Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Charlie E. M. Strauss is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Charlie E. M. Strauss.


Methods in Enzymology | 2004

Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta

Carol A. Rohl; Charlie E. M. Strauss; Kira M.S. Misura; David Baker

Publisher Summary This chapter elaborates protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Double-blind assessments of protein structure prediction methods have indicated that the Rosetta algorithm is perhaps the most successful current method for de novo protein structure prediction. In the Rosetta method, short fragments of known proteins are assembled by a Monte Carlo strategy to yield native-like protein conformations. Using only sequence information, successful Rosetta predictions yield models with typical accuracies of 3–6 A˚ Cα root mean square deviation (RMSD) from the experimentally determined structures for contiguous segments of 60 or more residues. For each structure prediction, many short simulations starting from different random seeds are carried out to generate an ensemble of decoy structures that have both favorable local interactions and protein-like global properties. This set is then clustered by structural similarity to identify the broadest free energy minima. The effectiveness of conformation modification operators for energy function optimization is also described in this chapter.


Protein Science | 2009

MAMMOTH (Matching molecular models obtained from theory): An automated method for model comparison

Angel R. Ortiz; Charlie E. M. Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea

Advances in structural genomics and protein structure prediction require the design of automatic, fast, objective, and well benchmarked methods capable of comparing and assessing the similarity of low‐resolution three‐dimensional structures, via experimental or theoretical approaches. Here, a new method for sequence‐independent structural alignment is presented that allows comparison of an experimental protein structure with an arbitrary low‐resolution protein tertiary model. The heuristic algorithm is given and then used to show that it can describe random structural alignments of proteins with different folds with good accuracy by an extreme value distribution. From this observation, a structural similarity score between two proteins or two different conformations of the same protein is derived from the likelihood of obtaining a given structural alignment by chance. The performance of the derived score is then compared with well established, consensus manual‐based scores and data sets. We found that the new approach correlates better than other tools with the gold standard provided by a human evaluator. Timings indicate that the algorithm is fast enough for routine use with large databases of protein models. Overall, our results indicate that the new program (MAMMOTH) will be a good tool for protein structure comparisons in structural genomics applications. MAMMOTH is available from our web site at http://physbio.mssm.edu/∼ortizg/.


Proteins | 2004

Modeling structurally variable regions in homologous proteins with rosetta

Carol A. Rohl; Charlie E. M. Strauss; Dylan Chivian; David Baker

A major limitation of current comparative modeling methods is the accuracy with which regions that are structurally divergent from homologues of known structure can be modeled. Because structural differences between homologous proteins are responsible for variations in protein function and specificity, the ability to model these differences has important functional consequences. Although existing methods can provide reasonably accurate models of short loop regions, modeling longer structurally divergent regions is an unsolved problem. Here we describe a method based on the de novo structure prediction algorithm, Rosetta, for predicting conformations of structurally divergent regions in comparative models. Initial conformations for short segments are selected from the protein structure database, whereas longer segments are built up by using three‐ and nine‐residue fragments drawn from the database and combined by using the Rosetta algorithm. A gap closure term in the potential in combination with modified Newtons method for gradient descent minimization is used to ensure continuity of the peptide backbone. Conformations of variable regions are refined in the context of a fixed template structure using Monte Carlo minimization together with rapid repacking of side‐chains to iteratively optimize backbone torsion angles and side‐chain rotamers. For short loops, mean accuracies of 0.69, 1.45, and 3.62 Å are obtained for 4, 8, and 12 residue loops, respectively. In addition, the method can provide reasonable models of conformations of longer protein segments: predicted conformations of 3Å root‐mean‐square deviation or better were obtained for 5 of 10 examples of segments ranging from 13 to 34 residues. In combination with a sequence alignment algorithm, this method generates complete, ungapped models of protein structures, including regions both similar to and divergent from a homologous structure. This combined method was used to make predictions for 28 protein domains in the Critical Assessment of Protein Structure 4 (CASP 4) and 59 domains in CASP 5, where the method ranked highly among comparative modeling and fold recognition methods. Model accuracy in these blind predictions is dominated by alignment quality, but in the context of accurate alignments, long protein segments can be accurately modeled. Notably, the method correctly predicted the local structure of a 39‐residue insertion into a TIM barrel in CASP 5 target T0186. Proteins 2004.


Proteins | 2001

Rosetta in CASP4: Progress in ab initio protein structure prediction

Richard Bonneau; Jerry Tsai; Ingo Ruczinski; Dylan Chivian; Carol A. Rohl; Charlie E. M. Strauss; David Baker

Rosetta ab initio protein structure predictions in CASP4 were considerably more consistent and more accurate than previous ab initio structure predictions. Large segments were correctly predicted (>50 residues superimposed within an RMSD of 6.5 Å) for 16 of the 21 domains under 300 residues for which models were submitted. Models with the global fold largely correct were produced for several targets with new folds, and for several difficult fold recognition targets, the Rosetta models were more accurate than those produced with traditional fold recognition models. These promising results suggest that Rosetta may soon be able to contribute to the interpretation of genome sequence information. Proteins 2001;Suppl 5:119–126.


Journal of Molecular Biology | 2002

De Novo Prediction of Three-dimensional Structures for Major Protein Families

Richard Bonneau; Charlie E. M. Strauss; Carol A. Rohl; Dylan Chivian; Phillip Bradley; Lars Malmström; Tim Robertson; David Baker

We use the Rosetta de novo structure prediction method to produce three-dimensional structure models for all Pfam-A sequence families with average length under 150 residues and no link to any protein of known structure. To estimate the reliability of the predictions, the method was calibrated on 131 proteins of known structure. For approximately 60% of the proteins one of the top five models was correctly predicted for 50 or more residues, and for approximately 35%, the correct SCOP superfamily was identified in a structure-based search of the Protein Data Bank using one of the models. This performance is consistent with results from the fourth critical assessment of structure prediction (CASP4). Correct and incorrect predictions could be partially distinguished using a confidence function based on a combination of simulation convergence, protein length and the similarity of a given structure prediction to known protein structures. While the limited accuracy and reliability of the method precludes definitive conclusions, the Pfam models provide the only tertiary structure information available for the 12% of publicly available sequences represented by these large protein families.


Physical Review Letters | 2008

Ultracold Triplet Molecules in the Rovibrational Ground State

Florian Lang; K. Winkler; Charlie E. M. Strauss; R. Grimm; J. Hecker Denschlag

We report here on the production of an ultracold gas of tightly bound Rb2 triplet molecules in the rovibrational ground state, close to quantum degeneracy. This is achieved by optically transferring weakly bound Rb2 molecules to the absolute lowest level of the ground triplet potential with a transfer efficiency of about 90%. The transfer takes place in a 3D optical lattice which traps a sizeable fraction of the tightly bound molecules with a lifetime exceeding 200 ms.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2008

Emergence of symmetry in homooligomeric biological assemblies

Ingemar André; Charlie E. M. Strauss; David B. Kaplan; Philip Bradley; David Baker

Naturally occurring homooligomeric protein complexes exhibit striking internal symmetry. The evolutionary origins of this symmetry have been the subject of considerable speculation; proposals for the advantages associated with symmetry include greater folding efficiency, reduced aggregation, amenability to allosteric regulation, and greater adaptability. An alternative possibility stems from the idea that to contribute to fitness, and hence be subject to evolutionary optimization, a complex must be significantly populated, which implies that the interaction energy between monomers in the ancestors of modern-day complexes must have been sufficient to at least partially overcome the entropic cost of association. Here, we investigate the effects of this bias toward very-low-energy complexes on the distribution of symmetry in primordial homooligomers modeled as randomly interacting pairs of monomers. We demonstrate quantitatively that a bias toward very-low-energy complexes can result in the emergence of symmetry from random ensembles in which the overall frequency of symmetric complexes is vanishingly small. This result is corroborated by using explicit protein–protein docking calculations to generate ensembles of randomly docked complexes: the fraction of these that are symmetric increases from 0.02% in the overall population to >50% in very low energy subpopulations.


PLOS ONE | 2011

Generalized Fragment Picking in Rosetta: Design, Protocols and Applications

Dominik Gront; Daniel W. Kulp; Robert M. Vernon; Charlie E. M. Strauss; David Baker

The Rosetta de novo structure prediction and loop modeling protocols begin with coarse grained Monte Carlo searches in which the moves are based on short fragments extracted from a database of known structures. Here we describe a new object oriented program for picking fragments that greatly extends the functionality of the previous program (nnmake) and opens the door for new approaches to structure modeling. We provide a detailed description of the code design and architecture, highlighting its modularity, and new features such as extensibility, total control over the fragment picking workflow and scoring system customization. We demonstrate that the program provides at least as good building blocks for ab-initio structure prediction as the previous program, and provide examples of the wide range of applications that are now accessible.


Proteins | 2001

Improving the performance of Rosetta using multiple sequence alignment information and global measures of hydrophobic core formation

Richard Bonneau; Charlie E. M. Strauss; David Baker

This study explores the use of multiple sequence alignment (MSA) information and global measures of hydrophobic core formation for improving the Rosetta ab initio protein structure prediction method. The most effective use of the MSA information is achieved by carrying out independent folding simulations for a subset of the homologous sequences in the MSA and then identifying the free energy minima common to all folded sequences via simultaneous clustering of the independent folding runs. Global measures of hydrophobic core formation, using ellipsoidal rather than spherical representations of the hydrophobic core, are found to be useful in removing non‐native conformations before cluster analysis. Through this combination of MSA information and global measures of protein core formation, we significantly increase the performance of Rosetta on a challenging test set. Proteins 2001;43:1–11.


Journal of Computational Chemistry | 2005

Practical conversion from torsion space to Cartesian space for in silico protein synthesis

Jerod Parsons; J. Bradley Holmes; J. Maurice Rojas; Jerry Tsai; Charlie E. M. Strauss

Many applications require a method for translating a large list of bond angles and bond lengths to precise atomic Cartesian coordinates. This simple but computationally consuming task occurs ubiquitously in modeling proteins, DNA, and other polymers as well as in many other fields such as robotics. To find an optimal method, algorithms can be compared by a number of operations, speed, intrinsic numerical stability, and parallelization. We discuss five established methods for growing a protein backbone by serial chain extension from bond angles and bond lengths. We introduce the Natural Extension Reference Frame (NeRF) method developed for Rosettas chain extension subroutine, as well as an improved implementation. In comparison to traditional two‐step rotations, vector algebra, or Quaternion product algorithms, the NeRF algorithm is superior for this application: it requires 47% fewer floating point operations, demonstrates the best intrinsic numerical stability, and offers prospects for parallel processor acceleration. The NeRF formalism factors the mathematical operations of chain extension into two independent terms with orthogonal subsets of the dependent variables; the apparent irreducibility of these factors hint that the minimal operation set may have been identified. Benchmarks are made on Intel Pentium and Motorola PowerPC CPUs.

Collaboration


Dive into the Charlie E. M. Strauss's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Baker

University of Washington

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

H. C. Bryant

University of New Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. Funk

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Xin Miao Zhao

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

D. C. Rislove

Saint Mary's College of California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

W. Miller

University of New Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

G. A. Kyrala

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Ramesh K. Jha

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

William B. Ingalls

Los Alamos National Laboratory

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge