Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Chriselle Hickerton is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Chriselle Hickerton.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2013

“It's about having the choice”: Stakeholder perceptions of population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome†

Alison D. Archibald; Chriselle Hickerton; Alice M. Jaques; Samantha Wake; Jonathan Cohen; Sylvia A. Metcalfe

This project explored, the views of key stakeholders regarding population‐based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome (FXS). Interviews and focus groups were conducted with healthcare providers, relatives of individuals with FXS and members of the general population. Data were transcribed verbatim and coded into themes. 188 individuals took part in this study. Perceived benefits of carrier screening included: learning the risk of having a child with FXS; learning the risk of fragile X‐associated primary ovarian insufficiency; and the opportunity for carriers to access reproductive options. Concerns included: the emotional impact of screening and receiving a carrier result; the predictive testing nature of the carrier test with respect to fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome; potential confusion created by receiving an intermediate result; and implications of genetic screening for society. Overall, population‐based genetic carrier screening was perceived to be acceptable provided it is optional and offered at an appropriate stage of life. With the support of the participants to promote individual choice by offering a population‐based carrier screening program for FXS, it is essential to carefully consider how screening might be offered in order to ensure broad accessibility and facilitation of decision‐making.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2015

A mixed methods exploration of families' experiences of the diagnosis of childhood spinal muscular atrophy

Sally Lawton; Chriselle Hickerton; Alison D. Archibald; Belinda J McClaren; Sylvia A. Metcalfe

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease with a carrier frequency of 1 in 41 in Australia. Childhood SMA is classified into three types based on the age at which children present with symptoms and the clinical severity. Families’ experiences leading up to the diagnosis have not been described, but are important when considering the potential for a diagnostic odyssey. Using a mixed methods approach, data were collected from interviews and a national survey of families of children with SMA to explore their experiences of this journey. The combined findings (n=28) revealed that the journey to receiving a diagnosis was protracted. The time from first noticing symptoms to finally receiving a diagnosis was emotional and frustrating. Once parents or other family members became aware of symptoms, almost all had consulted with multiple different health professionals before the diagnosis was ultimately made. Not surprisingly, receiving the diagnosis was devastating to the families. The nature of the information and the way it was given to them was not always optimal, particularly because of the difficulties predicting clinical severity. Most felt that their child could have been diagnosed earlier and, although there were mixed views around the benefit of this for their child, they felt it may have reduced the emotional impact on families. Overall, families were more in favour of population carrier screening for SMA when compared with newborn screening of the population. Despite an increasing awareness of SMA, the diagnostic delay continues to have negative impacts on families.


Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | 2016

Experiences of prenatal diagnosis and decision‐making about termination of pregnancy: A qualitative study

Jan Hodgson; Penelope Pitt; Sylvia A. Metcalfe; Jane Halliday; Melody Menezes; Jane Fisher; Chriselle Hickerton; Kerry Petersen; Belinda J McClaren

Advances in genetic technologies and ultrasound screening techniques have increased the ability to predict and diagnose congenital anomalies during pregnancy. As a result more prospective parents than ever before will receive a prenatal diagnosis of a fetal abnormality. Little is known about how Australian women and men experience receiving a prenatal diagnosis and how they make their decision about whether or not to continue the pregnancy.


Journal of Community Genetics | 2016

“It gives them more options”: preferences for preconception genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome in primary healthcare

Alison D. Archibald; Chriselle Hickerton; Samantha Wake; Alice M. Jaques; Jonathan Cohen; Sylvia A. Metcalfe

This study aims to explore stakeholder views about offering population-based genetic carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. A qualitative study using interviews and focus groups with stakeholders was undertaken to allow for an in-depth exploration of views and perceptions about practicalities of, and strategies for, offering carrier screening for fragile X syndrome to the general population in healthcare settings. A total of 188 stakeholders took part including healthcare providers (n = 81), relatives of people with fragile X syndrome (n = 29), and members of the general community (n = 78). The importance of raising community awareness about screening and providing appropriate support for carriers was emphasized. There was a preference for preconception carrier screening and for providing people with the opportunity to make an informed decision about screening. Primary care was highlighted as a setting which would ensure screening is accessible; however, challenges of offering screening in primary care were identified including time to discuss screening, knowledge about the test and possible outcomes, and the health professionals’ approach to offering screening. With the increasing availability of genetic carrier tests, it is essential that research now focuses on evaluating approaches for the delivery of carrier screening programs. Primary healthcare is perceived as an appropriate setting through which to access the target population, and raising awareness is essential to making genetic screening more accessible to the general community.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2012

ironXS: high-school screening for hereditary haemochromatosis is acceptable and feasible.

