Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Celine Hebras is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Celine Hebras.


Current Biology | 2013

The PP2A Inhibitor I2PP2A Is Essential for Sister Chromatid Segregation in Oocyte Meiosis II

Jean-Philippe Chambon; Sandra A. Touati; Stéphane Berneau; Damien Cladière; Celine Hebras; Rachel Groeme; Alex McDougall; Katja Wassmann

Haploid gametes are generated through two consecutive meiotic divisions, with the segregation of chromosome pairs in meiosis I and sister chromatids in meiosis II. Separase-mediated stepwise removal of cohesion, first from chromosome arms and later from the centromere region, is a prerequisite for maintaining sister chromatids together until their separation in meiosis II [1]. In all model organisms, centromeric cohesin is protected from separase-dependent removal in meiosis I through the activity of PP2A-B56 phosphatase, which is recruited to centromeres by shugoshin/MEI-S332 (Sgo) [2-5]. How this protection of centromeric cohesin is removed in meiosis II is not entirely clear; we find that all the PP2A subunits remain colocalized with the cohesin subunit Rec8 at the centromere of metaphase II chromosomes. Here, we show that sister chromatid separation in oocytes depends on a PP2A inhibitor, namely I2PP2A. I2PP2A colocalizes with the PP2A enzyme at centromeres at metaphase II, independently of bipolar attachment. When I2PP2A is depleted, sister chromatids fail to segregate during meiosis II. Our findings demonstrate that in oocytes I2PP2A is essential for faithful sister chromatid segregation by mediating deprotection of centromeric cohesin in meiosis II.


Development | 2010

Dual mechanism controls asymmetric spindle position in ascidian germ cell precursors

François Prodon; Janet Chenevert; Celine Hebras; Rémi Dumollard; Emmanuel Faure; Jose Gonzalez-Garcia; Hiroki Nishida; Christian Sardet; Alex McDougall

Mitotic spindle orientation with respect to cortical polarity cues generates molecularly distinct daughter cells during asymmetric cell division (ACD). However, during ACD it remains unknown how the orientation of the mitotic spindle is regulated by cortical polarity cues until furrowing begins. In ascidians, the cortical centrosome-attracting body (CAB) generates three successive unequal cleavages and the asymmetric segregation of 40 localized postplasmic/PEM RNAs in germ cell precursors from the 8-64 cell stage. By combining fast 4D confocal fluorescence imaging with gene-silencing and classical blastomere isolation experiments, we show that spindle repositioning mechanisms are active from prometaphase until anaphase, when furrowing is initiated in B5.2 cells. We show that the vegetal-most spindle pole/centrosome is attracted towards the CAB during prometaphase, causing the spindle to position asymmetrically near the cortex. Next, during anaphase, the opposite spindle pole/centrosome is attracted towards the border with neighbouring B5.1 blastomeres, causing the spindle to rotate (10°/minute) and migrate (3 μm/minute). Dynamic 4D fluorescence imaging of filamentous actin and plasma membrane shows that precise orientation of the cleavage furrow is determined by this second phase of rotational spindle displacement. Furthermore, in pairs of isolated B5.2 blastomeres, the second phase of rotational spindle displacement was lost. Finally, knockdown of PEM1, a protein localized in the CAB and required for unequal cleavage in B5.2 cells, completely randomizes spindle orientation. Together these data show that two separate mechanisms active during mitosis are responsible for spindle positioning, leading to precise orientation of the cleavage furrow during ACD in the cells that give rise to the germ lineage in ascidians.


Methods of Molecular Biology | 2011

Embryological Methods in Ascidians: The Villefranche-sur-Mer Protocols

Christian Sardet; Alex McDougall; Hitoyoshi Yasuo; Janet Chenevert; Gérard Prulière; Rémi Dumollard; Clare Hudson; Celine Hebras; Ngan Le Nguyen; Alexandre Paix

Ascidians (marine invertebrates: urochordates) are thought to be the closest sister groups of vertebrates. They are particularly attractive models because of their non-duplicated genome and the fast and synchronous development of large populations of eggs into simple tadpoles made of about 3,000 cells. As a result of stereotyped asymmetric cleavage patterns all blastomeres become fate restricted between the 16- and 110 cell stage through inheritance of maternal determinants and/or cellular interactions. These advantageous features have allowed advances in our understanding of the nature and role of maternal determinants, inductive interactions, and gene networks that are involved in cell lineage specification and differentiation of embryonic tissues. Ascidians have also contributed to our understanding of fertilization, cell cycle control, self-recognition, metamorphosis, and regeneration. In this chapter we provide basic protocols routinely used at the marine station in Villefranche-sur-Mer using the cosmopolitan species of reference Ciona intestinalis and the European species Phallusia mammillata. These two models present complementary advantages with regard to molecular, functional, and imaging approaches. We describe techniques for basic culture of embryos, micro-injection, in vivo labelling, micro-manipulations, fixation, and immuno-labelling. These methods allow analysis of calcium signals, reorganizations of cytoplasmic and cortical domains, meiotic and mitotic cell cycle and cleavages as well as the roles of specific genes and cellular interactions. Ascidians eggs and embryos are also an ideal material to isolate cortical fragments and to isolate and re-associate individual blastomeres. We detail the experimental manipulations which we have used to understand the structure and role of the egg cortex and of specific blastomeres during development.


Development | 2011

Mos limits the number of meiotic divisions in urochordate eggs

Rémi Dumollard; Mark Levasseur; Celine Hebras; Philippe Huitorel; Michael C. Carroll; Jean-Philippe Chambon; Alex McDougall

Mos kinase is a universal mediator of oocyte meiotic maturation and is produced during oogenesis and destroyed after fertilization. The hallmark of maternal meiosis is that two successive M phases (meiosis I and II) drive two rounds of asymmetric cell division (ACD). However, how the egg limits the number of meioses to just two, thereby preventing gross aneuploidy, is poorly characterized. Here, in urochordate eggs, we show that loss of Mos/MAPK activity is necessary to prevent entry into meiosis III. Remarkably, maintaining the Mos/MAPK pathway active after fertilization at near physiological levels induces additional rounds of meiotic M phase (meiosis III, IV and V). During these additional rounds of meiosis, the spindle is positioned asymmetrically resulting in further rounds of ACD. In addition, inhibiting meiotic exit with Mos prevents pronuclear formation, cyclin A accumulation and maintains sperm-triggered Ca2+ oscillations, all of which are hallmarks of the meiotic cell cycle in ascidians. It will be interesting to determine whether Mos availability in mammals can also control the number of meioses as it does in the urochordates. Our results demonstrate the power of urochordate eggs as a model to dissect the egg-to-embryo transition.


Developmental Biology | 2013

Beta-catenin patterns the cell cycle during maternal-to-zygotic transition in urochordate embryos.

Rémi Dumollard; Celine Hebras; Lydia Besnardeau; Alex McDougall

During the transition from maternal to zygotic control of development, cell cycle length varies in different lineages, and this is important for their fates and functions. The maternal to zygotic transition (MZT) in metazoan embryos involves a profound remodeling of the cell cycle: S phase length increases then G2 is introduced. Although β-catenin is the master regulator of endomesoderm patterning at MZT in all metazoans, the influence of maternal β-catenin on the cell cycle at MZT remains poorly understood. By studying urochordate embryogenesis we found that cell cycle remodeling during MZT begins with the formation of 3 mitotic domains at the 16-cell stage arising from differential S phase lengthening, when endomesoderm is specified. Then, at the 64-cell stage, a G2 phase is introduced in the endoderm lineage during its specification. Strikingly, these two phases of cell cycle remodeling are patterned by β-catenin-dependent transcription. Functional analysis revealed that, at the 16-cell stage, β-catenin speeds up S phase in the endomesoderm. In contrast, two cell cycles later at gastrulation, nuclear β-catenin induces endoderm fate and delays cell division. Such interphase lengthening in invaginating cells is known to be a requisite for gastrulation movements. Therefore, in basal chordates β-catenin has a dual role to specify germ layers and remodel the cell cycle.


PLOS ONE | 2012

Urochordate Ascidians Possess a Single Isoform of Aurora Kinase That Localizes to the Midbody via TPX2 in Eggs and Cleavage Stage Embryos

Celine Hebras; Alex McDougall

Aurora kinases are key proteins found throughout the eukaryotes that control mitotic progression. Vertebrate Aurora-A and B kinases are thought to have evolved from a single Aurora-kinase isoform closest to that found in present day urochordates. In urochordate ascidians Aurora binds both TPX2 (a vertebrate AURKA partner) and INCENP (a vertebrate AURKB partner) and localizes to centrosomes and spindle microtubules as well as chromosomes and midbody during both meiosis and mitosis. Ascidian Aurora also displays this localization pattern during mitosis in echinoderms, strengthening the idea that non-vertebrate deuterostomes such as the urochordates and echinoderms possess a single form of Aurora kinase that has properties of vertebrate Aurora-kinase A and B. In the ascidian, TPX2 localizes to the centrosome and the spindle poles also as in vertebrates. However, we were surprised to find that TPX2 also localized strongly to the midbody in ascidian eggs and embryos. We thus examined more closely Aurora localization to the midbody by creating two separate point mutations of ascidian Aurora predicted to perturb binding to TPX2. Both forms of mutated Aurora behaved as predicted: neither localized to spindle poles where TPX2 is enriched. Interestingly, neither form of mutated Aurora localized to the midbody where TPX2 is also enriched, suggesting that ascidian Aurora midbody localization required TPX2 binding in ascidians. Functional analysis revealed that inhibition of Aurora kinase with a pharmacological inhibitor or with a dominant negative kinase dead form of Aurora caused cytokinesis failure and perturbed midbody formation during polar body extrusion. Our data support the view that vertebrate Aurora-A and B kinases evolved from a single non-vertebrate deuterostome ancestor. Moreover, since TPX2 localizes to the midbody in ascidian eggs and cleavage stage embryos it may be worthwhile re-assessing whether Aurora A kinase or TPX2 localize to the midbody in eggs and cleavage stage embryos.


eLife | 2017

The invariant cleavage pattern displayed by ascidian embryos depends on spindle positioning along the cell's longest axis in the apical plane and relies on asynchronous cell divisions

Rémi Dumollard; Nicolas Minc; Gregory Salez; Sameh Ben Aicha; Faisal Bekkouche; Celine Hebras; Lydia Besnardeau; Alex McDougall

The ascidian embryo is an ideal system to investigate how cell position is determined during embryogenesis. Using 3D timelapse imaging and computational methods we analyzed the planar cell divisions in ascidian early embryos and found that spindles in every cell tend to align at metaphase in the long length of the apical surface except in cells undergoing unequal cleavage. Furthermore, the invariant and conserved cleavage pattern of ascidian embryos was found to consist in alternate planar cell divisions between ectoderm and endomesoderm. In order to test the importance of alternate cell divisions we manipulated zygotic transcription induced by β-catenin or downregulated wee1 activity, both of which abolish this cell cycle asynchrony. Crucially, abolishing cell cycle asynchrony consistently disrupted the spindle orienting mechanism underpinning the invariant cleavage pattern. Our results demonstrate how an evolutionary conserved cell cycle asynchrony maintains the invariant cleavage pattern driving morphogenesis of the ascidian blastula. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19290.001


Results and problems in cell differentiation | 2011

Cell cycle in ascidian eggs and embryos.

Alex McDougall; Janet Chenevert; Karen W. Lee; Celine Hebras; Rémi Dumollard

In ascidians the cell cycle machinery has been studied mainly in oocytes while ascidian embryos have been used to dissect the mechanism that controls asymmetric cell division (ACD). Here we overview the most specific and often exceptional points and events in cell cycle control in ascidian oocytes and early embryos. Mature stage IV eggs are arrested at metaphase I due to cytostatic factor (CSF). In vertebrates, unfertilized eggs are arrested at metaphase II by CSF. Meta II-CSF is mediated by the Mos/MEK/MAPK/Erp1 pathway, which inhibits the ubiquitin ligase APC/C(cdc20) preventing cyclin B destruction thus stabilizing MPF activity. CSF is inactivated by the fertilization Ca(2+) transient that stimulates the destruction of Erp1 thus releasing APC/C(cdc20) from inhibition. Although many of the components of CSF are conserved between the ascidian and the vertebrates, the lack of Erp1 in the ascidians (and indeed other invertebrates) is notable since the Mos/MAPK pathway nonetheless mediates Meta I-CSF. Moreover, since the fertilization Ca(2+) transient targets Erp1, it is not clear how the sperm-triggered Ca(2+) transient in ascidians (and again other invertebrates) stimulates cyclin B destruction in the absence of Erp1. Nonetheless, like mammalian eggs, sperm trigger a series of Ca(2+) oscillations that increases the rate of cyclin B destruction and the subsequent loss of MAPK activity leading to meiotic exit in ascidians. Positive feedback from MPF maintains the Ca(2+) oscillations in fertilized ascidian eggs ensuring the eventual loss of MPF stimulating the egg-to-embryo transition. Embryonic cell cycles in the ascidian are highly stereotyped where both the rate of cell division and the orientation of cell division planes are precisely controlled. Three successive rounds of ACD generate two small posterior germ cell precursors at the 64 cell stage. The centrosome-attracting body (CAB) is a macroscopic cortical structure visible by light microscopy that causes these three rounds of ACD. Entry into mitosis activates the CAB causing the whole mitotic spindle to rotate and migrate toward the cortical CAB leading to a highly ACD whereby one small cell is formed that inherits the CAB and approximately 40 maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs including the germ cell marker vasa.


bioRxiv | 2017

Kif2 microtubule depolymerase is required for unequal cell division and localizes to a subdomain of cortical endoplasmic reticulum

Vlad Costache; Celine Hebras; Gérard Prulière; Lydia Besnardeau; Margaux Failla; Richard R. Copley; David R. Burgess; Janet Chenevert; Alex McDougall

Unequal cell division (UCD) is a fundamental process responsible for creating sibling cell size asymmetry; however, how microtubules are specifically depolymerized on one aster of the mitotic spindle creating a smaller sibling cell during UCD has remained elusive. Using invertebrate chordate embryos (ascidian) that possess a large cortical structure (CAB) that causes UCD, we identified a microtubule depolymerase (Kif2) involved in creating cell size asymmetry. Kif2 localizes to the cortical subdomain of endoplasmic reticulum in the CAB. During three successive UCDs, Kif2 protein accumulates at the CAB during interphase and is delocalized from the CAB in mid mitosis. Rapid imaging of microtubule dynamics at the cortex revealed that microtubules do not penetrate the CAB during interphase. Inhibition of Kif2 function prevents the development of mitotic aster asymmetry and centrosome movement towards the CAB thereby blocking UCD, whereas locally increasing microtubule depolymerization causes exaggerated asymmetric spindle positioning. This study provides insights into the fundamental process of UCD and for the first time shows that a microtubule depolymerase is localized to a cortical site controlling UCD.


Journal of Cell Science | 2013

Release from meiotic arrest in ascidian eggs requires the activity of two phosphatases but not CaMKII

Mark Levasseur; Rémi Dumollard; Jean-Philippe Chambon; Celine Hebras; Maureen Sinclair; Michael Whitaker; Alex McDougall

Collaboration


Dive into the Celine Hebras's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Rémi Dumollard

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janet Chenevert

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alex McDougall

Pierre-and-Marie-Curie University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christian Sardet

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gérard Prulière

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clare Hudson

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Damien Cladière

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

François Prodon

Centre national de la recherche scientifique

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge