Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Colin Summerhayes is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Colin Summerhayes.


Antarctic Science | 2009

Antarctic climate change and the environment

Peter Convey; Robert Bindschadler; G. di Prisco; Eberhard Fahrbach; Julian Gutt; Dominic A. Hodgson; Paul Andrew Mayewski; Colin Summerhayes; John Turner

Abstract The Antarctic climate system varies on timescales from orbital, through millennial to sub-annual, and is closely coupled to other parts of the global climate system. We review these variations from the perspective of the geological and glaciological records and the recent historical period from which we have instrumental data (∼the last 50 years). We consider their consequences for the biosphere, and show how the latest numerical models project changes into the future, taking into account human actions in the form of the release of greenhouse gases and chlorofluorocarbons into the atmosphere. In doing so, we provide an essential Southern Hemisphere companion to the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment.


Reviews of Geophysics | 2009

State of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean climate system

Paul Andrew Mayewski; M. P. Meredith; Colin Summerhayes; John Turner; Ap Worby; P. J. Barrett; Gino Casassa; Nancy A. N. Bertler; Tom Bracegirdle; A. C. Naveira Garabato; David H. Bromwich; H. Campbell; Gordon S. Hamilton; W. Lyons; Kirk A. Maasch; S. Aoki; Cunde Xiao; Tas D. van Ommen

This paper reviews developments in our understanding of the state of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean climate, and its relation to the global climate system over the last few millennia. Climate over this and earlier periods has not been stable, as evidenced by the occurrence of abrupt changes in atmospheric circulation and temperature recorded in Antarctic ice core proxies for past climate. Two of the most prominent abrupt climate change events are characterized by intensification of the circumpolar westerlies (also known as the Southern Annular Mode) between ~6000 and 5000 years ago and since 1200-1000 years ago. Following the last of these is a period of major trans-Antarctic reorganization of atmospheric circulation and temperature between AD1700 and 1850. The two earlier Antarctic abrupt climate change events appear linked to but predate by several centuries even more abrupt climate change in the North Atlantic, and the end of the more recent event is coincident with reorganization of atmospheric circulation in the North Pacific. Improved understanding of such events and of the associations between abrupt climate change events recorded in both hemispheres is critical to predicting the impact and timing of future abrupt climate change events potentially forced by anthropogenic changes in greenhouse gases and aerosols. Special attention is given to the climate of the past 200 years, which was recorded by a network of recently available shallow firn cores, and to that of the past 50 years, which was monitored by the continuous instrumental record. Significant regional climate changes have taken place in the Antarctic during the past 50 years. Atmospheric temperatures have increased markedly over the Antarctic Peninsula, linked to nearby ocean warming and intensification of the circumpolar westerlies. Glaciers are retreating on the Peninsula, in Patagonia, on the sub-Antarctic islands, and in West Antarctica adjacent to the Peninsula. The penetration of marine air masses has become more pronounced over parts of West Antarctica. Above the surface, the Antarctic troposphere has warmed during winter while the stratosphere has cooled year-round. The upper kilometer of the circumpolar Southern Ocean has warmed, Antarctic Bottom Water across a wide sector off East Antarctica has freshened, and the densest bottom water in the Weddell Sea has warmed. In contrast to these regional climate changes, over most of Antarctica near-surface temperature and snowfall have not increased significantly during at least the past 50 years, and proxy data suggest that the atmospheric circulation over the interior has remained in a similar state for at least the past 200 years. Furthermore, the total sea ice cover around Antarctica has exhibited no significant overall change since reliable satellite monitoring began in the late 1970s, despite large but compensating regional changes. The inhomogeneity of Antarctic climate in space and time implies that recent Antarctic climate changes are due on the one hand to a combination of strong multi-decadal variability and anthropogenic effects and, as demonstrated by the paleoclimate record, on the other hand to multi-decadal to millennial scale and longer natural variability forced through changes in orbital insolation, greenhouse gases, solar variability, ice dynamics, and aerosols. Model projections suggest that over the 21st century the Antarctic interior will warm by 3.4° ± 1oC, and sea ice extent will decrease by ~30%. Ice sheet models are not yet adequate enough to answer pressing questions about the effect of projected warming on mass balance and sea level. Considering the potentially major impacts of a warming climate on Antarctica, vigorous efforts are needed to better understand all aspects of the highly coupled Antarctic climate system as well as its influence on the Earths climate and oceans.


Polar Record | 2014

Antarctic climate change and the environment: an update

John Turner; Nicholas E. Barrand; Thomas J. Bracegirdle; Peter Convey; Dominic A. Hodgson; Martin J. Jarvis; Adrian Jenkins; Gareth J. Marshall; Michael P. Meredith; Howard K. Roscoe; J. D. Shanklin; John Anthony French; Hugues Goosse; Mauro Guglielmin; Julian Gutt; Stan Jacobs; M. C. Kennicutt; Valérie Masson-Delmotte; Paul Andrew Mayewski; Francisco Navarro; Sharon A. Robinson; Theodore A. Scambos; M. Sparrow; Colin Summerhayes; Kevin G. Speer; A. Klepikov

We present an update of the ‘key points’ from the Antarctic Climate Change and the Environment (ACCE) report that was published by the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) in 2009. We summarise subsequent advances in knowledge concerning how the climates of the Antarctic and Southern Ocean have changed in the past, how they might change in the future, and examine the associated impacts on the marine and terrestrial biota. We also incorporate relevant material presented by SCAR to the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings, and make use of emerging results that will form part of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report


Science | 2012

Challenges to the Future Conservation of the Antarctic

Steven L. Chown; Jennifer E. Lee; Kevin A. Hughes; J. Barnes; P. J. Barrett; Dana M. Bergstrom; Peter Convey; Don A. Cowan; K. Crosbie; G. Dyer; Yves Frenot; Susie M. Grant; D. Herr; M. C. Kennicutt; M. Lamers; Alison E. Murray; Hugh P. Possingham; K. Reid; Martin J. Riddle; Peter G. Ryan; L. Sanson; Justine D. Shaw; M. D. Sparrow; Colin Summerhayes; Aleks Terauds; Diana H. Wall

Changing environments and resource demands present challenges to Antarctic conservation. The Antarctic Treaty System, acknowledged as a successful model of cooperative regulation of one of the globes largest commons (1), is under substantial pressure. Concerns have been raised about increased stress on Antarctic systems from global environmental change and growing interest in the regions resources (2, 3). Although policy-makers may recognize these challenges, failure to respond in a timely way can have substantial negative consequences. We provide a horizon scan, a systematic means for identifying emerging trends and assisting decision-makers in identifying policies that address future challenges (2, 3). Previous analyses of conservation threats in the Antarctic have been restricted to matters for which available evidence is compelling (4). We reconsider these concerns because they might escalate quickly, judging from recent rapid environmental change in parts of Antarctica and increasing human interest in the region (see the map). We then focus on a more distant time horizon.


Journal of the Geological Society | 2000

Enhanced productivity on the Iberian margin during glacial/interglacial transitions revealed by barium and diatoms

J. Thomson; S. Nixon; Colin Summerhayes; Eelco J. Rohling; Joachim Schönfeld; R. Zahn; P. Grootes; Fatima F Abrantes; Luis Gaspar; S. Vaqueiro

The Portuguese margin is at a critical location for studies of the ocean’s behaviour during glacial/interglacial climatic changes, and the rapid accumulation rates of the sediments enable high‐resolution palaeoclimatic investigation. The sedimentary record of the past 350 ka has been investigated in a 35 m long core from 3.5 km water depth on the slope at 40°N by geochemical, isotopic and micropalaeontological techniques. The CaCO3 content of this core as a function of time contains significant Milankovitch orbital frequencies of 18.8, 23.7, 38.0 and 100.6 ka, but these are driven primarily by dilution by clay‐flux variations rather than by CaCO3 productivity variations. The largest signals in the productivity indicators Corg, Ba/Al and diatom abundance are all observed as simultaneous peaks at the oxygen isotope stage boundaries 10/9 and 6/5, with the signal magnitude in the order 10/9>6/5 for all three indicators. Smaller coincident signals in Corg, Ba/Al but not diatoms are also observed at the oxygen isotope stage 2/1 boundary. Other less prominent peaks in the Corg and Ba/Al profiles occur elsewhere, including Heinrich Event horizons, but these are not always simultaneous and none contain evidence of the dissolution‐prone diatom microfossils. The 10/9, 6/5 and 2/1 oxygen isotope stage transitions represent the three most extreme glacial/interglacial sea level rises in the past 350 ky, possibly in the same sequence of magnitude, when sea level rose rapidly by 120+m from glacial low stands to interglacial low stands to interglacial high stands. The productivity signals at these transitions are contained within <5 ka (including bioturbation).


Earth’s Future | 2016

Stratigraphic and Earth System approaches to defining the Anthropocene

Will Steffen; Reinhold Leinfelder; Jan Zalasiewicz; Colin N. Waters; Mark Williams; Colin Summerhayes; Anthony D. Barnosky; Alejandro Cearreta; Paul J. Crutzen; Matt Edgeworth; Erle C. Ellis; Ian J. Fairchild; Agnieszka Gałuszka; Jacques Grinevald; Alan M. Haywood; Juliana Ivar do Sul; Catherine Jeandel; J. R. McNeill; Eric O. Odada; Naomi Oreskes; Andrew Revkin; Daniel D. Richter; James P. M. Syvitski; Davor Vidas; Michael Wagreich; Scott L. Wing; Alexander P. Wolfe; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber

Stratigraphy provides insights into the evolution and dynamics of the Earth System over its long history. With recent developments in Earth System science, changes in Earth System dynamics can now be observed directly and projected into the near future. An integration of the two approaches provides powerful insights into the nature and significance of contemporary changes to Earth. From both perspectives, the Earth has been pushed out of the Holocene Epoch by human activities, with the mid-20th century a strong candidate for the start date of the Anthropocene, the proposed new epoch in Earth history. Here we explore two contrasting scenarios for the future of the Anthropocene, recognizing that the Earth System has already undergone a substantial transition away from the Holocene state. A rapid shift of societies toward the UN Sustainable Development Goals could stabilize the Earth System in a state with more intense interglacial conditions than in the late Quaternary climate regime and with little further biospheric change. In contrast, a continuation of the present Anthropocene trajectory of growing human pressures will likely lead to biotic impoverishment and a much warmer climate with a significant loss of polar ice.


The Anthropocene Review | 2015

Colonization of the Americas, ‘Little Ice Age’ climate, and bomb-produced carbon: Their role in defining the Anthropocene

Jan Zalasiewicz; Colin N. Waters; Anthony D. Barnosky; Alejandro Cearreta; Matt Edgeworth; Erle C. Ellis; Agnieszka Gałuszka; Philip L. Gibbard; Jacques Grinevald; Irka Hajdas; Juliana Ivar do Sul; Catherine Jeandel; Reinhold Leinfelder; J. R. McNeill; Clément Poirier; Andrew Revkin; Daniel D. Richter; Will Steffen; Colin Summerhayes; James P. M. Syvitski; Davor Vidas; Michael Wagreich; Mark Williams; Alexander P. Wolfe

A recently published analysis by Lewis and Maslin (Lewis SL and Maslin MA (2015) Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519: 171–180) has identified two new potential horizons for the Holocene−Anthropocene boundary: 1610 (associated with European colonization of the Americas), or 1964 (the peak of the excess radiocarbon signal arising from atom bomb tests). We discuss both of these novel suggestions, and consider that there is insufficient stratigraphic basis for the former, whereas placing the latter at the peak of the signal rather than at its inception does not follow normal stratigraphical practice. Wherever the boundary is eventually placed, it should be optimized to reflect stratigraphical evidence with the least possible ambiguity.


Bulletin of The Atomic Scientists | 2015

Can nuclear weapons fallout mark the beginning of the Anthropocene Epoch

Colin N. Waters; James P. M. Syvitski; Agnieszka Gałuszka; Gary J. Hancock; Jan Zalasiewicz; Alejandro Cearreta; Jacques Grinevald; Catherine Jeandel; J. R. McNeill; Colin Summerhayes; Anthony D. Barnosky

