Christoph Kahl

Cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic marrow transplantation in patients with aplastic anaemia: a long‐term follow‐up

A total of 81 severe aplastic anaemia patients, aged 2–63 years, received human leucocyte antigen‐matched related marrow grafts after cyclophosphamide + antithymocyte globulin followed by postgrafting methotrexate + ciclosporin. Median follow‐up was 9·2 years. Ninety‐six per cent of patients had sustained engraftment, 24% developed acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD), grade II in all but two patients, and 26% developed chronic GVHD; all surviving patients eventually responded to immunosuppressive therapy. Six patients developed cancer: one fatal lymphoma and five carcinomas (all five patients are now free of cancer). Survival was 88%. The regimen appeared well tolerated and effective in heavily pretreated patients with aplastic anaemia.

Relation of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) observed in first-line treatment to efficacy parameters of subsequent treatment in FIRE-3 (AIOKRK0306)

We explored the association of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and non‐ETS with efficacy of first‐line and consecutive second‐line treatment in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer treated in FIRE‐3. Assessment of tumor shrinkage was based on the sum of longest diameters of target lesions, evaluated after 6 weeks of treatment. Shrinkage was classified as ETS (shrinkage by ≥ 20%), mETS (shrinkage by 0 to <20%), mPD (minor progression >0 to <20%) and PD (progression ≥20%). Overall survival (OS) was 33.2 (95% CI 28.0–38.4) months in ETS patients, while non‐ETS was associated with less favorable outcome (mETS 24.0 (95% CI 21.2–26.9) months, mPD 19.0 (95% CI 13.0–25.0) months, PD 12.8 (95% CI 11.1–14.5) months). Differences in PFS of first‐line therapy were less pronounced. ETS subgroups defined in first‐line therapy also correlated with efficacy of second‐line therapy. Progression‐free survival in second‐line (PFS2nd) was 6.5 months (5.8–7.2) for ETS, and was 5.6 (95% CI 4.7–6.5) months for mETS, 4.9 (95% CI 3.7–6.1) months for mPD and 3.3 (95% CI 2.3–4.3) months for PD. PFS of first‐line and PFS2nd showed a linear correlation (Bravais–Pearson coefficient: 0.16, p = 0.006). While ETS is associated with the most favorable outcome, non‐ETS represents a heterogeneous subgroup with distinct characteristics of less favorable initial tumor response to treatment. This is the first analysis to demonstrate that early tumor response observed during first‐line FOLFIRI‐based therapy may also relate to efficacy of second‐line treatment. Early response parameters may serve as stratification factors in trials recruiting pretreated patients.

Chronic Graft versus Host Disease but not the Intensity of Conditioning has Impact on Survival after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Advanced Hematological Diseases

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is often performed in cases of advanced hematological diseases, but because of the associated mortality and a high risk of relapse it is life prolonging only in some patients. Patients and Methods: A retrospective multi-center analysis of 401 patients was conducted to analyze the variables associated with outcome after alloHSCT in advanced hematological diseases. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the independence of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) from prognostic factors in a multivariate model. Results: The 5-year OS and DFS were 27.3 and 21.1% respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the underlying malignancy had a significant influence on OS and DFS (p < 0.001 and p < 0.011, respectively), whereas development of severe acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) had a negative impact on OS (p < 0.001). Development of chronic GvHD showed a trend to a better OS (p = 0.085) and DFS (p = 0.199). No impact was seen for the intensity of conditioning. Conclusion: Development of chronic GvHD but not the conditioning regimen improved the outcome after alloHSCT for advanced malignancies, underlining the importance of immunological rather than cytotoxic effects.

Relevance of liver-limited disease in metastatic colorectal cancer: Subgroup findings of the FIRE-3/AIO KRK0306 trial

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), liver‐limited disease (LLD) is associated with a higher chance of metastectomy leading to long‐term survival. However, limited data describes the prognostic and predictive relevance of initially unresectable LLD with regard to targeted first‐line therapy. The present analysis investigated the relevance of initially unresectable LLD in mCRC patients treated with targeted therapy against either the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF). The analysis was performed based on FIRE‐3, a randomized phase III trial comparing first‐line chemotherapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab (anti‐EGFR) or bevacizumab (anti‐VEGF) in RAS wild‐type (WT) mCRC. Of 400 patients, 133 (33.3%) had LLD and 267 (66.8%) had non‐LLD. Median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in LLD compared to non‐LLD patients (36.0 vs. 25.4 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51–0.87; p = 0.002). In a multivariate analysis also including secondary hepatic resection as time‐dependent variable, LLD status was independently prognostic for OS (HR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50–0.91; p = 0.01). As assessed by interaction tests, treatment benefit from FOLFIRI plus cetuximab compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab was independent of LLD status with regard to objective response rate (ORR), early tumour shrinkage ≥20% (ETS), depth of response (DpR) and OS (all p > 0.05). In conclusion, LLD could be identified as a prognostic factor in RAS‐WT mCRC, which was independent of hepatic resection in patients treated with targeted therapy. LLD had no predictive relevance since benefit from FOLFIRI plus cetuximab over bevacizumab was independent of LLD status.