Solveig G. Ericson

Zoledronic acid effectively prevents aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole: Z-FAST study 36-month follow-up results.

BACKGROUND Postmenopausal women with breast cancer receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are at risk for accelerated bone loss and subsequent fractures. The ongoing Zometa-Femara Adjuvant Synergy Trial (Z-FAST) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in preventing such bone loss. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter study, postmenopausal women with early hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole were randomized to receive up-front or delayed-start zoledronic acid (ZA; 4 mg intravenously every 6 months) for 5 years. Delayed-start ZA was administered if the lumbar spine (LS) or total hip (TH) T score fell below -2.0 or a nontraumatic fracture occurred. The primary endpoint was to compare the change from baseline in LS bone mineral density (BMD) between groups at month 12; secondary endpoints, measured at other predetermined timepoints, included comparing changes in TH BMD, LS BMD, and markers of bone turnover, fracture incidence, and time to disease recurrence. Herein, we report the results of the 36-month interim analysis. RESULTS Overall, 301 patients were randomized to each group. At month 36, the absolute difference in mean LS and TH BMDs between the up-front and delayed groups was 6.7% and 5.2%, respectively (P < .0001 for both). Although this study was not designed to show antifracture efficacy, the incidence of fractures was slightly higher in the delayed group (up-front, 17 [5.7%] vs. delayed, 19 [6.3%]) but not statistically significant (P = .8638). Pyrexia (27 [9%] vs. 6 [2%]; P = .0002) and bone pain (39 [13%] vs. 20 [6.7%]; P = .01) were more common in up-front patients; cough (13 [4.3%] vs. 27 [9%]; P = .03) was more common in delayed patients. No severe renal dysfunction or confirmed cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw were reported. Disease recurrence was reported in 9 up-front (3.0%) and 16 delayed (5.3%) patients (Kaplan-Meier analysis, P = .127), with an absolute decrease of 2.3%. CONCLUSION Up-front ZA more effectively prevents AI-associated bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer than delaying therapy until substantial bone loss or fracture occurs.

Integrated analysis of zoledronic acid for prevention of aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant letrozole

BACKGROUND The interim (12-month) results of two similarly designed, ongoing studies (the Zometa-Femara Adjuvant Synergy Trials [Z-FAST and ZO-FAST]) suggest that zoledronic acid (4 mg intravenously every 6 months) when initiated with adjuvant letrozole increases bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (LS) in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer compared with patients who receive zoledronic acid only when bone loss became clinically significant or a fragility fracture occurred. METHODS An integrated analysis was performed to maximize the value of the large pool of data from the two studies in answering clinically relevant questions. The primary objective was to compare the change in LS BMD at month 12. Secondary objectives included comparing (a) the change in total hip (TH) BMD, (b) changes in bone turnover marker concentrations, (c) time to disease recurrence, and (d) safety at month 12. FINDINGS The integrated analysis included 1,667 patients. At month 12, LS BMD was 5.2% higher in the upfront group than in the delayed group; TH BMD was 3.5% higher. N-telopeptide and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase concentrations decreased by 21.3% and 12.8% in the upfront group and increased by 21.7% and 24.9% in the delayed group, respectively (p < .0001 for intergroup comparisons). Fewer patients receiving upfront zoledronic acid experienced disease recurrence than patients in the delayed group-seven patients (0.84%) versus 17 patients (1.9%) (p = .0401). Fracture rates were similar. No confirmed osteonecrosis of the jaw was reported. CONCLUSIONS The results of this analysis strengthen the statistical validity of the preliminary results of the Z-FAST and ZO-FAST studies, showing that upfront zoledronic acid prevents aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss more effectively than delayed-start zoledronic acid in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer receiving letrozole. Additionally, disease recurrence appears to be lower with upfront zoledronic acid, but further follow-up is needed to confirm these interim results.

Final 5-year results of Z-FAST trial: adjuvant zoledronic acid maintains bone mass in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving letrozole.

Postmenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy are at risk of progressive bone loss and fractures. Zoledronic acid inhibits osteoclastic bone resorption, is effective in maintaining bone health, and may therefore be beneficial in this setting.

The Effect of Zoledronic Acid on Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Letrozole: The Z-FAST Study 5-Year Final Follow-Up.

Background: Aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy effectively increases disease-free survival in postmenopausal women (PMW) with ER+ and/or PR+ breast cancer (BCa). However, the use of AIs results in nearly complete ablation of estrogen production which can lead to accelerated bone loss and increased fracture risk. The Z-FAST study evaluated the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in preventing AI associated bone loss in PMW with early breast cancer (EBC) who received adjuvant letrozole (LET).Material and Methods: 602 PMW with stage I-IIIa ER+ and/or PR+ BCa starting LET (2.5 mg qd x 5 yrs) were randomized (1:1) to upfront ZOL (4 mg IV q 6 mos) vs delayed ZOL. The delayed arm (D) received ZOL when either the post-baseline T-score decreased to -1), and no U pts as compared to 4.9%(4) D pts became severely osteopenic (T Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4083.

Association between molecular monitoring and long-term outcomes in chronic myelogenous leukemia patients treated with first line imatinib

Abstract Objective: Molecular monitoring using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of BCR-ABL mRNA transcripts using the international scale (IS) is recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European LeukemiaNet for patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP). This study assessed the impact of the frequency of qPCR testing on progression-free survival (PFS). Research design and methods: This retrospective chart review of 402 CML-CP patients on first line imatinib therapy, performed by 38 community-based US physicians, analyzed the impact of the frequency of molecular monitoring on the risk of progression and PFS. Main outcome measures: Time to progression and progression-free survival. Results: Over the 3 year study, 13.2% of patients did not have any qPCR monitoring and 46.3% had 3–4 qPCR tests per year; 5.7% of CML-CP patients progressed to accelerated/blast phase or died. Compared to patients with no qPCR monitoring, those with 3–4 qPCR tests per year had a lower risk of progression (HR = 0.085; p = 0.001) and longer PFS (HR = 0.088; p = 0.001) after adjusting for potential confounders, as did those patients with 1–2 qPCR tests per year (both p < 0.02). Results were consistent after adjusting for Sokal score when available. Conclusion: This is the first study to document the clinical impact of frequent molecular monitoring, and the findings underscore the importance of regular molecular monitoring in delivering quality care for CML. These findings could be subject to unobserved confounders.

Multicenter, randomized, phase 2 study of zoledronic acid in combination with docetaxel and carboplatin in patients with unresectable stage IIIB or stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined zoledronic acid and docetaxel/carboplatin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as preclinical studies showed synergistic antitumoral activity with bisphosphonates and docetaxel. Patients with inoperable stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC were randomized 2:1 to receive docetaxel 75mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the concentration time curve 6 with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) zoledronic acid 4mg every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Patients responding in Arm A were rerandomized to receive monthly zoledronic acid (maximum: 12 months [Arm A1] or no zoledronic acid [Arm A2]). Patients responding in Arm B entered Arm B1 for follow-up evaluation only. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without disease progression; secondary endpoints were time to disease progression (TTP), TTP in bone, best overall response rate, 1-year overall survival (OS) time, and safety; study not powered to detect endpoint differences. Of 150 patients, 98 were randomized to Arm A and 52 to Arm B. In the treatment phase, results were similar between groups in the proportion of patients without disease progression (40.9% vs 38.8%; P=.8096) and median TTP (132d vs 132d; P=.9622). One-year OS times and best overall response rates were 266d vs 206d (P=.4855) and 64.1% vs 72% (P=.3423), respectively; the study was not powered to detect differences. In the follow-up phase, TTP and OS time were similar. Adding zoledronic acid to docetaxel/carboplatin in advanced stage NSCLC patients was well tolerated, but provided little to no effect on disease progression endpoints.

Monitoring and switching patterns of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib in community settings: a chart review analysis.

Abstract Objectives: Monitoring treatment response is an integral part of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) treatment. The guidelines recommend regular monitoring using standard methods (e.g., real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction based on the international scale for molecular response) and treatment adjustment when failure is detected among patients treated with imatinib. The objective of this study was to assess the real-world monitoring and therapy adjustment in this patient population in the US. Methods: Twenty-nine physicians from community practices across the US participated in an online chart review. Adult patients with chronic phase CML who initiated imatinib as first-line therapy during 2006–2010 were selected. Information was collected up to 36 months after imatinib initiation, including response monitoring, response status, and therapy adjustment upon treatment failure. Results: The study included 297 eligible patients. By 18 months, 47% of patients had received cytogenetic response assessment continuously as recommended by the guidelines. The corresponding proportion was 39% for continuous molecular response assessment. Among patients who experienced treatment failure by 18 months, only 14%–38% of patients switched to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor as recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the European Leukemia Net guidelines. Limitations: Major limitations included limited generalizability and the inability to accurately assess molecular response due to the variations in testing methods during the study period. Conclusions: Based on the guidelines, the rates of treatment monitoring and switching upon failure were low, demonstrating the need for improvement in CML care in community settings in the US.

Bone Marker–Directed Dosing of Zoledronic Acid for the Prevention of Skeletal Complications in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Z-MARK Study

Purpose: Zoledronic acid (ZOL) given every 3 to 4 weeks can reduce skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with bone lesions from multiple myeloma. This study evaluated efficacy and safety of less-frequent ZOL dosing based on bone turnover markers in patients with 1 to 2 years of prior bisphosphonate therapy. Experimental Design: Patients received ZOL (4 mg) every 4 or 12 weeks based on urinary N-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (uNTX) levels (every 4 weeks if uNTX ≥50 nmol/mmol creatinine, every 12 weeks if uNTX < 50). Results: Of 121 patients enrolled (mean age, 63.8 years; median follow-up, 21 months), 4 patients started ZOL every 4 weeks and 117 received ZOL every 12 weeks based on uNTX at study entry. All 4 patients who initiated ZOL every 4 weeks switched to every 12 weeks due to decreased uNTX. Thirty-eight of 117 patients who initiated ZOL every 12 weeks switched to ZOL every 4 weeks due to disease progression (n = 20), increased uNTX (n = 14), and SREs (n = 4). Overall SRE incidence was low; 7 (5.8%) and 5 (4.9%) patients experienced an SRE during years 1 and 2, respectively. Mean (SD) SRE rate at year 2 was 0.01 (0.03) per person-year. The 2-year incidence rate for osteonecrosis of jaw was 3.3%. Four deaths were reported, none related to ZOL. Conclusions: Less frequent ZOL dosing (every 12 weeks over 2 years) maintains a low SRE rate and can be safely administered for up to 4 years. Clin Cancer Res; 22(6); 1378–84. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Fonseca and Jain, p. 1301

Assessment of treatment and monitoring patterns and subsequent outcomes among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib in a community setting

Abstract Introduction: Real-world treatment and monitoring patterns have not been well documented among imatinib-treated chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients. Thus, we evaluated these patterns and responses to imatinib in CP-CML patients. Methods: This retrospective study, based on the Georgia Cancer Specialists’ electronic medical record (EMR) system, identified CP-CML patients initiating treatment with imatinib from 01/01/2002 to 11/01/2011 who were subsequently followed for ≥6 months. Results: A total of 177 patients met the study criteria. Imatinib dose modification occurred in 59 patients (33%). Rates of treatment interruption, discontinuation, and switching to another therapy were 16%, 24%, and 23%, respectively. Of 27 patients discontinuing imatinib for lack of efficacy, 9 (33%) had initial dose escalation; 26 patients (96%) eventually switched to a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor. By 3 months, 168 patients remained on imatinib, of whom 96 (57%) had undergone cytogenetic and/or molecular testing. The frequency of response monitoring fluctuated over time, with rates as high as 28% for cytogenetic and 69% for molecular testing. Cumulative response rates steadily increased; 18 month rates were 47% for complete cytogenetic response and 26% for major or complete molecular response. There were no cases of progression and/or death among 38 patients who were regularly monitored for molecular response within the first 12 months of imatinib. Ten of 98 patients (10%) not regularly monitored had progressed or died. Conclusions: Almost one-third of patients initiating imatinib for CP-CML required dose modification, treatment interruption, or discontinuation. Opportunities for improved monitoring in this setting were identified. Limitations include those inherent to retrospective analyses based on EMR and the uncertain extrapolability of the results.

Building blocks for institutional preparation of CTL019 delivery

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an investigational immunocellular therapy that reprograms a patients cytotoxic T cells to engage and eliminate malignant cells. CAR T-cell therapies targeting the CD19 antigen have demonstrated high efficacy in clinical trials for patients with B-cell malignancies and may potentially be available on a broader scale in the future. CAR T-cell therapy begins with the collection of a sufficient number of T cells from a patients peripheral blood through leukapheresis. Several factors must be considered when patients undergo leukapheresis for CAR T-cell therapy, including age and prior therapies. The leukapheresis material is shipped to a manufacturing facility, followed by return of the CAR T cells to the treatment center. Careful coordination of a multidisciplinary team composed of physicians, nurses, pharmacists and other hospital personnel is critical for the proper care of the patient before, during and after CAR T-cell therapy. CAR T-cell therapy has been associated with adverse events (AEs) such as cytokine release syndrome, which requires rapid attention by the emergency department, intensive care unit and hospital pharmacy. In this review, we discuss several aspects of institutional preparation for leukapheresis, CAR T-cell infusion and AE management based on our experience with clinical trials of the CD19 CAR T-cell therapy CTL019.