D. C. Rafferty
Australian National University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. C. Rafferty.
Physical Review C | 2015
K. Hammerton; Z. Kohley; David Hinde; Mahananda Dasgupta; A. Wakhle; E. Williams; V. E. Oberacker; A. S. Umar; I. P. Carter; K. J. Cook; J. Greene; D. Y. Jeung; D. H. Luong; S. D. McNeil; C. S. Palshetkar; D. C. Rafferty; C. Simenel; K. Stiefel
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. PHY-1102511 and No. IIA-1341088, by the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FG02- 96ER40975 with Vanderbilt University, and the Australian Research Council Grants No. DP110102858, No. DP140101337, No. FL110100098, No. DP130101569, No. FT120100760, and No. DE140100784. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration under Award No. DE-NA0000979. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. This research used resources of ANL’s ATLAS facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility.
Physical Review Letters | 2018
E. Williams; K. Sekizawa; David Hinde; C. Simenel; Mahananda Dasgupta; I. P. Carter; K. J. Cook; D. Y. Jeung; S. D. McNeil; C. S. Palshetkar; D. C. Rafferty; A. Wakhle
Energy dissipative processes play a key role in how quantum many-body systems dynamically evolve toward equilibrium. In closed quantum systems, such processes are attributed to the transfer of energy from collective motion to single-particle degrees of freedom; however, the quantum many-body dynamics of this evolutionary process is poorly understood. To explore energy dissipative phenomena and equilibration dynamics in one such system, an experimental investigation of deep-inelastic and fusion-fission outcomes in the ^{58}Ni+^{60}Ni reaction has been carried out. Experimental outcomes have been compared to theoretical predictions using time dependent Hartree-Fock and time dependent random phase approximation approaches, which, respectively, incorporate one-body energy dissipation and fluctuations. Excellent quantitative agreement has been found between experiment and calculations, indicating that microscopic models incorporating one-body dissipation and fluctuations provide a potential tool for exploring dissipation in low-energy heavy ion collisions.
Proceedings of The 26th International Nuclear Physics Conference — PoS(INPC2016) | 2017
David Hinde; Mahananda Dasgupta; Dongyun Jeung; G. Mohanto; E. Prasad; C. Simenel; E. C. Simpson; A. Wakhle; E. Williams; I. P. Carter; K.J. Cooke; Sunil Kalkal; D. C. Rafferty; J. Walshe
Quasifission is a non-equilibrium dynamical process resulting in rapid separation of the dinuclear system initially formed after capture and sticking of two colliding heavy nuclei. This can inhibit fusion by many orders of magnitude, thus suppressing the cross section for formation of superheavy elements. Measurements with projectiles from C to Ni, made at the Australian National University Heavy Ion Accelerator Facility, have mapped out quasifission characteristics and systematics using mass-angle distributions (MAD) - the fission mass-split as a function of centre-of-mass angle. These provide information on quasifission dynamics in the least model-dependent way. Quasifission time-scale information in the MAD has been compared with TDHF calculations of the collisions, with good agreement being found. Most significantly, the nuclear structure of the two colliding nuclei has a dramatic effect on quasifission probabilities and characteristics in gentle collisions at near-barrier energies. The effect of static deformation alignment, closed shells and N/Z matching can completely change reaction outcomes. The realization of this strong dependence makes modelling quasifission and superheavy element formation a challenging task, but should ultimately allow more reliable prediction of superheavy element formation cross sections.
Physical Review C | 2013
E. Williams; David Hinde; Mahananda Dasgupta; Rickard du Rietz; I. P. Carter; M. Evers; Huy Luong; S. D. McNeil; D. C. Rafferty; A. Wakhle
Physical Review C | 2016
Sunil Kalkal; E. C. Simpson; D. H. Luong; K. J. Cook; Mahananda Dasgupta; David Hinde; I. P. Carter; D. Y. Jeung; G. Mohanto; C. S. Palshetkar; E. Prasad; D. C. Rafferty; C. Simenel; K. Vo-Phuoc; E. Williams; L. R. Gasques; P. R. S. Gomes; R. Linares
Physical Review C | 2016
D. C. Rafferty; Mahananda Dasgupta; David Hinde; C. Simenel; E. C. Simpson; E. Williams; I. P. Carter; K. J. Cook; D. H. Luong; S. D. McNeil; K. Vo-Phuoc; A. Wakhle
Physical Review C | 2015
E. Prasad; David Hinde; E. Williams; Mahananda Dasgupta; I. P. Carter; K. J. Cook; D. Y. Jeung; D. H. Luong; S. D. McNeil; C. S. Palshetkar; D. C. Rafferty; C. Simenel; A. Wakhle; J. Khuyagbaatar; Ch. E. Düllmann; B. Lommel; B. Kindler
EPJ Web of Conferences | 2016
David Hinde; Mahananda Dasgupta; D. Y. Jeung; G. Mohanto; E. Prasad; C. Simenel; J. Walshe; A. Wahkle; E. Williams; I. P. Carter; K. J. Cook; Sunil Kalkal; D. C. Rafferty; R. du Rietz; E. C. Simpson; H.M. David; Ch. E. Düllmann; J. Khuyagbaatar
EPJ Web of Conferences: Heavy Ion Accelerator Symposium 2013 | 2013
I. P. Carter; Mahananda Dasgupta; David Hinde; R. Rafiei; D. H. Luong; E. Williams; K. J. Cook; S. D. McNeil; D. C. Rafferty; A.B. Harding; A. G. Muirhead; T. B. Tunningley
Physical Review C | 2018
A. Wakhle; K. Hammerton; Z. Kohley; D. J. Morrissey; K. Stiefel; J. Yurkon; J. Walshe; K. J. Cook; Mahananda Dasgupta; David Hinde; D. J. Jeung; E. Prasad; D. C. Rafferty; C. Simenel; E. C. Simpson; K. Vo-Phuoc; J. King; W. Loveland; R. Yanez