Costantino Picone

Cognitive impairment: A key feature of congestive heart failure in the elderly

Abstract.Congestive heart failure (CHF) has been proposed as a possible cause of cognitive dysfunction but only a few studies have directly assessed cognitive performance in CHF. The aim of the present study was to compare the cognitive patterns of patients with CHF and patients having cardiovascular diseases uncomplicated by CHF (no-CHF group). In a multicenter observational casecontrol study, we studied 149 hospitalized elderly CHF patients in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II (CHFm, m: moderate), 159 CHF patients in NYHA class III–IV (CHFs, s: severe), and 207 no-CHF patients. Patients underwent a multidimensional assessment and neuropsychological tests for the following cognitive domains: attention, visual-spatial intelligence, verbal attainment, verbal and visuo-spatial memory. Neuropsychological performances of groups were compared by multivariate analysis. Correlates of an abnormal performance on at least three neuropsychological tests were assessed by logistic regression analysis. CHFs performed worse than no-CHF patients on 4 of the 7 neuropsychological measures, the largest difference being in tests of attention and verbal learning (p < 0.001). Prevalence of abnormal performance on at least 3 tests was 57.9 % in CHFs, 43% in CHFm and 34.3 % in no-CHF groups (chi square = 17.3, p < 0.0001). The following qualified as independent correlates of the outcome at logistic regression analysis: CHFs group membership (Odds Ratio—OR = 2.56, 95% Confidence Interval—CI = 1.49–4.40), depression (OR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.54–3.66), hypertension (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.18–2.99). Our results demonstrate that cognitive impairment is common among CHF patients and seems to be causally related to CHF severity, depression and hypertension. The cognitive dysfunction also characterizes a relevant fraction of patients with cardiovascular diseases uncomplicated by CHF.

The brain in congestive heart failure.

In the present paper we discuss two issues about relationships between congestive heart failure and the brain. First, major acute cerebrovascular events are very frequent among elderly people, but stroke does not appear to be frequently associated with congestive heart failure. Second, some cardiovascular conditions may determine progressive damage of cerebral tissue, with consequent impairment of cognitive functions. The association of cognitive impairment and cardiovascular diseases may dramatically increase morbility and mortality risks in the elderly. Recent studies seem to show that hypotension and congestive heart failure are risk factors for dementia in elderly people. In view of this data, an Italian multicentric study on congestive heart failure in hospitalized elderly patients (CHF Italian Study I) included a brief screening of cognitive abilities (MMSE). The presence of congestive heart failure induced a significant decrease of MMSE scores: mean MMSE score after statistical adjustment for the other variables was about one point lower in patients with congestive heart failure respect to elderly patients affected by heart disease but without congestive heart failure. A novel multicentric study (CHF Italian Study II) has been performed to identify cognitive functions more specifically impaired during congestive heart failure in the elderly. Preliminary data relative to 385 patients, confirmed that congestive heart failure may induce a generalized impairment of cognitive functions. These data have relevant clinical implications because they demonstrate that a multidisciplinary approach is necessary in these patients, both for prevention and rehabilitation therapy.

Effect of β-blockade on the premature ventricular beats/heart rate relation and heart rate variability in patients with coronary heart disease and severe ventricular arrhythmias

