Sharon Arrol

Paraoxonase prevents accumulation of lipoperoxides in low-density lipoprotein

Oxidative modification of low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) enhances its uptake by macrophages in tissue culture and in vivo may underly the formation of arterial fatty streaks, the progenitors of atheroma. We investigated the possible protection which high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) affords against LDL oxidation. The formation of lipoperoxides and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances when LDL was incubated with copper ions was significantly decreased by HDL. The enzyme, paraoxonase (E.C. 3.1.8.1), purified from human HDL, had a similar effect and thus may be the component of HDL responsible for decreasing the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products.

Protection of low-density lipoprotein against oxidative modification by high-density lipoprotein associated paraoxonase

We have investigated the Cu2+ induced generation of lipid peroxides in low density lipoprotein (LDL) incubated with high density lipoprotein (HDL) and with purified paraoxonase, an enzyme normally resident on HDL. HDL (1.5 mg) and paraoxonase (20 micrograms) inhibited lipid peroxide generation in LDL by 32% and 25%, respectively after 24 h of incubation (both P < 0.01). The decrease in LDL lipid peroxides both with HDL and with paraoxonase were concentration dependent. The degree of protection offered by HDL tended to relate to its paraoxonase activity (R = 0.47; P < 0.06). Neither purified paraoxonase nor HDL chelated Cu2+ sufficiently to account for the decrease in LDL oxidation. Purified paraoxonase did not affect LDL oxidation when it had been heat inactivated. Mass transfer of lipid peroxides from LDL to HDL did not explain the protection of LDL against oxidation: the total lipid peroxides accumulating during incubation was decreased both by HDL and by paraoxonase. These results suggest a direct role for HDL in preventing atherosclerosis probably by an enzymic process which prevents the accumulation of lipid peroxides on LDL. Paraoxonase is an example of an enzyme which might possibly be involved.

Effect of the human serum paraoxonase 55 and 192 genetic polymorphisms on the protection by high density lipoprotein against low density lipoprotein oxidative modification

Human serum paraoxonase (PON1) associated with high density lipoprotein (HDL) has been postulated to have a role in protecting low density lipoprotein (LDL) against oxidative modification, which has led to the proposal that PON1 is an anti‐atherogenic, anti‐inflammatory enzyme. PON1 has two genetically determined polymorphic sites giving rise to amino‐acid substitutions at positions 55 (L→M) and 192 (R→Q) and therefore 4 potential alloenzymes. We have examined the effects of these molecular polymorphisms on the ability of HDL to protect LDL from oxidative modification. HDL protected LDL from oxidative modification, whatever the combination of PON1 alloenzymes present in it. However, HDL from QQ/MM homozygotes was most effective at protecting LDL while HDL from RR/LL homozygotes was least effective. Thus after 6 h of co‐incubation of HDL and LDL with Cu2+ PON1‐QQ HDL retained 57±6.3% of its original ability to protect LDL from oxidative modification, while PON1‐QR HDL retained less at 25.1±4.5% (P<0.01) and PON1‐RR HDL retained only 0.75±0.40% (P<0.005). In similar experiments HDL from LL and LM genotypes retained 21.8±7.5% and 29.5±6.6% (P=NS), respectively, of their protective ability, whereas PON1‐MM HDL maintained 49.5±5.3% (P<0.01). PON1 polymorphisms may affect the ability of HDL to impede the development of atherosclerosis and to prevent inflammation.

Serum Paraoxonase After Myocardial Infarction

HDL has been shown to prevent the oxidative modification of LDL. The antioxidant activity of HDL is believed to reside in its enzymes, particularly paraoxonase. Human serum paraoxonase (PON1) is closely associated with a specific HDL subfraction also containing apoA1 and clusterin. Recently PON1 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. We have examined the activity, concentration, and specific activity of PON1 in 50 patients on admission to hospital immediately after acute myocardial infarction (MI) and in 48 age- and gender-matched controls. Serum PON1 activity and concentration were significantly lower in patients with MI than in controls (activity, 221.5 [99.3 to 303.2] nmol. min-1. mL-1 in controls and 130.1 [78.9 to 230.3] nmol. min-1. mL-1 in MI patients [P<0.05]; concentration, 95.7 [73.2 to 135.5] microg/mL in controls and 35.4 [21.6 to 51.3] microg/mL in MI patients [P<0.001]). PON1-specific activity was significantly higher in patients with MI than in controls (1.5 [0.9 to 2.9] versus 3.4 [2.0 to 8.5] nmol. min-1. microg-1 [P<0.001]) due to the much lower PON1 concentration. PON1 activity had risen significantly (P<0.05) to 158.1 (85.4 to 282.0) nmol. min-1. mL-1 at day 42 but was still significantly less than that of controls. No significant variation in PON1 concentration occured in the days after MI or at 6 weeks. Also, no significant variation in specific activity was seen after MI. When the patients were divided into subgroups based on whether or not they received thrombolytic therapy on admission to hospital, no significant difference in PON1 levels was observed. Serum HDL cholesterol in patients with MI on admission was not significantly different than in controls, and the decrease that occurred by the fifth day after MI did not explain the lower PON1 levels. We conclude that low serum PON1 activity in patients with MI may be a consequence of the coronary event itself or could have been present before MI. The low PON1 activity was also not explicable on the basis of PON1 genotypes because the prevalence of genotypes associated with low activity was not sufficient to explain fully the difference in activity levels between patients and controls. The explanation for the low PON1 activity was most likely a decrease in serum PON1 concentration. The importance of PON1 as a predictive risk factor for MI should be assessed in future studies.

Serum paraoxonase (PON1) 55 and 192 polymorphism and paraoxonase activity and concentration in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus

Human serum paraoxonase (PON1) is located on high density lipoprotein and has been implicated in the detoxification of organophosphates and possibly in the prevention of low density lipoprotein lipid peroxidation. PON1 has two genetic polymorphisms both due to amino acid substitution, one involving glutamine (A genotype) and arginine (B genotype) at position 192 and the other leucine (L genotype) and methionine (M genotype) at position 55. We investigated the effect of these polymorphisms on serum PON1 activity and concentration in 252 non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) individuals and 282 non-diabetic controls. Serum PON1 activity in the controls (214.6 nmol/min per ml (26.3-620.8)) was significantly higher than in NIDDM (158.7 nmol/min per ml (3.6-550.5) (P < 0.001) as was serum PON1 concentration (89.1 microg/ml (16.8-527.4)) compared to 76.7 microg/ml (3.6-443.8) (P < 0.01). In the control population MM homozygotes had significantly lower serum PON1 activity regardless of the 192 polymorphism whereas in NIDDM both LM and MM genotypes had lower serum PON1 activity than LL homozygotes only when the 192 AA genotype was present. Serum PON1 concentration was lower in NIDDM with AA/LM, AA/LL, AB/LL and AB/MM genotypes than in controls. Differences in PON1 activity were the major cause of differences in specific activity between genotypes. Neither the PON1 55 or 192 polymorphisms consistently influenced the serum lipid or lipoprotein concentrations in either population. Low serum PON1 activity in NIDDM may be related to an increased tendency to lipid peroxidation and may also increase susceptibility to toxicity from organophosphate exposure. Our findings thus raise the possibility that PON1 may be of importance in both the genetic and acquired predisposition to premature atherosclerosis and neuropathy in diabetes.

APOLIPOPROTEINS (a), AI, AND B AND PARENTAL HISTORY IN MEN WITH EARLY ONSET ISCHAEMIC HEART DISEASE

Middle-aged men who had had a myocardial infarction were compared with controls matched for social background, age, cigarette-smoking, blood pressure, and alcohol consumption. Serum cholesterol, triglycerides, very low density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, high density lipoprotein (HDL), HDL2 and HDL3 cholesterol, and serum apolipoproteins (apo) (a), AI, and B were measured. Discriminant analysis showed that the combination of these variables that best distinguished patients from controls was provided by apo AI and apo B and a knowledge of parental history of early cardiac death, the most discriminating single factor being apo B. No other variable contributed more than these. Apo (a), however, could be substituted for parental history, which had a major influence on the serum concentration of apo (a). Apo (a) concentration accounted for much of the familial predisposition to cardiac ischaemia. These findings may prove valuable in the clinical assessment of genetic susceptibility to myocardial infarction. They also support the hypothesis that serum apo (a) concentration is a genetic trait that predisposes to arterial thrombosis. Apo B emerged as the main lipoprotein determinant of coronary disease risk.

Effect of the molecular polymorphisms of human paraoxonase (PON1) on the rate of hydrolysis of paraoxon

1 The hydrolysis of organophosphate pesticides (OP) and nerve gases by serum paraoxonase (PON1) is an important factor determining their toxicity to mammals including man. The PON1 gene contains 2 polymorphic sites at amino acid positions 55 (L→M) and 192 (G→A, classically defined as the A and B genotypes) which result in several alloenzymes of PON1 in human serum. 2 The 192 polymorphism has previously been shown to affect PON1 activity. We have investigated the effect of both polymorphisms on the hydrolysis of paraoxon by serum from 279 healthy human subjects. 3 The 55 polymorphism significantly influenced PON1 activity. MM homozygotes had over 50% less activity towards paraoxon compared to the LL and LM genotypes regardless of the 192 genotype (P<0.001). 4 Multiple regression analysis indicated that the 192 polymorphism, 55 polymorphism and serum PON1 concentration were responsible for 46, 16 and 13% of the variation in PON1 activity, respectively (all P<0.001). None of the other parameters investigated significantly affected PON1 activity. 5 Therefore both PON1 polymorphisms affect the hydrolysis of paraoxon. AA/MM and AB/MM individuals may be potentially more susceptible to OP intoxication. 6 Genotyping individuals for both PON1 polymorphisms may provide a method for identifying those individuals at most risk of OP poisoning. The effect of PON1 polymorphisms on activity may also explain why some Gulf War Veterans have developed Gulf War Syndrome and some have not.

Alloenzymes of paraoxonase and effectiveness of high-density lipoproteins in protecting low-density lipoprotein against lipid peroxidation.

Vol 349 • March 22, 1997 851 Our experience suggests that male-to-female transmission of HIV is infrequent during natural conception. Seroconversion occurring up to 3 months post-conception may be attributed to exposure up to the time of conception; no cases were observed. Counselling may help to reduce the risk of transmission, but this cannot be established from the number of couples followed in this study. It has been shown that there is a poor relationship between the number of acts of intercourse and the probability of transmission, indicating a great heterogeneity in infectivity. Our data may be biased being based on voluntary follow-up, and not a protocol. Some couples who did not return may have attempted to conceive unsuccessfully, and may not have reported seroconversions. Our findings are compatible with seroconversion rates in the order of 1 per 1000 episodes of unprotected intercourse reported in longitudinal studies of stable heterosexual couples, as well as in studies of transmission through artificial insemination. Some authors advocate intrauterine insemination with semen from the HIV-infected man, but the risk of this must be measured against the low background risk of natural conception. Stringent standards of safety must be required before inseminating potentially infective semen. Longitudinal virological studies are needed to evaluate whether interventions, including semen preparation, or antiretroviral therapies, can effectively clear cell-associated and cell-free virus from semen, thereby offering real hope for risk-free reproduction in “sero-different” couples.

Effects of two different fibric acid derivatives on lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer, fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor and paraoxonase activity in type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia

We have investigated the effects of two fibric acid derivatives, bezafibrate mono (400 mg daily) and gemfibrozil (600 mg b.d.), in 29 patients with type IIb hyperlipoproteinaemia. All patients received placebo and each drug for 8 weeks in randomised order in a double-blind, cross-over study designed to evaluate any different effects of the drugs on serum lipoproteins, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP), cholesteryl ester transfer activity (CETA), plasma fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-I (PAI-1) or paraoxonase. Serum cholesterol decreased (P < 0.05) with gemfibrozil, but the effect of bezafibrate on serum cholesterol did not achieve statistical significance (placebo 8.34 +/- 1.05 (mean +/- S.D.), gemfibrozil 7.70 +/- 1.23 and bezafibrate 7.8 +/- 1.37 mmol/l). Both drugs decreased the serum triglyceride concentration (both P < 0.001) (placebo 4.39 (3.13-5.75) (median (interquartile range)), bezafibrate 2.26 (1.89-3.89) and gemfibrozil 2.00 (1.30-3.30) mmol/l) and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (both P < 0.001) (placebo 1.18 (0.74-2.30), bezafibrate 0.59 (0.34-0.85) and gemfibrozil 0.48 (0.34-0.68) mmol/l). Discontinuous gradient ultracentrifugation (DGU) revealed that Sf 60-400 (large VLDL) decreased by more than 50% and Sf 20-60 (small VLDL) by more than 30% with each of the drugs (both P < 0.001), neither of which affected the composition of these lipoproteins. Gemfibrozil decreased the concentration of Sf 12-20 lipoprotein (intermediate density lipoprotein; IDL) by 23% (P < 0.01), whereas the effect of bezafibrate on this lipoprotein did not achieve statistical significance. Neither drug altered the concentration of apolipoprotein B or of total Sf 0-12 lipoproteins (low density lipoprotein, (LDL)). Both, however, significantly increased the quantity of free cholesterol in Sf 0-12 lipoproteins (P < 0.05). Overall the concentration of triglycerides decreased significantly in all lipoproteins isolated by DGU (Sf 0-12, Sf 12-20, Sf 20-60, Sf 60-400) on gemfibrozil treatment, but only in Sf 20-60 and Sf 60-400 on bezafibrate (all P < 0.05). Both drugs also increased serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (placebo 1.15 +/- 0.29, bezafibrate 1.27 +/- 0.38 (P < 0.01) and gemfibrozil 1.26 +/- 0.49 (P < 0.05) mmol/l) and HDL3 cholesterol concentration (placebo 0.59 +/- 0.12, bezafibrate 0.72 +/- 0.23 (P < 0.001) and gemfibrozil 0.70 +/- 0.24 (P < 0.01) mmol/l). Serum apolipoprotein A1 (apo A1) was increased (P < 0.05) by bezafibrate compared to gemfibrozil (placebo 103 +/- 26, bezafibrate 111 +/- 28 and gemfibrozil 102 +/- 25 mg/dl) and CETA from HDL to VLDL and LDL was decreased (P < 0.05) by bezafibrate compared to placebo, but the apparent decrease with gemfibrozil did not achieve statistical significance (placebo 39.6 +/- 17.7, bezafibrate 32.3 +/- 14.7 and gemfibrozil 33.8 +/- 15.0 nmol/ml/h). Neither drug affected the circulating concentration of CETP. Plasma fibrinogen was increased (P < 0.05) by gemfibrozil (placebo 4.16 (3.38-4.71) and gemfibrozil 4.65 (4.05-5.77) g/l) and was significantly lower (P < 0.001) on bezafibrate (3.60 (3.18-4.54) g/l) than on gemfibrozil treatment. There was a significant (P < 0.05) increase in PAI-1 activity with bezafibrate and a similar trend with gemfibrozil (placebo 41.2 (25.6-64.5), bezafibrate 50.5 (35.1-73.9) and gemfibrozil 48.5 (31.5-5.4 U/l). Neither fibrate influenced plasma concentrations of PAI-1 nor were the activities of lecithin:cholesterol acyl transferase or paraoxonase affected. The major difference in the action of the two drugs on lipoprotein metabolism was the greater effect of gemfibrozil in decreasing the overall serum concentration of Sf 12-20 lipoproteins and the triglycerides in Sf 12-20 and 0-12 lipoproteins. Bezafibrate, however, increased serum apo A1 concentration and significantly decreased CETA. The two drugs also had different effects on the plasma fibrinogen levels, which increased with gemfibrozil and tended to decrea

Serum lipoprotein(a) in patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia, their relatives, and unrelated control populations.

Serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) levels were significantly higher in 89 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (geometric mean, 22.7 mg/dl) than in 109 normocholesterolemic controls (10.0 mg/dl, p less than 0.05) and 40 controls (9.1 mg/dl, p less than 0.05) with similarly elevated low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels due to other primary hypercholesterolemias. To provide further evidence that the increased serum Lp(a) concentration was due to inheritance of the FH gene, 24 unaffected first-degree relatives were compared with their FH probands. Serum Lp(a) in affected individuals was significantly greater than in unaffected relatives (geometric means, 26.5 versus 13.7 mg/dl, respectively; p less than 0.05). Family membership exerted an effect on serum Lp(a) concentrations, indicating that other genetic influences were also operating, as is known to be the case in general populations. Serum Lp(a) in 30 of the FH patients, who had coronary heart disease, was not significantly different from 30 age- and sex-matched controls with FH but with coronary heart disease (geometric means, 23.6 versus 24.7 mg/dl, respectively). FH is associated with an increase in serum Lp(a). Elevated serum Lp(a) concentrations should probably now be regarded as a component of the clinical syndrome of FH. However, within our FH population Lp(a) did not distinguish those with clinically overt coronary heart disease from those without the disease.