Chrisandra Shufelt

Contraceptive hormone use and cardiovascular disease.

Contraceptive hormones, most commonly prescribed as oral contraceptives (OCs), are a widely utilized method to prevent ovulation, implantation, and, therefore, pregnancy. The Womens Health Initiative demonstrated cardiovascular risk linked to menopausal hormone therapy among women without pre-existing cardiovascular disease, prompting a review of the safety, efficacy, and side effects of other forms of hormone therapy. A variety of basic science, animal, and human data suggests that contraceptive hormones have antiatheromatous effects; however, relatively less is known regarding the impact on atherosclerosis, thrombosis, vasomotion, and arrhythmogenesis. Newer generation OC formulations in use indicate no increased myocardial infarction risk for current users, but a persistent increased risk of venous thromboembolism. There are no cardiovascular data available for the newest generation contraceptive hormone formulations, including those that contain newer progestins that lower blood pressure, as well as the nonoral routes (transdermal and vaginal). Current guidelines indicate that, as with all medication, contraceptive hormones should be selected and initiated by weighing risks and benefits for the individual patient. Women 35 years and older should be assessed for cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, smoking, diabetes, nephropathy, and other vascular diseases, including migraines, prior to use. Existing data are mixed with regard to possible protection from OCs for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events; longer-term cardiovascular follow-up of menopausal women with regard to prior OC use, including subgroup information regarding adequacy of ovulatory cycling, the presence of hyperandrogenic conditions, and the presence of prothrombotic genetic disorders is needed to address this important issue.

Ranolazine Improves Angina in Women With Evidence of Myocardial Ischemia But No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVES We conducted a pilot study for a large definitive clinical trial evaluating the impact of ranolazine in women with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Women with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive CAD frequently have microvascular coronary dysfunction. The impact of ranolazine in this patient group is unknown. METHODS A pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was conducted in 20 women with angina, no obstructive CAD, and ≥ 10% ischemic myocardium on adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Participants were assigned to ranolazine or placebo for 4 weeks separated by a 2-week washout. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire and CMR were evaluated after each treatment. Invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) was available in patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary reactivity testing. CMR data analysis included the percentage of ischemic myocardium and quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI). RESULTS The mean age of subjects was 57 ± 11 years. Compared with placebo, patients on ranolazine had significantly higher (better) Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores, including physical functioning (p = 0.046), angina stability (p = 0.008), and quality of life (p = 0.021). There was a trend toward a higher (better) CMR mid-ventricular MPRI (2.4 [2.0 minimum, 2.8 maximum] vs. 2.1 [1.7 minimum, 2.5 maximum], p = 0.074) on ranolazine. Among women with coronary reactivity testing (n = 13), those with CFR ≤ 3.0 had a significantly improved MPRI on ranolazine versus placebo compared to women with CFR > 3.0 (Δ in MPRI 0.48 vs. -0.82, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS In women with angina, evidence of ischemia, and no obstructive CAD, this pilot randomized, controlled trial revealed that ranolazine improves angina. Myocardial ischemia may also improve, particularly among women with low CFR. These data document approach feasibility and provide outcome variability estimates for planning a definitive large clinical trial to evaluate the role of ranolazine in women with microvascular coronary dysfunction. (Microvascular Coronary Disease In Women: Impact Of Ranolazine; NCT00570089).

Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study.

OBJECTIVES This study evaluated the safety of coronary reactivity testing (CRT) in symptomatic women with evidence of myocardial ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND Microvascular coronary dysfunction (MCD) in women with no obstructive CAD portends an adverse prognosis of a 2.5% annual major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rate. The diagnosis of MCD is established by invasive CRT, yet the risk of CRT is unknown. METHODS The authors evaluated 293 symptomatic women with ischemia and no obstructive CAD, who underwent CRT at 3 experienced centers. Microvascular function was assessed using a Doppler wire and injections of adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitroglycerin into the left coronary artery. CRT-related serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events (AEs), and follow-up MACE (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI], nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure) were recorded. RESULTS CRT-SAEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) during the procedure: 1 had coronary artery dissection, and 1 developed MI associated with coronary spasm. CRT-AEs occurred in 2 women (0.7%) and included 1 transient air microembolism and 1 deep venous thrombosis. There was no CRT-related mortality. In the mean follow-up period of 5.4 years, the MACE rate was 8.2%, including 5 deaths (1.7%), 8 nonfatal MIs (2.7%), 8 nonfatal strokes (2.7%), and 11 hospitalizations for heart failure (3.8%). CONCLUSIONS In women undergoing CRT for suspected MCD, contemporary testing carries a relatively low risk compared with the MACE rate in these women. These results support the use of CRT by experienced operators for establishing definitive diagnosis and assessing prognosis in this at-risk population. (Womens Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE]; NCT00832702).

The North American Menopause Society recommendations for clinical care of midlife women

In celebration of the 25th anniversary of The North American Menopause Society (NAMS), the Society has compiled a set of key points and clinical recommendations for the care of midlife women. NAMS has always been a premier source of information about menopause for both healthcare providers and midli

Myocardial ischemia in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES the purpose of this study was to evaluate the presence of myocardial ischemia measured by adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) using visual myocardial perfusion and a quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI) in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with anginal chest pain (CP). BACKGROUND ischemic heart disease is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in SLE. Previous studies demonstrated the presence of perfusion defects using adenosine stress CMR in patients with CP and no obstructive CAD, consistent with microvascular coronary dysfunction in patients without SLE. METHOD Twenty female SLE patients with typical and atypical anginal CP were prospectively enrolled. Patients with established cardiovascular disease were excluded. CMR was performed with 0.05 mmol/kg gadolinium adenosine stress first-pass perfusion in SLE patients and in 10 asymptomatic reference control women. SLE patients also underwent 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography. CMR was scored visually and quantitatively (MPRI). RESULTS among 18 patients with complete data, no patient had obstructive CAD; however, 8 of 18 (44%) displayed visual perfusion defects on stress CMR compared with 0 in 10 control subjects (p = 0.014). The mean MPRI in patients versus controls was 2.0 ± 0.4 versus 2.4 ± 0.4 (p = 0.031) in the subepicardium and 1.8 ± 0.3 versus 2.1 ± 0.4 (p = 0.24) in the subendocardium. Multivariate linear regression revealed that SLE was the only predictor of subepicardial (p < 0.0025; β = -1.059) and subendocardial (p < 0.05; β = -0.529) MPRIs. CONCLUSIONS we observed a 44% prevalence of abnormal stress myocardial perfusion by CMR in the absence of obstructive CAD in SLE patients with anginal CP. Compared with controls, reduced MPRI was observed in SLE patients, and SLE presence was a significant predictor of an abnormal MPRI. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that anginal CP in SLE patients without obstructive CAD is due to myocardial ischemia potentially caused by microvascular coronary dysfunction. Further research in a larger SLE population is warranted.

DHEA-S Levels and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in Postmenopausal Women: Results from the National Institutes of Health—National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE)

CONTEXT Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), a major circulating sex steroid prohormone, declines with age. Low levels have been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and all-cause mortality, although these results have not been consistently replicated, particularly in women. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to examine the association of circulating DHEA-S levels, CVD, and mortality risk among postmenopausal women with suspected myocardial ischemia. DESIGN In the Womens Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation, 270 postmenopausal women underwent coronary angiography and blood hormone levels for suspected ischemia and were followed annually. The primary outcome of interest was CVD mortality; secondary analyses included all-cause mortality and nonfatal CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, and congestive heart failure) and angiographic obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS Women in the lowest DHEA-S tertile had higher CVD mortality (17% 6-yr mortality rate vs. 8%; log-rank P = 0.011), and all-cause mortality (21 vs. 10%; P = 0.011) compared with women with higher DHEA-S levels. The increased CVD mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-5.45] remained unchanged after adjustment for multiple CVD risk factors (HR = 2.43; 95% CI = 1.06-5.56) but became nonsignificant when further adjusting for the presence or severity of angiographic obstructive CAD (HR = 1.99; 95% CI = 0.87-4.59). Results were similar for all-cause mortality. Lower DHEA-S levels were only marginally but not independently associated with obstructive CAD. CONCLUSIONS Among postmenopausal women with coronary risk factors undergoing coronary angiography for suspected myocardial ischemia, lower DHEA-S levels were linked with higher CVD mortality and all-cause mortality. Our study provides valuable feasibility data useful for future investigations and possible mechanistic pathways.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of late Na current inhibition (ranolazine) in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD): impact on angina and myocardial perfusion reserve

Abstract Aims The mechanistic basis of the symptoms and signs of myocardial ischaemia in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is unclear. The aim of this study was to mechanistically test short-term late sodium current inhibition (ranolazine) in such subjects on angina, myocardial perfusion reserve index, and diastolic filling. Materials and results Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, mechanistic trial in subjects with evidence of CMD [invasive coronary reactivity testing or non-invasive cardiac magnetic resonance imaging myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI)]. Short-term oral ranolazine 500–1000 mg twice daily for 2 weeks vs. placebo. Angina measured by Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) and SAQ-7 (co-primaries), diary angina (secondary), stress MPRI, diastolic filling, quality of life (QoL). Of 128 (96% women) subjects, no treatment differences in the outcomes were observed. Peak heart rate was lower during pharmacological stress during ranolazine (−3.55 b.p.m., P < 0.001). The change in SAQ-7 directly correlated with the change in MPRI (correlation 0.25, P = 0.005). The change in MPRI predicted the change in SAQ QoL, adjusted for body mass index (BMI), prior myocardial infarction, and site (P = 0.0032). Low coronary flow reserve (CFR <2.5) subjects improved MPRI (P < 0.0137), SAQ angina frequency (P = 0.027), and SAQ-7 (P = 0.041). Conclusions In this mechanistic trial among symptomatic subjects, no obstructive CAD, short-term late sodium current inhibition was not generally effective for SAQ angina. Angina and myocardial perfusion reserve changes were related, supporting the notion that strategies to improve ischaemia should be tested in these subjects. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01342029.

Persistent Chest Pain and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Patients with persistent chest pain and no obstructive coronary artery disease are often labeled as having noncardiac pain and not offered further cardiologic testing or treatment. Diagnostic uncertainty for persistent chest pain is associated with adverse quality of life, morbidity, and health care costs. Two underdiagnosed cardiac causes for persistent chest pain include microvascular coronary disease and abnormal cardiac nociception. Microvascular coronary disease is associated with an increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and sudden cardiac death, and treatment directed at improving endothelial function can improve outcomes. Abnormal cardiac nociception is also a cause for persistent chest pain caused by heightened coronary pain perception. Coronary reactivity testing allows for direct measurement of blood flow characteristics in response to vasoactive agents for the diagnoses of microvascular coronary disease and can be a useful tool to differentiate causes of chest pain. Coronary reactivity testing is an invasive method for assessing coronary vascular function, with current evidence suggesting that its associated risk is relatively low compared with the adverse prognosis associated with microvascular coronary dysfunction. Accurate diagnosis in patients with persistent chest pain and normal coronary arteries can be challenging and deserves adequate investigation in light of the associated morbidity, mortality, and health care costs.

Testosterone and the breast.

Although women have been treated with testosterone (T) for female sexual dysfunction since the 1950s, the role of T in normal female physiology is not yet fully defined. One of the major safety concerns of androgen therapy is whether androgens have a stimulatory effect on the breast that could lead to breast carcinomas. The proposed mechanisms for such stimulation include local estrogen production from the aromatase enzyme complex present in the breast tissue or by the direct stimulation of the androgen receptor. Predominant data from in vitro studies have shown that androgens actually have apoptotic and antiproliferative effects and not stimulatory effects. Animal models have shown similar results to in vitro studies, finding that androgens inhibit breast cancer growth. Prospective and retrospective epidemiological analyses have shown mixed outcomes, with no clear consensus regarding androgen use and breast cancer risk. Hyperandrogenism in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome with elevated levels of endogenous T is not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer and may, in fact, be protective. Another human model with excess of T is female-to-male transgenderism, in which genotypic women are treated with large doses of exogenous T with no increased risk. High-dose androgen therapy also has been effective in treating patients with advanced breast cancer. Thus, the preponderance of data suggests that T use in females is not associated with an increased risk of breast carcinoma.

Maternal Recall of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are risk markers for future maternal coronary heart disease (CHD). Clinical assessment of a womans history of pregnancy complications relies on self-report, but the predictive value of maternal recall is unclear. A systematic review was conducted to comprehensively review and critically assess the available literature on maternal recall of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were searched through August 2012. We included original research articles comparing maternal recall of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy with medical records. RESULTS Ten studies met eligibility criteria for qualitative analysis and were independently reviewed by two investigators. Recall periods ranged from 48 hours to 30 years. Length of recall did not appear to uniformly affect recall quality. Sensitivity was generally lower and less consistent for gestational hypertension than for preeclampsia. Specificity was >90% for all hypertensive disorders. Determinants of recall accuracy included maternal education and parity. CONCLUSIONS Although maternal recall of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is specific, low sensitivity and predictive values may limit the clinical utility of asking mothers to recall their history of hypertensive pregnancy complications. Future research on maternal recall of pregnancy complications should be designed to yield predictive values and test recall of disorder subtypes, recurrent complications, and changing recall over time in the same population. The utility of gestation length and offspring birth weight for clinical identification of women whose pregnancy history puts them at increased CHD risk should also be explored.