Helio Tedesco-Silva

Calcineurin Inhibitor Minimization in the Symphony Study: Observational Results 3 Years after Transplantation

The Symphony study showed that at 1 year posttransplant, a regimen based on daclizumab induction, 2 g mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), low‐dose tacrolimus and steroids resulted in better renal function and lower acute rejection and graft loss rates compared with three other regimens: two with low‐doses of cyclosporine or sirolimus instead of tacrolimus and one with no induction and standard cyclosporine dosage. This is an observational follow‐up for 2 additional years with the same endpoints as the core study. Overall, 958 patients participated in the follow‐up. During the study, many patients changed their immunosuppressive regimen (e.g. switched from sirolimus to tacrolimus), but the vast majority (95%) remained on MMF. During the follow‐up, renal function remained stable (mean change: −0.6 ml/min), and rates of death, graft loss and acute rejection were low (all about 1% per year). The MMF and low‐dose tacrolimus arm continued to have the highest GFR (68.6 ± 23.8 ml/min vs. 65.9 ± 26.2 ml/min in the standard‐dose cyclosporine, 64.0 ± 23.1 ml/min in the low‐dose cyclosporine and 65.3 ± 26.2 ml/min in the low‐dose sirolimus arm), but the difference with the other arms was not significant (p = 0.17 in an overall test and 0.077, 0.039 and 0.11, respectively, in pair‐wise tests). The MMF and low‐dose tacrolimus arm also had the highest graft survival rate, but with reduced differences between groups over time, and the least acute rejection rate. In the Symphony study, the largest ever prospective study in de novo kidney transplantation, over 3 years, daclizumab induction, MMF, steroids and low‐dose tacrolimus proved highly efficacious, without the negative effects on renal function commonly reported for standard CNI regimens.

Effect of sirolimus on malignancy and survival after kidney transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Objective To examine risk of malignancy and death in patients with kidney transplant who receive the immunosuppressive drug sirolimus. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Data sources Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to March 2013. Eligibility Randomized controlled trials comparing immunosuppressive regimens with and without sirolimus in recipients of kidney or combined pancreatic and renal transplant for which the author was willing to provide individual patient level data. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts and full text reports of potentially eligible trials to identify studies for inclusion. All eligible trials reported data on malignancy or survival. Results The search yielded 2365 unique citations. Patient level data were available from 5876 patients from 21 randomized trials. Sirolimus was associated with a 40% reduction in the risk of malignancy (adjusted hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.39 to 0.93) and a 56% reduction in the risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (0.44, 0.30 to 0.63) compared with controls. The most pronounced effect was seen in patients who converted to sirolimus from an established immunosuppressive regimen, resulting in a reduction in risk of malignancy (0.34, 0.28 to 0.41), non-melanoma skin cancer (0.32, 0.24 to 0.42), and other cancers (0.52, 0.38 to 0.69). Sirolimus was associated with an increased risk of death (1.43, 1.21 to 1.71) compared with controls. Conclusions Sirolimus was associated with a reduction in the risk of malignancy and non-melanoma skin cancer in transplant recipients. The benefit was most pronounced in patients who converted from an established immunosuppressive regimen to sirolimus. Given the risk of mortality, however, the use of this drug does not seem warranted for most patients with kidney transplant. Further research is needed to determine if different populations, such as those at high risk of cancer, might benefit from sirolimus.

Post-Transplant Anti-HLA Class II Antibodies as Risk Factor for Late Kidney Allograft Failure

The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the relationship between the post‐transplant anti‐HLA class I and/or class II panel reactive antibodies and graft failure due to chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). We studied 512 first kidney recipients transplanted at a single center, with a graft functioning for at least 3 years. A single blood sample was collected from each patient for antibody evaluation. The median posttransplant time after blood collection was 4.4 years and did not differ between patients with (n = 91) or without anti‐HLA antibodies (n = 421). Female gender, pregnancies and blood transfusions were associated with the presence of anti‐HLA class I antibodies. Graft function deterioration was associated with anti‐HLA class II antibodies. Multivariate analysis showed independent association for creatinine levels (RR = 7.5), acute rejection (RR = 2.6), recipient male gender (RR = 3.6) and anti‐HLA class II antibodies (RR = 2.9) and CAN‐associated graft loss. In conclusion, the presence of anti‐HLA class II antibodies conferred a risk for graft loss before a decline in renal function and increased the risk of graft failure in patients who already had a decline in graft function. Thus, anti‐HLA class II antibody monitoring is a useful tool for the management of long‐term kidney recipients.

12-month safety and efficacy of everolimus with reduced exposure cyclosporine in de novo renal transplant recipients

The proliferation signal inhibitor everolimus (Certican), has demonstrated efficacy with full‐dose cyclosporine (CsA) (Neoral®). Two multicenter randomized controlled studies were performed to compare 12‐month efficacy and safety of everolimus 1.5 and 3.0 mg/day with reduced‐dose CsA. Study 1 enrolled 237 de novo renal allograft recipients, randomizing 222 nonblack patients to either everolimus 1.5 or 3.0 mg/day, with the Neoral® dose guided by C2 (monitoring of CsA concentration 2 h after dosing). Study 2 had a similar protocol, with basiliximab included, enrolling 256 recipients and randomizing 243 nonblack patients. In Study 1, there was a lower incidence of acute rejection in nonblack patients on 3 mg/day (16.4%) compared with 1.5 mg/day (25.9%), P = 0.08. In Study 2, the inclusion of basiliximab lowered the overall incidence of acute rejection; 14.3% of nonblack patients (3 mg/day) and 13.6% of nonblack patients (1.5 mg/day) had acute rejection by 12 months (P =0.891). Renal function was preserved throughout the study, with no differences observed between groups within studies. Everolimus was well tolerated with no significant differences between doses. Everolimus, in combination with reduced‐dose Neoral®, demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated. Basiliximab allows for utilization of lower doses of everolimus with reduced dosing of Neoral®.

Randomized controlled trial of FTY720 versus MMF in de novo renal transplantation

Background. Phase II trials of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, have shown promise in preventing rejection with both standard and reduced cyclosporine exposure. This study was designed to confirm those findings. Methods. This one-year, multicenter, randomized, phase III study in 696 de novo renal transplant patients compared FTY720 5 mg plus reduced-dose cyclosporine (RDC) or FTY720 2.5 mg plus full-dose cyclosporine (FDC) with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC. All patients received concomitant corticosteroid therapy without antibody induction. The primary efficacy composite endpoint was the incidence of first treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (treated BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation at month 12. Results. FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC was demonstrated to be non-inferior to MMF plus FDC as the primary efficacy endpoint (30.8% and 30.6%) was comparable. The FTY720 5 mg plus RDC treatment regimen was discontinued due to an increased incidence of acute rejection episodes (primary endpoint 43.3%). FTY720 was associated with significantly lower creatinine clearance with a mean difference at 12 months between FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC and MMF plus FDC of 8 ml/min. Conclusions. While FTY720 2.5 mg plus FDC yielded similar efficacy to MMF plus FDC, the FTY720 5 mg plus RDC did not allow a 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure. The associated lower creatinine clearance indicated that FTY720 combined with cyclosporine provided no benefit over standard care.

Everolimus plus early tacrolimus minimization: a phase III, randomized, open-label, multicentre trial in renal transplantation

There is increasing interest in tacrolimus‐minimization regimens. ASSET was an open‐label, randomized, 12‐month study of everolimus plus tacrolimus in de‐novo renal‐transplant recipients. Everolimus trough targets were 3–8 ng/ml throughout the study. Tacrolimus trough targets were 4–7 ng/ml during the first 3 months and 1.5–3 ng/ml (n = 107) or 4–7 ng/ml (n = 117) from Month 4. All patients received basiliximab induction and corticosteroids. The primary objective was to demonstrate superior estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR; MDRD‐4) at Month 12 in the tacrolimus 1.5–3 ng/ml versus the 4–7 ng/ml group. Secondary endpoints included incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR; Months 4–12) and serious adverse events (SAEs; Months 0–12). Statistical significance was not achieved for the primary endpoint (mean eGFR: 57.1 vs. 51.7 ml/min/1.73 m2), potentially due to overlapping of achieved tacrolimus exposure levels (Month 12 mean ± SD, tacrolimus 1.5–3 ng/ml: 3.4 ± 1.4; tacrolimus 4–7 ng/ml: 5.5 ± 2.0 ng/ml). BPAR (months 4–12) and SAE rates were comparable between groups (2.7% vs. 1.1% and 58.7% vs. 51.3%; respectively). Everolimus‐facilitated tacrolimus minimization, to levels lower than previously investigated, achieved good renal function, low BPAR and graft‐loss rates, and an acceptable safety profile in renal transplantation over 12 months although statistically superior renal function of the 1.5–3 ng/ml tacrolimus group was not achieved. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00369161) is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

FTY720 versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplantation: six-month results of a double-blind study.

Background. FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator that was developed to produce optimal graft protection with improved safety and tolerability. Phase II studies have demonstrated the efficacy of FTY720 up to the doses of 2.5 mg with full-dose cyclosporine (FDC). Methods. This multicenter, double-blind, Phase IIb, randomized study evaluated the safety and efficacy of 5 mg FTY720 (n=87; Group 1) vs. 2.5 mg FTY720 (n=90; Group 2) vs. mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n=94; Group 3) in de novo renal transplant patients receiving FDC and prednisone. Results. The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death, or premature study discontinuation (composite endpoint) within 6 months. The primary endpoint was superior in Group 1 (24%) and statistically noninferior in Group 2 compared to Group 3 (24.1% vs. 29.2% vs. 39.4%; P=0.025 and 0.0039, respectively). FTY720 plus FDC was generally well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events across all groups. FTY720 was associated with higher incidence of bradycardia (Group 1: 26.4%, P=0.0002 and Group 2: 15.6%, P=0.046, vs. Group 3: 6.4%), respiratory disorders (Group 1: 40.2%, not significant [P=NS] and Group 2: 34.4%, P=NS vs. Group 3: 28.7%). One macular edema occurred in Group 2. Lower creatinine clearances were observed with FTY720 versus MMF (Group 1: 52.4 ml/min, P=NS and Group 2: 51.7 ml/min, P=0.039 vs. Group 3: 62.5 ml/min). Conclusions. Although FTY720 with FDC provided adequate protection from acute rejection the safety profile was less favorable for adverse events than current standard immunosuppression in de novo renal transplant patients.

O contexto do transplante renal no Brasil e sua disparidade geográfica

The Brazilian National Transplantation System coordinates and regulates perhaps the largest public transplantation program worldwide. Since its implementation in 1997, the number of kidney transplantations increased from 920 (5.8 pmp) in 1998, to 4,630 (24.1 pmp) in 2010. This growth was primarily due to the increased number of effective donors (from 1.8 pmp in 1998 to 9.3 pmp in 2010), with a corresponding increased number of kidneys transplanted from deceased donors (3.8 pmp in 1999 versus 9.9 pmp in 2010).The number of kidney transplantations from living donors has not increased significantly, from 1,065 (6.7 pmp) in 1998 to 1,641 (8.6 pmp) in 2010, either as a consequence of the observed increase in the deceased donor program or perhaps because of strict government regulations allowing only transplantations from related donors. From 2000 to 2009, the mean age of living donors increased from 40 to 45 years, while it increased from 33 to 41 years for deceased donors, of whom roughly 50% die of stroke. There are clear regional disparities in transplantation performance across the national regions. While the state of Sao Paulo is ranked first in organ donation and recovery (22.5 pmp), some states of the Northern region have much poorer performances. These disparities are directly related to different regional population densities, gross domestic product distribution, and number of trained transplantation physicians. The initial evaluation of the centers with robust outcomes indicates no clear differences in graft survival in comparison with centers in the USA and Europe. Ethnicity and time on dialysis, but not the type of immunosuppressive regimen, decisively influence the measured outcomes. Since the implementation of national clinical research regulations in 1996, Brazilian centers have participated in a number of national and international collaborative trials for the development of immunosuppressive regimens. Besides the challenge of reducing the regional disparities related to access to transplantation, further improvements can be obtained by the creation of a national registry of the outcomes of transplanted patients and living donors, and also by the promotion of clinical and experimental studies to better understand the transplantation-related immune response of the Brazilian population.

Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid : a comparison between enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients.

AbstractObjective: The pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were compared in renal transplant patients receiving either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). Methods: MPA concentration-time profiles were included from EC-MPS- (n = 208) and MMF-treated (n = 184) patients 4–257 months after renal transplantation. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM®). A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination was used to describe the data. Results: No differences were detected in MPA clearance, intercompartmental clearance, or the central or peripheral volume of distribution. Respective values and interindividual variability (IIV) were 16 L/h (39%), 22 L/h (78%), 40 L (100%) and 518 L (490%). EC-MPS was absorbed more slowly than MMF with respective absorption rate constant values of 3.0 h−1 and 4.1 h−1 (p < 0.001) [IIV 187%]. A mixture model was used for the change-point parameter lag-time (tlag) in order to describe IIV in this parameter adequately for EC-MPS. Following the morning dose of EC-MPS, the tlag values were 0.95, 1.88 and 4.83 h for 51%, 32% and 17% of the population (IIV 8%), respectively. The morning tlag following EC-MPS administration was significantly different from both the tlag following MMF administration (0.30 h; p < 0.001 [IIV 11%]) and the tlag following the evening dose of EC-MPS (9.04 h; p < 0.001 [IIV 40%]). Post hoc analysis showed that the tlag was longer and more variable following EC-MPS administration (morning median 2.0 h [0.9–5.5 h], evening median 8.9 h [5.4–12.3 h]) than following MMF administration (median 0.30 h [0.26–0.34 h]; p < 0.001). The morning MPA predose concentrations were higher and more variable following EC-MPS administration than following MMF administration, with respective values of 2.6 mg/L (0.4–24.4 mg/L) and 1.6 mg/L (0.2–7.6 mg/L). The correlation between predose concentrations and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was lower in EC-MPS-treated patients (r2 = 0.02) than in MMF-treated patients (r2 = 0.48). Conclusion: Absorption of MPA was delayed and also slower following EC-MPS administration than following MMF administration. Furthermore, the tlag varied more in EC-MPS-treated patients. MPA predose concentrations were poorly correlated with the MPA AUC in both MMF- and EC-MPS-treated patients.

Risk Factors Associated With Graft Loss and Patient Survival After Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of traditional risk factors on major kidney transplantation outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from kidney transplantation procedures performed between 2003 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed for the influence of traditional risk factors on transplantation outcome. Of 2364 transplants, 67% were from living donors, 27% were from donors who met standard criteria, and 6% were from donor who met expanded criteria. Two hundred thirty-nine procedures (10%) were performed in pediatric patients. Immunosuppression was selected on the basis of subgroup population. RESULTS At 1 year posttransplantation, cumulative freedom from a treated acute rejection episode (ARE) was 76.7%, with no difference between black vs nonblack recipients (75.0% vs 73.4%; P = .79). At 2 years, survival for patients (95.3% vs 88.3% vs 82.1%; P < .001) and grafts 92.3% vs 80.3% vs 70.9%; P < .001) was better in recipients of living donor grafts compared with donors who met standard or expanded criteria, respectively. Moreover, graft survival was poorer in black vs nonblack patients (83.6% vs 88.7%; P < .05) because of high mortality (13% vs 7%; P<.001). Risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (odds ratio [OR], 2.4) and black race (OR, 1.8), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.1), extended-criteria criteria donor organ (OR, 2.0), delayed graft function (OR, 1.8), and any ARE (OR, 3.5). At 6 months posttransplantation, risk factors associated with death included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.5) or ARE (OR, 2.4), and risk factors associated with graft loss included cadaveric donor organ (OR, 2.0), extended-criteria donor organ (OR, 2.6), ARE (OR, 9.5), and impaired graft function (creatinine concentration >1.5 mg/dL; OR, 2.1). CONCLUSION Traditional risk factors are still associated with transplantation outcome. Poorer graft survival in black vs nonblack recipients was due to higher mortality rather than graft loss.