Christoph Rodewald

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the repositionable Lotus valve compared with the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3 valve

BACKGROUND The rate of paravalvular aortic insufficiency (AI) with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with first generation devices was higher compared with surgical replacement. Residual AI after TAVI has been linked to an increased mortality rate. We compared two second generation TAVI devices - the repositionable Lotus valve with the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3 valve - regarding procedural and 30 day outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS In 78 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVI we evaluated post-procedural paravalvular AI, device success and early safety according to VARC criteria. Valve size was based on a 256-multislice computed tomography. Patients were followed for 30 days. The Lotus valve (N = 26) and the Edwards Sapien 3 valve (N = 52) were implanted under fluoroscopic guidance. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Perimeter derived annulus diameter did not differ with 25.7 ± 1.6mm for Lotus and 25.2 ± 2.1mm for Edwards Sapien 3 patients. After TAVI aortography and transthoracic echocardiography revealed no moderate or severe AI. The rate of mild AI was 12% for Lotus and 15% for Edwards Sapien 3 (p = 0.62). There were no deaths, stroke, annulus rupture or coronary obstruction. Device success was 96% and 98% (p = 0.61), early safety according to VARC 11.5% in both groups (p = 1.0) and the need for pacemaker implantation 27% and 4% (p < 0.003), respectively. CONCLUSIONS TAVI with second-generation devices was associated with no moderate or severe AI and a low rate of mild AI. Device success was high for Lotus and Edwards Sapien 3 while the need for permanent pacemaker was significantly higher with the Lotus valve.

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation in pure native aortic valve insufficiency using the repositionable and retrievable lotus valve

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of pure native aortic insufficiency is not routine clinical practice. Absent cusp calcification, missing landmarks in combination with no perfect valve control during release with first‐generation TAVI devices resulted in a high rate for need of a second valve or relevant residual aortic insufficiency. We report the first case with a native pure aortic valve insufficiency at high surgical risk successfully treated by implantation of the repositionable and completely retrievable Lotus valve, resulting in a well‐controlled and safe procedure with no residual aortic insufficiency.

Interferon β-1b Therapy in Chronic Viral Dilated Cardiomyopathy—Is There a Role for Specific Therapy?

BACKGROUND Myocardial biopsy can be used for the detection of viral genome in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Pilot studies have previously reported beneficial effects on clinical outcome and safety of an antiviral therapy using interferon beta-1b in chronic viral DCM. METHODS AND RESULTS Myocardial biopsies were taken from patients with DCM. Using polymerase chain reaction and Southern Blot analysis, viral genome could be detected in 49% of patients. In 42 patients with viral infection, off-label use with interferon beta-1b was initiated. A further 68 patients formed the control group. The outcome was evaluated after follow-up with echocardiography, exercise electrocardiogram, and New York Heart Association class. A total of 81 men and 29 women with a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 34% were included. The follow-up period was 36 months. In 33 (79%) patients with interferon beta-1b treatment, minor adverse reactions occurred, but no major adverse events were reported. No significant benefit for interferon beta-1b treatment on clinical outcome could be detected during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Off-label use with interferon beta-1b in patients with viral DCM is feasible and safe under routine clinical practice. Concerning the herein evaluated clinical outcome parameters, promising results from pilot studies could not be confirmed. High prevalence of parvovirus B19 (92%) might influence the results.

Bicuspid Aortic Stenosis Treated With the Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Valve

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis is a well-established and safe therapeutic option. However, data on TAVI in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis are limited and show a higher rate of moderate-severe aortic regurgitation compared with TAVI for tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. We report for the first time, to our knowledge, the use of the mechanically deployed Lotus valve in bicuspid aortic stenosis. In our patient who had severe bicuspid aortic stenosis and was at high surgical risk, the implantation of the repositionable and completely retrievable Lotus valve was a safe and controlled procedure resulting in no relevant aortic regurgitation.

Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation with the New Edwards Sapien 3 Valve for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis—Impact of Valve Size in a Single Center Experience

Aims The third generation Edwards Sapien 3 (Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, California) system was optimized to reduce residual aortic regurgitation and vascular complications. Methods and Results 235 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis were prospectively enrolled. Transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVI) were performed without general anesthesia by transfemoral approach. Patients were followed for 30 days. Patients received 23mm (N = 77), 26mm (N = 91) or 29mm (N = 67) valve based on pre-procedural 256 multislice computer tomography. Mean oversizing did not differ between the 3 valves. There was no residual moderate or severe aortic regurgitation. Rate of mild aortic regurgitation and regurgitation index did not differ between groups. There was no switch to general anesthesia or conversion to surgery. Rate of major vascular complication was 3.0% with no difference between valve and delivery sheath sizes. Within 30 days rates of all cause mortality (2.6%) and stroke (2.1%) were low. Conclusions In patients with severe aortic stenosis transfemoral TAVI with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve without general anesthesia was associated with a high rate of device success, no moderate or severe residual aortic regurgitation, low rates of major vascular complication, mortality and stroke within 30 days with no difference between the 3 valve sizes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02162069

Transfemoral valve-in-valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valves using the new balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3 valve

Surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves deteriorate 10 to 20 years after operation. Valve‐in‐valve implantation with first generation transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) devices has shown to be feasible. We report a first case series with the new Edwards Sapien 3 valve for transfemoral aortic valve‐in‐valve implantation.

Impact of suture mediated femoral access site closure with the Prostar XL compared to the ProGlide system on outcome in transfemoral aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND Management of femoral access site is an important issue in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and crucial for acute and long-term outcome. Data on vascular closure devices in this setting are limited. We evaluated safety and efficacy of the Prostar XL compared to the ProGlide suture-based vascular closure device. METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled 585 patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Outcomes were defined according to Valve academic research consortium (VARC)-2 criteria. In 237 (40.5%) patients femoral access site closure was performed using the Prostar and in 348 patients (59.6%) using the ProGlide vascular closure device. There was no significant difference in patient baseline characteristics including single and dual antiplatelet therapies. Sheath outer diameter was significantly larger in the ProGlide compared with the Prostar group (7.7±1.5 vs. 7.9±0.5mm; p=0.001). Closure device failure according to VARC-2 criteria was significantly more frequent with the Prostar versus ProGlide device (19% vs. 4.6%; p<0.01). Need for surgical repair (11.8% vs. 0%, p<0.01), major (12.2% vs. 2.3%, p<0.01) and minor (17.3% vs. 5.7%, p<0.01) vascular complications and bleeding complications (5.5% vs. 2.0%, p=0.02) occurred significantly more often with the Prostar device compared with the ProGlide system. In addition, in-hospital mortality was higher with Prostar compared with ProGlide (5.9% vs. 2.0%; p=0.01). CONCLUSION Femoral access site closure with the ProGlide device compared with the Prostar device in transfemoral aortic valve implantation was associated with significantly lower rates of closure device failure, minor and major bleedings and a significantly lower in-hospital mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.govNCT02162069.

Transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the repositionable Lotus valve for treatment of patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: results from a single-centre experience.

AIMS The aim of the study was to evaluate the procedural and 30-day results for the repositionable Lotus valve in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation in a single-centre experience. METHODS AND RESULTS We prospectively enrolled 110 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (NCT02162069). All procedures were performed without general anaesthesia by the transfemoral approach. Patients were followed for 30 days. Patients received the 23 mm (n=20), 25 mm (n=43) or 27 mm (n=47) Lotus device. Mean oversizing in relation to annulus or left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) did not differ among groups. There was no residual moderate or severe aortic regurgitation. The rate of mild aortic regurgitation was low at 9.1%. There was no valve embolisation, no need for a second valve and no conversion to surgery. The need for a new pacemaker implantation due to complete (third degree) or type II (Mobitz) second degree atrioventricular block was 24.1%, excluding patients with previously implanted devices. Within 30 days the rates of all-cause mortality and stroke were low. CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe aortic stenosis, transfemoral TAVI with the repositionable Lotus valve was associated with a high rate of device success, no moderate or severe residual aortic regurgitation, low rates of major vascular complications and mortality within 30 days.

TCT-744 New generation devices for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (Boston Scientific Lotus Valve and Edwards Sapien 3) are superior compared with last generation devices (Edwards XT and Medtronic Corevalve) with respect to VARC-2 outcome.

TCT-744 New generation devices for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (Boston Scientific Lotus Valve and Edwards Sapien 3) are superior compared with last generation devices (Edwards XT and Medtronic Corevalve) with respect to VARC-2 outcome Julia Seeger, Birgid Gonska, Christoph Rodewald, Wolfgang Rottbauer, Jochen Wöhrle Ulm University, Ulm, Germany; University hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Uniklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany; University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany

Image-guidance for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and cerebral embolic protection

The study was aimed at evaluation of the feasibility and potential benefit of image fusion (IF) of pre-procedural CT angiography (CTA) and x-ray (XR) fluoroscopy for image-guided navigation in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the strong focus on guiding the double-filter cerebral embolic protection device and valve prosthesis placement. METHODS In 31 patients undergoing TAVI, image registration of CTA-derived 3D anatomical models of the relevant cardiac anatomy and vasculature, and live XR was performed applying a commercially available navigation tool. The approach was evaluated in terms of the accuracy of the overlay. In 27 TAVI patients with IF receiving double-filter cerebral embolic protection device overall procedure time, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and total volume of intra-procedural iodinated contrast agent (CA) were registered and compared to those of a control group of prospectively enrolled during the same period of time N=27 patients receiving the same protection system but without IF. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS Image co-registration and model-based guidance is feasible in TAVI procedures. The overlay facilitates placement of the embolic protection device, placement of the guide wire in the left ventricle and initial alignment of the valve prosthesis prior to final deployment, thus improving the confidence level of the operators during the procedure without compromising CA or XR dose.