Conal Daly

Diagnosing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in the post-FDA restriction era

The emergence of an association between gadolinium‐based contrast agents (GBCA) and the rare condition nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) led to a warning in 2006 from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) restricting the use of the GBCAs to patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >30 mL/min/1.73m2. We discuss our experience with a post‐FDA restriction presentation of NSF and subsequent patient death in which the prolonged lead‐time of ∼5.5 years led to challenges in ensuring a secure diagnosis of NSF and establishing risk exposures. Accurate contemporary records of contrast administration and clinical factors alongside clinical and pathological expertise ensured that we were able to confidently diagnose NSF, despite the length of lead time and confounding factors. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:1268–1271.

How safe is renal replacement therapy? A national study of mortality and adverse events contributing to the death of renal replacement therapy recipients

BACKGROUND Patients receiving treatment with renal replacement therapy (RRT) have high mortality, and ensuring patient safety in this population is difficult. We aimed to estimate the incidence and nature of medical adverse events contributing to the death of patients being treated with RRT. METHODS This population registry-based retrospective case review study included all patients being treated with RRT for established renal failure in Scotland and who died between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2011. Deaths were reviewed by consultant nephrologists using a structured questionnaire to identify factors contributing to death occurring in both the inpatient and outpatient setting. Reviewers were able to use any information source deemed relevant, including paper and electronic clinical records, mortality and morbidity meetings and procurator fiscal (Scottish coroner) investigations. Deaths occurring in 2008 and 2009 where avoidable factors were identified that may have or did lead to death of a patient were subject to further review and root cause analysis, in order to identify recurrent themes. RESULTS Of 1551 deaths in the study period, 1357 were reviewed (87.5%). Cumulative RRT exposure in the cohort was 2.78 million person-days. RRT complications were the primary cause of death in 28 (2.1%). Health-care-associated infection had contributed to 9.6% of all deaths. In 3.5% of deaths, factors were identified which may have or did contribute to death. These were both organizational and human error related and were largely due to five main causes: management of hyperkalaemia, prescribing, out of hours care, infection and haemodialysis vascular access. CONCLUSIONS Adverse events contributing to death in RRT recipients mainly relate to the everyday management of common medical problems and not the technical aspects of RRT. Efforts to avoid harm in this population should address these ubiquitous causes of harm.

Antiglomerular Basement Membrane Disease: The Long-Term Pulmonary Outcome

We have evaluated long-term pulmonary function in 14 patients who were treated for anti-glomerular basement membrane disease at our institution during the last 17 years. Eight of these patients had evidence of pulmonary involvement, as manifested by hemoptysis, pulmonary infiltrates on chest x-ray film, or anemia. These patients were compared with a control group of 15 patients who had renal disease and who were matched for degree and duration of renal disease, age, smoking history, and method of renal replacement. The following variables were measured in each patient: forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 minute, vital capacity, total lung capacity, residual volume, functional residual capacity, single-breath carbon monoxide transfer factor, and single-breath carbon monoxide transfer factor corrected for alveolar volume (KCO). These patients also participated in a graded exercise test and measurements of oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, minute ventilation, and oxygen saturation were taken. Patients with anti-glomerular basement membrane disease and a prior history of pulmonary hemorrhage had a significantly reduced KCO (46% +/- 10% v 68.7% +/- 14.7%) compared with the control group. There was no difference in any of the other measured parameters.

Evidence-based medicine and health economics: a case study of end stage renal disease.

This paper explores the potential for use of an economic evaluation framework alongside systematic reviews. Clinical issues in dialysis therapy for end stage renal disease are used as case studies. The effectiveness data required were obtained from a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Resource use and cost data were obtained from three sources; the identified randomized controlled trials, a separate review of observational studies and primary data collection. The results of the case studies show that, although simple economic evaluations were possible, issues arose, such as how transferable results are between settings and how appropriate it is to focus on the average patient. The interface between economic evaluation and systematic reviews needs to be further developed in order to ensure that the best available evidence can be used to inform future policy and research.

Early Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis as a Cause of Renal Allograft Primary Nonfunction

Background. Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is one of the commonest causes of glomerular disease and if left untreated will often progress to established renal failure. In many cases the best treatment option is renal transplantation; however primary FSGS may rapidly recur in renal allografts and may contribute to delayed graft function. We present a case of primary nonfunction in a renal allograft due to biopsy-proven FSGS. Case Report. A 32-year-old man presented with serum albumin of 22 g/L, proteinuria quantified at 12 g/L, and marked peripheral oedema. Renal biopsy demonstrated tip-variant FSGS. Despite treatment, the patient developed progressive renal dysfunction and was commenced on haemodialysis. Cadaveric renal transplantation was undertaken; however this was complicated by primary nonfunction. Renal biopsies failed to demonstrate evidence of acute rejection but did demonstrate clear evidence of FSGS. The patient was treated to no avail. Discussion. Primary renal allograft nonfunction following transplantation is often due to acute kidney injury or acute rejection. Recurrent FSGS is recognised as a phenomenon that drives allograft dysfunction but is not traditionally associated with primary nonfunction. This case highlights FSGS as a potentially aggressive process that, once active in the allograft, may prove refractory to targeted treatment. Preemptive therapies in patients deemed to be at high risk of recurrent disease may be appropriate and should be considered.