Christophe Schmitz
Utrecht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christophe Schmitz.
Journal of Molecular Biology | 2016
G.C.P. van Zundert; João Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues; M. Trellet; Christophe Schmitz; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; M. van Dijk; S.J. de Vries; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
The prediction of the quaternary structure of biomolecular macromolecules is of paramount importance for fundamental understanding of cellular processes and drug design. In the era of integrative structural biology, one way of increasing the accuracy of modeling methods used to predict the structure of biomolecular complexes is to include as much experimental or predictive information as possible in the process. This has been at the core of our information-driven docking approach HADDOCK. We present here the updated version 2.2 of the HADDOCK portal, which offers new features such as support for mixed molecule types, additional experimental restraints and improved protocols, all of this in a user-friendly interface. With well over 6000 registered users and 108,000 jobs served, an increasing fraction of which on grid resources, we hope that this timely upgrade will help the community to solve important biological questions and further advance the field. The HADDOCK2.2 Web server is freely accessible to non-profit users at http://haddock.science.uu.nl/services/HADDOCK2.2.
Journal of the American Chemical Society | 2008
Xun-Cheng Su; Bradley Y.-W. Man; Sophie R. Beeren; Haobo Liang; Shane Simonsen; Christophe Schmitz; Thomas Huber; Barbara A. Messerle; Gottfried Otting
A new lanthanide tag was designed for site-specific labeling of proteins with paramagnetic lanthanide ions. The tag, 4-mercaptomethyl-dipicolinic acid, binds lanthanide ions with nanomolar affinity, is readily attached to proteins via a disulfide bond, and avoids the problems of diastereomer formation associated with most of the conventional lanthanide tags. The high lanthanide affinity of the tag opens the possibility to measure residual dipolar couplings in a single sample containing a mixture of paramagnetic and diamagnetic lanthanides. Using the DNA-binding domain of the E. coli arginine repressor as an example, it is demonstrated that the tag allows immobilization of the lanthanide ion in close proximity of the protein by additional coordination of the lanthanide by a carboxyl group of the protein. The close proximity of the lanthanide ion promotes accurate determinations of magnetic susceptibility anisotropy tensors. In addition, the small size of the tag makes it highly suitable for studies of intermolecular interactions.
Journal of Molecular Biology | 2012
Christophe Schmitz; Robert B. Vernon; Gottfried Otting; David Baker; Thomas Huber
Paramagnetic metal ions generate pseudocontact shifts (PCSs) in nuclear magnetic resonance spectra that are manifested as easily measurable changes in chemical shifts. Metals can be incorporated into proteins through metal binding tags, and PCS data constitute powerful long-range restraints on the positions of nuclear spins relative to the coordinate system of the magnetic susceptibility anisotropy tensor (Δχ-tensor) of the metal ion. We show that three-dimensional structures of proteins can reliably be determined using PCS data from a single metal binding site combined with backbone chemical shifts. The program PCS-ROSETTA automatically determines the Δχ-tensor and metal position from the PCS data during the structure calculations, without any prior knowledge of the protein structure. The program can determine structures accurately for proteins of up to 150 residues, offering a powerful new approach to protein structure determination that relies exclusively on readily measurable backbone chemical shifts and easily discriminates between correctly and incorrectly folded conformations.
