Craig S. Fleisher
University of Pittsburgh
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Craig S. Fleisher.
Competitive Intelligence Review | 1999
Craig S. Fleisher
The need to strategically manage public policy developments affecting business requires a broadened role for competitive intelligence. Public policy competitive intelligence (PPCI) can provide early warning of threats and opportunities that affect company strategy and allow decision makers to take appropriate action such as working to create, change or defeat legislation or regulation, or taking a public stance on key policy issues. In some cases, it also may be appropriate to respond to public policy developments by altering the companys mission, changing vendors/suppliers, and entering or exiting product or service lines. Public policy issues to monitor include those involving national and regional regulation, taxation, privatization, government expenditures, and actions affecting takeovers, among others. Companies also must monitor global, social, and political factors. Competitive intelligence professionals should collaborate with their colleagues in government relations, community relations, and corporate affairs. A comprehensive assessment of the companys public policy environment (PPE) should be performed. A framework is proposed for a continuous public policy strategy process.
Journal of Strategic Security | 2013
David L. Blenkhorn; Craig S. Fleisher
Current trends suggest that academia may be well “behind the curve” in delivering effective competitive and market intelligence programs and course offerings to students. There are many reasons why this state of affairs has occurred, and prominent among them is nature of challenges experienced by instructors in disseminating and teaching students the prominent competencies they need to acquire in order to be successful in the changing workplace. Applying cluster analysis to our teaching experiences and the scholarship, we develop a normative conceptual model that contrasts traditional and evolving pedagogical methods. Furthermore, we make the case that new learning tools and technologies which are revolutionizing the way information is taught need to be matched up with the new ways in which unique segments of contemporary intelligence students approach learning. This article is available in Journal of Strategic Security: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol6/iss3/6
Archive | 2000
Craig S. Fleisher; David L. Blenkhorn
Archive | 2003
Craig S. Fleisher; David L. Blenkhorn
Competitive Intelligence Review | 1991
John E. Prescott; Craig S. Fleisher
Archive | 2004
Craig S. Fleisher; John E. Prescott; David L. Blenkhorn; Patrick Bryant; Jonathan Calof; Paul Dishman; Patrick T. Gibbons; Paul Kinsinger; Jerry P. Miller; Susan Myburgh; Juro Nakagawa; Edna Reid; Luiz Felipe Serpa; Kathy Shelfer; Tom Tao; Conor Vibert; Sheila Wright
Competitive Intelligence Review | 1990
Craig S. Fleisher
Competitive Intelligence Review | 1991
Craig S. Fleisher
Archive | 2004
Craig S. Fleisher; John E. Prescott; Sheila Wright; Ahmad Badr; David L. Blenkhorn; Jonathan Calof; Paul Dishman; Ireland Ben Gilad; William K. Hutchinson; Denmark Kwangsoo Kim; Paul Kinsinger; Cynthia E. Miree; Susan Myburgh; Juro Nakagawa; Edna Reid; L. F. Serpa; Katherine M. Shelfer; Yoshio Sugasawa; Joaquin Tena
Archive | 1997
Craig S. Fleisher