Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Charles-Ambroise Valery is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Charles-Ambroise Valery.


Neurology | 2001

Role of the supplementary motor area in motor deficit following medial frontal lobe surgery.

A. Krainik; Stéphane Lehéricy; Hugues Duffau; Michaela Vlaicu; F. Poupon; Laurent Capelle; Philippe Cornu; Stéphane Clemenceau; Mokrane Sahel; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Anne-Laure Boch; J.-F. Mangin; D. Le Bihan; C. Marsault

Objective: Patients undergoing surgical resection of medial frontal lesions may present a transient postoperative deficit that remains largely unpredictable. The authors studied the role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in the occurrence of this deficit using fMRI. Methods: Twenty-three patients underwent a preoperative fMRI before resection of medial frontal lesions. Tasks included self-paced flexion/extension of the left and right hand, successively. Preoperative fMRI data were compared with postoperative MRI data and with neurologic outcome. Results: Following surgery, 11 patients had a motor deficit from which all patients recovered within a few weeks or months. The deficit was similar across patients, consisting of a global reduction in spontaneous movements contralateral to the operated side with variable severity. SMA activation was observed in all patients. The deficit was observed when the area activated in the posterior part of the SMA (SMA proper) was resected. Conclusions: fMRI is able to identify the area at risk in the SMA proper whose resection is highly related to the occurrence of the motor deficit. The clinical characteristics of this deficit support the role of the SMA proper in the initiation and execution of the movement.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2001

Radiosurgery for re-irradiation of brain metastasis: results in 54 patients

Georges Noel; Marie-Ange Proudhom; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Philippe Cornu; Gilbert Boisserie; Jean-Marc Simon; Loı̈c Feuvret; Hughes Duffau; Bernadette Tep; Jean-Yves Delattre; C. Marsault; Jacques Philippon; Denis Fohanno; François Baillet; Jean-Jacques Mazeron

PURPOSE To evaluate in terms of probabilities of local-regional control and survival, as well as of treatment-related toxicity, results of radiosurgery for brain metastasis arising in previously irradiated territory. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1994 and March 2000, 54 consecutive patients presenting with 97 metastases relapsing after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Median interval between the end of WBRT and radiosurgery was 9 months (range 2-70). Median age was 53 years (24-80), and median Karnofski performance status (KPS) 70 (60-100). Forty-seven patients had one radiosurgery, five had two and two had three. Median metastasis diameter and volume were 21 mm (6-59) and 1.2 cc (0.1-95.2), respectively. A Leksell stereotactic head frame (Leksell Model G, Elektra, Instrument, Tucker, GA) was applied under local anesthesia. Irradiation was delivered by a gantry mounted linear accelerator (linacs) (Saturne, General Electric). Median minimal dose delivered to the gross disease was 16.2 Gy (11.8-23), and median maximal dose 21.2 Gy (14- 42). RESULTS Median follow-up was 9 months (1-57). Five metastases recurred. One- and 2-year metastasis local control rates were 91.3 and 84% and 1- and 2-year brain control rates were 65 and 57%, respectively. Six patients died of brain metastasis evolution, and three of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. One- and 2-year overall survival rates were 31 and 28%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, KPS, RPA class, SIR score and interval between WBRT and radiosurgery were prognostic factors of overall survival and brain free-disease survival. According to multivariate analysis, RPA was an independent factor of overall survival and brain free-disease survival, and the interval between WBRT and radiosurgery longer than 14 months was associated with longer brain free-disease survival. Side effects were minimal, with only two cases of headaches and two of grade 2 alopecia. CONCLUSION Salvage radiosurgery of metastasis recurring after whole brain irradiation is an effective and accurate treatment which could be proposed to patients with a KPS>70 and a primary tumour controlled or indolent. We recommend that a dose not exceeding 14 Gy should be delivered to an isodose representing 70% of the maximal dose since local control observed rate was similar to that previously published in literature with upper dose and side effects were minimal.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2003

Radiosurgery for brain metastasis: impact of CTV on local control

Georges Noel; Jean-Marc Simon; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Philippe Cornu; Gilbert Boisserie; Dominique Ledu; Bernadette Tep; Jean-Yves Delattre; C. Marsault; François Baillet; Jean-Jacques Mazeron

