D. Neil Hayes
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. Neil Hayes.
Cancer Cell | 2010
Roel G.W. Verhaak; Katherine A. Hoadley; Elizabeth Purdom; Victoria Wang; Yuan Qi; Matthew D. Wilkerson; C. Ryan Miller; Li Ding; Todd R. Golub; Jill P. Mesirov; Gabriele Alexe; Michael S. Lawrence; Michael O'Kelly; Pablo Tamayo; Barbara A. Weir; Stacey Gabriel; Wendy Winckler; Supriya Gupta; Lakshmi Jakkula; Heidi S. Feiler; J. Graeme Hodgson; C. David James; Jann N. Sarkaria; Cameron Brennan; Ari Kahn; Paul T. Spellman; Richard Wilson; Terence P. Speed; Joe W. Gray; Matthew Meyerson
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network recently cataloged recurrent genomic abnormalities in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). We describe a robust gene expression-based molecular classification of GBM into Proneural, Neural, Classical, and Mesenchymal subtypes and integrate multidimensional genomic data to establish patterns of somatic mutations and DNA copy number. Aberrations and gene expression of EGFR, NF1, and PDGFRA/IDH1 each define the Classical, Mesenchymal, and Proneural subtypes, respectively. Gene signatures of normal brain cell types show a strong relationship between subtypes and different neural lineages. Additionally, response to aggressive therapy differs by subtype, with the greatest benefit in the Classical subtype and no benefit in the Proneural subtype. We provide a framework that unifies transcriptomic and genomic dimensions for GBM molecular stratification with important implications for future studies.
Cell | 2013
Cameron Brennan; Roel G.W. Verhaak; Aaron McKenna; Benito Campos; Houtan Noushmehr; Sofie R. Salama; Siyuan Zheng; Debyani Chakravarty; J. Zachary Sanborn; Samuel H. Berman; Rameen Beroukhim; Brady Bernard; Chang-Jiun Wu; Giannicola Genovese; Ilya Shmulevich; Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan; Lihua Zou; Rahulsimham Vegesna; Sachet A. Shukla; Giovanni Ciriello; W.K. Yung; Wei Zhang; Carrie Sougnez; Tom Mikkelsen; Kenneth D. Aldape; Darell D. Bigner; Erwin G. Van Meir; Michael D. Prados; Andrew E. Sloan; Keith L. Black
We describe the landscape of somatic genomic alterations based on multidimensional and comprehensive characterization of more than 500 glioblastoma tumors (GBMs). We identify several novel mutated genes as well as complex rearrangements of signature receptors, including EGFR and PDGFRA. TERT promoter mutations are shown to correlate with elevated mRNA expression, supporting a role in telomerase reactivation. Correlative analyses confirm that the survival advantage of the proneural subtype is conferred by the G-CIMP phenotype, and MGMT DNA methylation may be a predictive biomarker for treatment response only in classical subtype GBM. Integrative analysis of genomic and proteomic profiles challenges the notion of therapeutic inhibition of a pathway as an alternative to inhibition of the target itself. These data will facilitate the discovery of therapeutic and diagnostic target candidates, the validation of research and clinical observations and the generation of unanticipated hypotheses that can advance our molecular understanding of this lethal cancer.
Cancer Cell | 2010
Houtan Noushmehr; Daniel J. Weisenberger; Kristin Diefes; Heidi S. Phillips; Kanan Pujara; Benjamin P. Berman; Fei Pan; Christopher E. Pelloski; Erik P. Sulman; Krishna P. Bhat; Roel G.W. Verhaak; Katherine A. Hoadley; D. Neil Hayes; Charles M. Perou; Heather K. Schmidt; Li Ding; Richard Wilson; David Van Den Berg; Hui Shen; Henrik Bengtsson; Pierre Neuvial; Leslie Cope; Jonathan D. Buckley; James G. Herman; Stephen B. Baylin; Peter W. Laird; Kenneth D. Aldape
We have profiled promoter DNA methylation alterations in 272 glioblastoma tumors in the context of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We found that a distinct subset of samples displays concerted hypermethylation at a large number of loci, indicating the existence of a glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP). We validated G-CIMP in a set of non-TCGA glioblastomas and low-grade gliomas. G-CIMP tumors belong to the proneural subgroup, are more prevalent among lower-grade gliomas, display distinct copy-number alterations, and are tightly associated with IDH1 somatic mutations. Patients with G-CIMP tumors are younger at the time of diagnosis and experience significantly improved outcome. These findings identify G-CIMP as a distinct subset of human gliomas on molecular and clinical grounds.
Nature | 2007
Hongbin Ji; Matthew R. Ramsey; D. Neil Hayes; Cheng Fan; Kate McNamara; Piotr Kozlowski; Chad Torrice; Michael C. Wu; Takeshi Shimamura; Samanthi A. Perera; Mei Chih Liang; Dongpo Cai; George N. Naumov; Lei Bao; Cristina M. Contreras; Danan Li; Liang Chen; Janakiraman Krishnamurthy; Jussi Koivunen; Lucian R. Chirieac; Robert F. Padera; Roderick T. Bronson; Neal I. Lindeman; David C. Christiani; Xihong Lin; Geoffrey I. Shapiro; Pasi A. Jänne; Bruce E. Johnson; Matthew Meyerson; David J. Kwiatkowski
Germline mutation in serine/threonine kinase 11 (STK11, also called LKB1) results in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome, characterized by intestinal hamartomas and increased incidence of epithelial cancers. Although uncommon in most sporadic cancers, inactivating somatic mutations of LKB1 have been reported in primary human lung adenocarcinomas and derivative cell lines. Here we used a somatically activatable mutant Kras-driven model of mouse lung cancer to compare the role of Lkb1 to other tumour suppressors in lung cancer. Although Kras mutation cooperated with loss of p53 or Ink4a/Arf (also known as Cdkn2a) in this system, the strongest cooperation was seen with homozygous inactivation of Lkb1. Lkb1-deficient tumours demonstrated shorter latency, an expanded histological spectrum (adeno-, squamous and large-cell carcinoma) and more frequent metastasis compared to tumours lacking p53 or Ink4a/Arf. Pulmonary tumorigenesis was also accelerated by hemizygous inactivation of Lkb1. Consistent with these findings, inactivation of LKB1 was found in 34% and 19% of 144 analysed human lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas, respectively. Expression profiling in human lung cancer cell lines and mouse lung tumours identified a variety of metastasis-promoting genes, such as NEDD9, VEGFC and CD24, as targets of LKB1 repression in lung cancer. These studies establish LKB1 as a critical barrier to pulmonary tumorigenesis, controlling initiation, differentiation and metastasis.
Molecular Cell | 2004
Christina M. Hughes; Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen; Thomas A. Milne; Terry D. Copeland; Stuart S. Levine; Jeffrey C. Lee; D. Neil Hayes; Kalai Selvi Shanmugam; Arindam Bhattacharjee; Christine Biondi; Graham F. Kay; Nicholas K. Hayward; Jay L. Hess; Matthew Meyerson
The cellular function of the menin tumor suppressor protein, product of the MEN1 gene mutated in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, has not been defined. We now show that menin is associated with a histone methyltransferase complex containing two trithorax family proteins, MLL2 and Ash2L, and other homologs of the yeast Set1 assembly. This menin-associated complex methylates histone H3 on lysine 4. A subset of tumor-derived menin mutants lacks the associated histone methyltransferase activity. In addition, menin is associated with RNA polymerase II whose large subunit carboxyl-terminal domain is phosphorylated on Ser 5. Men1 knockout embryos and cells show decreased expression of the homeobox genes Hoxc6 and Hoxc8. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments reveal that menin is bound to the Hoxc8 locus. These results suggest that menin activates the transcription of differentiation-regulating genes by covalent histone modification, and that this activity is related to tumor suppression by MEN1.
Cancer Discovery | 2013
Esra A. Akbay; Shohei Koyama; Julian Carretero; Abigail Altabef; Jeremy H. Tchaicha; Camilla L. Christensen; Oliver R. Mikse; Andrew D. Cherniack; Ellen M. Beauchamp; Trevor J. Pugh; Matthew D. Wilkerson; Peter E. Fecci; Mohit Butaney; Jacob B. Reibel; Margaret Soucheray; Travis J. Cohoon; Pasi A. Jänne; Matthew Meyerson; D. Neil Hayes; Geoffrey I. Shapiro; Takeshi Shimamura; Lynette M. Sholl; Scott J. Rodig; Gordon J. Freeman; Peter S. Hammerman; Glenn Dranoff; Kwok-Kin Wong
UNLABELLED The success in lung cancer therapy with programmed death (PD)-1 blockade suggests that immune escape mechanisms contribute to lung tumor pathogenesis. We identified a correlation between EGF receptor (EGFR) pathway activation and a signature of immunosuppression manifested by upregulation of PD-1, PD-L1, CTL antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and multiple tumor-promoting inflammatory cytokines. We observed decreased CTLs and increased markers of T-cell exhaustion in mouse models of EGFR-driven lung cancer. PD-1 antibody blockade improved the survival of mice with EGFR-driven adenocarcinomas by enhancing effector T-cell function and lowering the levels of tumor-promoting cytokines. Expression of mutant EGFR in bronchial epithelial cells induced PD-L1, and PD-L1 expression was reduced by EGFR inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines with activated EGFR. These data suggest that oncogenic EGFR signaling remodels the tumor microenvironment to trigger immune escape and mechanistically link treatment response to PD-1 inhibition. SIGNIFICANCE We show that autochthonous EGFR-driven lung tumors inhibit antitumor immunity by activating the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway to suppress T-cell function and increase levels of proinflammatory cytokines. These findings indicate that EGFR functions as an oncogene through non-cell-autonomous mechanisms and raise the possibility that other oncogenes may drive immune escape.
Nature | 2012
Zhao Chen; Katherine A. Cheng; Zandra E. Walton; Yuchuan Wang; Hiromichi Ebi; Takeshi Shimamura; Yan Liu; Tanya Tupper; Jing Ouyang; Jie Li; Peng Gao; Michele S. Woo; Chunxiao Xu; Masahiko Yanagita; Abigail Altabef; Shumei Wang; Charles Lee; Yuji Nakada; Christopher G. Peña; Yanping Sun; Yoko Franchetti; Catherine Yao; Amy Saur; Michael D. Cameron; Mizuki Nishino; D. Neil Hayes; Matthew D. Wilkerson; Patrick J. Roberts; Carrie B. Lee; Nabeel Bardeesy
Targeted therapies have demonstrated efficacy against specific subsets of molecularly defined cancers. Although most patients with lung cancer are stratified according to a single oncogenic driver, cancers harbouring identical activating genetic mutations show large variations in their responses to the same targeted therapy. The biology underlying this heterogeneity is not well understood, and the impact of co-existing genetic mutations, especially the loss of tumour suppressors, has not been fully explored. Here we use genetically engineered mouse models to conduct a ‘co-clinical’ trial that mirrors an ongoing human clinical trial in patients with KRAS-mutant lung cancers. This trial aims to determine if the MEK inhibitor selumetinib (AZD6244) increases the efficacy of docetaxel, a standard of care chemotherapy. Our studies demonstrate that concomitant loss of either p53 (also known as Tp53) or Lkb1 (also known as Stk11), two clinically relevant tumour suppressors, markedly impaired the response of Kras-mutant cancers to docetaxel monotherapy. We observed that the addition of selumetinib provided substantial benefit for mice with lung cancer caused by Kras and Kras and p53 mutations, but mice with Kras and Lkb1 mutations had primary resistance to this combination therapy. Pharmacodynamic studies, including positron-emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT), identified biological markers in mice and patients that provide a rationale for the differential efficacy of these therapies in the different genotypes. These co-clinical results identify predictive genetic biomarkers that should be validated by interrogating samples from patients enrolled on the concurrent clinical trial. These studies also highlight the rationale for synchronous co-clinical trials, not only to anticipate the results of ongoing human clinical trials, but also to generate clinically relevant hypotheses that can inform the analysis and design of human studies.
Bioinformatics | 2010
Matthew D. Wilkerson; D. Neil Hayes
Summary: Unsupervised class discovery is a highly useful technique in cancer research, where intrinsic groups sharing biological characteristics may exist but are unknown. The consensus clustering (CC) method provides quantitative and visual stability evidence for estimating the number of unsupervised classes in a dataset. ConsensusClusterPlus implements the CC method in R and extends it with new functionality and visualizations including item tracking, item-consensus and cluster-consensus plots. These new features provide users with detailed information that enable more specific decisions in unsupervised class discovery. Availability: ConsensusClusterPlus is open source software, written in R, under GPL-2, and available through the Bioconductor project (http://www.bioconductor.org/). Contact: [email protected] Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2006
D. Neil Hayes; Stefano Monti; Giovanni Parmigiani; C. Blake Gilks; Katsuhiko Naoki; Arindam Bhattacharjee; Mark A. Socinski; Charles Perou; Matthew Meyerson
PURPOSE Published reports suggest that DNA microarrays identify clinically meaningful subtypes of lung adenocarcinomas not recognizable by other routine tests. This report is an investigation of the reproducibility of the reported tumor subtypes. METHODS Three independent cohorts of patients with lung cancer were evaluated using a variety of DNA microarray assays. Using the integrative correlations method, a subset of genes was selected, the reliability of which was acceptable across the different DNA microarray platforms. Tumor subtypes were selected using consensus clustering and genes distinguishing subtypes were identified using the weighted difference statistic. Gene lists were compared across cohorts using centroids and gene set enrichment analysis. RESULTS Cohorts of 31, 72, and 128 adenocarcinomas were generated for a total of 231 microarrays, each with 2,553 reliable genes. Three adenocarcinoma subtypes were identified in each cohort. These were named bronchioid, squamoid, and magnoid according to their respective correlations with gene expression patterns from histologically defined bronchioalveolar carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large-cell carcinoma. Tumor subtypes were distinguishable by many hundreds of genes, and lists generated in one cohort were predictive of tumor subtypes in the two other cohorts. Tumor subtypes correlated with clinically relevant covariates, including stage-specific survival and metastatic pattern. Most notably, bronchioid tumors were correlated with improved survival in early-stage disease, whereas squamoid tumors were associated with better survival in advanced disease. CONCLUSION DNA microarray analysis of lung adenocarcinomas identified reproducible tumor subtypes which differ significantly in clinically important behaviors such as stage-specific survival.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2007
Mark Agulnik; Ezra W.E. Cohen; Roger B. Cohen; Eric X. Chen; Everett E. Vokes; Sebastien J. Hotte; Eric Winquist; Scott A. Laurie; D. Neil Hayes; Janet Dancey; Shirley Brown; Gregory R. Pond; Ian A. J. Lorimer; Manijeh Daneshmand; James Ho; Ming Sound Tsao; Lillian L. Siu
PURPOSE Expression of erbB2 and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is associated with biologic aggressiveness and poor prognosis in malignant salivary gland tumors (MSGTs). This phase II study was conducted to determine the antitumor activity of lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of EGFR and erbB2 tyrosine kinase activity, in MSGTs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with progressive, recurrent, or metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) immunohistochemically expressing at least 1+ EGFR and/or 2+ erbB2 were treated with lapatinib 1,500 mg daily, in a two-stage cohort. Patients with non-ACC MSGTs were treated as a separate single-stage cohort. RESULTS Of 62 patients screened, 29 of 33 (88%) ACC and 28 of 29 (97%) non-ACC patients expressed EGFR and/or erbB2. Forty patients with progressive disease were enrolled onto the study. Among 19 assessable ACC patients, there were no objective responses, 15 patients (79%) had stable disease (SD), nine patients (47%) had SD > or = 6 months, and four patients (21%) had progressive disease (PD). For 17 assessable non-ACC patients, there were no objective responses, eight patients (47%) had SD, four patients (24%) had SD > or = 6 months, and nine patients (53%) had PD. The most frequent adverse events were grade 1 to 2 diarrhea, fatigue, and rash. Eight paired tumor biopsies for correlative studies were procured; results did not correlate with clinical outcome. CONCLUSION Although no responses were observed, lapatinib was well tolerated, with prolonged tumor stabilization of > or = 6 months in 36% (95% CI, 21% to 54%) of assessable patients. The antitumor effects of lapatinib in MGSTs appear mainly cytostatic, hence evaluation of other molecular targeted agents, or combinations with lapatinib, may be considered. Continued efforts should be made to gain better understanding into the biology of this heterogeneous group of malignancies.