Chin B. Eap

Response to antiretroviral treatment in HIV-1-infected individuals with allelic variants of the multidrug resistance transporter 1: a pharmacogenetics study

BACKGROUND HIV-1-infected patients vary considerably by their response to antiretroviral treatment, drug concentrations in plasma, toxic events, and rate of immune recovery. This variability could have a genetic basis. We did a pharmacogenetics study to analyse the association between response to antiretroviral treatment and allelic variants of several genes. METHODS In 123 patients, we did PCR analyses of the gene for the multidrug-resistance transporter (MDR1), which codes for P-glycoprotein, of genes coding for isoenzymes of cytochrome P450, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19, and of the gene for the chemokine receptor CCR5. We measured concentrations in plasma of the antiretroviral agents efavirenz and nelfinavir by high-performance liquid-chromatography, and measured levels of P-glycoprotein expression, CD4-cell count, and HIV-1 viraemia. FINDINGS Median drug concentrations in patients with the MDR1 3435 TT, CT, and CC genotypes were at the 30th, 50th, and 75th percentiles, respectively (p=0.0001). In patients with CYP2D6 extensive-metaboliser or poor-metaboliser alleles, median drug concentrations were at percentiles 45 and 62.5, respectively (p=0.04). Patients with the MDR1 TT genotype 6 months after starting treatment had a greater rise in CD4-cell count (257 cells/microL) than patients with the CT (165 cells/microL) and CC (121 cells/microL) genotype (p=0.0048), and the best recovery of naïve CD4-cells. INTERPRETATION The polymorphism MDR1 3435 C/T predicts immune recovery after initiation of antiretroviral treatment. This finding suggests that P-glycoprotein has an important role in admittance of antiretroviral drugs to restricted compartments in vivo.

Risk-benefit balance assessment of SSRI antidepressant use during pregnancy and lactation based on best available evidence.

Introduction: Psychiatric disorders are among the leading causes of disability in Western societies. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are the most frequently prescribed antidepressant drugs during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Over the last decade, conflicting findings regarding the safety of SSRI drugs during pregnancy and lactation have questioned whether such treatments should be used during this period. Areas covered: We discuss the main criteria that should be considered in the risk/benefit assessment of SSRI treatment in pregnant and/or breastfeeding patients (i.e., risks associated with SSRI use and with untreated depression as well as therapeutic benefits of SSRI and some alternative treatment strategies). For each criterion, available evidence has been synthesized and stratified by methodological quality as well as discussed for clinical impact. Expert opinion: Currently, it is impossible for most of the evaluated outcomes to distinguish between the effects related to the mother’s underlying disease and those inherent to SSRI treatment. In women suffering from major depression and responding to a pharmacological treatment, introduction or continuation of an SSRI should be encouraged in order to prevent maternal complications and to preserve maternal–infant bonding. The choice of the right drug depends above all on individual patient characteristics such as prior treatment response, diagnoses and comorbid conditions.

Increase of oral methadone dose in methadone injecting patients: A pilot study

Abstract A pilot study was initiated in seven methadone injecting patients to examine whether intravenous methadone use in patients in oral methadone maintenance treatment could be decreased by increased oral methadone dose. During the study, patients had a standardized methadone dose increase for three weeks, followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Mean methadone doses prior to, and at the end of the study, were 99 mg/day and 163 mg/day, respectively. On week 15, the mean frequency of injection and the mean proportion of methadone dose injected were reduced to 46% of the values measured at week 0 (p = 0.043 and p = 0.028, respectively). Two patients did not modify their frequency, nor their dose of injected methadone, four patients decreased their use of injectable methadone, while one completely stopped injecting methadone. Since the completion of the pilot study, an augmentation of oral methadone dose has been proposed as a therapeutic option to 18 other methadone injecting patients. Five patients did not change their frequency of injection. They did, however, either completely stop or decrease their illicit opiate consumption. Nine patients decreased their frequency of methadone injection from a mean 95 % down to 35 %. Finally, four patients completely stopped injecting methadone Although the present results have to be confirmed by controlled studies including a larger number of patients, when considering the high frequency of methadone injection in some places and the associated problems, the therapeutic option of increasing methadone dose should be considered further.