Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Coonoor R. Chandrasekar is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Coonoor R. Chandrasekar.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2008

The effect of an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma on prognosis

Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; H. Wafa; R. J. Grimer; S. R. Carter; R. M. Tillman; A. Abudu

We investigated whether our policy of routine re-excision of the tumour bed after an unplanned excision of a soft-tissue sarcoma was justified. Between April 1982 and December 2005, 2201 patients were referred to our hospital with the diagnosis of soft-tissue sarcoma, of whom 402 (18%) had undergone an unplanned excision elsewhere. A total of 363 (16.5%) were included in this study. Each patient was routinely restaged and the original histology was reviewed. Re-excision was undertaken in 316 (87%). We analysed the patient, tumour and treatment factors in relation to local control, metastasis and overall survival. Residual tumour was found in 188 patients (59%). There was thus no residual disease in 128 patients of whom 10% (13) went on to develop a local recurrence. In 149 patients (47%), the re-excision specimen contained residual tumour, but it had been widely excised. Local recurrence occurred in 30 of these patients (20%). In 39 patients (12%), residual tumour was present in a marginal resection specimen. Of these, 46% (18) developed a local recurrence. A final positive margin in a high-grade tumour had a 60% risk of local recurrence even with post-operative radiotherapy. Metastases developed in 24% (86). The overall survival was 77% at five years. Survival was related to the grade of the tumour and the finding of residual tumour at the time of re-excision. We concluded that our policy of routine re-excision after unplanned excision of soft-tissue sarcoma was justified in view of the high risk of finding residual tumour.


Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research | 2002

Two-stage revision for infected endoprostheses used in tumor surgery

Robert J. Grimer; Mohan Belthur; Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; S. R. Carter; R. M. Tillman

Thirty-four patients with infected massive endoprostheses had two-stage revision procedures to cure the infection and retain a useful functioning limb. An antibiotic impregnated cement spacer constructed with two cement gun liners and a Kuntscher nail provided temporary stability and also allowed a high dose of local antibiotic concentration. In three patients the infection never was controlled, and one of these patients had a successful second revision surgery. Six other patients had reinfection varying from 14 to 92 months after surgery. Risk factors for reinfection were previous radiotherapy and any additional operative intervention. The overall success rate for controlling infection was 91% at 1 year and 74% at 5 years. Six patients required amputation. The mean functional outcome for the retained limbs using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system was 77%. Two-stage revisions seem almost as effective at controlling infection in massive endoprostheses as in conventional joint replacements, particularly if additional surgical interventions can be avoided.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2009

Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur

Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; R. J. Grimer; S. R. Carter; R. M. Tillman; A. Abudu; L. Buckley

Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal femur may be required to treat primary bone tumours or destructive metastases either with impending or established pathological fracture. Modular prostheses are available off the shelf and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for this purpose. We have assessed the clinical and functional outcome of using the METS (Stanmore Implants Worldwide) modular tumour prosthesis to reconstruct the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients between 2001 and 2006. We compared the results with the published series for patients managed with modular and custom-made endoprosthetic replacements for the same conditions. There were 52 males and 48 females with a mean age of 56.3 years (16 to 84) and a mean follow-up of 24.6 months (0 to 60). In 65 patients the procedure was undertaken for metastases, in 25 for a primary bone tumour, and in ten for other malignant conditions. A total of 46 patients presented with a pathological fracture, and 19 presented with failed fixation of a previous pathological fracture. The overall patient survival was 63.6% at one year and 23.1% at five years, and was significantly better for patients with a primary bone tumour than for those with metastatic tumour (82.3% vs 53.3%, respectively at one year (p = 0.003)). There were six early dislocations of which five could be treated by closed reduction. No patient needed revision surgery for dislocation. Revision surgery was required by six (6%) patients, five for pain caused by acetabular wear and one for tumour progression. Amputation was needed in four patients for local recurrence or infection. The estimated five-year implant survival with revision as the endpoint was 90.7%. The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage score was 61% (51% to 95%). The implant survival and complications resulting from the use of the modular system were comparable to the published series of both custom-made and other modular proximal femoral implants. We conclude that at intermediate follow-up the modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur replacement provides versatility, a low incidence of implant-related complications and acceptable function for patients with metastatic tumours, pathological fractures and failed fixation of the proximal femur. It also functions as well as a custom-made endoprosthetic replacement.


Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | 2008

Modular endoprosthetic replacement for metastatic tumours of the proximal femur

Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; Robert J. Grimer; S. R. Carter; R. M. Tillman; A. Abudu

Background and aimsEndoprosthetic replacements of the proximal femur are commonly required to treat destructive metastases with either impending or actual pathological fractures at this site. Modular prostheses provide an off the shelf availability and can be adapted to most reconstructive situations for proximal femoral replacements. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes following modular tumour prosthesis reconstruction of the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients with metastatic tumours and to compare them with the published results of patients with modular and custom made endoprosthetic replacements.Methods100 consecutive patients who underwent modular tumour prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur for metastases using the METS system from 2001 to 2007 were studied. The patient, tumour and treatment factors in relation to overall survival, local control, implant survival and complications were analysed. Functional scores were obtained from surviving patients.Results and conclusionThere were 45 male and 55 female patients. The mean age was 60.2 years. The indications were metastases. Seventy five patients presented with pathological fracture or with failed fixation and 25 patients were at a high risk of developing a fracture. The mean follow up was 15.9 months [range 0–77]. Three patients died within 2 weeks following surgery. 69 patients have died and 31 are alive. Of the 69 patients who were dead 68 did not need revision surgery indicating that the implant provided single definitive treatment which outlived the patient. There were three dislocations (2/5 with THR and 1/95 with unipolar femoral heads). 6 patients had deep infections. The estimated five year implant survival (Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 83.1% with revision as end point. The mean TESS score was 64% (54%–82%).We conclude that METS modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur provides versatility; low implant related complications and acceptable function lasting the lifetime of the patients with metastatic tumours of the proximal femur.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2008

Variability in the presentation of synovial sarcoma in children: A PLEA FOR GREATER AWARENESS

F. Chotel; A. Unnithan; Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; R. Parot; L. Jeys; R. J. Grimer

We have analysed the pattern of symptoms in patients presenting with synovial sarcoma to identify factors which led to long delays in diagnosis. In 35 children, the early symptoms and the results of clinical and radiological investigation were reviewed, along with the presumed diagnoses. The duration of symptoms was separated into patient delay and doctor delay. Only half of the patients had one or more of the four clinical findings suggestive of sarcoma according to the guidance of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence at the onset of symptoms. Of the 33 children for whom data were available, 16 (48.5%) presented with a painless mass and in ten (30.3%) no mass was identified. Seven (21.2%) had an unexplained joint contracture. Many had been extensively investigated unsuccessfully. The mean duration of symptoms was 98 weeks (2 to 364), the mean patient delay was 43 weeks (0 to 156) and the mean doctor delay was 50 weeks (0 to 362). The mean number of doctors seen before referral was three (1 to 6) and for 15 patients the diagnosis was obtained after unplanned excision. Tumours around the knee and elbow were associated with a longer duration of symptoms and longer doctor delay compared with those at other sites. Delays did not improve significantly over the period of our study of 21 years, and we were unable to show that delay in diagnosis led to a worse prognosis. Our findings highlight the variety of symptoms associated with synovial sarcoma and encourage greater awareness of this tumour as a potential diagnosis in childhood.


International Scholarly Research Notices | 2012

Pathological Fracture of the Proximal Femur in Osteosarcoma: Need for Early Radical Surgery?

Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; Robert J. Grimer; S. R. Carter; R. M. Tillman; A. Abudu; L. Jeys; Wai Hung Cheung; Raju Sharma

Seventeen patients underwent treatment for a pathological fracture of the proximal femur due to osteosarcoma. Their age range was from 9 to 84 (mean age 42) with nine patients under the age of 40 and eight above the age of 40. Twelve patients had a fracture at diagnosis and five developed a fracture after the diagnosis. Seven patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Five patients were referred after internal fixation of the fracture prior to diagnosis. Chemotherapy was used when appropriate and eight patients then underwent limb salvage surgery, six had an amputation, and three had palliative treatment. The estimated five-year survival was 14%. These results are significantly worse than expected, and it proved impossible to identify any group who fared well. The high incidence of metastases both at diagnosis and subsequently suggests this group of patients are at very high risk. Review of multicentre data may suggest an optimum treatment for this patient group.


Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research | 2010

Revision hip replacement for recurrent Hydatid disease of the pelvis: a case report and review of the literature

Venkata Ss Neelapala; Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; Robert J. Grimer

A case of a large recurrent hydatid cyst involving the right ilium and right hip treated with excision of the cyst, Total hip replacement and revision of the acetabular component with a Tripolar articulation for cyst recurrence and acetabular component loosening is presented along with a review of the relevant literature. To our knowledge there is no reported case of Total Hip replacement and revision for hydatid disease involving the bony pelvis.


Journal of Surgical Oncology | 2011

Patient-oriented functional results of total femoral endoprosthetic reconstruction following oncologic resection

Kevin B. Jones; Anthony M. Griffin; Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; David Biau; Antoine Babinet; Benjamin Deheshi; Robert J. Grimer; Jay S. Wunder; Peter C. Ferguson

Functional outcomes following oncologic total femoral endoprosthetic reconstruction (TFR) are lacking. We compared patient‐oriented functional results of TFRs to proximal femur and distal femur reconstructions (PFR and DFR). We also compared function and complications with regard to knee and hip componentry.


The Foot | 2009

Adamantinoma of the calcaneum—A case report

Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; Riazuddin Mohammed; A.A. Rafalla; R. J. Grimer

Adamantinoma is rare, representing less than 1% of all primary malignant bone tumours. It is a slow growing low grade malignant tumour which is often clinically, radiologically and histologically mistaken for many other tumours like Ewings sarcoma, synovial sarcoma, fibrosarcoma, metastatic carcinoma, fibrous cortical defect and osteofibrous dysplasia. Adamantinoma commonly occurs in the tibia. It is also known to occur in the fibula, femur, humerus, radius and ulna. Adamantinoma of the foot is extremely rare. There are few reported cases of metatarsal and cuneiform bone involvement. To our knowledge adamantinoma of the calcaneum has not been previously reported in the literature. We report the case of a male patient, aged 33 years, who was treated for adamantinoma of the calcaneum and followed for 16 years highlighting the difficulty in diagnosis and management of this rare tumor occurring at a rare site.


Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-british Volume | 2009

Unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for tumour: THE RISK OF REVISION IN YOUNG PATIENTS

Coonoor R. Chandrasekar; R. J. Grimer; S. R. Carter; R. M. Tillman; A. Abudu; L. Jeys

We undertook a cemental unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement in 131 patients with a mean age of 50 years (2 to 84). Primary malignant tumours were present in 54 patients and 67 had metastatic disease. In addition, eight patients had either lymphoma or myeloma and two had non-oncological disorders. The mean follow-up was 27 months (0 to 180). An acetabular revision was required later in 14 patients, 12 of whom had been under the age of 21 years at the time of insertion of their original prosthesis. The risk of acetabular revision in patients over 21 years of age was 8% at five years compared with 36% in those aged under 21 years. All the unipolar hips in this younger age group required revision within 11 years of the initial operation. We conclude that unipolar replacement should not be used in younger patients and should be avoided in patients with a life expectancy of more than five years.

Collaboration


Dive into the Coonoor R. Chandrasekar's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. M. Tillman

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. Abudu

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

R. J. Grimer

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Robert J. Grimer

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. Jeys

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. R. Carter

Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge