Charles J. Mullany

2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC, FAHA, Co-Chair*†; Mary Hand, MSPH, RN, FAHA, Co-Chair; Paul W. Armstrong, MD, FACC, FAHA‡§; Eric R. Bates, MD, FACC, FAHA; Lee A. Green, MD, MPH ; Lakshmi K. Halasyamani, MD¶; Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC, FAHA**; Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, FACC, FAHA††; Gervasio A. Lamas, MD, FACC**; Charles J. Mullany, MB, MS, FACC; David L. Pearle, MD, FACC, FAHA; Michael A. Sloan, MD, FACC; Sidney C. Smith, Jr, MD, FACC, FAHA§§

2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Elliott M. Antman, MD, FACC, FAHA, Chair Daniel T. Anbe, MD, FACC, FAHA Paul W. Armstrong, MD, FACC, FAHA Eric R. Bates, MD, FACC, FAHA Lee A. Green, MD, MPH Mary Hand, MSPH, RN, FAHA Judith S. Hochman, MD, FACC, FAHA Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, FACC, FAHA Frederick G. Kushner, MD, FACC, FAHA

Intensive Intraoperative Insulin Therapy versus Conventional Glucose Management during Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Trial

Context Intensive insulin therapy used to maintain normoglycemia during intensive care after cardiac surgery improves perioperative outcomes. Its effect during cardiac surgery is unknown. Contributions The authors randomly assigned 400 cardiac surgical patients to tight glycemic control (blood glucose level, 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L [80 to 100 mg/dL]) during surgery or usual intraoperative care. All patients received tight glycemic control in the cardiac intensive care unit. The groups had the same risk for perioperative adverse events (risk ratio, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.2]). The intensive treatment group had more strokes (8 vs. 1) and more deaths (4 vs. 0) than the conventional treatment group. Caution The authors performed the study at a single center. Implications Maintaining normoglycemia during cardiac surgery does not improve outcomes and might worsen them. The Editors Hyperglycemia occurs frequently in patients with and without diabetes during cardiac surgery, especially during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery (1, 2). In a study by Van den Berghe and colleagues (3), intensive insulin therapy after surgery reduced morbidity and death in critically ill patients, most of whom underwent cardiac surgery. As a result, professional organizations have recommended rigorous glycemic control in hospitalized patients (4) and strict glycemic control is now routine practice during the postoperative period in cardiac surgical patients. However, no consensus exists on the optimal management of intraoperative hyperglycemia in cardiac surgical patients because of the lack of evidence from randomized trials. Researchers are increasingly extrapolating evidence from studies that assess the role of strict postoperative glycemic control in critically ill patients to advocate for intravenous insulin therapy for patients in the operating room (3, 57). Evidence, strictly from observational studies, suggests that tight intraoperative glycemic control may reduce postoperative complications (810). We recently reported, in a retrospective, observational study of 409 cardiac surgical patients, that intraoperative hyperglycemia was an independent risk factor for perioperative complications, including death, after adjustment for postoperative glucose concentrations. Each 1.1-mmol/L (20 mg/dL) increase in glucose concentration greater than 5.6 mmol/L (>100 mg/dL) during surgery was associated with a 34% increase in the likelihood of postoperative complications (8). An association between intraoperative hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes based on observational studies does not prove causality. Because hyperglycemia can adversely affect immunity, wound healing, and vascular function, the concept that normoglycemia be maintained during the relatively brief duration of cardiac surgery seems plausible (1116). On the other hand, the degree of intraoperative hyperglycemia may merely reflect the severity of underlying stress. If so, prevention of hyperglycemia might not reduce perioperative complications, and the risks and costs of intensive intraoperative glycemic management may outweigh the benefits. Simple, safe, and effective insulin infusion algorithms that achieve rigorous intraoperative glycemic control are lacking. To address these questions, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial at 1 center to determine whether maintenance of near normoglycemia during cardiac surgery by using intraoperative intravenous insulin infusion reduced perioperative death and morbidity when added to rigorous postoperative glycemic control. Methods Design Overview This was a randomized, open-label, controlled trial with blinded assessment. We randomly assigned patients to receive intensive insulin therapy to maintain intraoperative glucose levels between 4.4 (80 mg/dL) and 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) or conventional treatment. By design, both groups were postoperatively treated with strict glycemic control to ensure that the observed difference in outcome could be attributed to the effects of intraoperative glycemic control. Setting We performed the study at St. Marys Hospital, Rochester, Minnesota, which is a tertiary care teaching hospital with 1157 beds and an average of more than 41000 admissions per year. Participants Adults undergoing elective cardiac surgery between July 2004 and April 2005 were eligible for enrollment in our study. We excluded patients who had off-pump cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. The Mayo Foundation Institutional Review Board, Rochester, Minnesota, approved the protocol. Randomization and Interventions Before we enrolled patients in our randomized trial, we enrolled 20 patients in a 2-week pilot trial to ensure that the anesthesiologists in the operating room and the nursing staff in the intensive care units (ICUs) had adequate experience with the study insulin infusion algorithm. The 20 patients received intensive insulin therapy during surgery and for 24 hours after surgery. The pilot period data allowed us to modify the graded insulin infusion to achieve desired glucose concentration goals. We built safety features into our infusion protocol to minimize hypoglycemia. We discontinued the infusion when glucose levels were less than 4.4 mmol/L (<80 mg/dL) and initiated dextrose infusion. When glucose levels decreased to less than 3.3 mmol/L (<60 mg/dL), we treated hypoglycemia according to a standardized hypoglycemia protocol. Per protocol, patients treated in the pilot phase were not included in the analyzed cohort. Study coordinators obtained written informed consent from all patients who met eligibility criteria. We randomly assigned patients to receive intensive or conventional intraoperative insulin therapy. Randomization was computer-generated with permuted blocks of 4, with stratification according to surgeon, surgical procedure (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG] with or without other procedures and no CABG), and diabetes. The randomization assignments were concealed in opaque, sealed, tamper-proof envelopes that were opened sequentially by study personnel after participants signed the patient consent form. We could not possibly know, before obtaining consent, the few patients who would not have intraoperative hyperglycemia (glucose concentration of 5.6 mmol/L or more [100 mg/dL]). Therefore, per protocol, patients who gave consent were randomly assigned, and those whose glucose levels were less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) during surgery were not included in the final analyses. Intraoperative Period Intensive Treatment Patients in the intensive treatment group received a continuous intravenous insulin infusion, 250 units of NovoLin R (Novo Nordisk, Princeton, New Jersey) in 250 mL of 0.45% sodium chloride, when their blood glucose levels exceeded 5.6 mmol/L (>100 mg/dL). We adjusted the infusions to maintain blood glucose levels between 4.4 (80 mg/dL) and 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL). We adjusted the dose according to a standardized algorithm used by anesthesiologists (Appendix Table 1). Appendix Table 1. Insulin Infusion Protocol* Conventional Treatment Patients in the conventional treatment group did not receive insulin during surgery unless their glucose levels exceeded 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL). If glucose concentration was between 11.1 (200 mg/dL) and 13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL), patients received an intravenous bolus of 4 units insulin every hour until the glucose concentration was less than 11.1 mmol/L (<200 mg/dL). If the intraoperative glucose concentration was greater than 13.9 mmol/L (>250 mg/dL), patients received an intravenous infusion of insulin that was continued until the glucose level was less than 8.3 mmol/L (<150 mg/dL). In both study groups, we measured arterial plasma glucose concentration every 30 minutes, starting just before anesthetic induction by using hexokinase method on a Double P Modular System (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana). Intraoperative procedures, including cardiopulmonary bypass, monitoring, laboratory testing, and treatment, were left to the discretion of anesthesiologists and cardiac surgeons. There was no standard protocol for monitoring and managing intraoperative potassium levels. Postoperative Period Intravenous insulin infusion was started in patients in the conventional treatment group on their arrival in the ICU. Thereafter, both study groups were treated identically, with the intravenous insulin infusion rates adjusted by a nursing staff that was not involved with the study according to a standard protocol. The target blood glucose range was 4.4 (80 mg/dL) to 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) (Appendix Table 1). Arterial blood glucose levels were measured every 1 to 2 hours by using the Accu-Check Inform blood glucose monitoring system (glucometer) (Roche Diagnostics). During the first 24 hours after surgery, patients were given only clear liquids by mouth; we did not administer subcutaneous insulin or oral diabetic medications during this time. Thereafter, the hospital diabetes consulting service saw all patients and provided individualized recommendations for ongoing care. Outcomes and Measurements The primary outcome variable was a composite of death, sternal wound infections, prolonged pulmonary ventilation, cardiac arrhythmias (new-onset atrial fibrillation, heart block requiring permanent pacemaker, or cardiac arrest), stroke, and acute renal failure within 30 days after surgery. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay in the ICU and hospital. Trained study personnel identified the occurrence of a complication through chart abstraction by using confirmable, objective criteria in accordance with standardized definitions from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database committee (17). Personnel who assessed outcomes were not aware of patient treatment assignment or of the study hypothesis. Follow-up Procedures We contacted patients by telephone and used a standardized telephone survey at 30 days after surgery to assess outcomes that occurred after discharge. We considered pat

Intraoperative Hyperglycemia and Perioperative Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery Patients

OBJECTIVE To estimate the magnitude of association between intraoperative hyperglycemia and perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent cardiac surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study of consecutive adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery between June 10, 2002, and August 30, 2002, at the Mayo Clinic, a tertiary care center in Rochester, Minn. The primary independent variable was the mean intraoperative glucose concentration. The primary end point was a composite of death and infectious (sternal wound, urinary tract, sepsis), neurologic (stroke, coma, delirium), renal (acute renal failure), cardiac (new-onset atrial fibrillation, heart block, cardiac arrest), and pulmonary (prolonged pulmonary ventilation, pneumonia) complications developing within 30 days after cardiac surgery. RESULTS Among 409 patients who underwent cardiac surgery, those experiencing a primary end point were more likely to be male and older, have diabetes mellitus, undergo coronary artery bypass grafting, and receive insulin during surgery (P< or =.05 for all comparisons). Atrial fibrillation (n=105), prolonged pulmonary ventilation (n=53), delirium (n=22), and urinary tract infection (n=16) were the most common complications. The initial, mean, and maximal intraoperative glucose concentrations were significantly higher in patients experiencing the primary end point (P<.01 for all comparisons). In multivariable analyses, mean and maximal glucose levels remained significantly associated with outcomes after adjusting for potentially confounding variables, including postoperative glucose concentration. Logistic regression analyses indicated that a 20-mg/dL increase in the mean intraoperative glucose level was associated with an increase of more than 30% in outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence Interval, 1.10-1.62). CONCLUSION Intraoperative hyperglycemia is an independent risk factor for complications, including death, after cardiac surgery.

Glucose requirements following burn injury. Parameters of optimal glucose infusion and possible hepatic and respiratory abnormalities following excessive glucose intake.

Glucose and leucine metabolism in 18 severely burned patients were studied using the primed constant infusion of U-13C-glucose and l-13C-leucine, respectively. The leucine data were used to calculate rates of whole-body protein synthesis. In four additional burn patients and seven normal controls, the effects of exogenously infused insulin on the metabolism of infused glucose were evaluated. Also, the effect on leucine metabolism of adding insulin to infused glucose was tested and rates of protein synthesis were calculated. The protein studies were divided into two groups depending on the rate of glucose infusion. Protein synthesis was 4.3 + 0.54 g protein/kg/day during the lower infusion rates (1.4–4.5 mg/kg/min) and 5.17 + 0.19 g protein/kg/day during the higher infusion rates (4.7–9.3 mg/kg/min) (statistically different, p < 0.05). However, when the high infusion rate group was divided into two subgroups (high, 4.7–6.8 mg/kg/min, and very high, 7.03–9.31 mg/kg/min), there was no difference in the rate of protein synthesis. When U-13C-glucose was infused during varying rates of unlabeled glucose infusion, we found that the per cent of CO2 coming from the direct oxidation of glucose rose rapidly at the lower infusion rates but reached a plateau at approximately 55% as the infusion rates exceeded 5 mg/kg/min. Addition of insulin did not affect the rate of glucose oxidation but did seem to exert a stimulatory effect on protein synthesis. It was concluded that there appears to be a maximal rate of glucose infusion, beyond which physiologically significant increases in protein synthesis and direct oxidation of glucose cannot be expected. Furthermore, there appears to be a physiological cost of exceeding the optimal glucose infusion rate, as indicated by increased rates of CO2 production during infusion as well as large fat deposits in the liver at autopsy in patients infused with large amounts of glucose.

Surgery for aneurysms of the aortic root: A 30-year experience

Background—This study evaluated long-term results of aortic root replacement and valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction for patients with aneurysms involving the aortic root. Methods and Results—Two-hundred three patients aged 53±16 years (mean±SD; 153 male, 50 female) underwent elective or urgent aortic root surgery from 1971 to 2000 for an aortic root aneurysm: 149 patients underwent a composite valve conduit reconstruction, and 54 patients underwent valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction. Fifty patients had Marfan syndrome. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 4.0% (8/203) overall: for a composite valve conduit procedure, the corresponding value was 4.0% (6/149) and for valve-preserving procedure, 3.7% (2/54) (P=NS). Morbidity included 3 strokes (1%), 10 perioperative myocardial infarctions (5%), and 8 reoperations for bleeding (4%). Actuarial survival at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88% to 97%), 79% (95% CI = 71% to 87%), 67% (95% CI = 57% to 79%), and 52% (95% CI = 36% to 69%), respectively. Freedom from reoperation was 72% (95% CI = 54% to 86%) at 20 years. Complications with anticoagulation occurred in 29 patients; with valve thrombosis, in 2; and with hemorrhage, in 27 (4 life threatening and 23 minor). Freedom from thromboembolism was 91% (95% CI = 77% to 98%) at 20 years. Freedom from endocarditis was 99% (95% CI = 92% to 100%) at 20 years. Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative mitral valve regurgitation (+3 to 4) and older age to be significant predictors of late death (P≤0.005), and Marfan syndrome, initial valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction, and need for a concomitant procedure at initial operation to be significant predictors of the need for reoperation (P≤0.01). Conclusions—Aortic root replacement for aortic root aneurysms can be done with low morbidity and mortality. Composite valve conduit reconstruction resulted in a durable result. There were few serious complications related to the need for long-term anticoagulation or a prosthetic valve. Reoperation was most commonly required because of failure of the aortic valve when a valve-preserving aortic root reconstruction was performed or for other cardiac or aortic disease elsewhere.

Preoperative Aspirin Therapy Is Associated With Improved Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Background—Aspirin is beneficial in the setting of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. There are limited data evaluating preoperative aspirin administration preceding coronary artery bypass grafting and associated postoperative outcomes. Methods and Results—Using prospectively collected data from 1636 consecutive patients undergoing first-time isolated coronary artery bypass surgery at our institution from January 2000 through December 2002, we evaluated the association between aspirin usage within the 5 days preceding coronary bypass surgery and risk of adverse in-hospital postoperative events. A logistic regression model, which included propensity scores, was used to adjust for remaining differences between groups. Overall, there were 36 deaths (2.2%) and 48 adverse cerebrovascular events (2.9%) in the postoperative hospitalization period. Patients receiving preoperative aspirin (n=1316) had significantly lower postoperative in-hospital mortality compared with those not receiving preoperative aspirin [1.7% versus 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.75; P=0.007]. Rates of postoperative cerebrovascular events were similar between groups (2.7% versus 3.8%; adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.32 to 1.50; P=0.31). Preoperative aspirin therapy was not associated with an increased risk of reoperation for bleeding (3.5% versus 3.4%; P=0.96) or requirement for postoperative blood product transfusion (adjusted OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.54; P=0.28). Conclusions—Aspirin usage within the 5 days preceding coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with a lower risk of postoperative in-hospital mortality and appears to be safe without an associated increased risk of reoperation for bleeding or need for blood product transfusion.

Severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: Clinical profile and prognostic implications

OBJECTIVES We analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 47 patients with severe pulmonary hypertension (PHT) and severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) from 1987 to 1999. BACKGROUND The prognostic implications of severe pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe AS are poorly understood. METHODS The mean age of patients was 78 years (range 47 to 91 years), and 37 patients (79%) were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 37 patients (79%) and 10 patients (21%) were treated conservatively. RESULTS In the group that had AVR, there were six perioperative deaths (16%) and nine late deaths, resulting in a total mortality of 32%. In the conservatively treated group, there were eight deaths (80%) on follow-up. Severe PHT was an independent predictor of perioperative mortality. However, perioperative mortality was independent of the severity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction or concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Aortic valve replacement was associated with significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, the severity of PHT and NYHA functional class. The difference between long-term survival of the operative survivors and the expected survival from life tables was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The prognosis for patients with AS and severe PHT treated conservatively without AVR is dismal. Although AVR is associated with higher than usual mortality, the potential benefits outweigh the risk of surgery.

Survival After Resection of Primary Cardiac Tumors A 48-Year Experience

Background— Primary cardiac tumors are rare but have the potential to cause significant morbidity if not treated in an appropriate and timely manner. To date, however, there have been no studies examining survival characteristics of patients who undergo surgical resection. Methods and Results— From 1957 to 2006, 323 consecutive patients underwent surgical resection of primary cardiac tumors; 163 (50%) with myxomas, 83 (26%) with papillary fibroelastomas, 18 (6%) with fibromas, 12 (4%) with lipomas, 28 (9%) with other benign primary cardiac tumors, and 19 (6%) with primary malignant tumors. Operative (30 day) mortality was 2% (n=6). Univariate analysis indicated that patients who underwent resection of fibromas and myxomas had superior survival characteristics in comparison to the remainder of tumor variants; these results were consistent after adjusting for age at surgery, year of surgery, and cardiovascular risk factors. Based on actuarial characteristics of the 2002 U.S. population, patients who underwent myxoma resection had survival characteristics that were not significantly different from that of an age and gender matched population (SMR 1.11, P=0.57) whereas those who underwent resection of fibromas (SMR 11.17, P=0.002), papillary fibroelastomas (SMR 3.17, P=0.0003), lipomas (SMR 5.0, P=0.0003), other benign tumors (SMR 4.63, P=0.003), and malignant tumors (SMR 101, P<0.0001) had significantly poorer survival characteristics. Furthermore, malignant tumors in younger patients were highly fatal (HR 0.899, P<0.0001). Although the most significant predictor of mortality was tumor histology, survival was also influenced the by the duration of CPB and NYHA III/IV; the impact of these risk factors varied with time. The cumulative incidence of myxoma recurrence was 13% and occurred in a younger population (42 versus 57 years, P=0.003) with the risk of recurrence decreased after 4 years. Conclusions— Surgical resection of primary cardiac tumors is associated with excellent long-term survival; patients with cardiac myxomas have survival characteristics that are not significantly different from that of a general population. Predictors of mortality are primarily related to tumor histology but also include clinical characteristics such as symptomatology and duration of CPB.

Determinants of survival and recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement

To determine factors that influence survival and recovery of ventricular function in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement in the current surgical era, baseline risk factors related to outcome were analyzed in 1,012 consecutive patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1983 and 1990. Forty-two percent of patients underwent concomitant coronary bypass. Observed survival probabilities (expressed as 30-day/5-year) were 0.97/0.81 overall, 0.99/0.89 for patients aged less than 70 years, and 0.95/0.74 for patients aged 70 years or greater. Advanced age (p < 0.0001), decreased ejection fraction (p < 0.0001), extent of coronary disease (p < 0.006), smaller prosthetic valve (p < 0.03), and advanced New York Heart Association class (p < 0.04) were incremental risk factors for mortality. In patients with preoperative ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < or = 0.45), ejection fraction measured 1.4 years after aortic valve replacement improved in 72% and the mean increment in ejection fraction was 0.175 (95% confidence interval, 0.154 to 0.195). The increment in ejection fraction was greater in female patients than in male patients (p < 0.02) and greater in patients without than with coronary disease (p < 0.02). Female sex (p < 0.02) and lesser extent of coronary disease (p < 0.05) were independent predictors of change in ejection fraction. In all patients, early improvement in ejection fraction conveyed an independent subsequent survival benefit (p < 0.0001). The results of aortic valve replacement in the current era are excellent, and the majority of patients with ventricular dysfunction demonstrate significant improvement. Early improvement in ejection fraction, influenced by coexistent coronary artery disease and sex-associated factors, importantly affects subsequent survival.