&NA; We examined the effects of &bgr;-blockers on the associations between heart rate and number of premature ventricular beats (PVBs) and on heart rate variability and myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary heart disease. After 2 weeks of run-in placebo treatment, 18 patients with coronary artery disease were randomized to a 7-day treatment with either propranolol (40 mg) three times a day or placebo. During run-in and after 7 days of treatment, patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring and exercise tests. We analyzed the 24-hour Holter recordings with customized software that computes the correlation between heart rate and occurrence of PVBs. We also computed spectral measures of heart rate variability on the same recordings. Propranolol caused a significant decrease in the log-transformed total number of PVBs recorded over 24 hours and during the day. The number of PVBs was much lower during the night than during the day both after placebo and after propranolol. There were no differences between the two treatments. During the day, there was a positive correlation between heart rate and the number of PVBs in all 18 patients. The mean correlation coefficients between heart rate and number of PVBs increased significantly after propranolol treatment both during the 24-hour monitoring (p < 0.05) and during the day (p < 0.05). The night-recorded correlation coefficients between heart rate and number of PVBs were not significantly different in the placebo versus propranolol group. Propranolol significantly increased the total power during the day. Placebo caused a significant decrease in the low-frequency band (LF) and a significant increase in the high-frequency band (HF) during the night compared with the day. During the day, propranolol significantly reduced LF power and increased HF power, with respect to placebo. After propranolol treatment, the values of LF and HF power during the day were comparable to those recorded at night. The LF/HF ratio decreased significantly after propranolol treatment with respect to placebo in the day and became similar to that recorded during sleep. Propranolol significantly reduced heart rate and systolic blood pressure at rest and at peak exercise and reduced signs of myocardial ischemia. Propranolol administration reduces PVBs in patients with coronary artery disease and severe ventricular arrhythmias possibly through an improvement of cardiac autonomic regulation and through anti-ischemic effects, antiarrhythmic effects, or both.

Effects of delapril in combination with indapamide on blood pressure and left ventricular mass in elderly hypertensive patients.

We present a single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of the effects on blood pressure and left ventricular mass and of the safety of a combined antihypertensive treatment with delapril, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and indapamide, a sulfonamide diuretic. We studied 28 elderly patients aged 65–85 years (mean age, 69 ± 1) with sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 160–200/95–115 mm Hg (at the end of the placebo period). After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients took 30 mg delapril in combination with 1.25 mg indapamide once daily for 24 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was monitored and M- and B-mode echo-cardiography were performed before and after 24 weeks of treatment. Blood pressure decreased from 156 ± 1.5/101 ± 1 mm Hg before treatment to 133 ± 1/73 ± 1 mm Hg after treatment. The total blood pressure burden also decreased; the percentage of measurements with a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg decreased from 48.7% ± 5%/31.5% ± 4.3% to 23.5% ± 4%/20.5% ± 2.9% (p < 0.0005 and p > 0.05). The area under the curve of the 24-hour blood pressure decreased from 250 ± 41/103 ± 21 mm Hg to 97 ± 21/37 ± 8.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001 and p < 0.005). The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in the 15 patients with pretreatment left ventricular hypertrophy was reduced after therapy from 167.5 ± 8.5 g/m2 to 152.2 ± 7.6 g/m2 (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between percent changes of the area under the curve of the 24-hour diastolic blood pressure and percent changes of LVMI (r = 0.6; p < 0.05) in the 15 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Only 2 patients reported side effects: 1 developed skin rash and 1 developed headache. The safety of the treatment was confirmed by laboratory tests. In elderly hypertensive patients, the combination of delapril and indapamide at low doses reduced blood pressure and had favorable effects on LVMI with few side effects.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of 10 and 20 mg lercanidipine in patients with stable effort angina: effects on myocardial ischemia and heart rate variability.

We evaluated the anti-ischemic action and the effects on autonomic function of lercanidipine, a long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, in 25 patients with stable effort angina in a randomized, double-blind, parallel trial. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients entered a 2-week treatment period with 10 or 20 mg of lercanidipine once daily. During the placebo run-in period and at the study end, the patients underwent clinical examination, electrocardiography, exercise tests, 24-hour Holter electrocardiography for long-term heart rate variability evaluation, and short-term spectral analysis of heart rate and systolic blood pressure variability and plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels at rest and during tilting. Results showed that time to onset of ST segment depression ≥1 mm was significantly increased by both drug doses. No significant change was recorded in the average hourly heart rate after treatment with both 10 and 20 mg of lercanidipine. During the 24-hour recordings, no significant change was observed in low-frequency power, high-frequency power, or low frequency/high frequency. In the standing position, there was a significant increase in plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine concentration in both groups, and no change in the supine position after 10 and 20 mg of lercanidipine. When considering short-term heart rate variability, no significant difference was observed in either treatment group in low frequency, high frequency, or their ratio on electrocardiographic R-R spectra. The blood pressure spectral component was also unchanged. In conclusion, lercanidipine is effective in reducing ischemia in patients with stable effort angina. Moreover, lercanidipine does not cause adrenergic activation, which is the main mechanism hypothesized to explain the negative effect on cardiovascular mortality assigned to short-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonists.

Quinapril in patients with congestive heart failure: controlled trial versus captopril.

After two weeks of a wash-out run-in period with placebo, 131 patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II to III) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% were randomly assigned to a treatment period of 4 weeks with 10 mg quinapril once daily or 12.5 mg captopril twice daily. At the end of this period, doses were titrated to 20 mg quinapril once daily or 25 mg captopril twice daily on the basis of physician judgment if there were no major adverse reactions and if blood pressure was not below 110/70 mm Hg. Clinical symptoms of heart failure were significantly relieved by both drugs at the end of a 12-week treatment period. At the beginning of the study, 23 (35%) of the 65 patients taking quinapril and 27 (41%) of the 66 patients taking captopril were in NYHA functional class III, whereas, at the end of the trial, only 4 (6%) of the patients in the quinapril group and 14 (22%; p < 0.05 versus quinapril) patients in the captopril group were classified as NYHA class III. Both drugs had a positive effect on echocardiographic parameters. There was a statistically significant increase in exercise duration in both treatment groups (quinapril, 6.2 ± 1.8 versus 7.8 ± 1.9 minutes, p < 0.001; captopril, 5.9 ± 1.9 versus 7.1 ± 2.3 minutes, p < 0.001). One patient in the quinapril group died suddenly during the study and two patients in the captopril group dropped out of the study due to persistent dry cough. No patient in the quinapril group reported side effects. Three patients in the captopril group suffered from moderate dry cough, one from taste-blindness, and another from unstable angina. The safety of the tested drugs was confirmed by laboratory tests. Quinapril was as effective as captopril in reducing signs and symptoms of heart failure and in improving the left ventricular function and the exercise capacity with few side effects.

Acute dose-response, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of lercanidipine in patients with angina pectoris

Abstract Objective The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-response, pilot study was to assess the acute hemodynamic and therapeutic effects of a single dose of lercanidipine in patients with angina pectoris. Background The calcium channel blocker lercanidipine is a new lipophilic, vasoselective dihydropyridine derivative with a slow onset and long duration of action that has been shown to be effective in hypertensive patients at a dosage of 10 to 20 mg/d. Methods Forty-five patients (42 males, 3 females) with chronic stable angina pectoris and angiographically documented coronary artery disease received a single oral dose of lercanidipine 5 mg (n = 7), 10 mg (n = 8), 20 mg (n = 7), 30 mg (n = 7), or 40 mg (n = 8) or of placebo (n = 8). Anti-ischemic and antianginal efficacy was assessed by a bicycle exercise test 3 and 8 hours after dosing. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were assessed both at rest and during exercise. Results Because of the small number of patients and high variability between the groups, no significant difference was seen compared with placebo. Nevertheless, a significant ( P Conclusions Our data indicated that the acute administration of lercanidipine 10 mg to 40 mg in patients with stable exercise-induced angina pectoris caused no unfavorable change in myocardial oxygen consumption and was well tolerated.

The effects of delapril in combination with indapamide on glomerular filtration rate in elderly hypertensive patients.

