Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Christopher J. Patrick is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Christopher J. Patrick.


Estuaries and Coasts | 2016

The Relationship Between Shoreline Armoring and Adjacent Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in Chesapeake Bay and Nearby Atlantic Coastal Bays

Christopher J. Patrick; Donald E. Weller; Micah Ryder

Shoreline armoring is an ancient and globally used engineering strategy to prevent shoreline erosion along marine, estuarine, and freshwater coastlines. Armoring alters the land water interface and has the potential to affect nearshore submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) by changing nearshore hydrology, morphology, water clarity, and sediment composition. We quantified the relationships between the condition (bulkhead, riprap, or natural) of individual shoreline segments and three measures of directly adjacent SAV (the area of potential SAV habitat, the area occupied by SAV, and the proportion of potential habitat area that was occupied) in the Chesapeake Bay and nearby Atlantic coastal bays. Bulkhead had negative relationships with SAV in the polyhaline and mesohaline zones. Salinity and watershed land cover significantly modified the effect of shoreline armoring on nearshore SAV beds, and the effects of armoring were strongest in polyhaline subestuaries with forested watersheds. In high salinity systems, distance from shore modified the relationship between shoreline and SAV. The negative relationship between bulkhead and SAV was greater further off shore. By using individual shoreline segments as the study units, our analysis separated the effects of armoring and land cover, which were confounded in previous analyses that quantified average armoring and SAV abundance for much larger study units (subestuaries). Our findings suggest that redesigning or removing shoreline armoring structures may benefit nearshore SAV in some settings. Because armoring is ubiquitous, such information can inform efforts to reverse the global decline in SAV and the loss of the ecosystem services that SAV provides.


BioScience | 2017

Submersed aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay: Sentinel species in a changing world

Robert J. Orth; William C. Dennison; Jonathon S. Lefcheck; Cassie Gurbisz; Michael Hannam; Jennifer L.D. Keisman; J. Brooke Landry; Kenneth A. Moore; Rebecca R. Murphy; Christopher J. Patrick; Jeremy M. Testa; Donald E. Weller; David J. Wilcox

Abstract Chesapeake Bay has undergone profound changes since European settlement. Increases in human and livestock populations, associated changes in land use, increases in nutrient loadings, shoreline armoring, and depletion of fish stocks have altered the important habitats within the Bay. Submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) is a critical foundational habitat and provides numerous benefits and services to society. In Chesapeake Bay, SAV species are also indicators of environmental change because of their sensitivity to water quality and shoreline development. As such, SAV has been deeply integrated into regional regulations and annual assessments of management outcomes, restoration efforts, the scientific literature, and popular media coverage. Even so, SAV in Chesapeake Bay faces many historical and emerging challenges. The future of Chesapeake Bay is indicated by and contingent on the success of SAV. Its persistence will require continued action, coupled with new practices, to promote a healthy and sustainable ecosystem.


Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America | 2018

Long-term nutrient reductions lead to the unprecedented recovery of a temperate coastal region

Jonathan S. Lefcheck; Robert J. Orth; William C. Dennison; David J. Wilcox; Rebecca R. Murphy; Jennifer L.D. Keisman; Cassie Gurbisz; Michael Hannam; J. Brooke Landry; Kenneth A. Moore; Christopher J. Patrick; Jeremy M. Testa; Donald E. Weller; Richard A. Batiuk

Significance Human actions, including nutrient pollution, are causing the widespread degradation of coastal habitats, and efforts to restore these valuable ecosystems have been largely unsuccessful or of limited scope. We provide an example of successful restoration linking effective management of nutrients to the successful recovery of submersed aquatic vegetation along thousands of kilometers of coastline in Chesapeake Bay, United States. We also show that biodiversity conservation can be an effective path toward recovery of coastal systems. Our study validates 30 years of environmental policy and provides a road map for future ecological restoration. Humans strongly impact the dynamics of coastal systems, yet surprisingly few studies mechanistically link management of anthropogenic stressors and successful restoration of nearshore habitats over large spatial and temporal scales. Such examples are sorely needed to ensure the success of ecosystem restoration efforts worldwide. Here, we unite 30 consecutive years of watershed modeling, biogeochemical data, and comprehensive aerial surveys of Chesapeake Bay, United States to quantify the cascading effects of anthropogenic impacts on submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV), an ecologically and economically valuable habitat. We employ structural equation models to link land use change to higher nutrient loads, which in turn reduce SAV cover through multiple, independent pathways. We also show through our models that high biodiversity of SAV consistently promotes cover, an unexpected finding that corroborates emerging evidence from other terrestrial and marine systems. Due to sustained management actions that have reduced nitrogen concentrations in Chesapeake Bay by 23% since 1984, SAV has regained 17,000 ha to achieve its highest cover in almost half a century. Our study empirically demonstrates that nutrient reductions and biodiversity conservation are effective strategies to aid the successful recovery of degraded systems at regional scales, a finding which is highly relevant to the utility of environmental management programs worldwide.