Martin B. Delatycki; Michelle Wolthuizen; Veronica Collins; Elizabeth Varley; Joanna Craven; Katrina J. Allen; Lyle C. Gurrin; MaryAnne Aitken; M Kaye Trembath; Lyndal Bond; Gabrielle R. Wilson; Sarah E. M. Stephenson; Ivan Macciocca; Chriselle Hickerton; Paul J. Lockhart; Sylvia A. Metcalfe

As the results of the Human Genome Project are realised, screening for genetic mutations that predispose to preventable disease is becoming increasingly possible. How and where such screening should best be offered are critical, unanswered questions. This study aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of genetic screening for preventable disease, using the model of hereditary haemochromatosis, in high-school students. Screening was offered for the HFE C282Y substitution to 17 638 students. Questionnaires were administered at the time of screening (Q1) and approximately 1 month after results were communicated (Q2). Outcomes assessed were uptake of screening, change in scores of validated anxiety, affect and health perception scales from Q1 to Q2, knowledge and iron indices in C282Y homozygous individuals. A total of 5757 (32.6%) students had screening and 28 C282Y-homozygous individuals (1 in 206) were identified, and none of the 27 individuals who had iron indices measures had significant iron overload. There was no significant change in measures of anxiety, affect or health perception in C282Y homozygous or non-homozygous individuals. Over 86% of students answered each of five knowledge questions correctly at Q1. Genetic population-based screening for a preventable disease can be offered in schools in a way that results in minimal morbidity for those identified at high risk of disease. The results of this study are not only relevant for haemochromatosis, but for other genetic markers of preventable disease such as those for cardiovascular disease and cancer.


Scientific Reports | 2018

Intragenic DNA methylation in buccal epithelial cells and intellectual functioning in a paediatric cohort of males with fragile X

Marta Arpone; Emma K. Baker; Lesley Bretherton; Minh Bui; Xin Li; Simon Whitaker; Cheryl Dissanayake; Jonathan D. Cohen; Chriselle Hickerton; Carolyn Rogers; Michael Field; Justine Elliott; Solange Aliaga; Ling Ling; David M. Francis; Stephen Hearps; Matthew Hunter; David J. Amor; David E. Godler

Increased intragenic DNA methylation of the Fragile X Related Epigenetic Element 2 (FREE2) in blood has been correlated with lower intellectual functioning in females with fragile X syndrome (FXS). This study explored these relationships in a paediatric cohort of males with FXS using Buccal Epithelial Cells (BEC). BEC were collected from 25 males with FXS, aged 3 to 17 years and 19 age-matched male controls without FXS. Methylation of 9 CpG sites within the FREE2 region was examined using the EpiTYPER approach. Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) scores of males with FXS were corrected for floor effect using the Whitaker and Gordon (WG) extrapolation method. Compared to controls, children with FXS had significant higher methylation levels for all CpG sites examined (p < 3.3 × 10−7), and within the FXS group, lower FSIQ (WG corrected) was associated with higher levels of DNA methylation, with the strongest relationship found for CpG sites within FMR1 intron 1 (p < 5.6 × 10−5). Applying the WG method to the FXS cohort unmasked significant epi-genotype-phenotype relationships. These results extend previous evidence in blood to BEC and demonstrate FREE2 DNA methylation to be a sensitive epigenetic biomarker significantly associated with the variability in intellectual functioning in FXS.


Genetics in Medicine | 2017

Informed decision making and psychosocial outcomes in pregnant and nonpregnant women offered population fragile X carrier screening

Sylvia A. Metcalfe; Melissa Martyn; Alice Grace Ames; Vicki Anderson; Alison D. Archibald; Grad Dip Gen Couns; Rob Carter; Jonathan C. Cohen; Megan Cotter; M GenCouns; William Dang; Martin B. Delatycki; Susan Donath; Samantha Edwards; PGrad Dip Educ; Robin Forbes; Mioara Gavrila; M MedSci; Jane Halliday; Chriselle Hickerton; Melissa Hill; Lorilli Jacobs; PGrad Dip Ultrasound; Vicki Petrou; Loren Plunkett; Leslie J. Sheffield; F Racp; Alison Thornton; Sandra Younie; PGrad Dip Hlth Econ