Proteins | 2012
João Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues; Mikael Trellet; Christophe Schmitz; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
Inaccuracies in computational molecular modeling methods are often counterweighed by brute‐force generation of a plethora of putative solutions. These are then typically sieved via structural clustering based on similarity measures such as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of atomic positions. Albeit widely used, these measures suffer from several theoretical and technical limitations (e.g., choice of regions for fitting) that impair their application in multicomponent systems (N > 2), large‐scale studies (e.g., interactomes), and other time‐critical scenarios. We present here a simple similarity measure for structural clustering based on atomic contacts—the fraction of common contacts—and compare it with the most used similarity measure of the protein docking community—interface backbone RMSD. We show that this method produces very compact clusters in remarkably short time when applied to a collection of binary and multicomponent protein–protein and protein–DNA complexes. Furthermore, it allows easy clustering of similar conformations of multicomponent symmetrical assemblies in which chain permutations can occur. Simple contact‐based metrics should be applicable to other structural biology clustering problems, in particular for time‐critical or large‐scale endeavors.Proteins 2012;
Proteins | 2014
Marc F. Lensink; Iain H. Moal; Paul A. Bates; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Ezgi Karaca; Christophe Schmitz; Marc van Dijk; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin; Miriam Eisenstein; Brian Jiménez-García; Solène Grosdidier; Albert Solernou; Laura Pérez-Cano; Chiara Pallara; Juan Fernández-Recio; Jianqing Xu; Pravin Muthu; Krishna Praneeth Kilambi; Jeffrey J. Gray; Sergei Grudinin; Georgy Derevyanko; Julie C. Mitchell; John Wieting; Eiji Kanamori; Yuko Tsuchiya; Yoichi Murakami; Joy Sarmiento; Daron M. Standley; Matsuyuki Shirota
We report the first assessment of blind predictions of water positions at protein–protein interfaces, performed as part of the critical assessment of predicted interactions (CAPRI) community‐wide experiment. Groups submitting docking predictions for the complex of the DNase domain of colicin E2 and Im2 immunity protein (CAPRI Target 47), were invited to predict the positions of interfacial water molecules using the method of their choice. The predictions—20 groups submitted a total of 195 models—were assessed by measuring the recall fraction of water‐mediated protein contacts. Of the 176 high‐ or medium‐quality docking models—a very good docking performance per se—only 44% had a recall fraction above 0.3, and a mere 6% above 0.5. The actual water positions were in general predicted to an accuracy level no better than 1.5 Å, and even in good models about half of the contacts represented false positives. This notwithstanding, three hotspot interface water positions were quite well predicted, and so was one of the water positions that is believed to stabilize the loop that confers specificity in these complexes. Overall the best interface water predictions was achieved by groups that also produced high‐quality docking models, indicating that accurate modelling of the protein portion is a determinant factor. The use of established molecular mechanics force fields, coupled to sampling and optimization procedures also seemed to confer an advantage. Insights gained from this analysis should help improve the prediction of protein–water interactions and their role in stabilizing protein complexes. Proteins 2014; 82:620–632.
Proteins | 2013
João Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Ezgi Karaca; Mikael Trellet; M. van Dijk; G.C.P. van Zundert; Christophe Schmitz; S.J. de Vries; A. Bordogna; L.H. Bonati; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
Information‐driven docking is currently one of the most successful approaches to obtain structural models of protein interactions as demonstrated in the latest round of CAPRI. While various experimental and computational techniques can be used to retrieve information about the binding mode, the availability of three‐dimensional structures of the interacting partners remains a limiting factor. Fortunately, the wealth of structural information gathered by large‐scale initiatives allows for homology‐based modeling of a significant fraction of the protein universe. Defining the limits of information‐driven docking based on such homology models is therefore highly relevant. Here we show, using previous CAPRI targets, that out of a variety of measures, the global sequence identity between template and target is a simple but reliable predictor of the achievable quality of the docking models. This indicates that a well‐defined overall fold is critical for the interaction. Furthermore, the quality of the data at our disposal to characterize the interaction plays a determinant role in the success of the docking. Given reliable interface information we can obtain acceptable predictions even at low global sequence identity. These results, which define the boundaries between trustworthy and unreliable predictions, should guide both experts and nonexperts in defining the limits of what is achievable by docking. This is highly relevant considering that the fraction of the interactome amenable for docking is only bound to grow as the number of experimentally solved structures increases. Proteins 2013; 81:2119–2128.
Journal of Biomolecular NMR | 2008
Christophe Schmitz; Mitchell Stanton-Cook; Xun-Cheng Su; Gottfried Otting; Thomas Huber
Journal of the American Chemical Society | 2007
Michael John; Christophe Schmitz; Ah Young Park; Nicholas E. Dixon; Thomas Huber; Gottfried Otting
Journal of Biomolecular NMR | 2006
Christophe Schmitz; Michael John; Ah Young Park; Nicholas E. Dixon; Gottfried Otting; Guido Pintacuda; Thomas Huber
Journal of Biomolecular NMR | 2011
Christophe Schmitz; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin