Coya Tapia

Prognostic Relevance of Gene Amplifications and Coamplifications in Breast Cancer

Multiple different oncogenes have been described previously to be amplified in breast cancer including HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2. Gene amplification results in oncogene overexpression but may also serve as an indicator of genomic instability. As such, presence of one or several gene amplifications may have prognostic significance. To assess the prognostic importance of amplifications and coamplifications of HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and MDM2 in breast cancer, we analyzed a breast cancer tissue microarray containing samples from 2197 cancers with follow-up information. Fluorescence in situ hybridizations revealed amplifications of CCND1 in 20.1%, HER2 in 17.3%, MDM2 in 5.7%, MYC in 5.3%, and EGFR in 0.8% of the tumors. All gene amplifications were significantly associated with high grade. HER2 (P < 0.001) and MYC amplification (P < 0.001) were also linked to shortened survival. In case of HER2, this was independent of grade, pT, and pN categories. MYC amplification was almost 3 times more frequent in medullary cancer (15.9%), than in the histologic subtype with the second highest frequency (ductal; 5.6%; P = 0.0046). HER2 and MYC amplification were associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negativity (P < 0.001) whereas CCND1 amplification was linked to estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positivity (P < 0.001). Coamplifications were more prevalent than expected based on the individual frequencies. Coamplifications of one or several other oncogenes occurred in 29.6% of CCND1, 43% of HER2, 55.7% of MDM2, 65% of MYC, and 72.8% of EGFR-amplified cancers. HER2/MYC-coamplified cancers had a worse prognosis than tumors with only one of these amplifications. Furthermore, a gradual decrease of survival was observed with increasing number of amplifications. In conclusion, these data support a major prognostic impact of genomic instability as determined by a broad gene amplification survey in breast cancer.

Two mitosis-specific antibodies, MPM-2 and phospho-histone H3 (Ser28), allow rapid and precise determination of mitotic activity.

Mitotic figure (MF) counting is important in the evaluation of many tumor types. Inadequate fixation, crush artefacts, the presence of many apoptoses, or the rarity of MFs in a given lesion can make the determination of the mitotic index a very time-consuming or even impossible task, especially for novices. We evaluated the potential of the two commercially available mitotic markers MPM-2 and Phospho-Histone H3 Ser28 (PHH3) for improving mitotic counting. Formalin-fixed tissue of 1 lymphoma, 19 epithelial, 25 mesenchymal, and 10 melanocytic tumors was immunohistochemically stained with both antibodies. Mitotic counts of each tumor sample were determined by a pathologist and three residents in the hematoxylin and eosin and in both immunohistochemical stainings. Because of the higher sensitivity of the immunohistochemical stainings for MFs, average mitotic counts per 10 HPF were higher with MPM-2 (11.0) and PHH3 (10.1) than with hematoxylin and eosin (5.9) staining. The precise distinction of MFs from apoptoses and the visualization of the distribution of MFs uncovering mitotic hotspots, even at low magnification, turned out to be major advantages of both mitotic markers. In addition, the average time needed to establish the mitotic count was reduced by 40.3% with MPM-2 and by 50.4% with PHH3. MPM-2 and PHH3 were subjectively rated by all pathologists involved in this study to be very helpful in mitotic counting, especially in melanocytic and mesenchymal lesions but less so in epithelial tumors. Both markers have hence been successfully introduced in our laboratory for the routine assessment of MFs in melanocytic and mesenchymal tumors.

HER2 gene status in primary breast cancers and matched distant metastases

IntroductionThe status of the gene encoding human EGF-like receptor 2 (HER2) is an important prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer. Only breast cancers with HER2 amplification respond to the targeted therapy with trastuzumab. It is controversial to what degree the primary tumour is representative of distant metastases in terms of HER2 status. Discrepancies in HER2 status between primary tumours and distant metastases have been described, but their reasons remain unclear. Here, we compared HER2 status on cytological specimens of distant metastases with the result from the primary carcinomas, and explored the prevalence of and the reasons for discrepant results.MethodsHER2 status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. HER2 gene amplification was defined as a HER2/chromosome 17 signal ratio of 2 or more. HER2 results from cytological specimens of matched distant metastases were compared with the results from the corresponding primary tumours (n = 105 patients). In addition, lymph node metastases were analysed in 31 of these patients.ResultsHER2 amplification was found in 20% of distant metastases. HER2 status was discordant between the primary tumour and distant metastasis in 7.6% of the 105 patients. Re-evaluation revealed that in five patients (4.7%), discrepancies were due to interpretational difficulties. In two of these patients, focal amplification had initially been overlooked as a result of heterogeneity in the primary tumours or in the metastases, respectively. A further three patients had borderline amplification with a ratio close to 2. Discrepancy remained unexplained in three patients (2.9%).ConclusionHER2 gene status remains highly conserved as breast cancers metastasise. However, discrepant results do occur because of interpretational difficulties and heterogeneity of HER2 amplification. Cytological specimens from distant metastases are well suited for HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis.

Ki67 labeling index in core needle biopsies independently predicts tumor-specific survival in prostate cancer.

A better knowledge of the biological aggressiveness of individual tumors could facilitate the selection of treatment in prostate cancer patients. This study assesses the influence of histological and molecular features in core needle biopsy specimens of prostate cancer on tumor-specific survival. Formalin-fixed core needle biopsy specimens from 111 consecutive patients (mean follow-up, 5.0 years) were immunohistochemically examined for their proliferative activity (Ki67 labeling index [LI]) and expression of p53 and Bcl-2. Overexpression of p53 was found in 16% of the biopsy specimens and was mainly restricted to poorly differentiated tumors. Bcl-2 positivity was found in 20% of tumors. The median Ki67 LI was 7.5%. There was a strong relationship between Ki67 LI and Gleason grade, with a continuous increase in the proliferative activity from low-grade to high-grade tumors (P = .0006). Univariate tumor-specific survival analysis showed that high Gleason score (P = .0018), high percentage of biopsy tumor involvement (P = .0227), high Ki67 LI (P = .0007), and p53 positivity (P = .0024) were predictors of tumor-related death. A high Ki67 LI emerged as the only independent predictor of tumor-specific survival in multiparametric analysis. These results indicate that core needle biopsy specimens of the prostate not only are useful for diagnosis of malignancy but also can provide valuable prognostic information. Immunohistochemical examinations of molecular features may be a helpful adjunct for a better pretherapeutic assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness and therefore contribute to an improved initial patient management.

Estrogen induces apoptosis in estrogen deprivation-resistant breast cancer through stress responses as identified by global gene expression across time

In laboratory studies, acquired resistance to long-term antihormonal therapy in breast cancer evolves through two phases over 5 y. Phase I develops within 1 y, and tumor growth occurs with either 17β-estradiol (E2) or tamoxifen. Phase II resistance develops after 5 y of therapy, and tamoxifen still stimulates growth; however, E2 paradoxically induces apoptosis. This finding is the basis for the clinical use of estrogen to treat advanced antihormone-resistant breast cancer. We interrogated E2-induced apoptosis by analysis of gene expression across time (2–96 h) in MCF-7 cell variants that were estrogen-dependent (WS8) or resistant to estrogen deprivation and refractory (2A) or sensitive (5C) to E2-induced apoptosis. We developed a method termed differential area under the curve analysis that identified genes uniquely regulated by E2 in 5C cells compared with both WS8 and 2A cells and hence, were associated with E2-induced apoptosis. Estrogen signaling, endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS), and inflammatory response genes were overrepresented among the 5C-specific genes. The identified ERS genes indicated that E2 inhibited protein folding, translation, and fatty acid synthesis. Meanwhile, the ERS-associated apoptotic genes Bcl-2 interacting mediator of cell death (BIM; BCL2L11) and caspase-4 (CASP4), among others, were induced. Evaluation of a caspase peptide inhibitor panel showed that the CASP4 inhibitor z-LEVD-fmk was the most active at blocking E2-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, z-LEVD-fmk completely prevented poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage, E2-inhibited growth, and apoptotic morphology. The up-regulated proinflammatory genes included IL, IFN, and arachidonic acid-related genes. Functional testing showed that arachidonic acid and E2 interacted to superadditively induce apoptosis. Therefore, these data indicate that E2 induced apoptosis through ERS and inflammatory responses in advanced antihormone-resistant breast cancer.

HER2, TOP2A, CCND1, EGFR and C-MYC oncogene amplification in colorectal cancer

Aim: Recent studies had suggested substantial molecular differences between tumours from different ethnic groups. In this study, the molecular differences between the incidences of colorectal carcinoma in Saudi and Swiss populations are investigated. Method: 518 cases of colon cancer tumours (114 from Saudi Arabia and 404 from Switzerland) were analysed in a tissue microarray format. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) was used to estimate frequencies of copy number changes of known oncogenes, including HER2, TOPO2A, CCND1, EGFR and C-MYC. Results: Using FISH, amplifications were mostly low level (gene-to-centromere ratio 2 to 4), which is in contrast with other tumour types with more frequent gene amplifications. The amplifications were particularly frequent for MYC (Saudi 9% and Swiss 14.2%) but unrelated to clinical outcome and pathological information. Remarkably, there were four tumours exhibiting classic high-level gene amplification for HER2 (Swiss 1.3%), a pattern often accompanied by response to trastuzumab (Herceptin) in breast cancer. Occasional high-level amplifications were also observed for CCND1 (Saudi 1/106, 0.9%; Swiss 2/373, 0.5%) and EGFR (Swiss 2/355; 0.6%). Conclusions: Rare high-level amplifications of therapeutic target genes were found in patients with colon cancer. Although no molecular differences were found between incidences of colon cancer cases in Swiss and Saudi populations, these observations emphasise the urgent need for clinical studies investigating the effect of targeted therapies.

Comprehensive epidermal growth factor receptor gene analysis from cytological specimens of non-small-cell lung cancers

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations and increased copy numbers are considered as predictors of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung cancer diagnosis is often based on cytology alone. However, almost all published data on EGFR gene analyses were obtained from biopsies. This study tested the feasibility of EGFR gene analyses on cytological specimens. Eighty-four cytological specimens from NSCLCs were prospectively analysed for EGFR gene mutation in exons 18–21 and EGFR gene copy numbers were evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). A FISH-positive result was defined according to the criteria by Cappuzzo et al established for biopsies of NSCLCs. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation results of cytological specimens were compared to the FISH results on matching biopsies (n=33). Initial diagnosis of NSCLC was solely based on cytology in 37 out of 84 (44.0%) patients. Out of 80 NSCLCs, 6 (7.5%) showed EGFR gene mutations. Out of 67 cancers, 45 (67.2%) were FISH positive on cytological specimens. Comparison of FISH showed a FISH-positive result in 21 out of 33 (63.6%) cytological specimens but in only 8 out of 33 (24.2%) matched biopsies. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene analyses are well applicable to cytological specimens. The high FISH-positive rate of NSCLC on cytological specimens contrasts with the low rate on biopsies when previously suggested criteria are used. New criteria for a positive EGFR FISH status to predict response to therapy with EGFR-TKI need to be defined for cytological specimens.

KIT (CD117)-Positive Breast Cancers Are Infrequent and Lack KIT Gene Mutations

Purpose: KIT (CD117) is a transmembrane tyrosine kinase representing a target for STI571 (Glivec) therapy. Some KIT-overexpressing solid tumors have responded favorably to STI571, potentially because of the presence of KIT-activating mutations. Experimental Design: To investigate the epidemiology of KIT overexpression and mutations, we investigated a series of 1654 breast cancers. All tumors were analyzed by immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format. Results: KIT expression was always present in normal breast epithelium. However, cancer analysis revealed the only 43 of 1654 (2.6%) tumors were KIT-positive. KIT expression was more frequent in medullary cancer (9 of 47 positive; 19.1%) than in any other histological tumor subtype (P < 0.001). KIT expression was significantly associated with high tumor grade (P < 0.0001) but unrelated to pT and pN categories or patient survival. Mutation analysis of exons 2, 8, 9, 11, 13, and 17 was negative in 10 KIT-positive tumors. Conclusions: Overall, our data show that a high level of KIT expression occurs infrequently in breast cancer. KIT-positive breast cancers may not reflect “KIT up-regulation” because KIT is also expressed in normal breast epithelium. The lack of KIT mutations also argues against the therapeutic efficacy of STI571 in breast cancer.

Close association between HER-2 amplification and overexpression in human tumors of non-breast origin

The relationship between HER-2 overexpression and gene amplification is well evaluated in breast cancers but remains unclear or controversial in many other tumor entities. Therefore, we tested the HER-2 status in more than 120 different tumor entities. 5751 tumor samples were analyzed on TMAs by immunohistochemistry (Hercept-Test, DAKO) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (PathVysion, Abbott-Vysis) under highly standardized conditions. HER-2 overexpression (score 2/3+) and amplification occurred most often in breast cancers but was also seen in 18 other tumor entities including cancers of the urinary bladder (amplification in 14.3%, overexpression in 6.7%), stomach (8.3/4.9%), endometrium (6.6/6.8%), lung (2.8/3.1%) and ovary (2.3/1.2%). Remarkably, a strong association between overexpression and amplification was seen in all examined cancer entities. Trastuzumab therapy is highly efficient in HER-2 amplified breast cancer both in metastatic disease and as an adjuvant therapy. A variety of other tumor entities including frequent neoplasms and cancers with often limited therapeutic options have similar patterns of HER-2 alterations as observed in breast cancer (ie high overexpression due to high level gene amplification). Such tumor entities should be carefully evaluated for a possible utility of trastuzumab treatment.

Patterns of gene amplification in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common primary mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). They represent a wide clinico-pathological spectrum of tumors. No single histological or clinical parameter can predict the prognosis while the response to therapy is related to the type of KIT or PDGFRA mutation. Cytogenetic and CGH studies have identified frequent gross chromosomal aberrations but the target genes of these changes are unknown. To determine whether known oncogenes take part in genomic rearrangements and to investigate the potential clinical significance of their amplifications, nine known oncogenes (CMYC, MDM2, GLI1, CDK4, HER2, EGFR1, CCND1, FGF3, EMS) were analyzed by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on a tissue microarray (TMA) containing 94 primary GIST. Clinical follow-up information was available for 57 of these patients. Amplification was found for CMYC in three of 90 (3.3%), for MDM2 in five of 94 (5.3%), for EGFR1 in five of 94 (5.3%), and for CCND1 in seven of 79 (8.9%) evaluable cases. No amplifications were seen for HER2, GLI1, CDK4, FGF3, and EMS. Amplifications of MDM2 and CCND1 were associated with clinical and histological malignancy. In conclusion, our data show that gene amplification does occur in a subset of GIST. Identification of MDM2/CCND1 amplification may represent another molecular feature that could help in the evaluation of the behavior of GISTs.