Many scientists are making the case that humanity is living in a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, but there is no agreement yet as to when this epoch began. The start might be defined by a historical event, such as the beginning of the fossil-fueled Industrial Revolution or the first nuclear explosion in 1945. Standard stratigraphic practice, however, requires a more significant, globally widespread, and abrupt signature, and the fallout from nuclear weapons testing appears most suitable. The appearance of plutonium 239 (used in post-1945 above-ground nuclear weapons tests) makes a good marker: This isotope is rare in nature but a significant component of fallout. It has other features to recommend it as a stable marker in layers of sedimentary rock and soil, including: long half-life, low solubility, and high particle reactivity. It may be used in conjunction with other radioactive isotopes, such as americium 241 and carbon 14, to categorize distinct fallout signatures in sediments and ice caps. On a global scale, the first appearance of plutonium 239 in sedimentary sequences corresponds to the early 1950s. While plutonium is easily detectable over the entire Earth using modern measurement techniques, a site to define the Anthropocene (known as a “golden spike”) would ideally be located between 30 and 60 degrees north of the equator, where fallout is maximal, within undisturbed marine or lake environments.


The Anthropocene Review | 2017

Scale and diversity of the physical technosphere: A geological perspective

Jan Zalasiewicz; Mark Williams; Colin N. Waters; Anthony D. Barnosky; John Palmesino; Ann-Sofi Rönnskog; Matt Edgeworth; Cath Neal; Alejandro Cearreta; Erle C. Ellis; Jacques Grinevald; Peter K. Haff; Juliana A. Ivar do Sul; Catherine Jeandel; Reinhold Leinfelder; J. R. McNeill; Eric O. Odada; Naomi Oreskes; S.J. Price; Andrew Revkin; Will Steffen; Colin Summerhayes; Davor Vidas; Scott L. Wing; Alexander P. Wolfe

We assess the scale and extent of the physical technosphere, defined here as the summed material output of the contemporary human enterprise. It includes active urban, agricultural and marine components, used to sustain energy and material flow for current human life, and a growing residue layer, currently only in small part recycled back into the active component. Preliminary estimates suggest a technosphere mass of approximately 30 trillion tonnes (Tt), which helps support a human biomass that, despite recent growth, is ~5 orders of magnitude smaller. The physical technosphere includes a large, rapidly growing diversity of complex objects that are potential trace fossils or ‘technofossils’. If assessed on palaeontological criteria, technofossil diversity already exceeds known estimates of biological diversity as measured by richness, far exceeds recognized fossil diversity, and may exceed total biological diversity through Earth’s history. The rapid transformation of much of Earth’s surface mass into the technosphere and its myriad components underscores the novelty of the current planetary transformation.


Polar Record | 2008

International collaboration in Antarctica: the International Polar Years, the International Geophysical Year, and the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research

Colin Summerhayes

As the fourth International Polar Year (IPY) 2007-2008, gets into full swing it is timely to reflect on the history of development of international scientific collaboration in the IPYs since the first one in 1882-1883, including the third, which evolved into the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957-1958. The success of international scientific collaboration in the IGY led the International Council for Science (ICSU), the body that managed the IGY, to create the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) to carry forward the collaboration in Antarctic science that had begun during the IGY. This year, 2008, seems an appropriate time to undertake such an historical review, given that we are not only midway through the fourth IPY, but also that it is SCARs 50th anniversary; the first SCAR meeting having been held in The Hague on 3-5 February 1958. Since SCARs membership began with 12 member countries and 4 ICSU unions, membership has grown to 34 countries and 8 ICSU unions, with more expected to join at the 30th meeting of SCAR in Moscow in July 2008. Both SCARs activities and those of the fourth IPY benefit from international collaboration not only between scientists, but also between the national Antarctic operations managers, working together through the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes (COMNAP), and national policy makers working together through the Antarctic Treaty mechanisms. Thanks to all their efforts, the IPY of 2007-2009 will leave behind a legacy of enhanced observing systems for documenting the status and change of all aspects of the Antarctic environment as the basis for improved forecasting of its future condition. SCAR expects to play a major role in the design of those systems and their use to improve scientific understanding of the place of the Antarctic in the global environmental system, and the pace and direction of change within that system.

Collaboration


Dive into the Colin Summerhayes's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Peter Convey

British Antarctic Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Colin N. Waters

British Geological Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Julian Gutt

Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

John Turner

British Antarctic Survey

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alejandro Cearreta

University of the Basque Country

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Will Steffen

Australian National University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge