Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Charles G. Drake is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Charles G. Drake.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2012

Safety and Activity of Anti–PD-L1 Antibody in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Julie R. Brahmer; Scott S. Tykodi; Laura Q. Chow; Wen-Jen Hwu; Suzanne L. Topalian; Patrick Hwu; Charles G. Drake; Luis H. Camacho; John Kauh; Kunle Odunsi; Henry C. Pitot; Omid Hamid; Shailender Bhatia; Renato Martins; Keith D. Eaton; Shuming Chen; Theresa M. Salay; Suresh Alaparthy; Joseph F. Grosso; Alan J. Korman; Susan M. Parker; Shruti Agrawal; Stacie M. Goldberg; Drew M. Pardoll; Ashok Kumar Gupta; Jon M. Wigginton

BACKGROUND Programmed death 1 (PD-1) protein, a T-cell coinhibitory receptor, and one of its ligands, PD-L1, play a pivotal role in the ability of tumor cells to evade the hosts immune system. Blockade of interactions between PD-1 and PD-L1 enhances immune function in vitro and mediates antitumor activity in preclinical models. METHODS In this multicenter phase 1 trial, we administered intravenous anti-PD-L1 antibody (at escalating doses ranging from 0.3 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight) to patients with selected advanced cancers. Anti-PD-L1 antibody was administered every 14 days in 6-week cycles for up to 16 cycles or until the patient had a complete response or confirmed disease progression. RESULTS As of February 24, 2012, a total of 207 patients--75 with non-small-cell lung cancer, 55 with melanoma, 18 with colorectal cancer, 17 with renal-cell cancer, 17 with ovarian cancer, 14 with pancreatic cancer, 7 with gastric cancer, and 4 with breast cancer--had received anti-PD-L1 antibody. The median duration of therapy was 12 weeks (range, 2 to 111). Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects that investigators considered to be related to treatment occurred in 9% of patients. Among patients with a response that could be evaluated, an objective response (a complete or partial response) was observed in 9 of 52 patients with melanoma, 2 of 17 with renal-cell cancer, 5 of 49 with non-small-cell lung cancer, and 1 of 17 with ovarian cancer. Responses lasted for 1 year or more in 8 of 16 patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Antibody-mediated blockade of PD-L1 induced durable tumor regression (objective response rate of 6 to 17%) and prolonged stabilization of disease (rates of 12 to 41% at 24 weeks) in patients with advanced cancers, including non-small-cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal-cell cancer. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00729664.).


Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2010

Phase I Study of Single-Agent Anti–Programmed Death-1 (MDX-1106) in Refractory Solid Tumors: Safety, Clinical Activity, Pharmacodynamics, and Immunologic Correlates

Julie R. Brahmer; Charles G. Drake; Ira Wollner; John D. Powderly; Joel Picus; William H. Sharfman; Elizabeth Stankevich; Alice Pons; Theresa M. Salay; Tracee L. McMiller; Marta M. Gilson; Changyu Wang; Mark J. Selby; Janis M. Taube; Robert A. Anders; Lieping Chen; Alan J. Korman; Drew M. Pardoll; Israel Lowy; Suzanne L. Topalian

PURPOSE Programmed death-1 (PD-1), an inhibitory receptor expressed on activated T cells, may suppress antitumor immunity. This phase I study sought to determine the safety and tolerability of anti-PD-1 blockade in patients with treatment-refractory solid tumors and to preliminarily assess antitumor activity, pharmacodynamics, and immunologic correlates. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-nine patients with advanced metastatic melanoma, colorectal cancer (CRC), castrate-resistant prostate cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), or renal cell carcinoma (RCC) received a single intravenous infusion of anti-PD-1 (MDX-1106) in dose-escalating six-patient cohorts at 0.3, 1, 3, or 10 mg/kg, followed by a 15-patient expansion cohort at 10 mg/kg. Patients with evidence of clinical benefit at 3 months were eligible for repeated therapy. RESULTS Anti-PD-1 was well tolerated: one serious adverse event, inflammatory colitis, was observed in a patient with melanoma who received five doses at 1 mg/kg. One durable complete response (CRC) and two partial responses (PRs; melanoma, RCC) were seen. Two additional patients (melanoma, NSCLC) had significant lesional tumor regressions not meeting PR criteria. The serum half-life of anti-PD-1 was 12 to 20 days. However, pharmacodynamics indicated a sustained mean occupancy of > 70% of PD-1 molecules on circulating T cells > or = 2 months following infusion, regardless of dose. In nine patients examined, tumor cell surface B7-H1 expression appeared to correlate with the likelihood of response to treatment. CONCLUSION Blocking the PD-1 immune checkpoint with intermittent antibody dosing is well tolerated and associated with evidence of antitumor activity. Exploration of alternative dosing regimens and combinatorial therapies with vaccines, targeted therapies, and/or other checkpoint inhibitors is warranted.


Nature | 2014

A draft map of the human proteome

Min Sik Kim; Sneha M. Pinto; Derese Getnet; Raja Sekhar Nirujogi; Srikanth S. Manda; Raghothama Chaerkady; Dhanashree S. Kelkar; Ruth Isserlin; Shobhit Jain; Joji Kurian Thomas; Babylakshmi Muthusamy; Pamela Leal-Rojas; Praveen Kumar; Nandini A. Sahasrabuddhe; Lavanya Balakrishnan; Jayshree Advani; Bijesh George; Santosh Renuse; Lakshmi Dhevi N. Selvan; Arun H. Patil; Vishalakshi Nanjappa; Aneesha Radhakrishnan; Samarjeet Prasad; Tejaswini Subbannayya; Rajesh Raju; Manish Kumar; Sreelakshmi K. Sreenivasamurthy; Arivusudar Marimuthu; Gajanan Sathe; Sandip Chavan

The availability of human genome sequence has transformed biomedical research over the past decade. However, an equivalent map for the human proteome with direct measurements of proteins and peptides does not exist yet. Here we present a draft map of the human proteome using high-resolution Fourier-transform mass spectrometry. In-depth proteomic profiling of 30 histologically normal human samples, including 17 adult tissues, 7 fetal tissues and 6 purified primary haematopoietic cells, resulted in identification of proteins encoded by 17,294 genes accounting for approximately 84% of the total annotated protein-coding genes in humans. A unique and comprehensive strategy for proteogenomic analysis enabled us to discover a number of novel protein-coding regions, which includes translated pseudogenes, non-coding RNAs and upstream open reading frames. This large human proteome catalogue (available as an interactive web-based resource at http://www.humanproteomemap.org) will complement available human genome and transcriptome data to accelerate biomedical research in health and disease.


Cancer Cell | 2015

Immune Checkpoint Blockade: A Common Denominator Approach to Cancer Therapy

Suzanne L. Topalian; Charles G. Drake; Drew M. Pardoll

The immune system recognizes and is poised to eliminate cancer but is held in check by inhibitory receptors and ligands. These immune checkpoint pathways, which normally maintain self-tolerance and limit collateral tissue damage during anti-microbial immune responses, can be co-opted by cancer to evade immune destruction. Drugs interrupting immune checkpoints, such as anti-CTLA-4, anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and others in early development, can unleash anti-tumor immunity and mediate durable cancer regressions. The complex biology of immune checkpoint pathways still contains many mysteries, and the full activity spectrum of checkpoint-blocking drugs, used alone or in combination, is currently the subject of intense study.


Current Opinion in Immunology | 2012

Targeting the PD-1/B7-H1(PD-L1) pathway to activate anti-tumor immunity

Suzanne L. Topalian; Charles G. Drake; Drew M. Pardoll

Genetic alterations and epigenetic dysregulation in cancer cells create a vast array of neoepitopes potentially recognizable by the immune system. Immune checkpoint blockade has the capacity to enhance and sustain endogenous immunity against non-mutated tumor-associated antigens as well as uniquely mutant antigens, establishing durable tumor control. Recent evidence from preclinical models highlights the pivotal role of the Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) T cell co-receptor and its ligands, B7-H1/PD-L1 and B7-DC/PD-L2, in maintaining an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Encouraging early clinical results using blocking agents against components of the PD-1 pathway have validated its importance as a target for cancer immunotherapy.


Cancer Research | 2012

Immune Inhibitory Molecules LAG-3 and PD-1 Synergistically Regulate T-cell Function to Promote Tumoral Immune Escape

Seng Ryong Woo; Meghan E. Turnis; Monica V. Goldberg; Jaishree Bankoti; Mark J. Selby; Christopher Nirschl; Matthew L. Bettini; David M. Gravano; Peter Vogel; Chih Long Liu; Stephanie Tangsombatvisit; Joseph F. Grosso; George J. Netto; Matthew P. Smeltzer; Alcides Chaux; Paul J. Utz; Creg J. Workman; Drew M. Pardoll; Alan J. Korman; Charles G. Drake; Dario A. A. Vignali

Inhibitory receptors on immune cells are pivotal regulators of immune escape in cancer. Among these inhibitory receptors, CTLA-4 (targeted clinically by ipilimumab) serves as a dominant off-switch while other receptors such as PD-1 and LAG-3 seem to serve more subtle rheostat functions. However, the extent of synergy and cooperative interactions between inhibitory pathways in cancer remain largely unexplored. Here, we reveal extensive coexpression of PD-1 and LAG-3 on tumor-infiltrating CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in three distinct transplantable tumors. Dual anti-LAG-3/anti-PD-1 antibody treatment cured most mice of established tumors that were largely resistant to single antibody treatment. Despite minimal immunopathologic sequelae in PD-1 and LAG-3 single knockout mice, dual knockout mice abrogated self-tolerance with resultant autoimmune infiltrates in multiple organs, leading to eventual lethality. However, Lag3(-/-)Pdcd1(-/-) mice showed markedly increased survival from and clearance of multiple transplantable tumors. Together, these results define a strong synergy between the PD-1 and LAG-3 inhibitory pathways in tolerance to both self and tumor antigens. In addition, they argue strongly that dual blockade of these molecules represents a promising combinatorial strategy for cancer.


Lancet Oncology | 2014

Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184-043): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

Eugene D. Kwon; Charles G. Drake; Howard I. Scher; Karim Fizazi; Alberto Bossi; Alfons J.M. van den Eertwegh; Michael Krainer; Nadine Houédé; Ricardo Santos; Hakim Mahammedi; Siobhan Ng; Michele Maio; Fabio A. Franke; Santhanam Sundar; Neeraj Agarwal; Andries M. Bergman; Tudor Ciuleanu; Ernesto Korbenfeld; Lisa Sengeløv; Steinbjørn Hansen; Christopher J. Logothetis; Tomasz M. Beer; M. Brent McHenry; Paul Gagnier; David Liu; Winald R. Gerritsen

BACKGROUND Ipilimumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 to enhance antitumour immunity. Our aim was to assess the use of ipilimumab after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS We did a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial in which men with at least one bone metastasis from castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel treatment were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive bone-directed radiotherapy (8 Gy in one fraction) followed by either ipilimumab 10 mg/kg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to four doses. Non-progressing patients could continue to receive ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg or placebo as maintenance therapy every 3 months until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effect, or death. Patients were randomly assigned to either treatment group via a minimisation algorithm, and stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, alkaline phosphatase concentration, haemoglobin concentration, and investigator site. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00861614. FINDINGS From May 26, 2009, to Feb 15, 2012, 799 patients were randomly assigned (399 to ipilimumab and 400 to placebo), all of whom were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median overall survival was 11·2 months (95% CI 9·5-12·7) with ipilimumab and 10·0 months (8·3-11·0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·85, 0·72-1·00; p=0·053). However, the assessment of the proportional hazards assumption showed that it was violated (p=0·0031). A piecewise hazard model showed that the HR changed over time: the HR for 0-5 months was 1·46 (95% CI 1·10-1·95), for 5-12 months was 0·65 (0·50-0·85), and beyond 12 months was 0·60 (0·43-0·86). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were immune-related, occurring in 101 (26%) patients in the ipilimumab group and 11 (3%) of patients in the placebo group. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events included diarrhoea (64 [16%] of 393 patients in the ipilimumab group vs seven [2%] of 396 in the placebo group), fatigue (40 [11%] vs 35 [9%]), anaemia (40 [10%] vs 43 [11%]), and colitis (18 [5%] vs 0). Four (1%) deaths occurred because of toxic effects of the study drug, all in the ipilimumab group. INTERPRETATION Although there was no significant difference between the ipilimumab group and the placebo group in terms of overall survival in the primary analysis, there were signs of activity with the drug that warrant further investigation. FUNDING Bristol-Myers Squibb.


Advances in Immunology | 2006

Mechanisms of Immune Evasion by Tumors

Charles G. Drake; Elizabeth M. Jaffee; Drew M. Pardoll

In the past decade, basic studies in animal models have begun to elucidate the physiological barriers which impede a successful antitumor immune response. These barriers operate at a number of levels, and involve the tumor, the tumor microenvironment and various components of the innate and adaptive immune systems. In this review, we discuss the multiple mechanisms by which tumors evade an immune response, with an emphasis on clinically relevant strategies to overcome these inhibitory checkpoints.


Journal of Immunology | 2007

Cutting Edge: An In Vivo Requirement for STAT3 Signaling in TH17 Development and TH17-Dependent Autoimmunity

Timothy J. Harris; Joseph F. Grosso; Hung-Rong Yen; Hong Xin; Marcin Kortylewski; Emilia Albesiano; Edward L. Hipkiss; Derese Getnet; Monica V. Goldberg; Charles H. Maris; Franck Housseau; Hua Yu; Drew M. Pardoll; Charles G. Drake

STAT3 activation has been observed in several autoimmune diseases, suggesting that STAT3-mediated pathways promote pathologic immune responses. We provide in vivo evidence that the fundamental role of STAT3 signaling in autoimmunity relates to its absolute requirement for generating TH17 T cell responses. We show that STAT3 is a master regulator of this pathogenic T cell subtype, acting at multiple levels in vivo, including TH17 T cell differentiation and cytokine production, as well as induction of RORγt and the IL-23R. Neither naturally occurring TH17 cells nor TH17-dependent autoimmunity occurs when STAT3 is ablated in CD4 cells. Furthermore, ablation of STAT3 signaling in CD4 cells results in increased TH1 responses, indicating that STAT3 signaling skews TH responses away from the TH1 pathway and toward the TH17 pathway. Thus, STAT3 is a candidate target for TH17-dependent autoimmune disease immunotherapy that could selectively inhibit pathogenic immune pathways.


Cancer Cell | 2009

Regulation of the IL-23 and IL-12 balance by Stat3 signaling in the tumor microenvironment.

Marcin Kortylewski; Hong Xin; Maciej Kujawski; Heehyoung Lee; Yong Liu; Timothy J. Harris; Charles G. Drake; Drew M. Pardoll; Hua Yu

Interactions between tumor and immune cells either enhance or inhibit cancer progression. We show here that Stat3 signaling within the tumor microenvironment induces a procarcinogenic cytokine, IL-23, while inhibiting a central anticarcinogenic cytokine, IL-12, thereby shifting the balance of tumor immunity toward carcinogenesis. Stat3 induces expression of IL-23, which is mainly produced by tumor-associated macrophages, via direct transcriptional activation of the IL-23/p19 gene. Furthermore, Stat3 inhibits NF-kappaB/c-Rel-dependent IL-12/p35 gene expression in tumor-associated dendritic cells. Tumor-associated regulatory T cells (Tregs) express IL-23 receptor, which activates Stat3 in this cell type, leading to upregulation of the Treg-specific transcription factor Foxp3 and the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. These results demonstrate that Stat3 promotes IL-23-mediated procarcinogenic immune responses while inhibiting IL-12-dependent antitumor immunity.

Collaboration


Dive into the Charles G. Drake's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Emmanuel S. Antonarakis

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Drew M. Pardoll

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Drew M. Pardoll

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Angelo M. De Marzo

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

George J. Netto

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Janis M. Taube

Johns Hopkins University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge