Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Chirag Shah is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Chirag Shah.


Radiotherapy and Oncology | 2011

Twelve-year clinical outcomes and patterns of failure with accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole-breast irradiation: Results of a matched-pair analysis

Chirag Shah; J.V. Antonucci; J.B. Wilkinson; M. Wallace; M. Ghilezan; Peter Y. Chen; Kenneth Lewis; Christina Mitchell; Frank A. Vicini

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEnTo compare 12-year outcomes of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) versus whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in patients treated with breast conservation.nnnMATERIALS AND METHODSnA matched-pair analysis was performed using 199 patients receiving WBI and 199 patients receiving interstitial APBI. Match criteria included tumor size, age, nodal status, ER status, and the use of adjuvant hormonal therapy. Patterns of failure and efficacy of salvage treatments were examined.nnnRESULTSnNo differences were seen in the 12-year rates of local recurrence (3.8% vs. 5.0%, p=0.40), regional recurrence (0% vs. 1.1%, p=0.15), disease free survival (DFS) (87% vs. 91%, p=0.30), cause-specific survival (CSS) (93% vs. 95%, p=0.28), or overall survival (OS) (78% vs. 71%, p=0.06) between the WBI and APBI groups, respectively. The rate of distant metastases was lower in the APBI group (10.1% vs. 4.5%, p=.05). Following LR, no difference in outcome was seen between the two groups with 5year post-LR rates of DFS (80% vs. 86%, p=0.55), CSS (88% vs. 75%, p=0.77), and OS (88% vs. 75%, p=0.77), respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSnWith 12-year follow-up, APBI produced outcomes equivalent to WBI. Following LR, patients treated with APBI also had similar failure patterns to those managed with WBI.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011

Breast Cancer-Related Arm Lymphedema: Incidence Rates, Diagnostic Techniques, Optimal Management and Risk Reduction Strategies

Chirag Shah; Frank A. Vicini

As more women survive breast cancer, long-term toxicities affecting their quality of life, such as lymphedema (LE) of the arm, gain importance. Although numerous studies have attempted to determine incidence rates, identify optimal diagnostic tests, enumerate efficacious treatment strategies and outline risk reduction guidelines for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), few groups have consistently agreed on any of these issues. As a result, standardized recommendations are still lacking. This review will summarize the latest data addressing all of these concerns in order to provide patients and health care providers with optimal, contemporary recommendations. Published incidence rates for BCRL vary substantially with a range of 2-65% based on surgical technique, axillary sampling method, radiation therapy fields treated, and the use of chemotherapy. Newer clinical assessment tools can potentially identify BCRL in patients with subclinical disease with prospective data suggesting that early diagnosis and management with noninvasive therapy can lead to excellent outcomes. Multiple therapies exist with treatments defined by the severity of BCRL present. Currently, the standard of care for BCRL in patients with significant LE is complex decongestive physiotherapy (CDP). Contemporary data also suggest that a multidisciplinary approach to the management of BCRL should begin prior to definitive treatment for breast cancer employing patient-specific surgical, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy paradigms that limit risks. Further, prospective clinical assessments before and after treatment should be employed to diagnose subclinical disease. In those patients who require aggressive locoregional management, prophylactic therapies and the use of CDP can help reduce the long-term sequelae of BCRL.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Intrafraction variation of mean tumor position during image-guided hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Chirag Shah; I.S. Grills; Larry L. Kestin; Samuel McGrath; Hong Ye; S. Martin; Di Yan

PURPOSEnProlonged delivery times during daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) introduce concerns regarding intrafraction variation (IFV) of the mean target position (MTP). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the magnitude of the IFV-MTP and to assess target margins required to compensate for IFV and postonline CBCT correction residuals. Patient, treatment, and tumor characteristics were analyzed with respect to their impact on IFV-MTP.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnA total of 126 patients with 140 tumors underwent 659 fractions of lung SBRT. Dose prescribed was 48 or 60 Gy in 12 Gy fractions. Translational target position correction of the MTP was performed via onboard CBCT. IFV-MTP was measured as the difference in MTP between the postcorrection CBCT and the posttreatment CBCT excluding residual error.nnnRESULTSnIFV-MTP was 0.2 ± 1.8 mm, 0.1 ± 1.9 mm, and 0.01 ± 1.5 mm in the craniocaudal, anteroposterior, and mediolateral dimensions and the IFV-MTP vector was 2.3 ± 2.1 mm. Treatment time and excursion were found to be significant predictors of IFV-MTP. An IFV-MTP vector greater than 2 and 5 mm was seen in 40.8% and 7.2% of fractions, respectively. IFV-MTP greater than 2 mm was seen in heavier patients with larger excursions and longer treatment times. Significant differences in IFV-MTP were seen between immobilization devices. The stereotactic frame immobilization device was found to be significantly less likely to have an IFV-MTP vector greater than 2 mm compared with the alpha cradle, BodyFIX, and hybrid immobilization devices.nnnCONCLUSIONSnTreatment time and respiratory excursion are significantly associated with IFV-MTP. Significant differences in IFV-MTP were found between immobilization devices. Target margins for IFV-MTP plus post-correction residuals are dependent on immobilization device with 5-mm uniform margins being acceptable for the frame immobilization device.


American Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013

Impact of a prostate multidisciplinary clinic program on patient treatment decisions and on adherence to NCCN guidelines: the William Beaumont Hospital experience.

Howard Korman; Thomas B. Lanni; Chirag Shah; Jan Parslow; Joyce Tull; M. Ghilezan; Daniel J. Krauss; Savitha Balaraman; Kenneth Kernen; Matthew Cotant; Jeffrey Margolis; Frank A. Vicini

Objectives:In order to demonstrate the impact of multidisciplinary care in the community oncology setting, we evaluated treatment decisions after the initiation of a dedicated prostate and genitourinary (GU) multidisciplinary clinic (MDC). Methods:In March 2010, a GU MDC was created at William Beaumont Hospital with the goal of providing patients with a comprehensive multidisciplinary evaluation and consensus treatment recommendations in a single visit. Urologists, radiation, and medical oncologists along with ancillary support staff participated in this comprehensive initial evaluation. The impact of this experience on patient treatment decisions was analyzed. Results:During the first year, a total of 182 patients were seen. Compared with previous years, low-risk MDC patients more frequently chose external beam radiation therapy (41.1% vs. 26.6%, P=0.02), and active surveillance (14.3% vs. 6.1%, P=0.02) and less frequently prostatectomy (30.4% vs. 44.0%, P=0.03). Similar increases in external beam were seen in intermediate and high-risk patients. Increased use of hormonal therapy was found in high-risk patients compared with the years before the initiation of the MDC (76.2% vs. 51.1%, P=0.03). Increased adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines was seen with intermediate-risk patients (89.8% vs. 75.9%, P=0.01), whereas nonsignificant increases were seen in low-risk (100% vs. 98.9%, P=0.43) and high-risk patients (100% vs. 94.2%, P=0.26). Conclusions:The establishment of a GU MDC improved the quality of care for cancer patients as demonstrated by improved adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, and a broadening of treatment choices made available.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Factors Associated With the Development of Breast Cancer–Related Lymphedema After Whole-Breast Irradiation

Chirag Shah; J.B. Wilkinson; A.M. Baschnagel; M.I. Ghilezan; Justin Riutta; Nayana Dekhne; Savitha Balaraman; Christina Mitchell; M. Wallace; Frank A. Vicini

PURPOSEnTo determine the rates of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) in patients undergoing whole-breast irradiation as part of breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors associated with its development.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnA total of 1,861 patients with breast cancer were treated at William Beaumont Hospital with whole-breast irradiation as part of their BCT from January 1980 to February 2006, with 1,497 patients available for analysis. Determination of BCRL was based on clinical assessment. Differences in clinical, pathologic, and treatment characteristics between patients with BCRL and those without BCRL were evaluated, and the actuarial rates of BCRL by regional irradiation technique were determined.nnnRESULTSnThe actuarial rate of any BCRL was 7.4% for the entire cohort and 9.9%, 14.7%, and 8.3% for patients receiving a supraclavicular field, posterior axillary boost, and internal mammary irradiation, respectively. BCRL was more likely to develop in patients with advanced nodal status (11.4% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.001), those who had a greater number of lymph nodes removed (14 nodes) (9.5% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.01), those who had extracapsular extension (13.4% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.009), those with Grade II/III disease (10.8% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001), and those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (10.5% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.02). Regional irradiation showed small increases in the rates of BCRL (p = not significant).nnnCONCLUSIONSnThese results suggest that clinically detectable BCRL will develop after traditional BCT in up to 10% of patients. High-risk subgroups include patients with advanced nodal status, those with more nodes removed, and those who receive chemotherapy, with patients receiving regional irradiation showing a trend toward increased rates.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Factors Associated With Optimal Long-Term Cosmetic Results in Patients Treated With Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Using Balloon-Based Brachytherapy

Frank A. Vicini; Martin Keisch; Chirag Shah; Sharad Goyal; Atif J. Khan; Peter D. Beitsch; Maureen Lyden; Bruce G. Haffty

PURPOSEnTo evaluate factors associated with optimal cosmetic results at 72 months for early-stage breast cancer patients treated with Mammosite balloon-based accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnA total of 1,440 patients (1,449 cases) with early-stage breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving therapy were treated with balloon-based brachytherapy to deliver APBI (34 Gy in 3.4-Gy fractions). Cosmetic outcome was evaluated at each follow-up visit and dichotomized as excellent/good (E/G) or fair/poor (F/P). Follow-up was evaluated at 36 and 72 months to establish long-term cosmesis, stability of cosmesis, and factors associated with optimal results.nnnRESULTSnThe percentage of evaluable patients with excellent/good (E/G) cosmetic results at 36 months and more than 72 months were 93.3% (n = 708/759) and 90.4% (n = 235/260). Factors associated with optimal cosmetic results at 72 months included: larger skin spacing (p = 0.04) and T1 tumors (p = 0.02). Using multiple regression analysis, the only factors predictive of worse cosmetic outcome at 72 months were smaller skin spacing (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.99) and tumors greater than 2 cm (OR, 4.96, CI, 1.53-16.07). In all, 227 patients had both a 36-month and a 72-month cosmetic evaluation. The number of patients with E/G cosmetic results decreased only slightly from 93.4% at 3 years to 90.8% (p = 0.13) at 6 years, respectively.nnnCONCLUSIONSnAPBI delivered with balloon-based brachytherapy produced E/G cosmetic results in 90.4% of cases at 6 years. Larger tumors (T2) and smaller skin spacing were found to be the two most important independent predictors of cosmesis.


Practical radiation oncology | 2013

Required target margins for image-guided lung SBRT: Assessment of target position intrafraction and correction residuals

Chirag Shah; Larry L. Kestin; Andrew Hope; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette; Matthias Guckenberger; Ying Xiao; Jan Jakob Sonke; J. Belderbos; Di Yan; I.S. Grills

PURPOSEnWith increased use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer, quantification of intrafraction variation (IFV) is required to develop adequate target margins.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnA total of 409 patients with 427 tumors underwent 1593 fractions of lung SBRT between 2005 and 2010. Translational target position correction of the mean target position (MTP) was performed via onboard cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). IFV was measured as the difference in MTP between the post-correction CBCT and the post-treatment CBCT and was calculated on 1337 fractions.nnnRESULTSnMean IFV-MTP was 0.0 ± 1.7 mm, 0.6 ± 2.2 mm, and -1.0 ± 2.0 mm in the mediolateral (ML), anteroposterior (AP), and craniocaudal (CC) dimensions, and the vector was 3.1 ± 2.0 mm; 67.8% of fractions had an IFV vector greater than 2 mm, and 14.3% greater than 5 mm. Weight, excursion, forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, and treatment time were found to be significant predictors of IFV-MTP greater than 2 mm and 5 mm. Significant differences in IFV-MTP were seen between immobilization devices with a mean IFV of 2.3 ± 1.4 mm, 2.7 ± 1.6 mm, 3.0 ± 1.7 mm, 3.0 ± 2.5 mm, 3.3 ± 1.7 mm, and 3.3 ± 2.2 mm for the body frame, hybrid device, alpha cradle, body fix, wing board, and no immobilization, respectively (P < .001). Estimated required target margins for the entire cohort were 4.3, 6.1, and 6.0 mm in the ML, AP, and CC dimensions, with differences in margins based on immobilization.nnnCONCLUSIONSnIFV is dependent on several factors: immobilization device, treatment time, pulmonary function, and bodyweight. These factors are responsible for a significant portion of target margins with a mean IFV vector of 3 mm. Target margins of 6 mm or greater are required to encompass IFV in all dimensions when using four-dimensional CT with CBCT without respiratory gating or compression.


International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2012

Comparison of IGRT Registration Strategies for Optimal Coverage of Primary Lung Tumors and Involved Nodes Based on Multiple Four-Dimensional CT Scans Obtained Throughout the Radiotherapy Course

Nasiruddin Mohammed; Larry L. Kestin; I.S. Grills; Chirag Shah; Carri K. Glide-Hurst; Di Yan; Dan Ionascu

PURPOSEnTo investigate the impact of primary tumor and involved lymph node (LN) geometry (centroid, shape, volume) on internal target volume (ITV) throughout treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer using weekly four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT).nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnEleven patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were treated using image-guided radiotherapy with acquisition of weekly 10-Phase 4DCTs (nxa0= 51). Initial ITV was based on planning 4DCT. Master-ITV incorporated target geometry across the entire treatment (all 4DCTs). Geographic miss was defined as the % Master-ITV positioned outside of the initial planning ITV after registration is complete. Registration strategies considered were bony (B), primary tumor soft tissue alone (T), and registration based on primary tumor and involved LNs (T_LN).nnnRESULTSnThe % geographic miss for the primary tumor, mediastinal, and hilar lymph nodes based on each registration strategy were (1) B: 30%, 30%, 30%; (2) T: 21%, 40%, 36%; and (3) T_LN: 26%, 26%, 27%. Mean geographic expansions to encompass 100% of the primary tumor and involved LNs were 1.2 ± 0.7 cm and 0.8 ± 0.3 cm, respectively, for B and T_LN. Primary and involved LN expansions were 0.7 ± 0.5 cm and 1.1 ± 0.5 cm for T.nnnCONCLUSIONnT is best for solitary targets. When treatments include primary tumor and LNs, B and T_LN provide more comprehensive geographic coverage. We have identified high % geographic miss when considering multiple registration strategies. The dosimetric implications are the subject of future study.


Cancer | 2011

Increasing accrual in cancer clinical trials with a focus on minority enrollment: The William Beaumont Hospital Community Clinical Oncology Program Experience.

Frank A. Vicini; Joyce Nancarrow-Tull; Chirag Shah; Gary W. Chmielewski; Monty Fakhouri; Stacey A. Sitarek; Claire T. Feczko; Carol Brzozowski; David L. Felten

The authors reviewed changes in accrual to cancer clinical trials over the last 2 decades at their institution with a focus on minority participation after the implementation of a community clinical oncology program (CCOP) and an aggressive, education‐orientated minority outreach program (MOP).


Cancer | 2012

Outcome After Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence in Patients Who Receive Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Chirag Shah; Frank A. Vicini; Martin Keisch; Henry M. Kuerer; Peter D. Beitsch; Bruce G. Haffty; Maureen Lyden

The objective of this study was to examine clinical outcomes and patterns of failure in patients with early stage breast cancer who developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after breast‐conserving therapy (BCT) using accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).

Collaboration


Dive into the Chirag Shah's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge