Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Colin N. Waters is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Colin N. Waters.


Gsa Today | 2008

Are we now living in the Anthropocene

Jan Zalasiewicz; Mark Williams; Alan E. Smith; Tiffany L. Barry; Angela L. Coe; Paul R. Bown; Patrick J. Brenchley; David Cantrill; Andrew S. Gale; Philip L. Gibbard; F. John Gregory; Mark W. Hounslow; Andrew Craig Kerr; Paul Nicholas Pearson; Robert W. O'b. Knox; John H. Powell; Colin N. Waters; J. E. A. Marshall; Michael Oates; Peter F. Rawson; P. Stone

The term Anthropocene, proposed and increasingly employed to denote the current interval of anthropogenic global environmental change, may be discussed on stratigraphic grounds. A case can be made for its consideration as a formal epoch in that, since the start of the Industrial Revolution, Earth has endured changes sufficient to leave a global stratigraphic signature distinct from that of the Holocene or of previous Pleistocene interglacial phases, encompassing novel biotic, sedimentary, and geochemical change. These changes, although likely only in their initial phases, are sufficiently distinct and robustly established for suggestions of a Holocene–Anthropocene boundary in the recent historical past to be geologically reasonable. The boundary may be defined either via Global Stratigraphic Section and Point (“golden spike”) locations or by adopting a numerical date. Formal adoption of this term in the near future will largely depend on its utility, particularly to earth scientists working on late Holocene successions. This datum, from the perspective of the far future, will most probably approximate a distinctive stratigraphic boundary.


Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A | 2011

Stratigraphy of the Anthropocene

Jan Zalasiewicz; Mark Williams; R Fortey; Alan E. Smith; Tiffany L. Barry; Angela L. Coe; Paul R. Bown; Peter F. Rawson; Andrew S. Gale; Philip L. Gibbard; Fj Gregory; Mark W. Hounslow; Andrew Craig Kerr; Paul Nicholas Pearson; Robert W. O'b. Knox; John H. Powell; Colin N. Waters; J. E. A. Marshall; Michael Oates; P. Stone

The Anthropocene, an informal term used to signal the impact of collective human activity on biological, physical and chemical processes on the Earth system, is assessed using stratigraphic criteria. It is complex in time, space and process, and may be considered in terms of the scale, relative timing, duration and novelty of its various phenomena. The lithostratigraphic signal includes both direct components, such as urban constructions and man-made deposits, and indirect ones, such as sediment flux changes. Already widespread, these are producing a significant ‘event layer’, locally with considerable long-term preservation potential. Chemostratigraphic signals include new organic compounds, but are likely to be dominated by the effects of CO2 release, particularly via acidification in the marine realm, and man-made radionuclides. The sequence stratigraphic signal is negligible to date, but may become geologically significant over centennial/millennial time scales. The rapidly growing biostratigraphic signal includes geologically novel aspects (the scale of globally transferred species) and geologically will have permanent effects.


Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2014

A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene

Colin N. Waters; Jan Zalasiewicz; Mark Williams; Michael A. Ellis; Andrea M. Snelling

Abstract Recognition of intimate feedback mechanisms linking changes across the atmosphere, biosphere, geosphere and hydrosphere demonstrates the pervasive nature of humankinds influence, perhaps to the point that we have fashioned a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene. To what extent will these changes be evident as long-lasting signatures in the geological record? To establish the Anthropocene as a formal chronostratigraphical unit it is necessary to consider a spectrum of indicators of anthropogenically induced environmental change, and to determine how these show as stratigraphic signals that can be used to characterize an Anthropocene unit and to recognize its base. It is important to consider these signals against a context of Holocene and earlier stratigraphic patterns. Here we review the parameters used by stratigraphers to identify chronostratigraphical units and how these could apply to the definition of the Anthropocene. The onset of the range of signatures is diachronous, although many show maximum signatures which post-date 1945, leading to the suggestion that this date may be a suitable age for the start of the Anthropocene.


Journal of the Geological Society | 2012

Nature and timing of Late Mississippian to Mid-Pennsylvanian glacio-eustatic sea-level changes of the Pennine Basin, UK

Colin N. Waters; Daniel J. Condon

The Pennine Basin of northern England contains a comparatively complete Serpukhovian– Moscovian succession characterized by high-resolution ammonoid zonation and cyclic paralic sedimentation. Two new isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry zircon ages from a bentonite deposited during the Arnsbergian (mid-Serpukhovian) regional substage and tonstein of earliest Bolsovian (early Moscovian) regional substage have been determined. The weighted mean 206Pb/238U ages of 328.34 ± 0.55 and 314.37 ± 0.53 Ma (total uncertainty), respectively, require modification of the time scale for the Western Europe regional chronostratigraphy. The areal extent of acme ammonoid facies is used as a proxy for the magnitude of 47 discrete flooding events. Incised valleys (major sequence boundaries) are used as a proxy for the magnitude of sea-level falls. The frequency of these events, in the light of the new radiometric dating, indicates the following: (1) there is temporal coincidence between major glaciations in Gondwana and phases of increased frequency of sequence boundaries in the Pennine Basin; (2) high-amplitude flooding surfaces have an average frequency of c. 400 ka; (3) average cycle durations during the Pendleian–early Arnsbergian and Chokierian–Bolsovian, of c. 111 and c. 150 ka, respectively, reflect short-duration eccentricities; (4) multiple flooding surfaces with the same ammonoid assemblages may equate with sub-100 ka precession or obliquity frequencies. Supplementary material: U–Pb method description and data, procedure for the calculation of the areal extent of marine bands, and tables showing a full listing of biostratigraphical data used in the study are available at www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18505.


The Anthropocene Review | 2015

Diachronous beginnings of the Anthropocene: The lower bounding surface of anthropogenic deposits

Matt Edgeworth; Daniel D. Richter; Colin N. Waters; Peter K. Haff; Cath Neal; S.J. Price

Across a large proportion of Earth’s ice-free land surfaces, a solid-phase stratigraphic boundary marks the division between humanly modified ground and natural geological deposits. At its clearest, the division takes the form of an abrupt surface at the base of deposits variously called ‘artificial ground’, ‘anthropogenic ground’ or ‘archaeological stratigraphy’ – which together comprise a distinctive part of the geosphere called the ‘archaeosphere’. In other cases the bounding surface is more diffuse, gradational or mixed, due to action of non-human agencies and anthropedogenic forcings. It is alternately conformable and unconformable. Layers above typically contain artificial features, structures, artifacts and other material traces of human activity, in contrast to their relative absence in layers below. A fundamental characteristic of the boundary is that it is diachronous, still being formed and renewed today. In examining the boundary, this paper asks – does it reflect the diachronous onset and development of the Anthropocene itself?


The Anthropocene Review | 2014

The technofossil record of humans

Jan Zalasiewicz; Mark Williams; Colin N. Waters; Anthony D. Barnosky; Peter K. Haff

As humans have colonised and modified the Earth’s surface, they have developed progressively more sophisticated tools and technologies. These underpin a new kind of stratigraphy, that we term technostratigraphy, marked by the geologically accelerated evolution and diversification of technofossils – the preservable material remains of the technosphere (Haff, 2013), driven by human purpose and transmitted cultural memory, and with the dynamics of an emergent system. The technosphere, present in some form for most of the Quaternary, shows several thresholds. Its expansion and transcontinental synchronisation in the mid 20th century has produced a global technostratigraphy that combines very high time-resolution, great geometrical complexity and wide (including transplanetary) extent. Technostratigraphy can help characterise the deposits of a potential Anthropocene Epoch and its emergence marks a step change in planetary mode.


Geological Society, London, Special Publications | 2014

An assessment of lithostratigraphy for anthropogenic deposits

Jonathan Richard Ford; S.J. Price; A.H. Cooper; Colin N. Waters

Abstract The deliberate anthropogenic movement of reworked natural and novel manufactured materials represents a novel sedimentary environment associated with mining, waste disposal, construction and urbanization. Anthropogenic deposits display distinctive engineering and environmental properties, and can be of archaeological importance. This paper shows that temporal changes in the scale and lithological character of anthropogenic deposits may be indicative of the Anthropocene. However, the stratigraphy of such deposits is not readily described by existing classification schemes, which do not differentiate separate phases or lithologically distinct deposits beyond a local scale. Lithostratigraphy is a scalable, hierarchical classification used to distinguish successive and lithologically distinct natural deposits. Many natural and anthropogenic deposits exhibit common characteristics; they typically conform to the Law (or Principle) of Superposition and exhibit lithological distinction. The lithostratigraphical classification of surficial anthropogenic deposits may be effective, although defined units may be significantly thinner and far less continuous than those defined for natural deposits. Further challenges include the designation of stratotypes, accommodating the highly diachronous nature of anthropogenic deposits and the common presence of disconformities. International lithostratigraphical guidelines would require significant modification before being effective for the classification of anthropogenic deposits. A practical alternative may be to establish an ‘anthrostratigraphical’ approach, or ‘anthrostratigraphy’.


Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences | 1992

Anatomically preserved conifer like stems from the upper carboniferous of england

Jean Galtier; Andrew C. Scott; John H. Powell; B. W. Glover; Colin N. Waters

Gymnosperm stems preserved in volcaniclastic deposits, from the Upper Carboniferous (Westphalian C) of the West Midlands, England, U. K., provide anatomical characters of the wood, pith and primary xylem which allow us to interpret them as conifers. They would represent the earliest report of an anatomically preserved member of this group, complementing the previous assignment to conifers of fusainized leafy twigs from the Westphalian B of Yorkshire, U. K., mainly based on detail of leaf structure.


Archive | 2011

A revised correlation of Carboniferous rocks in the British Isles

Colin N. Waters; Ian D. Somerville; N.S. Jones; C.J. Cleal; J.D. Collinson; Richard A. Waters; B.M. Besly; Mark Dean; Michael H. Stephenson; J.R. Davies; E.C. Freshney; D.I. Jackson; W.I. Mitchell; John H. Powell; W.J. Barclay; M.A.E. Browne; Brian E. Leveridge; Sarah L. Long; D. McLean

The report revises and expands upon the 1976 and 1978 publications for the Dinantian and Silesian, respectively, combining them into a single account of British and Irish Carboniferous stratigraphy. The need to update the two Special Reports reflects the considerable advances in Carboniferous geology over the last 30 years. The report covers developments in international chronostratigraphy and incorporates wholesale reassessments of British lithostratigraphy. A huge volume of biostratigraphical information has been published over recent decades and the report summarizes the key information. Carboniferous rocks have long been of economic importance, but it is the search for hydrocarbons, in its infancy at the time of the previous reports, which has greatly increased our understanding of Carboniferous successions offshore and at depth, particularly in southern and eastern England.


Earth’s Future | 2016

Stratigraphic and Earth System approaches to defining the Anthropocene

Will Steffen; Reinhold Leinfelder; Jan Zalasiewicz; Colin N. Waters; Mark Williams; Colin Summerhayes; Anthony D. Barnosky; Alejandro Cearreta; Paul J. Crutzen; Matt Edgeworth; Erle C. Ellis; Ian J. Fairchild; Agnieszka Gałuszka; Jacques Grinevald; Alan M. Haywood; Juliana Ivar do Sul; Catherine Jeandel; J. R. McNeill; Eric O. Odada; Naomi Oreskes; Andrew Revkin; Daniel D. Richter; James P. M. Syvitski; Davor Vidas; Michael Wagreich; Scott L. Wing; Alexander P. Wolfe; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber

Stratigraphy provides insights into the evolution and dynamics of the Earth System over its long history. With recent developments in Earth System science, changes in Earth System dynamics can now be observed directly and projected into the near future. An integration of the two approaches provides powerful insights into the nature and significance of contemporary changes to Earth. From both perspectives, the Earth has been pushed out of the Holocene Epoch by human activities, with the mid-20th century a strong candidate for the start date of the Anthropocene, the proposed new epoch in Earth history. Here we explore two contrasting scenarios for the future of the Anthropocene, recognizing that the Earth System has already undergone a substantial transition away from the Holocene state. A rapid shift of societies toward the UN Sustainable Development Goals could stabilize the Earth System in a state with more intense interglacial conditions than in the late Quaternary climate regime and with little further biospheric change. In contrast, a continuation of the present Anthropocene trajectory of growing human pressures will likely lead to biotic impoverishment and a much warmer climate with a significant loss of polar ice.

Collaboration


Dive into the Colin N. Waters's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John H. Powell

British Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Colin Summerhayes

Scott Polar Research Institute

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Will Steffen

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alejandro Cearreta

University of the Basque Country

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge