Chuang-Yao Zhao

Cross Vapor Stream Effect on Falling Film Evaporation in Horizontal Tube Bundle Using R134a

Abstract The falling film evaporation of R134a with nucleate boiling outside a triangular-pitch (2-3-2-3) tube bundle is experimentally investigated, and the effects of saturation temperature, film flow rate and heat flux on heat transfer performance are studied. To study the effect of cross vapor stream on the falling film evaporation, a novel test section is designed, including the tube bundle, liquid and extra vapor distributors. The measurements without extra vapor are conducted at the saturation temperature of 6, 10 and 16°C, film Reynolds number of 220 to 2650, and heat flux of 20 to 60 kWm−2. Cross vapor stream effect experiments are operated at three heat fluxes 20, 30, and 40 kWm−2 and two film flow rates of 0.035 and 0.07 kgm−1s−1, and the vapor velocity at the smallest clearance in the tube bundle varies from 0 to 2.4 ms−1. The results indicate that: film flow rate, heat flux and saturation temperature significantly influence the heat transfer; the cross vapor stream either promote or inhibit the falling film evaporation, depending on the tube position, film flow rate, heat flux and vapor velocity.

Pool boiling heat transfer of water and nanofluid outside the surface with higher roughness and different wettability

ABSTRACT In order to investigate the effect of surface wettability on the pool boiling heat transfer, nucleate pool boiling experiments were conducted with deionized water and silica based nanofluid. A higher surface roughness value in the range of 3.9 ~ 6.0μm was tested. The contact angle was from 4.7° to 153°, and heat flux was from 30kW/m2 to 300kW/m2. Experimental results showed that hydrophilicity diminish the boiling heat transfer of silica nanofluid on the surfaces with higher roughness. As the increment of nanofluid mass concentration from 0.025% to 0.1%, a further reduction of heat transfer coefficient was observed. For the super hydrophobic surface with higher roughness (contact angle 153.0°), boiling heat transfer was enhanced at heat flux less than 93 kW/m2, and then the heat transfer degraded at higher heat flux.

Experimental Study of Water Cooled Condenser Made of Three Dimensional and High Fin Density Integral-Finned Tubes

The thermo-hydraulic performance of two shell and tube condensers was investigated with an experimental approach. The experiment is conducted in a water cooled centrifugal chiller test rig. The condensers are made of three-dimensional (3-D) and high fin density integral-finned (2-D) tubes. 2-D and 3-D tubes all have the diameter of 3/4 inch (19mm). The 2-D tube has external fin density of 56fpi (fins per inch), fin height 1.023mm and 48 internal ribs per circle. The 3-D enhanced tube has the external fin density of 45fpi, fin height of 0.981mm and 45 internal ribs per circle. The 3-D tube is widely used in the water cooled chillers. 2-D tube is a newly designed surface with enhanced external fin density. Condensing heat transfer coefficient of R134a outside single horizontal tube is firstly tested at saturate temperature of 40°C. At the internal water velocity of 2.2m/s, the overall heat transfer coefficients of 2-D tube is in the range of 10364.7 to 12420.9W/m2K, 4.2% ∼ 9.0% higher than 3-D tube. External condensing heat transfer coefficient is 16.3% ∼ 25.2% higher than 3-D tube. The condensers are manufactured with these two types of tubes. Both condensers have the same geometric parameters except the tubes and tube bundle space. The length of tube in the condenser is 4000mm. The tube bundles are arranged in a staggered mode. For the integral-fin tube condenser, the longitudinal tube pitch of tube arrays is 23mm in rows and the transverse is 20mm. At the same power input and cooling water inlet temperature of 32°C, the cooling power of 2-D tube condenser are respectively of 1755.4kW and 1769.4kW; 3-D tube condenser is 1727.5kW and 1770.5kW. The pressure drop increased about 11.2% ∼ 15.9% for the 2-D tube condenser compared with 3-D tube condenser. Generally, the two condensers have the same heat transfer performance, while the integral-fin tube condenser saves 15% of copper material consumption.Copyright