Estuaries and Coasts | 2017

Linking the Abundance of Estuarine Fish and Crustaceans in Nearshore Waters to Shoreline Hardening and Land Cover

Matthew S. Kornis; Richard G. Balouskus; Donna Marie Bilkovic; Lori A. Davias; Steve Giordano; Keira Heggie; Anson H. Hines; John M. Jacobs; Thomas E. Jordan; Ryan S. King; Christopher J. Patrick; Rochelle D. Seitz; Heather Soulen; Timothy E. Targett; Donald E. Weller; Dennis F. Whigham; Jim Uphoff

Human alteration of land cover (e.g., urban and agricultural land use) and shoreline hardening (e.g., bulkheading and rip rap revetment) are intensifying due to increasing human populations and sea level rise. Fishes and crustaceans that are ecologically and economically valuable to coastal systems may be affected by these changes, but direct links between these stressors and faunal populations have been elusive at large spatial scales. We examined nearshore abundance patterns of 15 common taxa across gradients of urban and agricultural land cover as well as wetland and hardened shoreline in tributary subestuaries of the Chesapeake Bay and Delaware Coastal Bays. We used a comprehensive landscape-scale study design that included 587 sites in 39 subestuaries. Our analyses indicate shoreline hardening has predominantly negative effects on estuarine fauna in water directly adjacent to the hardened shoreline and at the larger system-scale as cumulative hardened shoreline increased in the subestuary. In contrast, abundances of 12 of 15 species increased with the proportion of shoreline comprised of wetlands. Abundances of several species were also significantly related to watershed cropland cover, submerged aquatic vegetation, and total nitrogen, suggesting land-use-mediated effects on prey and refuge habitat. Specifically, abundances of four bottom-oriented species were negatively related to cropland cover, which is correlated with elevated nitrogen and reduced submerged and wetland vegetation in the receiving subestuary. These empirical relationships raise important considerations for conservation and management strategies in coastal environments.


Ecological Applications | 2017

Modeled hydrologic metrics show links between hydrology and the functional composition of stream assemblages

Christopher J. Patrick; Lester L. Yuan

Flow alteration is widespread in streams, but current understanding of the effects of differences in flow characteristics on stream biological communities is incomplete. We tested hypotheses about the effect of variation in hydrology on stream communities by using generalized additive models to relate watershed information to the values of different flow metrics at gauged sites. Flow models accounted for 54-80% of the spatial variation in flow metric values among gauged sites. We then used these models to predict flow metrics in 842 ungauged stream sites in the mid-Atlantic United States that were sampled for fish, macroinvertebrates, and environmental covariates. Fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages were characterized in terms of a suite of metrics that quantified aspects of community composition, diversity, and functional traits that were expected to be associated with differences in flow characteristics. We related modeled flow metrics to biological metrics in a series of stressor-response models. Our analyses identified both drying and base flow instability as explaining 30-50% of the observed variability in fish and invertebrate community composition. Variations in community composition were related to variations in the prevalence of dispersal traits in invertebrates and trophic guilds in fish. The results demonstrate that we can use statistical models to predict hydrologic conditions at bioassessment sites, which, in turn, we can use to estimate relationships between flow conditions and biological characteristics. This analysis provides an approach to quantify the effects of spatial variation in flow metrics using readily available biomonitoring data.


Estuaries and Coasts | 2018

Land Use and Salinity Drive Changes in SAV Abundance and Community Composition

Christopher J. Patrick; Donald E. Weller; Robert J. Orth; David J. Wilcox; Michael Hannam

Conserving and restoring submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) are key management goals for estuaries worldwide because SAV integrates many aspects of water quality and provides a wide range of ecosystem services. Management strategies are typically focused on aggregated abundance of several SAV species, because species cannot be easily distinguished in remotely sensed data. Human land use and shoreline alteration have been shown to negatively impact SAV abundance, but the effects have varied with study, spatial scale, and location. The differences in reported effects may be partly due to the focus on abundance, which overlooks within-community and among-community dynamics that generate total SAV abundance. We analyzed long-term SAV aerial survey data (1984–2009) and ground observations of community composition (1984–2012) in subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay to integrate variations in abundance with differences in community composition. We identified five communities (mixed freshwater, milfoil-Zannichellia, mixed mesohaline, Zannichellia, and Ruppia-Zostera). Temporal variations in SAV abundance were more strongly related to community identity than to terrestrial stressors, and responses to stressors differed among communities and among species. In one fifth of the subestuaries, the community identity changed during the study, and the probability of such a change was positively related to the prevalence of riprapped shoreline in the subestuary. Mixed freshwater communities had the highest rates of recovery, and this may have been driven by Hydrilla verticillata, which was the single best predictor of SAV recovery rate. Additional species-specific and community-specific research will likely yield better understanding of the factors affecting community identity and SAV abundance, more accurate predictive models, and more effective management strategies.


Wetlands | 2014

Dispersal Mode and Ability Affect the Spatial Turnover of a Wetland Macroinvertebrate Metacommunity

Christopher J. Patrick; Matthew J. Cooper; Donald G. Uzarski

Dispersal limitation is an important element of metacommunity dynamics, but measuring dispersal is complicated because many communities are composed of species that vary in dispersal strategy and ability We explored how macroinvertebrate community structure varied through the growing season and across habitat types in the Muskegon River mouth wetland complex. We then measured the effect of dispersal mode and ability on the structure of these communities. Macroinvertebrates were categorized as having no, poor, or strong ability to either fly or swim. We found that community structure was closely related to micro-habitat type (i.e., sediment, water column, plant stems) and that communities composed of strong flyers had higher cross-site similarity than those composed of poor or non-flyers.Strong swimmers had higher cross-site similarity than poor or non-swimmers. Prior studies have focused on body size or a multivariate measure of dispersal ability to measure the effect of dispersal on metacommunity structure rather than the direct measures that we used. Our results suggest that while micro-habitat strongly influenced community structure in general, both dispersal mode and dispersal ability affected the spatial organization of macroinvertebrate metacommunities in the Muskegon River mouth wetland complex.


Oecologia | 2013

The β-richness of two detritivore caddisflies affects fine organic matter export

Christopher J. Patrick; Dylan H. Fernandez

We used stream networks as a model system to test whether the ecosystem function, upstream production, and export of fine organic particles, an important subsidy to downstream habitats, would vary between two stream networks with identical detritivore species but different spatial distributions (i.e. high or low β-richness). Our experiment employed artificial stream networks with two simulated tributaries. We used two species of detritivorous caddisflies, Lepidostoma sp. and Pycnopsyche guttifer, in either sympatry (low β-richness) or allopatry (high β-richness) in the tributaries of each network. The tributaries were given either senesced or green speckled alder (Alnus incana rugosa). In the networks with senesced leaves, particle export was more than twice as great when the detritivores were in allopatry whereas interference competition in sympatry reduced particle export. In the networks with green leaves, particle export did not significantly vary between the allopatric and sympatric distributions because the interference competition was reduced and the two species had similar feeding rates on green leaves. Humans are altering β-richness by homogenizing or differentiating flora and fauna across habitats; however, little is known about how altering this type of biodiversity will affect ecosystem functions. Our experimental manipulation is a simple version of a change in the β-richness of the detritivores in a more complex stream network in nature. These results may indicate that shifts in species distributions across sites may significantly affect ecosystem functions, even when no species are lost from a watershed.


Estuaries and Coasts | 2014

Effects of Shoreline Alteration and Other Stressors on Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in Subestuaries of Chesapeake Bay and the Mid-Atlantic Coastal Bays

Christopher J. Patrick; Donald E. Weller; Xuyong Li; Micah Ryder


Biological Invasions | 2016

Local and regional disturbances associated with the invasion of Chesapeake Bay marshes by the common reed Phragmites australis

M. Benjamin Sciance; Christopher J. Patrick; Donald E. Weller; Meghan N. Williams; Melissa K. McCormick; Eric L. G. Hazelton

Collaboration


Dive into the Christopher J. Patrick's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Donald E. Weller

Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David J. Wilcox

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Michael Hannam

Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert J. Orth

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cassie Gurbisz

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jennifer L.D. Keisman

United States Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jeremy M. Testa

University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Kenneth A. Moore

Virginia Institute of Marine Science

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Micah Ryder

Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge