study of lumretuzumab plus cetuximab or erlotinib in solid tumor patients and evaluation of HER3 and heregulin as potential biomarkers of clinical activity

Purpose: This study investigated the safety, clinical activity, and target-associated biomarkers of lumretuzumab, a humanized, glycoengineered, anti-HER3 monoclonal antibody (mAb), in combination with the EGFR-blocking agents erlotinib or cetuximab in patients with advanced HER3-positive carcinomas. Experimental Design: The study included two parts: dose escalation and dose extension phases with lumretuzumab in combination with either cetuximab or erlotinib, respectively. In both parts, patients received lumretuzumab doses from 400 to 2,000 mg plus cetuximab or erlotinib according to standard posology, respectively. The effect of HRG mRNA and HER3 mRNA and protein expression were investigated in a dedicated extension cohort of squamous non–small cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) patients treated with lumretuzumab and erlotinib. Results: Altogether, 120 patients were treated. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the cetuximab part and two DLTs in the erlotinib part were reported. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal and skin toxicities, which were manageable. The objective response rate (ORR) was 6.1% in the cetuximab part and 4.2% in the erlotinib part. In the sqNSCLC extension cohort of the erlotinib part, higher tumor HRG and HER3 mRNA levels were associated with a numerically higher disease control rate but not ORR. Conclusions: The toxicity profile of lumretuzumab in combination with cetuximab and erlotinib was manageable, but only modest clinical activity was observed across tumor types. In the sqNSCLC cohort, there was no evidence of meaningful clinical benefit despite enriching for tumors with higher HRG mRNA expression levels. Clin Cancer Res; 23(18); 5406–15. ©2017 AACR.

Direct estrogen receptor (ER) / HER family crosstalk mediating sensitivity to lumretuzumab and pertuzumab in ER+ breast cancer

Bidirectional cross talk between members of the human epidermal growth factor family of receptors (HER) and the estrogen receptor (ER) is believed to underlie resistance mechanisms that develop in response to treatment with anti-HER agents and endocrine therapy. We investigated the interaction between HER2, HER3 and the ER in vitro using human embryonic kidney cells transfected with human HER2, HER3, and ERα. We also investigated the additive efficacy of combination regimens consisting of anti-HER3 (lumretuzumab), anti-HER2 (pertuzumab), and endocrine (fulvestrant) therapy in vivo. Our data show that both HER2 and HER3 can directly complex with the ER and can mediate phosphorylation of the ER. Phosphorylation of the ER was only observed in cells that expressed both HER2 and ERα or in heregulin-stimulated cells that expressed both HER3 and ERα. Using a mouse xenograft model of ER+/HER2-low (HER2 immunohistochemistry 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification) human breast cancer we show that the combination of lumretuzumab and pertuzumab is highly efficacious and induces long-lasting tumor regression in vivo and adding endocrine therapy (fulvestrant) to this combination further improved efficacy. In addition, a prolonged clinical response was observed with the combination of lumretuzumab and pertuzumab in a patient with ER+/HER2-low breast cancer who had failed endocrine therapy. These preclinical data confirm that direct cross talk exists between HER2/HER3 and ER which may explain the resistance mechanisms to endocrine therapy and monoclonal antibodies that target HER2 and HER3. Our data also indicate that the triplet of anti-HER2, anti-HER3, and endocrine therapy might be an efficacious combination for treating patients with ER+/HER2-low breast cancer, which is an area of significant unmet medical need.

Zr-89-Lumretuzumab PET Imaging before and during HER3 Antibody Lumretuzumab Treatment in Patients with Solid Tumors

Purpose: We evaluated biodistribution and tumor targeting of 89Zr-lumretuzumab before and during treatment with lumretuzumab, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (HER3)–targeting monoclonal antibody. Experimental Design: Twenty patients with histologically confirmed HER3-expressing tumors received 89Zr-lumretuzumab and underwent positron emission tomography (PET). In part A, 89Zr-lumretuzumab was given with additional, escalating doses of unlabeled lumretuzumab, and scans were performed 2, 4, and 7 days after injection to determine optimal imaging conditions. In part B, patients were scanned following tracer injection before (baseline) and after a pharmacodynamic (PD)-active lumretuzumab dose for saturation analysis. HER3 expression was determined immunohistochemically in skin biopsies. Tracer uptake was calculated as standardized uptake value (SUV). Results: Optimal PET conditions were found to be 4 and 7 days after administration of 89Zr-lumretuzumab with 100-mg unlabeled lumretuzumab. At baseline using 100-mg unlabeled lumretuzumab, the tumor SUVmax was 3.4 (±1.9) at 4 days after injection. SUVmean values for normal blood, liver, lung, and brain tissues were 4.9, 6.4, 0.9 and 0.2, respectively. Saturation analysis (n = 7) showed that 4 days after lumretuzumab administration, tumor uptake decreased by 11.9% (±8.2), 10.0% (±16.5), and 24.6% (±20.9) at PD-active doses of 400, 800, and 1,600 mg, respectively, when compared with baseline. Membranous HER3 was completely downregulated in paired skin biopsies already at and above 400-mg lumretuzumab. Conclusions: PET imaging showed biodistribution and tumor-specific 89Zr-lumretuzumab uptake. Although, PD-active lumretuzumab doses decreased 89Zr-lumretuzumab uptake, there was no clear evidence of tumor saturation by PET imaging as the tumor SUV did not plateau with increasing doses. Clin Cancer Res; 23(20); 6128–37. ©2017 AACR.

444OPHASE IB TRIAL TRIAL OF RG7116, A GLYCOENGINEERED MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY TARGETING HER3, IN COMBINATION WITH CETUXIMAB OR ERLOTINIB IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED/METASTATIC TUMORS OF EPITHELIAL CELL ORIGIN EXPRESSING HER3 PROTEIN

ABSTRACT Aim: To evaluate the safety profile of RG7116 in combination with cetuximab or erlotinib. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic carcinomas with centrally confirmed HER3 protein expression were included. RG7116 plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 qw IV) and RG7116 plus erlotinib (150 mg/day p.o.) combinations were evaluated in a dose escalation study with “3 + 3” design at a starting dose of 400 mg IV of RG7116 in a q2w regimen. Results: Twenty-seven pts were enrolled in 5 cohorts (400 to 2000 mg) in the cetuximab arm. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 dehydration was reported in the 800-mg cohort. Twenty-seven pts were enrolled in 4 cohorts (400 to 2000 mg) in the erlotinib arm. One DLT was reported in the 1600-mg cohort (grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hypokalemia) and one DLT was reported in the 2000-mg cohort (grade 3 blood bilirubin increase). No maximum tolerated dose was reached. The most frequently reported adverse events of any grade were diarrhea (78%) and rash (59%) for the cetuximab arm and diarrhea (82%) and decreased appetite (48%) for the erlotinib arm. In the erlotinib arm treatment-related grade 3 diarrhea was observed more frequently at higher doses of RG7116 (400 mg: 0%; 800 mg: 17%; 1600 mg: 43%; 2000 mg: 33%). Overall, infusion-related reactions related to RG7116 occurred in 11% of pts. Two of these were grade 3 (4%). The pharmacokinetic profile of RG7116 in combination with cetuximab and erlotinib was comparable to that in the monotherapy setting (Meulendijks et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 suppl; abstr 2522). HER3 membranous protein down-regulation was observed from 400 mg onwards in on-treatment tumor and skin tissue. In the cetuximab arm, two pts with colorectal carcinoma had a confirmed partial response (PR). In the erlotinib arm, one patient with ovarian carcinoma had a confirmed PR. Metabolic PR on FDG-PET occurred in 42% of pts in the cetuximab arm and in 28% of pts in the erlotinib arm. Conclusions: RG7116 combination with cetuximab or erlotinib was well tolerated, and demonstrated preliminary signs of clinical activity. Disclosure: U.N. Lassen: discloses Research grants from Roche; A. Cervantes Ruiperez: discloses Research grants, advisory boards and lectures for Roche; C. Adessi, A. Keelara, F. Michielin, B. Bossenmaier, G. Meneses-Lorente, I. James, W. Jacob and M. Weisser: Employee of Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Mechanistic Investigations of Diarrhea Toxicity Induced by anti-HER2/3 Combination Therapy

Combination of targeted therapies is expected to provide superior efficacy in the treatment of cancer either by enhanced antitumor activity or by preventing or delaying the development of resistance. Common challenges in developing combination therapies include the potential of additive and aggravated toxicities associated with pharmacologically related adverse effects. We have recently reported that combination of anti-HER2 and anti-HER3 antibodies, pertuzumab and lumretuzumab, along with paclitaxel chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer, resulted in a high incidence of diarrhea that ultimately limited further clinical development of this combination. Here, we further dissected the diarrhea profile of the various patient dose cohorts and carried out in vitro investigations in human colon cell lines and explants to decipher the contribution and the mechanism of anti-HER2/3 therapeutic antibodies to intestinal epithelium malfunction. Our clinical investigations in patients revealed that while dose reduction of lumretuzumab, omission of pertuzumab loading dose, and introduction of a prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment reduced most severe adverse events, patients still suffered from persistent diarrhea during the treatment. Our in vitro investigations showed that pertuzumab and lumretuzumab combination treatment resulted in upregulation of chloride channel activity without indication of intestinal barrier disruption. Overall, our findings provide a mechanistic rationale to explore alternative of conventional antigut motility using medication targeting chloride channel activity to mitigate diarrhea of HER combination therapies. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(7); 1464–74. ©2018 AACR.

EGFR and HER3 signaling blockade in invasive mucinous lung adenocarcinoma harboring an NRG1 fusion

Rearrangements of NRG1 have been identified in invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung (IMA), formerly referred to as mucinous bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. NRG1 ligand signals through induction of HER2-HER3 heterodimers, thus leading to PI3K-AKT pathway activation. Therefore, targeting HER2, HER3 and the downstream pathway may be a hypothesis-driven strategy for IMA with NRG1 fusion. Herein we reported two patients who benefited from lumretuzumab, a monoclonal anti-HER3 antibody, in combination of erlotinib during a clinical trial (NCT01482377). At least sixteen weeks of progression-free survival were achieved without any unacceptable toxicity.

Clinical development of HER3-targeting monoclonal antibodies: Perils and progress

The human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family consists of four transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases: epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), HER2, HER3, and HER4. They are part of a complex signalling network and stimulate intracellular pathways regulating cell growth and differentiation. So far, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR and HER2 have been developed and approved. Recently, focus has turned to HER3 as it may play an important role in resistance to EGFR- and HER2-targeting therapies. HER3-targeting agents have been undergoing clinical evaluation for the last 10 years and currently thirteen mAbs are in phase 1 or 2 clinical studies. Single agent activity has proven to be limited, however, the tolerability was favourable. Thus, combinations of HER3-binding mAbs with other HER-targeting therapies or chemotherapies have been pursued in various solid tumor entities. Data indicate that the HER3-binding ligand heregulin may serve as a response prediction marker for HER3-targeting therapy. Within this review the current status of clinical development of HER3-targeting compounds is described.