Craig A. Bond
Colorado State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Craig A. Bond.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review | 2005
Kelly L. Giraud; Craig A. Bond; Jennifer Keeling Bond
Does willingness to pay a premium for local specialty food products differ between consumers in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont? Two food categories are investigated: low-end (
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics | 2009
Jennifer Keeling Bond; Dawn D. Thilmany; Craig A. Bond
5) and high-end (
Journal of Environmental Management | 2009
Daniel Deisenroth; John B. Loomis; Craig A. Bond
20) products. Premia estimates are compared across states and across base prices within states using dichotomous choice contingent valuation methods. Results suggest that the three states of northern New England have many similarities, including comparable price premia for the lower-priced good. However, there is some evidence that the premium for the higher-priced good is greater for the pooled Vermont and Maine treatment than for the New Hampshire treatment. Vermont and New Hampshire residents are willing to pay a higher premium for a
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2008
Craig A. Bond; Y. Hossein Farzin
20 than for a
Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research | 2008
John B. Loomis; Craig A. Bond; David A. Harpman
5 food item, while the evidence suggests that Maine residents are not.
Aquaculture Economics & Management | 2012
Daniel Bryan Deisenroth; Craig A. Bond; John B. Loomis
There is evidence that consumers are increasingly purchasing food directly from local producers, but little is understood about which market-specific, intrinsic, extrinsic, and demographic attributes influence the probability of preferring to purchase fresh produce through direct-market channels. A multinomial logit model is used to analyze a national dataset of fresh produce consumers with a focus on exploring differences among those that prefer to purchase direct always, occasionally (seasonally and as a secondary source), and never. Results suggest that to increase patronage and loyalty of current customers, producers may emphasize the availability of fresh, superior, vitamin-rich, and locally-grown produce at market locations through booth displays, ads in magazines, radio spots, and electronic newsletters. To attract new customers who do not currently admit a preference for purchasing direct, producers may find greater success by locating in convenient-to-reach venues, showcasing a variety of colorful offerings, and working to enhance the overall aesthetic appeal of market locations.
Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UCD | 2004
Craig A. Bond; Y. Hossein Farzin
Few economic studies are available to measure off-highway vehicle recreation benefits foregone when trails must be closed to protect the environment. This paper estimates the non-market benefits associated with off-highway vehicle (OHV) recreation on National Forest lands in Larimer County, Colorado. We use a contingent valuation model (CVM) to estimate benefits to OHV users, which includes dirt bike riders, all terrain vehicle (ATV) riders, and 4-wheel drive (4x4) users. Using CVM we find the mean consumer surplus estimates to be
Archive | 2012
Y. Hossein Farzin; Craig A. Bond
78 per person per day. These results are consistent with the few previous estimates of OHV recreation benefits. This equates to a per trail per summer consumer surplus of at least between
American Journal of Agricultural Economics | 2008
Dawn D. Thilmany; Craig A. Bond; Jennifer Keeling Bond
219,467 and
Journal of Development Economics | 2006
Y. Hossein Farzin; Craig A. Bond
296,876, and a county level surplus per summer to be at least between