We performed a placebo-controlled trial on the effects of a combined antihypertensive treatment with delapril, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and indapamide, a sulfonamide diuretic. We studied 28 elderly patients aged 65–85 years (mean age, 69 ± 1 years) who took 30 mg delapril in combination with 1.25 mg indapamide once daily for 24 weeks. In the present study (performed simultaneously with our trial on the effects of delapril/indapamide on left ventricular mass in elderly patients with hypertension and on the same patients), we report the effects of this drug combination on glomerular filtration rate. Sitting arterial pressure (mean ± SE) decreased from 156 ± 1.5/101 ± 1 mm Hg at baseline to 133 ± 1/73 ± 1 mm Hg at the end of the 24-week treatment period (p < 0.0001). No significant changes in heart rate or episodes of orthostatic hypotension were observed. Glomerular filtration rate increased from 91.8 ± 4.42 mL/min at baseline to 106.3 ± 4.5 mL/min (p < 0.001) at the end of treatment. Our results show that the combination of delapril and indapamide is effective in the elderly hypertensive patient, with a favorable effect on the prevention of deterioration of kidney function.

Clinical determinants of long-term mortality in elderly patients with heart disease

To determine which of the many clinical parameters routinely collected influence mortality in patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (< 45% at radionuclide ventriculography), 128 elderly patients (mean age 79 +/- 3 years) with various heart diseases were prospectively followed for 3 years. Twenty-eight-percent had coronary heart disease, 16% hypertensive heart disease, 7% valvular heart disease. The remaining 62 patients (48%) made up a group comprising patients with primitive cardiomyopathy, cor pulmonary with no evidence of coronary heart disease, valvular disease or hypertensive heart disease. Thirty-four-percent of all patients were classified as having congestive heart failure (CHF). Age, sex and 37 clinical variables were analyzed using a Cox proportional model. Forty-four patients died, 36 (82%) of sudden cardiac death. Ten characteristics at study entry predicted an increased mortality risk: S3 gallop, number of clinical signs >or= 3, LVEF <or= 25%, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class >or= III, dyspnea, digoxin treatment, rales, number of symptoms >or= 4, asthenia, associated pulmonary disease. Long-term survival of very elderly patients with low ejection fraction is related to the functional capacity, the severity of symptoms and the number of clinical signs. Moreover a LVEF <or= 25% selects a subgroup of patients at higher risk. Our results suggest that these variables may influence the long-term survival of elderly patients with heart disease. Further studies with a greater number of patients are necessary to better delineate the prognostic value of the clinical and instrumental variables routinely collected in these patients.

Effect of gallopamil on myocardial microperfusion in patients with stable effort angina: A randomized, cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daily administration of gallopamil 150 mg/day and its effects on myocardial perfusion in a medium-term, randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled trial. We studied 19 patients (17 males and 2 females; mean age 57 +/- 6.8 years) with stable effort angina, angiographically documented coronary artery disease and reversible perfusion defects during exercise thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy of at least one segment of the left ventricle. After 2 weeks of a single-blind placebo run-in period, during which each patient underwent at least 2 exercise tests and a 48-hour Holter ECG recording, all patients were treated with either placebo or gallopamil 50 mg t.i.d. for 28 days. At the end of this period, patients crossed over to the alternate regimen. This phase was double blind. After treatment with placebo or gallopamil, patients underwent exercise tests, 24-hour Holter ECG recording and thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy. Weekly angina frequency and trinitroglycerin (TNT) consumption and safety were also evaluated. No patients dropped out of the study because of major side effects. The number of total ischemic and symptomatic events recorded at 24-hour ECG monitoring, weekly angina frequency and TNT consumption were significantly reduced during gallopamil treatment. After gallopamil administration, exercise duration significantly increased (run-in: 419 +/- 116 s, placebo: 420 +/- 118 s, gallopamil: 511 +/- 144 s; p < 0.05), and ST segment depression was significantly reduced (run-in: -1.3 +/- 0.3 mm, placebo: -1.3 +/- 0.3 mm, gallopamil: -0.94 +/- 0.68 mm; p < 0.01), while heart rate, systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product were unchanged at rest, at submaximal and at peak exercise. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion and the myocardial uptake percentage of thallium-201 in ischemic zones were significantly improved by gallopamil treatment. These findings demonstrate that gallopamil can improve myocardial perfusion and reduce myocardial oxygen consumption.