Cody E. Morris

Impact of alternative footwear on human balance

Alternative footwear are those that are most commonly used for casual or recreational purposes, over the course of the day. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of three forms of alternative footwear (thong style flip-flops, clog style Crocs®, and Vibram Five-Fingers®) on balance with a low-intensity workload. Eighteen healthy male adults (age: 22.9 ± 2.88 years; height: 179 ± 6.0 cm; mass: 81.3 ± 8.8 kg) participated in this study. Balance performance along with electromyographic (EMG) measures was assessed with sensory organization test (SOT) and motor control test on the Neurocom Equitest, while donning alternative footwear, prior to and after a one-mile walk at a self-selected pace. Sway velocities and root-mean-square sway, SOT equilibrium scores, postural response latencies, and EMG measures from lower leg muscles were analysed using a 3 × 2 (footwear × time) repeated-measures ANOVA. Results from balance variables revealed a significant main effect difference for footwear in the eyes closed and eyes open sway-referenced vision conditions and a significant main effect difference for time in the eyes open, eyes open sway-referenced vision, and eyes open sway-referenced platform conditions. Pairwise comparisons revealed MIN demonstrating significantly greater balance performance in the pretest condition and the post-test demonstrating significantly lower balance performance. Greater balance performance from MIN could be attributed to the barefoot design suggesting an increase in somatosensory feedback from the plantar surface, particularly during absent or conflicting visual feedback. The lower balance performance seen in post-test could be attributed to the one-mile walk, suggesting that even a transient physiological workload could be sufficient to cause balance decrements in alternative footwear.

Effect of a simulated tactical occupation task on physiological strain index, stress and inflammation

Background. This study aimed to evaluate the physiological strain index (PSI) along with specific immune system markers in response to a simulated firefighting occupation workload. Methods. Ten healthy male adults completed a 6-min simulated fire stair climb (SFSC) at 60 steps/min. The protocol consisted of four conditions, some including wearing a 34.04-kg vest to simulate personal protective equipment (PPE) and/or inclusion of a color-word interference test (CWIT) as a distracting mechanism. The PSI was evaluated by continuously monitoring the heart rate and core temperature. Salivary cortisol (CORT) was measured at baseline, mid SFSC and post SFSC. C-reactive protein (CRP) was evaluated at baseline and 1 h post SFSC. Results. Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significantly different PSI across conditions (p = 0.001). A significantly elevated PSI was exhibited during all 6 min of SFSC for both PPE and PPE + CWIT conditions. Neither CORT (p = 0.116) nor CRP (p = 0.700) was significantly different across conditions or from baseline. Conclusion. These findings suggest that firefighters are potentially at a substantial degree of physiological stress from exercise and the weight of gear alone. Further work should be conducted to further evaluate the usefulness of the PSI as a means to monitor firefighters during fire suppression.