Christel M. J. De Pooter

Cell cycle effect of gemcitabine and its role in the radiosensitizing mechanism in vitro

PURPOSE The mechanism of radiosensitization by gemcitabine is still unclear. It has been hypothesized that the accumulation of cells in early S phase may play a role in enhancing radiosensitivity. METHODS AND MATERIALS The schedule dependency of the radiosensitizing effect was studied in ECV304, human bladder cancer cells, and H292, human lung cancer cells, by varying the incubation time and time interval between gemcitabine and radiation treatment. To determine the role of cell cycle perturbations in the radiosensitization, the influence of gemcitabine on the cell cycle at the moment of radiation was investigated by flow cytometry. RESULTS The radiosensitizing effect increased with a longer incubation period: Dose enhancement factors varied from 1.30 to 2.82 in ECV304 and from 1.04 to 1.78 in H292 after treatment during 8-32 h, respectively. Radiosensitization decreased with an increasing interval: Dose enhancement factors varied from 2.26 to 1.49 in ECV304 and from 1.45 to 1.11 in H292 after an interval 0-24 h, respectively. Cells were blocked in the early S phase of the cell cycle by gemcitabine. The highest percentage S-phase cells was observed after treatment with the schedules that resulted in the highest radiosensitizing effect. CONCLUSIONS We observed a clear schedule-dependent radiosensitization by gemcitabine. Our findings demonstrated a correlation between gemcitabine-induced early S-phase block and the radiosensitizing effect.

Unraveling the Mechanism of Radiosensitization by Gemcitabine: The Role of TP53

Abstract Pauwels, B., Korst, A. E. C., Andriessen, V., Baay, M. F. D., Pattyn, G. G. O., Lambrechts, H. A. J., De Pooter, C. M. J., Lardon, F. and Vermorken, J. B. Unraveling the Mechanism of Radiosensitization by Gemcitabine: The Role of TP53. Radiat. Res. 164, 642–650 (2005). Gemcitabine has excellent radiosensitizing properties, as shown in both preclinical and clinical studies. Radiosensitization correlated with the early S-phase block of gemcitabine. In the present study, we investigated the role of TP53 in the radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine. Isogenic A549 cells differing in TP53 status were treated with gemcitabine during the 24 h prior to irradiation. Cell survival was determined 7 days after irradiation by the sulforhodamine B test. In addition, cell cycle perturbation was determined by flow cytometry and TP53 expression by Western blot analysis. Gemcitabine caused a concentration-dependent radiosensitizing effect in all cell lines. Transformed A549 cells were less sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine. The cell cycle arrest early in the S phase was dependent on the drug dose but was comparable in the different cell lines and was not related to functional TP53. Using isogenic cell lines, we have shown that neither TP53 status nor the transfection procedure influenced the radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine. Since both the radiosensitizing effect at equitoxic concentrations and the cell cycle effect of gemcitabine were independent of TP53 expression, it is likely that TP53 protein does not play a crucial role in the radiosensitizing mechanism of gemcitabine.

Comparative study of the radiosensitising and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, in vitro

BackgroundVinca alkaloids are an important class of anticancer agents and semisynthetic vinca alkaloids are developed to improve the therapeutic index of this class of drugs. In the present study, a direct comparison was made between vinflunine and vinorelbine regarding their radiosensitising and cell cycle effects.MethodsFour human tumour cell lines were tested under identical experimental conditions, using equitoxic concentrations of vinflunine and vinorelbine.ResultsVinflunine and vinorelbine induced a comparable radiosensitising effect (p-value never below 0.01) when cells were incubated for 24 h immediately prior to radiation. Regarding the cell cycle effects, a statistically significant concentration-dependent G2/M block was seen after 24 h incubation with vinorelbine in all tested cell lines. Similar results, with small cell line-related differences, were observed with vinflunine.ConclusionThe radiosensitising effects of both semisynthetic vinca alkaloids were comparable (not statistically different) and nearly always cell line-specific and concentration-dependent. The cell cycle effects could be related to the observed radiosensitising effects. Considering the more favourable toxicity profile of vinflunine, this agent might be more promising than vinorelbine for chemoradiation studies in the clinic.

The relation between deoxycytidine kinase activity and the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine in eight different human tumour cell lines

BackgroundGemcitabine (dFdC) is an active antitumour agent with radiosensitising properties, shown both in preclinical and clinical studies. In the present study, the relation between deoxycytidine kinase (dCK) activity and the radiosensitising effect of gemcitabine was investigated in eight different human tumour cell lines.MethodsTumour cells were treated with dFdC (0–100 nM) for 24 h prior to radiotherapy (RT) (γ-Co60, 0–6 Gy, room temperature). Cell survival was determined 7, 8, or 9 days after RT by the sulforhodamine B test. dCK activity of the cells was determined by an enzyme activity assay.ResultsA clear concentration-dependent radiosensitising effect of dFdC was observed in all cell lines. The degree of radiosensitisation was also cell line dependent and seemed to correlate with the sensitivity of the cell line to the cytotoxic effect of dFdC. The dCK activity of our cell lines varied considerably and differed up to three fold from 5 to 15 pmol/h/mg protein between the tested cell lines. In this range dCK activity was only weakly related to radiosensitisation (correlation coefficient 0.62, p = 0.11).ConclusionGemcitabine needs to be metabolised to the active nucleotide in order to radiosensitise the cells. Since dFdCTP accumulation and incorporation into DNA are concentration dependent, the degree of radiosensitisation seems to be related to the extent of dFdCTP incorporated into DNA required to inhibit DNA repair. The activity of dCK does not seem to be the most important factor, but is clearly a major factor. Other partners of the intracellular metabolism of gemcitabine in relation to the cell cycle effects and DNA repair could be more responsible for the radiosensitising effect than dCK activity.

Correlation of the response to cisplatin of human ovarian cancer cell lines, originating from one tumor but with different sensitivity, with the recovery of DNA adducts

Cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP) is used in the treatment of various cancers, with or without ionizing radiation. During treatment, resistance may develop, and cross-resistance can also occur. DNA is the main target for CDDP and ionizing radiation, and we therefore evaluated the correlation between the amount of CDDP-DNA adducts and the cytotoxic activity of CDDP in human ovarian cancer cell lines with different platinum sensitivities. DNA-adduct levels were investigated 18 hr after CDDP exposure in three cell lines originating from the same human ovarian cancer. The least sensitive cells appeared to have the largest amounts of CDDP-DNA adducts, while the most sensitive had higher adduct levels than the parental cells. The proportion of the four adducts measured (i.e., Pt-G, Pt-AG, Pt-GG, and G-Pt-G) was comparable in all cell lines, with a preference for Pt-GG adduct formation (> 50% of the adducts). Intracellular CDDP concentrations were higher in sensitive than in resistant cells, in contrast to the degree of CDDP adduct formation. Data obtained following continuous exposure of CDDP-resistant cells to CDDP suggest that DNA repair is partly responsible for resistance to CDDP. We conclude that the amount of CDDP-DNA adduct formation in cancer cells is not a predictor of CDDP cytotoxicity.

Histopathological growth patterns as a candidate biomarker for immunomodulatory therapy

The encroachment of a growing tumor upon the cells and structures of surrounding normal tissue results in a series of histopathological growth patterns (HGPs). These morphological changes can be assessed in hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections from primary and metastatic tumors and have been characterized in a range of tissue types including liver, lung, lymph node and skin. HGPs in different tissues share certain general characteristics like the extent of angiogenesis, but also appropriate tissue-specific mechanisms which ultimately determine differences in the biology of HGP subtypes. For instance, in the well-characterized HGPs of liver metastases, the two main subtypes, replacement and desmoplastic, recapitulate two responses of the normal liver to injury: regeneration and fibrosis. HGP subtypes have distinct cytokine profiles and differing levels of lymphocytic infiltration which suggests that they are indicative of immune status in the tumor microenvironment. HGPs predict response to bevacizumab and are associated with overall survival (OS) after surgery for liver metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC). In addition, HGPs can change over time in response to therapy. With standard scoring methods being developed, HGPs represent an easily accessible, dynamic biomarker to consider when determining strategies for treatment using anti-VEGF and immunomodulatory drugs.