Charles C. Lee

Auditory thalamocortical transformation: structure and function

Communicative, predatory, and reproductive behaviors rely on the auditory thalamocortical system, a key nexus that combines, transforms, and distributes virtually all acoustic information relevant to survival. The rules of connectivity for this complex network, both anatomically and functionally, are only beginning to be uncovered. Although the auditory thalamocortical system shares many features with other modalities, its connectivity and information processing principles differ from those of other modalities in many ways. Some physiological and anatomical bases for these differences are the subject of this review.

The distributed auditory cortex.

A synthesis of cat auditory cortex (AC) organization is presented in which the extrinsic and intrinsic connections interact to derive a unified profile of the auditory stream and use it to direct and modify cortical and subcortical information flow. Thus, the thalamocortical input provides essential sensory information about peripheral stimulus events, which AC redirects locally for feature extraction, and then conveys to parallel auditory, multisensory, premotor, limbic, and cognitive centers for further analysis. The corticofugal output influences areas as remote as the pons and the cochlear nucleus, structures whose effects upon AC are entirely indirect, and it has diverse roles in the transmission of information through the medial geniculate body and inferior colliculus. The distributed AC is thus construed as a functional network in which the auditory percept is assembled for subsequent redistribution in sensory, premotor, and cognitive streams contingent on the derived interpretation of the acoustic events. The confluence of auditory and multisensory streams likely precedes cognitive processing of sound. The distributed AC constitutes the largest and arguably the most complete representation of the auditory world. Many facets of this scheme may apply in rodent and primate AC as well. We propose that the distributed auditory cortex contributes to local processing regimes in regions as disparate as the frontal pole and the cochlear nucleus to construct the acoustic percept.

Connections of Cat Auditory Cortex: I. Thalamocortical System

Despite the functional importance of the medial geniculate body (MGB) in normal hearing, many aspects of its projections to auditory cortex are unknown. We analyzed the MGB projections to 13 auditory areas in the cat using two retrograde tracers to investigate thalamocortical nuclear origins, topography, convergence, and divergence. MGB divisions and auditory cortex areas were defined independently of the connectional results using architectonic, histochemical, and immunocytochemical criteria. Each auditory cortex area received a unique pattern of input from several MGB nuclei, and these patterns of input identify four groups of cortical areas distinguished by their putative functional affiliations: tonotopic, nontonotopic, multisensory, and limbic. Each family of areas received projections from a functionally related set of MGB nuclei; some nuclei project to only a few areas (e.g., the MGB ventral division to tonotopic areas), and others project to all areas (e.g., the medial division input to every auditory cortical area and to other regions). Projections to tonotopic areas had fewer nuclear origins than those to multisensory or limbic‐affiliated fields. All projections were organized topographically, even those from nontonotopic nuclei. The few divergent neurons (mean: 2%) are consistent with a model of multiple segregated streams ascending to auditory cortex. The expanded cortical representation of MGB auditory, multisensory, and limbic affiliated streams appears to be a primary facet of forebrain auditory function. The emergence of several auditory cortex representations of characteristic frequency may be a functional multiplication of the more limited maps in the MGB. This expansion suggests emergent cortical roles consistent with the divergence of thalamocortical connections. J. Comp. Neurol. 507:1879–1900, 2008.

Connections of cat auditory cortex: III. Corticocortical system

The mammalian auditory cortex (AC) is essential for computing the source and decoding the information contained in sound. Knowledge of AC corticocortical connections is modest other than in the primary auditory regions, nor is there an anatomical framework in the cat for understanding the patterns of connections among the many auditory areas. To address this issue we investigated cat AC connectivity in 13 auditory regions. Retrograde tracers were injected in the same area or in different areas to reveal the areal and laminar sources of convergent input to each region. Architectonic borders were established in Nissl and SMI‐32 immunostained material. We assessed the topography, convergence, and divergence of the labeling. Intrinsic input constituted >50% of the projection cells in each area, and extrinsic inputs were strongest from functionally related areas. Each area received significant convergent ipsilateral input from several fields (5 to 8; mean 6). These varied in their laminar origin and projection density. Major extrinsic projections were preferentially from areas of the same functional type (tonotopic to tonotopic, nontonotopic to nontonotopic, limbic‐related to limbic‐related, multisensory‐to‐multisensory), while smaller projections link areas belonging to different groups. Branched projections between areas were <2% with deposits of two tracers in an area or in different areas. All extrinsic projections to each area were highly and equally topographic and clustered. Intrinsic input arose from all layers except layer I, and extrinsic input had unique, area‐specific infragranular and supragranular origins. The many areal and laminar sources of input may contribute to the complexity of physiological responses in AC and suggest that many projections of modest size converge within each area rather than a simpler area‐to‐area serial or hierarchical pattern of corticocortical connectivity. J. Comp. Neurol. 507:1920–1943, 2008.

TONOTOPIC AND HETEROTOPIC PROJECTION SYSTEMS IN PHYSIOLOGICALLY DEFINED AUDITORY CORTEX

Combined physiological and connectional studies show significant non-topographic extrinsic projections to frequency-specific domains in the cat auditory cortex. These frequency-mismatched loci in the thalamus, ipsilateral cortex, and commissural system complement the predicted topographic and tonotopic projections. Two tonotopic areas, the primary auditory cortex (AI) and the anterior auditory field (AAF), were electrophysiologically characterized by their frequency organization. Next, either cholera toxin beta subunit or cholera toxin beta subunit gold conjugate was injected into frequency-matched locations in each area to reveal the projection pattern from the thalamus and cortex. Most retrograde labeling was found at tonotopically appropriate locations within a 1 mm-wide strip in the thalamus and a 2-3 mm-wide expanse of cortex (approximately 85%). However, approximately 13-30% of the neurons originated from frequency-mismatched locations far from their predicted positions in thalamic nuclei and cortical areas, respectively. We propose that these heterotopic projections satisfy at least three criteria that may be necessary to support the magnitude and character of plastic changes in physiological studies. First, they are found in the thalamus, ipsilateral and commissural cortex; since this reorganization could arise from any of these routes and may involve each, such projections ought to occur in them. Second, they originate from nuclei and areas with or without tonotopy; it is likely that plasticity is not exclusively shaped by spectral influences and not limited to cochleotopic regions. Finally, the projections are appropriate in magnitude and sign to plausibly support such rearrangements; given the rapidity of some aspects of plastic changes, they should be mediated by substantial existing connections. Alternative roles for these heterotopic projections are also considered.

DNA binding by the KP repressor protein inhibits P‐element transposase activity in vitro

P elements are a family of mobile DNA elements found in Drosophila. P‐element transposition is tightly regulated, and P‐element‐encoded repressor proteins are responsible for inhibiting transposition in vivo. To investigate the molecular mechanisms by which one of these repressors, the KP protein, inhibits transposition, a variety of mutant KP proteins were prepared and tested for their biochemical activities. The repressor activities of the wild‐type and mutant KP proteins were tested in vitro using several different assays for P‐element transposase activity. These studies indicate that the site‐specific DNA‐binding activity of the KP protein is essential for repressing transposase activity. The DNA‐binding domain of the KP repressor protein is also shared with the transposase protein and resides in the N‐terminal 88 amino acids. Within this region, there is a C2HC putative metal‐binding motif that is required for site‐specific DNA binding. In vitro the KP protein inhibits transposition by competing with the transposase enzyme for DNA‐binding sites near the P‐element termini.

Connections of cat auditory cortex: II. Commissural system

The commissural projections between 13 areas of cat auditory cortex (AC) were studied using retrograde tracers. Areal and laminar origins were characterized as part of a larger study of thalamic input and cortical origins of projections to each area. Cholera toxin beta subunit (CTβ) and cholera toxin beta subunit gold‐conjugate (CTβG) were injected separately within an area or in different areas in an experiment. The areas were identified independently with SMI‐32, which revealed differences in neurofilament immunoreactivity in layers III, V, and VI. Each area received convergent AC input from 3 to 6 (mean, 5) contralateral areas. Most of the projections (>75%) were homotopic and from topographically organized loci in the corresponding area. Heterotopic projections (>1 mm beyond the main homotopic projection) constituted ≈25% of the input. Layers III and V contained >95% of the commissural neurons. Commissural projection neurons were clustered in all areas. Commissural divergence, assessed by double labeling, was less than 3% in each area. This sparse axonal branching is consistent with the essentially homotopic connectivity of the commissural system. The many heterotopic origins represent unexpected commissural influences converging on an area. Areas more dorsal on the cortical convexity have commissural projections originating in layers III and V; more ventral areas favor layer III at the expense of layer V, to its near‐total exclusion in some instances. Some areas have almost entirely layer III origins (temporal cortex and area AII), whereas others have a predominantly layer V input (anterior auditory field) or dual contributions from layers III and V (the dorsal auditory zone). A topographic distribution of commissural cells of origin is consistent with the order observed in thalamocortical and corticocortical projections, and which characterizes all extrinsic projection systems (commissural, corticocortical, and thalamocortical) in all AC areas. Thus, laminar as well as areal differences in projection origin distinguish the auditory cortical commissural system. J. Comp. Neurol. 507:1901–1919, 2008.

Branched projections in the auditory thalamocortical and corticocortical systems

Branched axons (BAs) projecting to different areas of the brain can create multiple feature-specific maps or synchronize processing in remote targets. We examined the organization of BAs in the cat auditory forebrain using two sensitive retrograde tracers. In one set of experiments (n=4), the tracers were injected into different frequency-matched loci in the primary auditory area (AI) and the anterior auditory field (AAF). In the other set (n=4), we injected primary, non-primary, or limbic cortical areas. After mapped injections, percentages of double-labeled cells (PDLs) in the medial geniculate body (MGB) ranged from 1.4% (ventral division) to 2.8% (rostral pole). In both ipsilateral and contralateral areas AI and AAF, the average PDLs were <1%. In the unmapped cases, the MGB PDLs ranged from 0.6% (ventral division) after insular cortex injections to 6.7% (dorsal division) after temporal cortex injections. Cortical PDLs ranged from 0.1% (ipsilateral AI injections) to 3.7% in the second auditory cortical area (AII) (contralateral AII injections). PDLs within the smaller (minority) projection population were significantly higher than those in the overall population. About 2% of auditory forebrain projection cells have BAs and such cells are organized differently than those in the subcortical auditory system, where BAs can be far more numerous. Forebrain branched projections follow different organizational rules than their unbranched counterparts. Finally, the relatively larger proportion of visual and somatic sensory forebrain BAs suggests modality specific rules for BA organization.

Challenges to a Neuroanatomical Theory of Forebrain Auditory Plasticity

The mature brain performs paradoxical tasks. It encodes sensory experience accurately and with fidelity, and it modifies otherwise stable maps of the ears, eyes, and body to represent learning (Weinberger et al, 1984), forgetting (Bakin and Weinberger, 1990), and manipulation of stimulus parameters and statistics (Zhang et al, 2002). These two functional modes have elicited attention at the synaptic (Metherate and Ashe, 1995) and systems (Wall, 1988) levels of analysis, both of which have dynamic (Calford, 2002) as well as metastable (Schieber, 2001) elements. Reconciling the conflicting requirements of stability and lability in the adult map is a profound challenge for systems neuroscience that has received surprisingly little attention at the neuroanatomical level of discourse. The finding that primary auditory cortex (Al) neurons can reorganize their tonotopic map rapidly and globally in a frequency-specific manner (Kilgard and Merzenich, 1998) suggests that the continuous impact of sensory plasticity on shaping local processing (Weinberg, 1997) may have been underestimated (Kaas, 1997). A key issue for understanding the limits of such systems-level plasticity is to propose, and ultimately to test, a theory of neural substrates that plausibly encode, or that instruct the brain to represent, experience selectively (Recanzone et al, 1993), specifically 109