Charles L. Beall

Ondansetron for nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and tolerability of ondansetron 8 mg twice daily for 3 days with placebo in preventing nausea and vomiting in 81 patients receiving cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The first dose of study drug was administered 30 minutes before the initiation of chemotherapy. Patients received a rescue antiemetic if the investigator deemed it necessary or if the patient experienced more than two emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Sixty-one percent of patients treated with ondansetron compared with 6% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001) had no emetic episodes during the 3-day study. Among patients with at least one emetic episode, the mean time to emesis was 24 hours 18 minutes in the ondansetron group compared with 8 hours 1 minute in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In the intent-to-treat analysis, 78% of patients in the ondansetron group and 29% of patients in the placebo group completed the study with no need for rescue therapy. Clinical laboratory and adverse-event profiles were similar between groups. The most common adverse event was headache, occurring in 23% of ondansetron patients and 24% of placebo patients. This study is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to demonstrate that ondansetron 8 mg twice daily is effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-based chemotherapy. The twice-daily regimen may encourage patient compliance and may be more cost-effective than regimens that need to be given three times daily.

Dose-dense vinorelbine and docetaxel with Filgrastim support in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma†

Vinorelbine and docetaxel are active single agents in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and may provide enhanced activity when combined in a dose‐dense fashion. The efficacy and safety of this combination was assessed when it was administered every 14 days with Filgrastim support in a community practice setting.

Thiotepa and fractionated TBI conditioning prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation for advanced hematologic malignancies: a phase II single institution trial.

Summary:Relapse of hematologic malignancies after allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains a common problem, in particular for patients who have advanced disease at the time of transplantation. Thiotepa has excellent antileukemic and immunosuppressive activity, and could therefore be a useful drug in the conditioning regimen for patients with advanced hematologic neoplasms. We retrospectively analyzed toxicity, engraftment and survival data of 41 patients who received a conditioning regimen of thiotepa (600 mg/m2) and hyperfractionated TBI (10 Gy) prior to matched related (n=25) or matched unrelated (n=16) allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The mean age at transplantation was 37.8 years (range 20–59), all but five patients had advanced hematologic malignancies at the time of transplantation. GVHD prophylaxis was with standard cyclosporine and methotrexate. Engraftment was excellent, but the regimen was associated with a high incidence of grade III renal (41%) and hepatic (15%) toxicity, and high transplant-related mortality (44% at day +90). The 3-year event-free survival was 13% and overall survival 14%. We conclude that this regimen requires modification to reduce toxicity.

High-Dose Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin’s Disease: Outcome Based on a Prognostic Model

We evaluated the results of high-dose therapy (HDT) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with relapsed or primary refractory Hodgkin’s disease (HD), using a previously reported prognostic model based on the presence of three poor prognostic factors at the start of salvage therapy/preparative regimen: B symptoms, extranodal disease and the duration of last complete response of less than 1 year. Based on this model, the patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups. Between 1993 and 2001, 24 patients with HD were treated with HDT and ASCT. Eighteen of the 24 patients had 0–1 risk factors (low-risk group) and 6 patients had 2–3 risk factors (high-risk group). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, after a median follow-up of 40.5 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) was 48%, and the overall survival (OS) was 55%. PFS in the low-risk group was 56%, and in the high-risk group 17% (p < 0.001). OS in the low-risk group was 68% and in the high-risk group it was 18% (p < 0.001). The 100-day transplant-related mortality for the entire group was 16%. Our results are comparable to those reported in previous clinical trials for patients with refractory and relapsed HD treated with HDT and ASCT. The use of a prognostic model appears useful for predicting the outcome of HDT and ASCT for HD patients, and may play an important role in choosing the appropriate therapy for these patients.