Christopher A. Powers
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Christopher A. Powers.
American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2012
Diane L. Frankenfield; Eric D. Weinhandl; Christopher A. Powers; Benjamin L. Howell; Charles A. Herzog; Wendy L. St. Peter
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major source of mortality and morbidity in dialysis patients. Population-level descriptions of CVD medication use are lacking in this population. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Adult dialysis patients in the United States, alive on December 31, 2006, with Medicare Parts A and B and enrollment in Medicare Part D continuously in 2007. PREDICTOR CVDs and demographic characteristics. OUTCOME ≥1 prescription fill during follow-up (2007). MEASUREMENTS Average out-of-pocket costs per user per month and average total drug costs per member per month were calculated. RESULTS Of 225,635 dialysis patients who met inclusion criteria during the entry period, 70% (n = 158,702) had continuous Part D coverage during follow-up. Of these, 76% received the low-income subsidy. β-Blockers were the most commonly used CVD medication (64%), followed by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (52%), calcium channel blockers (51%), lipid-lowering agents (44%), and α-agonists (23%). Use varied by demographics, geographic region, and low-income subsidy status. For CVD medications, mean out-of-pocket costs per user per month were
Inquiry | 2012
J. Samantha Shoemaker; Amy J. Davidoff; Bruce Stuart; Ilene H. Zuckerman; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Christopher A. Powers
3.44 and
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy | 2010
Dong-Churl Suh; Christopher A. Powers; Joseph A. Barone; Hyunchul Shin; Jinweon Kwon; Susan Goodin
49.59 and mean total costs per member per month were
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology | 2012
Benjamin L. Howell; Christopher A. Powers; Eric D. Weinhandl; Wendy L. St. Peter; Diane L. Frankenfield
124.02 and
Psychiatric Services | 2017
Pamela Roberto; Nicole Brandt; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Eleanor M. Perfetto; Christopher A. Powers; Bruce Stuart
110.32 for patients with and without the low-income subsidy, respectively. LIMITATIONS Information was available for only filled prescriptions under the Part D benefit; information for clinical contraindications was lacking, information for over-the-counter medications was unavailable, and medication adherence and persistence were not examined. CONCLUSIONS Most Medicare dialysis patients in 2007 were enrolled in Part D, and most enrollees received the low-income subsidy. β-Blockers were the most used CVD medication. Total costs of CVD medications were modestly higher for low-income subsidy patients, but out-of-pocket costs were much higher for patients not receiving the subsidy. Further study is warranted to delineate sources of variation in the use and costs of CVD medications across subgroups.
Medical Care | 2017
Meghan Hufstader Gabriel; Christopher A. Powers; William E. Encinosa; Julie P. W. Bynum
There is concern about poor take-up of the Medicare Part D Low-Income Subsidy (LIS), but uncertainty in published estimates. The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), which contains Medicare LIS enrollment records and extensive survey data on individual beneficiary characteristics, would appear an ideal resource for evaluating LIS take-up. However, use of the MCBS to identify eligible beneficiaries is limited due to underreporting of income and lack of asset information in the published MCBS releases. We evaluate LIS eligibility and participation by enhancing the reliability of MCBS financial information using unpublished survey data on income and assets together with an income imputation procedure.
American Journal of Emergency Medicine | 2016
Susannah G. Cafardi; Jesse M. Pines; Partha Deb; Christopher A. Powers; William H. Shrank
BACKGROUND Although full costs (including direct and indirect costs) that incurred during the process of chemotherapy administration should be measured, many studies estimate only direct labor and medication costs associated with various chemotherapy delivery systems. OBJECTIVES To estimate the total costs for dispensing and administration of fluorouracil when administered with leucovorin, by intravenous infusion or bolus, using a microcosting approach from the perspective of a provider or health system. METHODS A time-and-motion study was used to measure the time spent by (1) pharmacy staff in the handling, admixture, and dispensing of fluorouracil and (2) patients in the clinic. The study was performed at The Cancer Institute of New Jersey for an 8-month period. Costs of dispensing and administering fluorouracil were calculated per patient visit on the basis of resources used in the processing of fluorouracil and time spent by pharmacy staff and patient. All costs were standardized to 2005 dollars. RESULTS A total of 275 observations were made, and 74 (26.9%) of these were associated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Pharmacy staff spent an average of 11 minutes for bolus fluorouracil with leucovorin infusion (fluorouracil/LCV-IV) and 8 minutes for bolus fluorouracil with bolus leucovorin (fluorouracil/LCV-B). Patients who received fluorouracil/LCV-IV spent an average of 203 minutes in the clinic, whereas patients who received fluorouracil/LCV-B spent 110 minutes. The average cost of administering fluorouracil/LCV-IV was
Administration and Policy in Mental Health | 2017
Pamela Roberto; Nicole Brandt; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Eleanor M. Perfetto; Christopher A. Powers; Bruce Stuart
933, which comprised drug costs (
The American Economic Review | 2015
Jonathan D. Ketcham; Claudio Lucarelli; Christopher A. Powers
279), dispensing costs (
American Journal of Kidney Diseases | 2014
Akeem A. Yusuf; Benjamin L. Howell; Christopher A. Powers; Wendy L. St. Peter
189), and administration costs (