PURPOSE The purpose of the present analysis was to assess whether adding a 1 mm margin to the gross tumour volume (GTV) improves the control rate of brain metastasis treated with radiosurgery (RS). PATIENTS AND METHODS All the patients had one or two brain metastases, 30 mm or less in diameter, and only one isocentre was used for RS. There were 23 females and 38 males. The median age was 54 years (34-76). The median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (60-100). At the time of RS, 23 patients had no evidence of extracranial disease and 38 had a progressive systemic disease. Thirty-eight patients were treated up-front with only RS. Twenty-three patients were treated for relapse or progression more than 2 months after whole brain radiotherapy. From January 1994 to July 1995, clinical target volume (CTV) was equal to GTV without any margin (33 metastases). From August 1995 to August 2000, CTV was defined as GTV plus a 1 mm margin (45 metastases). A dose of 20Gy was prescribed to the isocentre and 14Gy at the margin of CTV. RESULTS The median follow-up was 10.5 months (1-45). The mean minimum dose delivered to GTV was 14.6Gy in the group without a margin and 16.8Gy in the group with a 1 mm margin (P<0.0001). The response of 11 metastases was never assessed because patients died before the first follow-up. Ten metastases recurred, eight in the group treated without a margin and two in the group treated with a 1 mm margin (P=0.01). Two-year local control rates were 50.7+/-12.7% and 89.7+/-7.4% (P=0.008), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the treatment group (P=0.008) and the tumour volume (P=0.009) were prognostic factors for local control. In multivariate analysis, only the treatment group with a 1 mm margin was an independent prognostic factor for local control (P=0.04, RR: 5.8, 95% CI [1.08-31.13]). There were no significant differences, either in overall survival rate or in early and late side effects, between the two groups. CONCLUSION Adding a 1 mm margin to the GTV in patients treated with RS significantly improves the probability of metastasis control without increasing the side effects.


Lung Cancer | 2003

Three irradiation treatment options including radiosurgery for brain metastases from primary lung cancer

Georges Noel; Jacques Medioni; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Gilbert Boisserie; Jean-Marc Simon; Philippe Cornu; Dominique Ledu; Bernadette Tep; Jean-Yves Delattre; C. Marsault; François Baillet; Jean-Jacques Mazeron

PURPOSE To determine local control and survival rates in 92 patients with 145 brain metastases treated with three options of radiotherapy including stereotactic radiosurgery (SR). METHODS Between July 1994 and August 2002, 92 consecutive patients with 145 metastases were treated with a SR, 34 with initially SR alone, 22 initially with an association of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and 36 with SR alone for recurrent new brain metastasis after WBRT. At time of treatment, extracranial disease was controlled in 46 (50%) and uncontrolled in 46 (50%). Pathologies were adenocarcinoma in 54 cases (59%), squamous cell carcinoma in 14 cases (15%), small cell carcinoma in 10 cases (11%) and miscellaneous in 14 cases (15%). All patients underwent only one treatment fraction for 1 or 2 metastases in 73 cases (83%) and for more than 2 metastases for the others. RESULTS The characteristics of patients and metastases in the group treated initially with SR alone and in the group treated initially with WBRT+SR were comparable. Median follow-up was 29 months (18-36). Overall, the median and the 1- and 2-year rates of overall survival were, respectively, 9 months, 37 and 20%. A controlled extracranial disease, a high Karnofsky index and a low number of metastasis were independent prognostic factor of overall survival, respectively, HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.31-0.90, P=0.01), HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, P=0.0002), and HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.25-0.90, P=0.02). Thirteen metastases were not controlled (9%). Six-month and 1-year local control rate were, respectively, 93 and 86%. High delivered dose was an independent prognostic factor of local control, HR 0.41 (95% CI 0.18-0.95, P=0.03). A controlled extracranial disease was favourable independent prognostic factor of brain free-disease free survival, HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.2-0.98, P=0.04). Although there was a trend of a better local control, overall and brain disease free survivals rates in the WBRT+SR group compared to SR alone one, the difference were not statistically different. CONCLUSION Local control and survival rates are acceptable for a palliative treatment for the three option of treatment. In this series, the number of patients is not enough great to conclude to the necessity of the association of WBRT to SR. Re-irradiation is a safe treatment after new metastases appeared in previously irradiated area.


Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations | 2004

LINAC radiosurgery for brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma

Georges Noel; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Gilbert Boisserie; Philippe Cornu; Jean-Marc Simon; Bernadette Tep; Dominique Ledu; Jean-Yves Delattre; C. Marsault; François Baillet; Jean-Jacques Mazeron

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of the brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. From 1994 to 2001, 28 patients presenting with 65 metastases of renal cell cancer were treated by radiosurgery. Median age was 55 years (35-75), and median Karnofski performance status ranges between 50 and 100. Seven patients had received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) before radiosurgery. Twelve patients were treated by radiosurgery for 1 metastasis, 5 patients for two metastases and 6 for three, and 5 for more than three metastases. One procedure was performed in 22 patients and, 2 or 3 procedures for 6 patients. Median metastasis diameter was 19 mm (5-55 mm). Median metastasis volume was 1.28 cc (0.02-28 cc). Irradiation was delivered by linear accelerator. Median minimal dose (on the 70% isodose) was 14.7 Gy (10.8 Gy, 19.5 Gy), median maximal dose (at the isocenter) 20.5 Gy (14.3 Gy, 39.6 Gy). Median follow-up was 14 months (1-33). Two metastases progressed (3%), 2 and 12 months after radiosurgery. Overall, crude local control rate was 97% and 3-, 6- and 12-month local control rates were 98% +/- 2%, 98% +/- 2%, and 93% +/- 5%, respectively. In univariate analysis, no prognostic factor of local control was retrieved. Median brain disease-free survival was 25 months after RS. the 3-, 6- and 12-month distant brain control rates were 91% +/- 4%, 91% +/- 4%, and 70% +/- 12%, respectively. Median survival duration was 11 months. The 3-, 6-, 12- and 24-month overall survival rates were 82% +/- 7%, 67% +/- 9%, 48% +/- 10%, and 33% +/- 10%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, only site of metastasis was overall survival prognostic factor. Radiosurgery for brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma is an effective and accurate treatment. The use of radiosurgery alone is an appropriate management strategy for many patients with brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma. Radiosurgery is efficient even after development of new metastasis appearing after WBRT.


Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery | 2002

Linac Radiosurgery for Brain Metastasis of Melanoma

Georges Noel; Jean-Marc Simon; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Philippe Cornu; Gilbert Boisserie; Dominique Ledu; Bernadette Tep; Jean-Yves Delattre; C. Marsault; François Baillet; Jean-Jacques Mazeron

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic radiotherapy in the treatment of brain metastases of melanoma. Patients and Methods: From 1994 to 2001, 25 patients presenting with 61 metastases of cutaneous melanoma were treated with radiosurgery. Median age was 47 years (range: 25–73 years) and median Karnofski performance status 80 (range: 50–100). Twenty patients had one radiosurgery, 5 had two or three. Median metastasis diameter was 21 mm (range: 6–54.4 mm), and median metastasis volume was 1.7 cm3 (range: 0.4–25.6 cm3). Irradiation was delivered by a linear accelerator. Median minimal dose was 14.1 Gy (range: 10–19.4 Gy), and median maximal dose was 20.5 Gy (range: 16–48 Gy). Results: Mean follow-up was 12.6 months (range: 1–85 months). Five metastases progressed (9.8%), 2–12 months after radiosurgery. Three-, 6- and 12-month local control rates were 95 ± 3, 90 ± 5 and 84 ± 7%, respectively. By univariate analysis, only absence of extracranial tumor was a prognostic factor of local control. Three-, 6- and 12-month brain-disease-free survival rates were 75 ± 9, 68 ± 11 and 38 ± 13%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, only the Score Index for Radiosurgery in brain metastases (SIR) was a prognostic factor of brain-event-free survival (p = 0.03). Median survival was 8 months. Three-, 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 75 ± 9, 53 ± 10, and 29 ± 10%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, extracranial controlled disease status (p = 0.03), and SIR (p = 0.04) were prognostic factors for overall survival. According to multivariate analysis, none was an independent prognosticator for overall survival. Complications were minimal. Conclusion: Radiosurgical treatment of brain metastases of melanoma is effective and accurate. The use of radiosurgery alone is an appropriate management strategy for many patients with brain metastases of melanoma.


Journal of Neurosurgery | 2000

Correspondence between functional magnetic resonance imaging somatotopy and individual brain anatomy of the central region: comparison with intraoperative stimulation in patients with brain tumors

Stéphane Lehéricy; Hugues Duffau; Philippe Cornu; Laurent Capelle; Bernard Pidoux; Alexandre Carpentier; Stéphanie Auliac; Stéphane Clemenceau; Jean-Pierre Sichez; A. Bitar; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Remy van Effenterre; Thierry Faillot; Abbas Srour; Denis Fohanno; Jacques Philippon; Denis Le Bihan; C. Marsault


Medical Oncology | 2018

Can anticancer chemotherapy promote the progression of brain metastases

Aymeric Amelot; Louis-Marie Terrier; Bertrand Mathon; Ann-Rose Cook; Jean-Jacques Mazeron; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Philippe Cornu; Marc Leveque; Alexandre Carpentier


Medical Oncology | 2017

Timeline metastatic progression: in the wake of the « seed and soil » theory

Aymeric Amelot; Louis-Marie Terrier; Jean-Jacques Mazeron; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Philippe Cornu; Alexandre Carpentier; Marc Leveque


Bulletin Du Cancer | 2003

Irradiation en conditions stéréotaxiques des métastases cérébrales chez les patients âgés

Georges Noel; Sophie Noël; L. Feuvret; Charles-Ambroise Valery; Philippe Cornu; Gilbert Boisserie; Bernadette Tep; Jean-Yves Delattre; François Baillet; Jean-Jacques Mazeron

Collaboration


Dive into the Charles-Ambroise Valery's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gilbert Boisserie

Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Georges Noel

University of Strasbourg

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hugues Duffau

University of Montpellier

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge