D. Bhatnagar

Coronary risk factors in people from the Indian subcontinent living in West London and their siblings in India

Several reports have shown that migrants from southeast Asia tend to have an increased risk of coronary heart disease when settled in their new country. We compared coronary risk factors in a randomly selected group of 247 migrants from the Indian subcontinent of Punjabi origin living in West London and 117 of their siblings living in the Punjab in India. The West London cohort had a greater body mass index (p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.0087), serum cholesterol (p < 0.001), apolipoprotein B (p < 0.001), lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.05) and higher fasting blood glucose (p < 0.05) than their siblings in the Punjab. Insulin sensitivity, derived from the homoeostatic assessment mathematical model, was lower in men in West London than in their counterparts in India (p < 0.05). Indians in West London had lower beta cell function than those in the Punjab (p < 0.001). Serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations were similar in both the West London and Punjab population, but were significantly higher (p = 0.01) than those of white European populations in the UK. Increases in serum cholesterol after migration from India lead to increased coronary risk conferred by high serum lipoprotein (a) concentrations and greater insulin resistance. Such between-country comparisons are an important means of establishing the importance of coronary risk factors.

APOLIPOPROTEINS (a), AI, AND B AND PARENTAL HISTORY IN MEN WITH EARLY ONSET ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE

Middle-aged men who had had a myocardial infarction were compared with controls matched for social background, age, cigarette-smoking, blood pressure, and alcohol consumption. Serum cholesterol, triglycerides, very low density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, high density lipoprotein (HDL), HDL2 and HDL3 cholesterol, and serum apolipoproteins (apo) (a), AI, and B were measured. Discriminant analysis showed that the combination of these variables that best distinguished patients from controls was provided by apo AI and apo B and a knowledge of parental history of early cardiac death, the most discriminating single factor being apo B. No other variable contributed more than these. Apo (a), however, could be substituted for parental history, which had a major influence on the serum concentration of apo (a). Apo (a) concentration accounted for much of the familial predisposition to cardiac ischaemia. These findings may prove valuable in the clinical assessment of genetic susceptibility to myocardial infarction. They also support the hypothesis that serum apo (a) concentration is a genetic trait that predisposes to arterial thrombosis. Apo B emerged as the main lipoprotein determinant of coronary disease risk.

Effects of two different fibric acid derivatives on lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor and paraoxonase activity in type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia

We have investigated the effects of two fibric acid derivatives, bezafibrate mono (400 mg daily) and gemfibrozil (600 mg b.d.), in 29 patients with type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia. All patients received placebo and each drug for 8 weeks in randomised order in a double-blind, cross-over study designed to evaluate any different effects of the drugs on serum lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), cholesteryl ester transfer activity (CETA), plasma fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-I (PAI-1) or paraoxonase. Serum cholesterol decreased (P < 0.05) with gemfibrozil, but the effect of bezafibrate on serum cholesterol did not achieve statistical significance (placebo 8.34 +/- 1.05 (mean +/- S.D.), gemfibrozil 7.70 +/- 1.23 and bezafibrate 7.8 +/- 1.37 mmol/l). Both drugs decreased the serum triglyceride concentration (both P < 0.001) (placebo 4.39 (3.13-5.75) (median (interquartile range)), bezafibrate 2.26 (1.89-3.89) and gemfibrozil 2.00 (1.30-3.30) mmol/l) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (both P < 0.001) (placebo 1.18 (0.74-2.30), bezafibrate 0.59 (0.34-0.85) and gemfibrozil 0.48 (0.34-0.68) mmol/l). Discontinuous gradient ultracentrifugation (DGU) revealed that Sf 60-400 (large VLDL) decreased by more than 50% and Sf 20-60 (small VLDL) by more than 30% with each of the drugs (both P < 0.001), neither of which affected the composition of these lipoproteins. Gemfibrozil decreased the concentration of Sf 12-20 lipoprotein (intermediate density lipoprotein; IDL) by 23% (P < 0.01), whereas the effect of bezafibrate on this lipoprotein did not achieve statistical significance. Neither drug altered the concentration of apolipoprotein B or of total Sf 0-12 lipoproteins (low density lipoprotein, (LDL)). Both, however, significantly increased the quantity of free cholesterol in Sf 0-12 lipoproteins (P < 0.05). Overall the concentration of triglycerides decreased significantly in all lipoproteins isolated by DGU (Sf 0-12, Sf 12-20, Sf 20-60, Sf 60-400) on gemfibrozil treatment, but only in Sf 20-60 and Sf 60-400 on bezafibrate (all P < 0.05). Both drugs also increased serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (placebo 1.15 +/- 0.29, bezafibrate 1.27 +/- 0.38 (P < 0.01) and gemfibrozil 1.26 +/- 0.49 (P < 0.05) mmol/l) and HDL3 cholesterol concentration (placebo 0.59 +/- 0.12, bezafibrate 0.72 +/- 0.23 (P < 0.001) and gemfibrozil 0.70 +/- 0.24 (P < 0.01) mmol/l). Serum apolipoprotein A1 (apo A1) was increased (P < 0.05) by bezafibrate compared to gemfibrozil (placebo 103 +/- 26, bezafibrate 111 +/- 28 and gemfibrozil 102 +/- 25 mg/dl) and CETA from HDL to VLDL and LDL was decreased (P < 0.05) by bezafibrate compared to placebo, but the apparent decrease with gemfibrozil did not achieve statistical significance (placebo 39.6 +/- 17.7, bezafibrate 32.3 +/- 14.7 and gemfibrozil 33.8 +/- 15.0 nmol/ml/h). Neither drug affected the circulating concentration of CETP. Plasma fibrinogen was increased (P < 0.05) by gemfibrozil (placebo 4.16 (3.38-4.71) and gemfibrozil 4.65 (4.05-5.77) g/l) and was significantly lower (P < 0.001) on bezafibrate (3.60 (3.18-4.54) g/l) than on gemfibrozil treatment. There was a significant (P < 0.05) increase in PAI-1 activity with bezafibrate and a similar trend with gemfibrozil (placebo 41.2 (25.6-64.5), bezafibrate 50.5 (35.1-73.9) and gemfibrozil 48.5 (31.5-5.4 U/l). Neither fibrate influenced plasma concentrations of PAI-1 nor were the activities of lecithin:cholesterol acyl transferase or paraoxonase affected. The major difference in the action of the two drugs on lipoprotein metabolism was the greater effect of gemfibrozil in decreasing the overall serum concentration of Sf 12-20 lipoproteins and the triglycerides in Sf 12-20 and 0-12 lipoproteins. Bezafibrate, however, increased serum apo A1 concentration and significantly decreased CETA. The two drugs also had different effects on the plasma fibrinogen levels, which increased with gemfibrozil and tended to decrea

Indications for cholesterol-lowering medication : comparison of risk-assessment methods

BACKGROUNDnRecommendations for the prescription of lipid-lowering drugs emphasise the importance of an assessment of absolute coronary heart disease (CHD) risk based on all risk factors, rather than simply the serum cholesterol concentration. If, however, the methods recommended for risk assessment are inaccurate, recommended prescribing will not occur. We compared several sets of guidelines for such treatment in a series of patients referred to a lipid clinic, to assess the difference in degree of risk of CHD at which lipid-lowering medication is recommended by each set of guidelines.nnnMETHODSnFor a series of 570 patients (50% men) without pre-existing clinical evidence of atherosclerosis referred to a lipid clinic, we compared the algorithms, charts, and tables used by the US National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), the joint guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology, the European Atherosclerosis Society, and the European Society of Hypertension, and the report of the UK Standing Medical Advisory Committee with the Framingham risk equation programmed into a computer.nnnFINDINGSnIn 386 patients for whom the NCEP and UK guidelines could be compared, 62% of the men and 72% of the women met NCEP criteria for lipid-lowering medication, whereas only 9% of the men and less than 1% of the women met the UK criteria. The Framingham equation estimated a CHD risk of more than 3% per year in 22% of the men and 7% of the women, which shows that the UK tables underestimated CHD risk. European guidelines could be applied to only 261 patients, and were reasonably accurate in assessment of a CHD risk of 2% per year.nnnINTERPRETATIONnGuidelines for the use of statin treatment in patients with CHD differ in their assessment of CHD risk. The method of risk assessment recommended in future guidelines for CHD prevention should be critically tested in relevant groups of patients.

Serum lipoprotein(a) in patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia, their relatives, and unrelated control populations.

Serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels were significantly higher in 89 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (geometric mean, 22.7 mg/dl) than in 109 normocholesterolemic controls (10.0 mg/dl, p less than 0.05) and 40 controls (9.1 mg/dl, p less than 0.05) with similarly elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels due to other primary hypercholesterolemias. To provide further evidence that the increased serum Lp(a) concentration was due to inheritance of the FH gene, 24 unaffected first-degree relatives were compared with their FH probands. Serum Lp(a) in affected individuals was significantly greater than in unaffected relatives (geometric means, 26.5 versus 13.7 mg/dl, respectively; p less than 0.05). Family membership exerted an effect on serum Lp(a) concentrations, indicating that other genetic influences were also operating, as is known to be the case in general populations. Serum Lp(a) in 30 of the FH patients, who had coronary heart disease, was not significantly different from 30 age- and sex-matched controls with FH but with coronary heart disease (geometric means, 23.6 versus 24.7 mg/dl, respectively). FH is associated with an increase in serum Lp(a). Elevated serum Lp(a) concentrations should probably now be regarded as a component of the clinical syndrome of FH. However, within our FH population Lp(a) did not distinguish those with clinically overt coronary heart disease from those without the disease.

Investigation of lipid transfer in human serum leading to the development of an isotopic method for the determination of endogenous cholesterol esterification and transfer

The rate at which radioactivity appeared in cholesteryl esters (CE) in whole serum and in very low density lipoproteins (VLDL) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) when radioactively labelled free cholesterol (FC) was incubated with serum was investigated. At 4 degrees C equilibration of radioactive FC with native FC occurred, but there was no conversion to CE. At 37 degrees C CE mass increased in parallel with radioactivity in CE both in whole serum and VLDL/LDL. Incubation at 37 degrees C with an inhibitor of lecithin cholesterol acyl transferase (LCAT) abolished the increase in the total CE radioactivity and mass in serum. Transfer of CE from high density lipoprotein (HDL) to VLDL/LDL, however, continued to occur. An assay for LCAT and for cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) was developed, which employed the increases in radioactive CE in whole serum and VLDL/LDL during a single incubation as indices of LCAT and CETP activity, respectively. Determination of the initial serum FC concentration allowed the expression of these activities in nmol/ml per h. References ranges were established in 62 fasting normolipidaemic men and women and increases in both LCAT and CETP were found following a fatty meal. The experiments thus provided further information about the carrier-mediated transfer of CE from its site of esterification on HDL to VLDL/LDL and formed the basis of a relatively simple assay, which has advantages over previously published methods and which may be used in clinical and epidemiological studies to elucidate the role of CETP and LCAT in atherosclerosis.

Increased transfer of cholesteryl esters from high density lipoproteins to low density and very low density lipoproteins in patients with angiographic evidence of coronary artery disease

Cholesterol esterification, transfer of cholesteryl esters from high density lipoproteins to very low density and low density lipoproteins (VLDL/LDL) and the composition of lipoproteins isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation have been investigated in 18 men with angiographic evidence of severe coronary artery disease and in 27 healthy men without coronary artery disease. Patients had significantly higher serum cholesterol (P < 0.001), serum triglycerides (P < 0.02) and lower high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) (P < 0.04) compared with healthy men. The transfer of cholesteryl ester from HDL to VLDL and LDL was 27.8 +/- 12.2 nmol/ml per h (mean +/- S.D.) in patients and was significantly higher than the value of 17.8 +/- 6.5 nmol/ml per h obtained in healthy men (P < 0.003) or 17.1 +/- 7.6 nmol/ml per h) in 16 controls (P < 0.03) with similar serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations. Lipoprotein protein concentrations were significantly higher in LDL (P < 0.05) and small VLDL (P < 0.01) in patients. In addition, patient LDL and large VLDL contained more free cholesterol than matched controls (P < 0.01, P < 0.05, respectively). This was reflected in the increased free cholesterol/phospholipid ratio (a measure of lipoprotein surface composition) in LDL (P < 0.002). These findings indicate that patients with established coronary artery disease have increased transfer of cholesteryl ester from HDL to VLDL and LDL, which is independent of serum triglyceride concentrations. This increased transfer of cholesteryl ester may be a result of the increased free cholesterol content of very low density lipoproteins.

An investigation of the role of lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in the metabolism of pre-beta high density lipoproteins

Small high density lipoproteins (HDL) with pre-beta electrophoretic mobility (pre-beta HDL) have recently been shown to be the primary acceptor of cholesterol from cultured cells. We studied the metabolism of these particles by incubating serum at 37 degrees C in the presence and absence of active lecithin: cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT). We found that the serum pre-beta HDL concentration decreased in the presence of LCAT, but when LCAT was inhibited the concentration remained constant, or increased, depending on the method of inhibition. This suggests that pre-beta HDL are a substrate for LCAT. We also found a significant negative correlation between levels of LCAT activity and pre-beta HDL in 28 fasting healthy subjects, this provides evidence that the activity of LCAT regulates, at least in part the concentration of these particles in vivo. During the early phase of incubation there was a more rapid decrease in pre-beta HDL concentration which was greater in the post-prandial than fasting state. When we infused a triglyceride emulsion into 6 subjects or added this to serum in vitro we observed an immediate fall in pre-beta HDL concentration. These findings suggest that pre-beta HDL interact with triglyceride rich particles. We investigated the origin of pre-beta HDL from blood lipoproteins during their lipolysis, in vivo and in vitro and found that they were produced from both triglyceride-rich and high-density lipoproteins. Formation from triglyceride-rich lipoproteins was evident by the rise in pre-beta HDL concentration during heparin-induced lipolysis when fasting and post-prandially. The rise was greater post-prandially and particularly marked in 4 hypertriglyceridaemic patients following a fat load. Generation from alpha-HDL was evident when we prolonged the action of the heparin-released lipases by incubation of post-heparin sera at 37 degrees C. Continued formation of pre-beta HDL occurred at an equal rate in the fasting and post-prandial samples suggesting release by lipolysis of alpha-HDL. This was supported by the action of lipases on serum and isolated HDL in vitro, where triglyceride lipase rather than phospholipase activity appeared more effective at releasing pre-beta HDL. These findings suggest binding and release of pre-beta HDL by triglyceride-rich lipoproteins depending on the prandial state and production from alpha-HDL through the action of lipases.

Lipid-lowering drugs in the management of hyperlipidaemia.

Despite intense debate on the benefits of cholesterol lowering, the use of lipid-lowering drugs has risen substantially in most countries. This change in attitude has accompanied the appreciation of data from initial observational studies on large cohorts that established the link between elevated serum cholesterol and coronary heart disease and randomized controlled trials of cholesterol lowering that demonstrated improvements in coronary morbidity and mortality seen in patients with or without coronary heart disease. Data are now accumulating on the effects of lowering serum triglyceride levels in improving coronary risk. More studies are still required, but metabolic studies indicate that high serum triglycerides are a marker for the presence of atherogenic small dense low-density lipoproteins. Low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol is also a marker for coronary risk, but the case for increasing levels by drugs is unclear. The rationale for the use of lipid-lowering drugs becomes more evident with an understanding of the mechanisms that cause hyperlipidaemia. In addition to serum lipid values, a good clinical history and examination are an essential part of assessing coronary risk. Certain groups, such as women, children, elderly people and patients with genetic hyperlipidaemias or liver or renal disease, need a special approach to therapy. The better tolerability and widespread use of the newer lipid-lowering drugs have raised issues of cost effectiveness. New lipid-lowering drugs are being developed, and there is some evidence that existing lipid-lowering drugs may produce benefit beyond that related to lipid lowering.

Lipoprotein (a) and Microvascular Disease in Type 1 (Insulin-dependent) Diabetes

The influence of albuminuria and proliferative retinopathy on concentrations of serum lipoprotein (a) was examined cross‐sectionally in 90 Type 1 diabetic patients. Concentrations of lipoprotein (a) were less in those with normoalbuminuria (90 (8–882) (median (range)) U l−1) than in those with micro‐ or macro‐albuminuria (137 (19–1722) U l−1, p < 0.05). The prevalence of patients whose lipoprotein (a) concentrations were greater than 200 U l−1 was also greater (45% vs 24%, p = 0.03) among patients with albuminuria, but no difference was found between the microalbuminuric and macroalbuminuric groups (53 and 41%, respectively), or between those with or without proliferative retinopathy. The present finding that lipoprotein (a) concentrations may be increased at an early stage of diabetic renal disease may in part account for the excess ischaemic heart disease associated with diabetic nephropathy.