Gian Luca Iannuzzi

Hypermagnesemia predicts mortality in elderly with congestive heart disease: relationship with laxative and antacid use.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of magnesium levels on 3-year survival in the elderly with congestive heart failure (CHF) admitted to the Rehabilitative Cardiology Unit of S. Maugeri Foundation Scientific Institute of Telese/Campoli. All elderly patients > or = 65 years old with a diagnosis of CHF underwent clinical and instrumental examination, and their demographics, co-morbidity, and in-hospital and 3-year mortality rates were recorded. Hypomagnesemia was found in 4.8%, normomagnesemia in 67.5%, and hypermagnesemia in 27.8% of subjects. The hypomagnesemic group was excluded for numerical exiguity; the analysis was performed on a total of 199 elderly patients. Hypermagnesemia was found in 29.1% and normomagnesemia in 70.9%. At the univariate analysis no differences were found in hypermagnesemia in respect to normomagnesemia group, except for slightly higher levels of creatininemia (1.35 +/- 0.61 vs. 1.13 +/- 0.55 mg/dL, respectively; p < 0.02), greater disability (lost ADL, 2.69 +/- 1.57 vs. 2.15 +/- 1.56, respectively; p < 0.05), more mortality for CHF (32.6 vs. 48.3%; p < 0.05), and higher antacid and laxative use (82.7 vs. 24.8%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Patients with higher magnesium showed less probability to survive at a 3-year follow-up than did patients with lower levels (17.32 +/- 15.93 vs. 22.46 +/- 16.16 months; p < 0.05), and this finding remained significant in the multivariate analysis after adjusting for some confounders. Finally hypermagnesemia should also be considered in the absence of pre-existing renal failure clinical evidence because of its negative prognostic value, especially in elderly patients with CHF. The shown relationship between hypermagnesemia and laxative/antacid use should induce physicians to pay more attention to abuse of these drugs.

Echo-dipyridamole stress test evaluation of isosorbide-5-mononitrate efficacy and tolerance in patients with coronary heart disease: interplay with sympathetic activity.

In 22 patients with stable myocardial ischemia, we prospectively studied the short- and long-term effects of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (5-ISMN) on dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischemia, the ability of dipyridamole-stress echocardiography to evaluate nitrate tolerance, and the role of activation of the neurohumoral system in nitrate tolerance development, assessed by modifications of catecholamines plasma levels and heart rate variability. After brief treatment with 5-ISMN, dipyridamole-stress echocardiography was negative in 19 of 22 patients (p < 0.001 vs. placebo). During the sustained phase, dipyridamole-stress echocardiography was positive after both placebo and active drug (p = NS vs. placebo). Heart rate variability showed significantly higher values in power of the low frequency (LF) band and low- to high-frequency ratio (L/H), as well as significantly lower values of the power of the high-frequency (HF) band (all p < 0.001) during brief but not during sustained administration of 5-ISMN. Norepinephrine plasma levels were significantly higher (p < 0.001) during short-term 5-ISMN administration but not during the sustained phase. Our results indicate that short-term administration of 5-ISMN antagonizes dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischemia and show the loss of antiischemic efficacy in 95% of patients during sustained treatment, demonstrating that dipyridamole-stress echocardiography is a useful tool to assess the presence of nitrate tolerance. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability and norepinephrine values confirm that brief nitrate administration increases sympathetic activity, a possible crucial trigger event in the development of nitrate tolerance, whereas prolonged nitrate treatment is not associated with prolonged neurohumoral activation.

Effect of β-blockade on the premature ventricular beats/heart rate relation and heart rate variability in patients with coronary heart disease and severe ventricular arrhythmias

&NA; We examined the effects of &bgr;-blockers on the associations between heart rate and number of premature ventricular beats (PVBs) and on heart rate variability and myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary heart disease. After 2 weeks of run-in placebo treatment, 18 patients with coronary artery disease were randomized to a 7-day treatment with either propranolol (40 mg) three times a day or placebo. During run-in and after 7 days of treatment, patients underwent 24-hour Holter monitoring and exercise tests. We analyzed the 24-hour Holter recordings with customized software that computes the correlation between heart rate and occurrence of PVBs. We also computed spectral measures of heart rate variability on the same recordings. Propranolol caused a significant decrease in the log-transformed total number of PVBs recorded over 24 hours and during the day. The number of PVBs was much lower during the night than during the day both after placebo and after propranolol. There were no differences between the two treatments. During the day, there was a positive correlation between heart rate and the number of PVBs in all 18 patients. The mean correlation coefficients between heart rate and number of PVBs increased significantly after propranolol treatment both during the 24-hour monitoring (p < 0.05) and during the day (p < 0.05). The night-recorded correlation coefficients between heart rate and number of PVBs were not significantly different in the placebo versus propranolol group. Propranolol significantly increased the total power during the day. Placebo caused a significant decrease in the low-frequency band (LF) and a significant increase in the high-frequency band (HF) during the night compared with the day. During the day, propranolol significantly reduced LF power and increased HF power, with respect to placebo. After propranolol treatment, the values of LF and HF power during the day were comparable to those recorded at night. The LF/HF ratio decreased significantly after propranolol treatment with respect to placebo in the day and became similar to that recorded during sleep. Propranolol significantly reduced heart rate and systolic blood pressure at rest and at peak exercise and reduced signs of myocardial ischemia. Propranolol administration reduces PVBs in patients with coronary artery disease and severe ventricular arrhythmias possibly through an improvement of cardiac autonomic regulation and through anti-ischemic effects, antiarrhythmic effects, or both.

Effects of delapril in combination with indapamide on blood pressure and left ventricular mass in elderly hypertensive patients.

We present a single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of the effects on blood pressure and left ventricular mass and of the safety of a combined antihypertensive treatment with delapril, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and indapamide, a sulfonamide diuretic. We studied 28 elderly patients aged 65–85 years (mean age, 69 ± 1) with sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 160–200/95–115 mm Hg (at the end of the placebo period). After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients took 30 mg delapril in combination with 1.25 mg indapamide once daily for 24 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was monitored and M- and B-mode echo-cardiography were performed before and after 24 weeks of treatment. Blood pressure decreased from 156 ± 1.5/101 ± 1 mm Hg before treatment to 133 ± 1/73 ± 1 mm Hg after treatment. The total blood pressure burden also decreased; the percentage of measurements with a systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg decreased from 48.7% ± 5%/31.5% ± 4.3% to 23.5% ± 4%/20.5% ± 2.9% (p < 0.0005 and p > 0.05). The area under the curve of the 24-hour blood pressure decreased from 250 ± 41/103 ± 21 mm Hg to 97 ± 21/37 ± 8.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001 and p < 0.005). The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in the 15 patients with pretreatment left ventricular hypertrophy was reduced after therapy from 167.5 ± 8.5 g/m2 to 152.2 ± 7.6 g/m2 (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between percent changes of the area under the curve of the 24-hour diastolic blood pressure and percent changes of LVMI (r = 0.6; p < 0.05) in the 15 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Only 2 patients reported side effects: 1 developed skin rash and 1 developed headache. The safety of the treatment was confirmed by laboratory tests. In elderly hypertensive patients, the combination of delapril and indapamide at low doses reduced blood pressure and had favorable effects on LVMI with few side effects.

Quinapril in patients with congestive heart failure: controlled trial versus captopril.

After two weeks of a wash-out run-in period with placebo, 131 patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class II to III) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% were randomly assigned to a treatment period of 4 weeks with 10 mg quinapril once daily or 12.5 mg captopril twice daily. At the end of this period, doses were titrated to 20 mg quinapril once daily or 25 mg captopril twice daily on the basis of physician judgment if there were no major adverse reactions and if blood pressure was not below 110/70 mm Hg. Clinical symptoms of heart failure were significantly relieved by both drugs at the end of a 12-week treatment period. At the beginning of the study, 23 (35%) of the 65 patients taking quinapril and 27 (41%) of the 66 patients taking captopril were in NYHA functional class III, whereas, at the end of the trial, only 4 (6%) of the patients in the quinapril group and 14 (22%; p < 0.05 versus quinapril) patients in the captopril group were classified as NYHA class III. Both drugs had a positive effect on echocardiographic parameters. There was a statistically significant increase in exercise duration in both treatment groups (quinapril, 6.2 ± 1.8 versus 7.8 ± 1.9 minutes, p < 0.001; captopril, 5.9 ± 1.9 versus 7.1 ± 2.3 minutes, p < 0.001). One patient in the quinapril group died suddenly during the study and two patients in the captopril group dropped out of the study due to persistent dry cough. No patient in the quinapril group reported side effects. Three patients in the captopril group suffered from moderate dry cough, one from taste-blindness, and another from unstable angina. The safety of the tested drugs was confirmed by laboratory tests. Quinapril was as effective as captopril in reducing signs and symptoms of heart failure and in improving the left ventricular function and the exercise capacity with few side effects.

The effects of delapril in combination with indapamide on glomerular filtration rate in elderly hypertensive patients.

We performed a placebo-controlled trial on the effects of a combined antihypertensive treatment with delapril, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and indapamide, a sulfonamide diuretic. We studied 28 elderly patients aged 65–85 years (mean age, 69 ± 1 years) who took 30 mg delapril in combination with 1.25 mg indapamide once daily for 24 weeks. In the present study (performed simultaneously with our trial on the effects of delapril/indapamide on left ventricular mass in elderly patients with hypertension and on the same patients), we report the effects of this drug combination on glomerular filtration rate. Sitting arterial pressure (mean ± SE) decreased from 156 ± 1.5/101 ± 1 mm Hg at baseline to 133 ± 1/73 ± 1 mm Hg at the end of the 24-week treatment period (p < 0.0001). No significant changes in heart rate or episodes of orthostatic hypotension were observed. Glomerular filtration rate increased from 91.8 ± 4.42 mL/min at baseline to 106.3 ± 4.5 mL/min (p < 0.001) at the end of treatment. Our results show that the combination of delapril and indapamide is effective in the elderly hypertensive patient, with a favorable effect on the prevention of deterioration of kidney function.

Effect of gallopamil on myocardial microperfusion in patients with stable effort angina: A randomized, cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of daily administration of gallopamil 150 mg/day and its effects on myocardial perfusion in a medium-term, randomized, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled trial. We studied 19 patients (17 males and 2 females; mean age 57 +/- 6.8 years) with stable effort angina, angiographically documented coronary artery disease and reversible perfusion defects during exercise thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy of at least one segment of the left ventricle. After 2 weeks of a single-blind placebo run-in period, during which each patient underwent at least 2 exercise tests and a 48-hour Holter ECG recording, all patients were treated with either placebo or gallopamil 50 mg t.i.d. for 28 days. At the end of this period, patients crossed over to the alternate regimen. This phase was double blind. After treatment with placebo or gallopamil, patients underwent exercise tests, 24-hour Holter ECG recording and thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy. Weekly angina frequency and trinitroglycerin (TNT) consumption and safety were also evaluated. No patients dropped out of the study because of major side effects. The number of total ischemic and symptomatic events recorded at 24-hour ECG monitoring, weekly angina frequency and TNT consumption were significantly reduced during gallopamil treatment. After gallopamil administration, exercise duration significantly increased (run-in: 419 +/- 116 s, placebo: 420 +/- 118 s, gallopamil: 511 +/- 144 s; p < 0.05), and ST segment depression was significantly reduced (run-in: -1.3 +/- 0.3 mm, placebo: -1.3 +/- 0.3 mm, gallopamil: -0.94 +/- 0.68 mm; p < 0.01), while heart rate, systolic blood pressure and rate-pressure product were unchanged at rest, at submaximal and at peak exercise. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of myocardial perfusion and the myocardial uptake percentage of thallium-201 in ischemic zones were significantly improved by gallopamil treatment. These findings demonstrate that gallopamil can improve myocardial perfusion and reduce myocardial oxygen consumption.

Quantitative ultrasonic myocardial blood flow reserve reproducibility in men

Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow (MBF) by contrast echocardiography (CE) has the potential to become a routine procedure with continued methodologic enhancements. Improved hardware technology, better physical characteristics of the contrast agent (microbubbles), and the development of more advanced algorithms to compute blood flow underlie the advances in this field. The purpose of this study was to assess the reproducibility of quantitative CE blood flow parameters obtained with the destruction-reperfusion principle.