César Fiel

Resistance of Cooperia to ivermectin treatments in grazing cattle of the Humid Pampa, Argentina

A field experiment and a controlled efficacy trial were conducted to demonstrate resistance of cattle trichostrongylid nematodes to endectocidal compounds in grazing cattle on the Humid Pampa, Argentina. Male Polled Hereford calves, aged 9-11 months old, with a history of frequent treatments with compounds of the avermectin/milbemycin class, were used for the trial. The field experiment involved six groups of 10 animals each, which were subcutaneously treated with either ivermectin (IVM), long-acting ivermectin (LA-IVM), moxidectin (MXD) or doramectin (DRM) at a dosage of 0.2mg/kg BW. A fifth group was treated orally with fenbendazole at a dosage of 5mg/kg BW; the sixth group of calves served as non-treated control. Faecal samples were collected from each animal on the day of treatment and at 14 days after treatment. Nematode egg counts were performed to estimate the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). The FECRT showed that reductions were 65% (IVM), -20% (LA-IVM) and 85% (DRM). Egg counts from calves treated with MXD or fenbendazole were reduced by 95 and 100%, respectively. For the controlled efficacy trial, six animals with the highest egg counts from the IVM, LA-IVM and non-treated control groups, were necropsied on day 18 after treatment to determine numbers and nematode species in the abomasum and small intestine. The results indicated that efficacy against Cooperia oncophora was 62.7 and 48% for IVM and LA-IVM, respectively. Neither of the IVM formulations showed efficacy against Trichostrongylus spp. in the small intestine. However, the absence of Trichostrongylus spp. in some animals of both treated and control groups precluded a valid assessment of efficacy or resistance. It was concluded that resistance of trichostrongylid nematodes to the avermectin/milbemycin class of compounds in grazing cattle of the Humid Pampa, Argentina, may be strongly established on farms where cattle are treated at frequent intervals throughout the year.

Observations on the free-living stages of cattle gastrointestinal nematodes.

A 4-year study on the free-living stages of cattle gastrointestinal nematodes was conducted to determine (a) the development time from egg to infective larvae (L3) inside the faecal pats, (b) the pasture infectivity levels over time, and (c) the survival of L3 on pasture. Naturally infected calves were allowed to contaminate 16 plots on monthly basis. Weekly monitoring of eggs per gram of faeces (epg) values and faecal cultures from these animals provided data for the contamination patterns and the relative nematode population composition. At the same time, faecal pats were shaped and deposited monthly onto herbage and sampled weekly to determine the development time from egg to L3. Herbage samples were collected fortnightly over a 16-month period after deposition to evaluate the pasture larval infectivity and survival of L3 over time. The development time from egg to L3 was 1-2 weeks in summer, 3-5 weeks in autumn, 4-6 weeks in winter, and 1-4 weeks in spring. The levels of contamination and pasture infectivity showed a clear seasonality during autumn-winter and spring, whilst a high mortality of larvae on pasture occurred in summer. Ostertagia spp., Cooperia spp. and Trichostrongylus spp. were predominant and a survival of L3 on pasture over a 1-year period was recorded in this study.

Resistant nematodes in cattle: Pharmaco-therapeutic assessment of the ivermectin- ricobendazole combination.

Nematodicidal combinations have been proposed as a valid strategy to achieve effective nematode control in the presence of drug resistance. The goals of this study were: (1) to compare the clinical efficacy (therapeutic response) of ivermectin (IVM) and ricobendazole (RBZ) given subcutaneously either by separate or combined administration to calves naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to IVM, and (2) to evaluate the potential pharmacokinetic (PK) and/or pharmacodynamic (PD) interactions occurring after the co-administration of both anthelmintics. Sixty male calves naturally infected with gastrointestinal nematodes resistant to IVM were randomly allocated into four groups (n=15). Untreated control: animals not receiving anthelmintic treatment; IVM alone: animals treated with IVM by subcutaneous (SC) injection (0.2mg/kg); RBZ alone: animals received RBZ by the SC route (3.75mg/kg); IVM+RBZ: animals treated with IVM and RBZ (0.2 and 3.75mg/kg, respectively), by SC injection in two separates sites. Eight animals of each treated group were randomly selected to perform the PK study. Plasma samples were taken from those animals up to 28days post-treatment. IVM and RBZ plasma concentrations were quantified by HPLC. The therapeutic response was determined by faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). The proportions of third-stage larvae (L3) recovered from coprocultures were used to calculate the efficacy against the main parasite genera. The daily total egg deposition for each experimental group was estimated. Similar pharmacokinetic trends were obtained for both IVM and RBZ allying the single-drug and the combined treatments, which indicates the absence of PK interactions between both anthelmintics. The observed overall clinical drug efficacies were 48% (IVM alone), 94% (RBZ alone) and 98% (IVM+RBZ). Haemonchus spp. and Cooperia spp. were recovered in the coproculture after IVM treatment, suggesting that resistance to IVM includes both genera. In fact, the efficacy against Cooperia spp. was 83% (IVM), 98% (RBZ) and 98% (IVM+RBZ), while the efficacy against Haemonchus spp. was 0% (IVM), 97% (RBZ) and 100% (IVM+RBZ). The combination was the only treatment that achieved 100% clinical efficacy against IVM-resistant Haemonchus spp. The total egg excretion was reduced to 49.9% (IVM alone group), 6.3% (RBZ alone group) and 1.8% (IVM+RBZ combined group) compared to the untreated control. Although the combined treatment did not significantly increase the overall clinical efficacy in the current natural field conditions, an additive effect was achieved against IVM-resistant nematodes. In fact, the combination obtained significantly higher efficacy against IVM-resistant Haemonchus spp. than RBZ alone. Additionally, the epidemiological relevance of the reduction in the number of eggs excreted following the combined treatment is not negligible and should be taken into account in future studies. Further work is required to understand the advantages of nematodicidal combinations in different natural anthelmintic resistance scenarios.

Anthelmintic resistance: Management of parasite refugia for Haemonchus contortus through the replacement of resistant with susceptible populations

Sheep production in tropical and temperate regions is hampered by the presence of Haemonchus contortus, the blood-sucking nematode that is the major cause of economic losses in small ruminant enterprises. The most limiting factor in the control of this parasitic disease is the steady progress of anthelmintic resistance worldwide. The search for control strategies that minimise the use of anthelmintics is therefore central to various efforts worldwide. One strategy is the introduction of susceptible parasites in refugia when these refugia are at low levels. This strategy could lead to a renewed possibility anthelmintics being effective. At farm level, this management practice could recover the use of anthelmintics in flocks with high levels of resistance. This review explores the possibility of replacing resistant H. contortus populations with susceptible ones through refugia management and. highlights the experiences of on-farm research attempts carried out in different geographical areas, reaching various degrees of success.

An attempt to replace an ivermectin-resistant Cooperia spp. population by a susceptible one on grazing pastures based on epidemiological principles and refugia management.

The maintenance of anthelmintic-susceptible parasite refugia to delay the onset of anthelmintic resistance is an almost impossible effort in many grazing livestock production countries given that current refugia consist of already resistant parasites. Rather, efforts could be focused on replacing the resistant parasite refugia by susceptible parasite ones and implementing sustainable parasite control measures from then on. To this purpose, a trial was conducted to attempt to establish a new population of ivermectin-susceptible Cooperia sp. on a beef cattle farm with proven problems of ivermectin-resistant Cooperia. During two consecutive years, 82 (Year 1) and 100 (Year 2) recently weaned and parasite-free heifers were inoculated with 40,000 or 30,000 susceptible Cooperia L3, respectively, at a time when levels of resistant parasite refugia were normally low. The animals were subsequently allowed to graze on the problem pastures during autumn until the end of spring. Levels of parasitism in the animals and on pasture were monitored monthly and animals were treated with levamisole when needed. The combination of parasitological monitoring and local epidemiological knowledge was essential to determine when treatments were to be administered. No clinical signs of gastrointestinal parasitosis in the herd were observed throughout the study and unnecessary treatments were avoided. Faecal egg counts reduction tests (FECRT) and controlled efficacy tests (CET) employing worm counts were carried out at different times throughout the study to determine the clinical efficacy (FECRT) and the absolute efficacy (CET) of ivermectin, respectively. The clinical efficacy of ivermectin increased from an initial 73% to 99.4%, while the absolute efficacy increased from 54.1% to 87.5% after just two animal production cycles. The switch from a resistant parasite population to a susceptible one requires knowledge of parasitological epidemiology, especially in relation to seasonal variations of parasite populations in both the host and in refugia.

Failure of ivermectin efficacy against Psoroptes ovis infestation in cattle: Integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic evaluation of two commercial formulations

Psoroptic mange is an important parasitic disease that mainly affects beef cattle producing marked economic losses. Ivermectin (IVM) is considered one of the most effective treatments against psoroptic mange and is used worldwide to control both endo and ectoparasites in different species. The current work assessed the relationship between pharmacokinetic behavior of IVM and its efficacy against Psoroptes ovis after the subcutaneous administration of two commercial formulations in a cattle feedlot. Aberdeen Angus and Hereford steers were selected based on the presence of active mite infestations. Animals were allocated into 4 experimental groups and treated with a single (day 0) or repeated subcutaneous injection (days 0 and 7) of one of two commercial formulations of IVM (1%) at 0.2 mg/kg. Blood and skin samples were taken from 8 randomly selected animals of each experimental group to measure IVM concentrations by HPLC. Skin scrapings were also collected from six different sites in each animal, mites were counted and ranked based on a density score. Equivalent plasma concentrations of IVM were measured after the administration of IVM formulations under study. The repeated administration of both IVM formulations at day 0 and 7 accounted for a greater plasma drug availability compared with the single administration (P < 0.05). IVM was well distributed from the plasma to the skin without significant differences between both IVM formulations. There was a positive correlation between IVM concentrations in skin and plasma (r: 0.73 P < 0.0001). The mean ratios between IVM availabililty (measured as AUC) in the skin and in plasma were between 1.2 and 2.1. The repeated administration of IVM increased significantly the IVM concentrations in the skin of areas affected by mange. IVM failed to obtain a parasitological cure in the different groups affected by mange. The failure was observed with both formulations administeredat single or repeated doses. Based on the number of animals cured, the range of efficacy was between 0% on day 7 and 60% on day 28 post-treatment. No significant differences in the P. ovis density scores were observed after the IVM treatment at single or repeated doses. Additional studies are needed to confirm the presence of resistant strains of P.ovis and to establish the appropriate measures to control these parasitic infestations in feedlot cattle.