Janet Chenevert

From Oocyte to 16-Cell Stage: Cytoplasmic and Cortical Reorganizations That Pattern the Ascidian Embryo

The dorsoventral and anteroposterior axes of the ascidian embryo are defined before first cleavage by means of a series of reorganizations that reposition cytoplasmic and cortical domains established during oogenesis. These domains situated in the periphery of the oocyte contain developmental determinants and a population of maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs. One of these RNAs (macho‐1) is a determinant for the muscle cells of the tadpole embryo. Oocytes acquire a primary animal–vegetal (a‐v) axis during meiotic maturation, when a subcortical mitochondria‐rich domain (myoplasm) and a domain rich in cortical endoplasmic reticulum (cER) and maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs (cER‐mRNA domain) become polarized and asymmetrically enriched in the vegetal hemisphere. Fertilization at metaphase of meiosis I initiates a series of dramatic cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations of the zygote, which occur in two major phases. The first major phase depends on sperm entry which triggers a calcium wave leading in turn to an actomyosin‐driven contraction wave. The contraction concentrates the cER‐mRNA domain and myoplasm in and around a vegetal/contraction pole. The precise localization of the vegetal/contraction pole depends on both the a‐v axis and the location of sperm entry and prefigures the future site of gastrulation and dorsal side of the embryo. The second major phase of reorganization occurs between meiosis completion and first cleavage. Sperm aster microtubules and then cortical microfilaments cause the cER‐mRNA domain and myoplasm to reposition toward the posterior of the zygote. The location of the posterior pole depends on the localization of the sperm centrosome/aster attained during the first major phase of reorganization. Both cER‐mRNA and myoplasm domains localized in the posterior region are partitioned equally between the first two blastomeres and then asymmetrically over the next two cleavages. At the eight‐cell stage the cER‐mRNA domain compacts and gives rise to a macroscopic cortical structure called the Centrosome Attracting Body (CAB). The CAB is responsible for a series of unequal divisions in posterior–vegetal blastomeres, and the postplasmic/PEM RNAs it contains are involved in patterning the posterior region of the embryo. In this review, we discuss these multiple events and phases of reorganizations in detail and their relationship to physiological, cell cycle, and cytoskeletal events. We also examine the role of the reorganizations in localizing determinants, postplasmic/PEM RNAs, and PAR polarity proteins in the cortex. Finally, we summarize some of the remaining questions concerning polarization of the ascidian embryo and provide comparisons to a few other species. A large collection of films illustrating the reorganizations can be consulted by clicking on “Film archive: ascidian eggs and embryos” at http://biodev.obs‐vlfr.fr/recherche/biomarcell/. Developmental Dynamics 236:1716–1731, 2007.

Dual mechanism controls asymmetric spindle position in ascidian germ cell precursors

Mitotic spindle orientation with respect to cortical polarity cues generates molecularly distinct daughter cells during asymmetric cell division (ACD). However, during ACD it remains unknown how the orientation of the mitotic spindle is regulated by cortical polarity cues until furrowing begins. In ascidians, the cortical centrosome-attracting body (CAB) generates three successive unequal cleavages and the asymmetric segregation of 40 localized postplasmic/PEM RNAs in germ cell precursors from the 8-64 cell stage. By combining fast 4D confocal fluorescence imaging with gene-silencing and classical blastomere isolation experiments, we show that spindle repositioning mechanisms are active from prometaphase until anaphase, when furrowing is initiated in B5.2 cells. We show that the vegetal-most spindle pole/centrosome is attracted towards the CAB during prometaphase, causing the spindle to position asymmetrically near the cortex. Next, during anaphase, the opposite spindle pole/centrosome is attracted towards the border with neighbouring B5.1 blastomeres, causing the spindle to rotate (10°/minute) and migrate (3 μm/minute). Dynamic 4D fluorescence imaging of filamentous actin and plasma membrane shows that precise orientation of the cleavage furrow is determined by this second phase of rotational spindle displacement. Furthermore, in pairs of isolated B5.2 blastomeres, the second phase of rotational spindle displacement was lost. Finally, knockdown of PEM1, a protein localized in the CAB and required for unequal cleavage in B5.2 cells, completely randomizes spindle orientation. Together these data show that two separate mechanisms active during mitosis are responsible for spindle positioning, leading to precise orientation of the cleavage furrow during ACD in the cells that give rise to the germ lineage in ascidians.

Embryological Methods in Ascidians: The Villefranche-sur-Mer Protocols

Ascidians (marine invertebrates: urochordates) are thought to be the closest sister groups of vertebrates. They are particularly attractive models because of their non-duplicated genome and the fast and synchronous development of large populations of eggs into simple tadpoles made of about 3,000 cells. As a result of stereotyped asymmetric cleavage patterns all blastomeres become fate restricted between the 16- and 110 cell stage through inheritance of maternal determinants and/or cellular interactions. These advantageous features have allowed advances in our understanding of the nature and role of maternal determinants, inductive interactions, and gene networks that are involved in cell lineage specification and differentiation of embryonic tissues. Ascidians have also contributed to our understanding of fertilization, cell cycle control, self-recognition, metamorphosis, and regeneration. In this chapter we provide basic protocols routinely used at the marine station in Villefranche-sur-Mer using the cosmopolitan species of reference Ciona intestinalis and the European species Phallusia mammillata. These two models present complementary advantages with regard to molecular, functional, and imaging approaches. We describe techniques for basic culture of embryos, micro-injection, in vivo labelling, micro-manipulations, fixation, and immuno-labelling. These methods allow analysis of calcium signals, reorganizations of cytoplasmic and cortical domains, meiotic and mitotic cell cycle and cleavages as well as the roles of specific genes and cellular interactions. Ascidians eggs and embryos are also an ideal material to isolate cortical fragments and to isolate and re-associate individual blastomeres. We detail the experimental manipulations which we have used to understand the structure and role of the egg cortex and of specific blastomeres during development.

Atypical protein kinase C controls sea urchin ciliogenesis

The distribution and function of aPKC are examined during sea urchin ciliogenesis. The kinase concentrates in a ring at the transition zone between the basal body and the elongating axoneme. Inhibition of aPKC results in mislocalization of the kinase and defective ciliogenesis. Thus aPKC controls the growth of motile cilia in invertebrate embryos.

Cell cycle in ascidian eggs and embryos.

In ascidians the cell cycle machinery has been studied mainly in oocytes while ascidian embryos have been used to dissect the mechanism that controls asymmetric cell division (ACD). Here we overview the most specific and often exceptional points and events in cell cycle control in ascidian oocytes and early embryos. Mature stage IV eggs are arrested at metaphase I due to cytostatic factor (CSF). In vertebrates, unfertilized eggs are arrested at metaphase II by CSF. Meta II-CSF is mediated by the Mos/MEK/MAPK/Erp1 pathway, which inhibits the ubiquitin ligase APC/C(cdc20) preventing cyclin B destruction thus stabilizing MPF activity. CSF is inactivated by the fertilization Ca(2+) transient that stimulates the destruction of Erp1 thus releasing APC/C(cdc20) from inhibition. Although many of the components of CSF are conserved between the ascidian and the vertebrates, the lack of Erp1 in the ascidians (and indeed other invertebrates) is notable since the Mos/MAPK pathway nonetheless mediates Meta I-CSF. Moreover, since the fertilization Ca(2+) transient targets Erp1, it is not clear how the sperm-triggered Ca(2+) transient in ascidians (and again other invertebrates) stimulates cyclin B destruction in the absence of Erp1. Nonetheless, like mammalian eggs, sperm trigger a series of Ca(2+) oscillations that increases the rate of cyclin B destruction and the subsequent loss of MAPK activity leading to meiotic exit in ascidians. Positive feedback from MPF maintains the Ca(2+) oscillations in fertilized ascidian eggs ensuring the eventual loss of MPF stimulating the egg-to-embryo transition. Embryonic cell cycles in the ascidian are highly stereotyped where both the rate of cell division and the orientation of cell division planes are precisely controlled. Three successive rounds of ACD generate two small posterior germ cell precursors at the 64 cell stage. The centrosome-attracting body (CAB) is a macroscopic cortical structure visible by light microscopy that causes these three rounds of ACD. Entry into mitosis activates the CAB causing the whole mitotic spindle to rotate and migrate toward the cortical CAB leading to a highly ACD whereby one small cell is formed that inherits the CAB and approximately 40 maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs including the germ cell marker vasa.

Old knowledge and new technologies allow rapid development of model organisms.

Until recently the set of “model” species used commonly for cell biology was limited to a small number of well-understood organisms, and developing a new model was prohibitively expensive or time-consuming. With the current rapid advances in technology, in particular low-cost high-throughput sequencing, it is now possible to develop molecular resources fairly rapidly. Wider sampling of biological diversity can only accelerate progress in addressing cellular mechanisms and shed light on how they are adapted to varied physiological contexts. Here we illustrate how historical knowledge and new technologies can reveal the potential of nonconventional organisms, and we suggest guidelines for selecting new experimental models. We also present examples of nonstandard marine metazoan model species that have made important contributions to our understanding of biological processes.

Purification of mitochondrial proteins HSP60 and ATP synthase from ascidian eggs: implications for antibody specificity.

Use of antibodies is a cornerstone of biological studies and it is important to identify the recognized protein with certainty. Generally an antibody is considered specific if it labels a single band of the expected size in the tissue of interest, or has a strong affinity for the antigen produced in a heterologous system. The identity of the antibody target protein is rarely confirmed by purification and sequencing, however in many cases this may be necessary. In this study we sought to characterize the myoplasm, a mitochondria-rich domain present in eggs and segregated into tadpole muscle cells of ascidians (urochordates). The targeted proteins of two antibodies that label the myoplasm were purified using both classic immunoaffinity methods and a novel protein purification scheme based on sequential ion exchange chromatography followed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Surprisingly, mass spectrometry sequencing revealed that in both cases the proteins recognized are unrelated to the original antigens. NN18, a monoclonal antibody which was raised against porcine spinal cord and recognizes the NF-M neurofilament subunit in vertebrates, in fact labels mitochondrial ATP synthase in the ascidian embryo. PMF-C13, an antibody we raised to and purified against PmMRF, which is the MyoD homolog of the ascidian Phallusia mammillata, in fact recognizes mitochondrial HSP60. High resolution immunolabeling on whole embryos and isolated cortices demonstrates localization to the inner mitochondrial membrane for both ATP synthase and HSP60. We discuss the general implications of our results for antibody specificity and the verification methods which can be used to determine unequivocally an antibodys target.

Localization and anchorage of maternal mRNAs to cortical structures of ascidian eggs and embryos using high resolution in situ hybridization.

In several species, axis formation and tissue differentiation are the result of developmental cascades which begin with the localization and translation of key maternal mRNAs in eggs. Localization and anchoring of mRNAs to cortical structures can be observed with high sensitivity and resolution by fluorescent in situ hybridization coupled with labeling of membranes and macromolecular complexes. Oocytes and embryos of ascidians--marine chordates closely related to vertebrates--are ideal models to understand how maternal mRNAs pattern the simple ascidian tadpole. More than three dozen cortically localized maternal mRNAs have been identified in ascidian eggs. They include germ cell markers such as vasa or pem-3 and determinants of axis (pem-1), unequal cleavage (pem-1), and muscle cells (macho-1). High resolution localization of mRNAs, proteins, and lipids in whole eggs and embryos and their cortical fragments shows that maternal mRNA determinants pem-1 and macho-1 are anchored to cortical endoplasmic reticulum and segregate with it into small posterior somatic cells. In contrast, mRNAs such as vasa are associated with granular structures which are inherited by the same somatic cells plus adjacent germ cell precursors. In this chapter, we provide detailed protocols for simultaneous localization of mRNAs and proteins to determine their association with cellular structures in eggs and embryos. Using preparations of isolated cortical fragments with intact membranous structures allows unprecedented high resolution analysis and identification of cellular anchoring sites for key mRNAs. This information is necessary for understanding the mechanisms for localizing mRNAs and partitioning them into daughter cells after cleavage.

Kif2 microtubule depolymerase is required for unequal cell division and localizes to a subdomain of cortical endoplasmic reticulum

Unequal cell division (UCD) is a fundamental process responsible for creating sibling cell size asymmetry; however, how microtubules are specifically depolymerized on one aster of the mitotic spindle creating a smaller sibling cell during UCD has remained elusive. Using invertebrate chordate embryos (ascidian) that possess a large cortical structure (CAB) that causes UCD, we identified a microtubule depolymerase (Kif2) involved in creating cell size asymmetry. Kif2 localizes to the cortical subdomain of endoplasmic reticulum in the CAB. During three successive UCDs, Kif2 protein accumulates at the CAB during interphase and is delocalized from the CAB in mid mitosis. Rapid imaging of microtubule dynamics at the cortex revealed that microtubules do not penetrate the CAB during interphase. Inhibition of Kif2 function prevents the development of mitotic aster asymmetry and centrosome movement towards the CAB thereby blocking UCD, whereas locally increasing microtubule depolymerization causes exaggerated asymmetric spindle positioning. This study provides insights into the fundamental process of UCD and for the first time shows that a microtubule depolymerase is localized to a cortical site controlling UCD.