PurposePopulation-based carrier screening for fragile X syndrome (FXS) is still not universally endorsed by professional organizations due to concerns around genetic counseling for complex information and potential for psychosocial harms.MethodsWe determined uptake levels, decision making, and psychosocial impact in a prospective study of pregnant and nonpregnant Australian women offered FXS carrier screening in clinical settings. Women received pretest genetic counseling, and completed questionnaires when deciding and one month later.ResultsOf 1,156 women recruited, 83.1% returned the first questionnaire with 70.6% nonpregnant and 58.8% pregnant women choosing testing (χ2=16.98, P<0.001). Overall, informed choice was high in both nonpregnant (77.4%) and pregnant (72.9%) women (χ2=0.21, P=0.644), and more tested (76.0%) than not-tested (66.7%) women (χ2=6.35, P=0.012) made an informed choice. Measures of depression, stress, and anxiety were similar to population norms for ~85% of women. Decisional conflict and regret were generally low; however, decisional uncertainty and regret were greater in pregnant than nonpregnant women, and not-tested than tested women (uncertainty: χ2=18.51, P<0.001 and χ2=43.11, P<0.001, respectively; regret: χ2=6.61, P<0.037 and χ2=35.54, P<0.001, respectively).ConclusionWe provide evidence to inform guidelines that population FXS carrier screening can be implemented with minimal psychosocial harms following appropriate information and prescreening genetic counseling.


Clinical Genetics | 2013

To tell or not to tell – what to do about p.C282Y heterozygotes identified by HFE screening

Martin B. Delatycki; Michelle Wolthuizen; MaryAnne Aitken; Chriselle Hickerton; Sylvia A. Metcalfe; Katrina J. Allen

Hereditary hemochromatosis (HH) is a common preventable disorder of iron overload that can result in liver cirrhosis and reduced lifespan. Most HH is due to homozygosity for the HFE p.C282Y substitution. We conducted a study of screening for p.C282Y in high schools where p.C282Y heterozygotes (CY) individuals were informed of their genotype by letter. We studied whether these individuals understood the implications of their genotype, whether this resulted in anxiety or reduced health perception and whether cascade testing was higher in families of CY than wild‐type homozygous (CC) individuals. We found 586 of 5757 (1 in 10) screened individuals were CY. One month after receiving their result, 83% correctly answered that they have one copy of p.C282Y. There was no adverse change in anxiety or health perception from prior to screening to 1 month after receiving results. Significantly more family members of CY individuals than CC individuals were informed about HH and had testing for HH. In conclusion, we found that informing CY individuals of their genotype does not increase anxiety and the implications are generally well understood. This leads to cascade testing in a minority of families. CY individuals should be informed of their genetic status when identified by population screening.


European Journal of Human Genetics | 2018

Australians’ views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study

Sylvia A. Metcalfe; Chriselle Hickerton; Jacqueline Savard; Bronwyn Terrill; Erin Turbitt; Clara Gaff; Kathleen Gray; Anna Middleton; Brenda Wilson; Ainsley J. Newson

Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Australia; yet little is known of the views/expectations of Australians. Focus groups were conducted within a multi-stage, cross-disciplinary project (Genioz) to explore this. In mid-2015, 56 members of the public participated in seven focus groups, allocated into three age groups: 18–24, 25–49, and ≥50 years. Three researchers coded transcripts independently and generated themes. Awareness of personal genomic testing was low, but most could deduce what “personal genomics” might entail. Very few had heard of the term “direct-to-consumer” testing, which has implications for organisations developing information to support individuals in their decision-making. Participants’ understanding of genetics was varied and drawn from several sources. There were diverse perceptions of the relative influence of genetics and environment on health, mental health, behavior, talent, or personality. Views about having a personal genomic test were mixed, with greater interest in health-related tests if they believed there was a reason for doing so. However, many expressed scepticisms about the types of tests available, and how the information might be used; concerns were also raised about privacy and the potential for discrimination. These exploratory findings inform subsequent stages of the Genioz study, thereby contributing to strategies of supporting Australians to understand and make meaningful and well-considered decisions about the benefits, harms, and implications of personal genomic tests.


American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | 2012

Did you find that out in time?: new life trajectories of parents who choose to continue a pregnancy where a genetic disorder is diagnosed or likely.

Chriselle Hickerton; MaryAnne Aitken; Jan Hodgson; Martin B. Delatycki

Collaboration


Dive into the Chriselle Hickerton's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jan Hodgson

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alice M. Jaques

Royal Children's Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Clara Gaff

University of Melbourne

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge