Claudia Rosso Felipe

Effect of sirolimus on malignancy and survival after kidney transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Objective To examine risk of malignancy and death in patients with kidney transplant who receive the immunosuppressive drug sirolimus. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2013. Eligibility Randomized controlled trials comparing immunosuppressive regimens with and without sirolimus in recipients of kidney or combined pancreatic and renal transplant for which the author was willing to provide individual patient level data. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full text reports of potentially eligible trials to identify studies for inclusion. All eligible trials reported data on malignancy or survival. Results The search yielded 2365 unique citations. Patient level data were available from 5876 patients from 21 randomized trials. Sirolimus was associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of malignancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.93) and a 56% reduction in the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (0.44, 0.30 to 0.63) compared with controls. The most pronounced effect was seen in patients who converted to sirolimus from an established immunosuppressive regimen, resulting in a reduction in risk of malignancy (0.34, 0.28 to 0.41), non-melanoma skin cancer (0.32, 0.24 to 0.42), and other cancers (0.52, 0.38 to 0.69). Sirolimus was associated with an increased risk of death (1.43, 1.21 to 1.71) compared with controls. Conclusions Sirolimus was associated with a reduction in the risk of malignancy and non-melanoma skin cancer in transplant recipients. The benefit was most pronounced in patients who converted from an established immunosuppressive regimen to sirolimus. Given the risk of mortality, however, the use of this drug does not seem warranted for most patients with kidney transplant. Further research is needed to determine if different populations, such as those at high risk of cancer, might benefit from sirolimus.

Reduced Incidence of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients Receiving Everolimus and Reduced Tacrolimus Doses

This study compared the incidence of CMV infection/disease in de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving everolimus or mycophenolate and no CMV pharmacological prophylaxis. We randomized 288 patients to receive a single 3 mg/kg dose of antithymocyte globulin, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (r‐ATG/EVR, n = 85); basiliximab, tacrolimus, everolimus, and prednisone (BAS/EVR, n = 102); or basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, and prednisone (BAS/MPS, n = 101). The primary end‐point was the incidence of first CMV infection/disease in the intention‐to‐treat population at 12 months. Patients treated with r‐ATG/EVR showed a 90% proportional reduction (4.7% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.037–0.29; p < 0.001), while those treated with BAS/EVR showed a 75% proportional reduction (10.8% vs. 37.6%, HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.13–0.48; p < 0.001) in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to BAS/MPS. There were no differences in the incidence of acute rejection (9.4 vs. 18.6 vs. 15.8%, p = 0.403), wound‐healing complications, delayed graft function, and proteinuria. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was lower in BAS/EVR (65.7 ± 21.8 vs. 60.6 ± 20.9 vs. 69.5 ± 21.5 ml/min, p = 0.021). In de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving no pharmacological CMV prophylaxis, reduced‐dose tacrolimus and everolimus was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of CMV infection/disease compared to standard tacrolimus dose and mycophenolate (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01354301).

Risk Factors Associated With Graft Loss and Patient Survival After Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of traditional risk factors on major kidney transplantation outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from kidney transplantation procedures performed between 2003 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for the influence of traditional risk factors on transplantation outcome. Of 2364 transplants, 67% were from living donors, 27% were from donors who met standard criteria, and 6% were from donor who met expanded criteria. Two hundred thirty-nine procedures (10%) were performed in pediatric patients. Immunosuppression was selected on the basis of subgroup population. RESULTS At 1 year posttransplantation, cumulative freedom from a treated acute rejection episode (ARE) was 76.7%, with no difference between black vs nonblack recipients (75.0% vs 73.4%; P = .79). At 2 years, survival for patients (95.3% vs 88.3% vs 82.1%; P < .001) and grafts 92.3% vs 80.3% vs 70.9%; P < .001) was better in recipients of living donor grafts compared with donors who met standard or expanded criteria, respectively. Moreover, graft survival was poorer in black vs nonblack patients (83.6% vs 88.7%; P < .05) because of high mortality (13% vs 7%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and black race (OR, 1.8), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.1), extended-criteria criteria donor organ (OR, 2.0), delayed graft function (OR, 1.8), and any ARE (OR, 3.5). At 6 months posttransplantation, risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.5) or ARE (OR, 2.4), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.0), extended-criteria donor organ (OR, 2.6), ARE (OR, 9.5), and impaired graft function (creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dL; OR, 2.1). CONCLUSION Traditional risk factors are still associated with transplantation outcome. Poorer graft survival in black vs nonblack recipients was due to higher mortality rather than graft loss.

Pharmacogenetics of calcineurin inhibitors in Brazilian renal transplant patients

AIM Polymorphisms in the CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genes have been investigated as modulators of the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of cyclosporine (CSA) and tacrolimus (TAC) in European, North American and Asian populations, with controversial results. The extensive variation in worldwide frequency distribution of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms is a caveat against the extrapolation of these data to the heterogeneous and admixed Brazilian population. We investigated the effect of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms on CSA and TAC dose-adjusted trough concentration (C₀/dose) in Brazilian renal transplant recipients, during the first 3 months post-transplantation. MATERIALS & METHODS Patients receiving CSA (n = 150) or TAC (n = 151) were genotyped for CYP3A5*3 (rs776746, 6986A>G), *6 (rs10264272, 14690G>A) and *7 (rs41303343, 27131-27132insT) and for ABCB1 1236C>T (rs1128503), 2677G>T/A (rs2032582) and 3435C>T (rs1045642) polymorphisms. We explored the effects of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 polymorphisms, clinical and demographical characteristics on CSA and TAC C₀/dose under a two-step data analysis strategy by fitting a longitudinal mixed-effects model to the data; first to select the important covariates under a univariate setting and then to fit the final multivariate model. RESULTS C₀/dose of TAC was associated with the number of CYP3A5-defective alleles, in a gene-dose manner, throughout the observation period, whereas C₀/dose of CSA was associated with body surface area and prednisone dosing. No other significant associations were detected. CONCLUSION Individual adjustment of the initial TAC dose according to the CYP3A5 haplotypes comprising the CYP3A5*3, *6 and *7 defective alleles might prove beneficial to Brazilian renal transplant recipients and should be further investigated in prospective trials.

The impact of ethnic miscegenation on tacrolimus clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Abstract: The impact of ethnic miscegenation on tacrolimus clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring. We sought to determine the influence of ethnic miscegenation on tacrolimus pharmacokinetics and trough concentrations during the first 6 months after transplantation.

Lipid Profile Changes During the First Year After Kidney Transplantation: Risk Factors and Influence of the Immunosuppressive Drug Regimen

AIM This study analyzed the incidence, time course, and risk factors associated with dyslipidemia during the first year after kidney transplantation among patients receiving various immunosuppressive regimens. METHODS The analysis included 474 kidney transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine (CSA) combined with sirolimus (SRL; n=137) or mycophenolate (MMF, n=58) or everolimus (EVR, n=47); or SRL combined with MMF (n=32); or tacrolimus (TAC) combined with SRL (n=86) or MMF (n=114). All patients received prednisone. We evaluated the influence of demographic features, clinical outcomes, and statin use on lipid profiles during the first year after transplantation. total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (hdl-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (ldl-C), non-HDL-C, TC:HDL-C, LDL-C:HDL-C, TG:HDL-C. RESULTS Lipid profiles were within the recommended ranges in 28% of patients pretransplantation and in 10% at 1 year; 27% of them received statins. At 1 year, LDL-C<100 mg/dL was observed in 31.8% of patients but more than 35% of these patients still showed other lipid fractions or ratios outside recommended target concentrations. Among all patients with LDL-C>100 mg/dL, almost 70% to 80% had other lipid fractions or ratios within target ranges. A logistic regression analysis showed age, gender, time on dialysis, diabetes, type of calcineurin inhibitor (CSA vs TAC), adjunctive therapy (SRL/EVR vs MMF) and prednisone dose to be associated with dyslipidemia. CONCLUSION Dyslipidemia is frequent at 1 year after transplantation. The lack of agreement among changes observed in lipid fractions and ratios suggests that more studies are necessary to guide therapy besides targeting LDL-C concentrations as recommended by current guidelines.

Planned Randomized Conversion From Tacrolimus to Sirolimus‐Based Immunosuppressive Regimen in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Planned conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus was evaluated in de novo kidney transplant recipients. In this multicenter, randomized, open‐label study, 297 patients were initially treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate sodium and prednisone. Of the 283 patients reaching 3 months, 97 were converted to sirolimus (SRL), 107 were maintained on tacrolimus (TAC) and 79 were patients receiving TAC without criteria to undergo intervention at month 3 (TACex). The primary objective was to show superior estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in the SRL group at month 24. Of the 258 patients who completed 24 months, 91 (94%) were in the SRL group, 101 (94%) in the TAC group and 66 (84%) in the TACex group. In the intention‐to‐treat population there were no differences in eGFR (66.2 ± 25.3 vs. 70.7 ± 25.1, p = 0.817) or in the severity of chronic sclerosing lesions scores in 24‐month protocol biopsies. Higher mean urinary protein‐to‐creatinine ratio (0.36 ± 0.69 vs. 0.15 ± 0.53, p = 0.03) and higher incidence of treated acute rejection between months 3–24 (13.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.047) were observed in SRL compared to TAC group. In this population planned conversion from TAC to SRL 3 months after kidney transplantation was not associated with improved renal function at 24 months.

Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium provides higher mycophenolic acid predose levels compared with mycophenolate mofetil: Implications for therapeutic drug monitoring

Abstract: The delayed release of mycophenolic acid (MPA) from enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) may lead to different MPA predose (C0) levels compared with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). A post hoc analysis was performed on MPA morning predose values assessed in 88 maintenance renal transplant patients from three studies converted from MMF (1000 mg twice a day) to equimolar EC-MPS (720 mg twice a day) or vice versa, both in combination with cyclosporine. The median MPA predose level was approximately 30% higher when patients received EC-MPS (2.40 μg/mL; range, 0.49-39.30 μg/mL) compared with MMF (1.83 μg/mL; range, <0.1-12.80 μg/mL). Rare cases (3.0%) of high MPA C0 levels 15 μg/mL or greater were observed with EC-MPS consistent with a very prolonged release of MPA from this formulation. Both EC-MPS and MMF exhibited a poor correlation between MPA C0 levels and exposure as assessed by MPA area under the curve. Physicians targeting a certain MPA predose level have to be aware of the higher morning C0 levels with EC-MPS, whereas the overall MPA exposure is not different to MMF.

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus‐based immunosuppressive regimen

Abstract:  Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) are effective immunosuppressive drugs with distinct safety profile.

Tacrolimus pharmacokinetic drug interactions: effect of prednisone, mycophenolic acid or sirolimus

This study was conducted to evaluate time‐dependent pharmacokinetic changes and drug interactions over the first 6 months after transplantation in kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC), prednisone (PRED) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus (SRL). Pharmacokinetic assessments were carried out at day 7 and months 1, 3, and 6 in kidney transplant recipients receiving TAC plus PRED with either MMF (2 g/day, n = 13) or SRL (15 mg loading dose, 5 mg for 7 days followed by 2 mg/day, n = 12). There were no differences in the main demographic characteristics or in mean PRED doses during the first 6 months after transplant. From day 7 to month 6, there was a 65% increase in TAC dose corrected exposure (dose corrected area under the curve; AUC) in patients receiving MMF (P = 0.005) and a 59% increase in TAC dose corrected exposure in patients receiving SRL (P = 0.008). From day 7 to month 6, there was a 72% increase in mycophenolate dose corrected exposure (P = 0.001) and a 65% increase in SRL dose corrected exposure (P = 0.008). TAC dose corrected exposure was 23% lower in patients receiving SRL compared with MMF (P = 0.012) on average over the study period. PRED dose reduction was associated with increase in TAC (in patients receiving SRL, P = 0.040) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) (P = 0.070) drug exposures. Tercile distribution of TAC drug exposure showed a positive correlation with mean SRL exposures (P = 0.016). Conversely, tercile distribution of SRL drug exposure showed a positive correlation with mean TAC exposures (P = 0.004). Time‐dependent increases in TAC, MPA and SRL drug exposures occur up to 6 months after transplantation. Drug‐to‐drug interactions indicate that intense therapeutic drug monitoring is required to avoid under‐ or over‐immunosuppression.