Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where D. Scholefield is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by D. Scholefield.


Biology and Fertility of Soils | 2005

Laboratory study of the effects of two nitrification inhibitors on greenhouse gas emissions from a slurry-treated arable soil: impact of diurnal temperature cycle

D. J. Hatch; Henrique Trindade; Laura Cardenas; J. Carneiro; J. M. B. Hawkins; D. Scholefield; David Chadwick

An automated laboratory soil incubation system enabled the effects on gaseous emissions from a soil to be quantified accurately, when amended with slurry plus a nitrification inhibitor: dicyandiamide (DCD), or 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP). Nitrification inhibitors applied with slurry under simulated Portuguese conditions were very efficient in reducing N2O emission, and did not increase CH4 emissions significantly, when the soil was predominantly aerobic. The inhibitors were also indirectly effective in reducing N2O emissions due to denitrification during a subsequent anaerobic phase. All gaseous emissions followed strong diurnal patterns that were positively correlated with soil temperature and obeyed a Q10=2 relationship. The widespread use of DCD and DMPP inhibitors with slurry applied to Portuguese soils could have the potential to reduce N2O emissions from this source by ten- to 20-fold.


The Journal of Agricultural Science | 2008

Use of SIMSDAIRY modelling framework system to compare the scope on the sustainability of a dairy farm of animal and plant genetic-based improvements with management-based changes

A. del Prado; D. Scholefield

Currently, society awareness, legislations and competing markets demand dairy farming systems which are sustainable. In the near future, farm management and animal genetics will be key elements in developing such sustainability. Although the effect of farm management on some attributes of sustainability has already been studied, the impacts and scope for realizing goals of agricultural multifunctionality through genetic changes are still to be tested. Sustainable and Integrated Management Systems for Dairy Production (SIMS DAIRY ) is a new farm level modelling framework which integrates these concepts to practical actions and brings all of this complexity into an operational and scientific modus operandi . The current paper provides a brief description of the structure of SIMS DAIRY and an example of how it can be used to compare the scope for improving the overall sustainability of a dairy farm by: (i) future system changes aimed at improving genetic characteristics of plants and animals with (ii) current system structural changes aimed at improving nutrient management efficiency. In order to do this comparison, management factors and new genetic traits from plants or/and animals, acting singly or in combination, are evaluated against a baseline dairy farm scenario. Sustainability is measured in terms of targets associated with: (i) the Nitrates Directive, (ii) phosphorus (P) threshold for eutrophication, (iii) the Kyoto Protocol, (iv) the Gothenburg Protocol, (v) an adequate net farm income for standard of living and acceptable standards of (vi) quality of milk, (vii) animal welfare, (viii) level of biodiversity, (ix) landscape aesthetics and (x) soil quality. Results suggest that genetic-based changes offer greater scope than management-based ones to improve sustainability up to an acceptable level. Costs associated with management changes are often too high within current socio-economics circumstances. Optimizing nitrogen (N) mineral fertilizer rate and timing was the only management-based measure that, while improving most of the environmental and biodiversity indices, resulted in improved economic results. Some genetic-based changes offered substantial scope for reducing environmental losses while having economic benefits. However, only those decreasing the crude protein (CP) of the plant and increasing the diet N cow partition into milk seemed to result in non-significant pollution swapping and be achievable in the nearby future.


Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2000

Comparison of grassland management systems for beef cattle using self-contained farmlets: effects of contrasting nitrogen inputs and management strategies on nitrogen budgets, and herbage and animal production

J.A. Laws; B.F. Pain; S.C. Jarvis; D. Scholefield

Past research on nitrogen (N) inputs, losses and surpluses focused on separate components of grassland management, i.e., grazed or cut swards and the impact of fertiliser or slurry applications. In practice, however, grassland is both grazed and cut for conservation, and N fertiliser is supplied from both organic and inorganic sources. A whole systems approach was used to evaluate the effects of combinations of management strategies designed to reduce N losses on N budgets, and herbage and animal production in South West England. Three systems with contrasting N inputs were compared: CN, conventional mineral N application and broadcast slurry; TN, tactical mineral N application with slurry injection and the early housing of cattle; GC, a mixed grass/white clover sward with no mineral N addition and slurry injection. Comparisons were made on two contrasting soil types: a freely-draining sandy loam (Gleysol, Site 1), and a poorly drained clay (Luvisol, Site 2). 1 ha farmlets were grazed to a target sward height by beef cattle for a 5-year (Site 1) or a 4-year (Site 2) period. Herbage surplus to grazing requirements was cut for silage. On average, 185 kg N ha 1 was applied annually to treatment TN compared with 280 kg N ha 1 for CN. An additional 76, 102 and 67 kg N ha 1 was applied in slurry to treatments CN, TN and GC, respectively. Substantial reductions in N surpluses were achieved for both treatments TN and GC compared with treatment CN (N surpluses ha 1 : 254, 168 and 119 kg at Site 1, and 247 kg, 190 and 73 kg at Site 2, for CN, TN and GC, respectively). The highest N input for treatment CN was associated with the greatest animal and herbage production. More land was required for grazing on treatment GC and less herbage was cut for silage so that self-sufficiency was not attained for winter fodder on this treatment. The early removal of cattle on treatment TN did not result in a significant increase in the amount of herbage cut for silage. It was concluded that the combinations of mitigation options used were successful in reducing N surpluses compared with the conventional N management system, but animal and herbage production was reduced.


Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems | 2006

Principles of Development of a Mass Balance N Cycle Model for Temperate Grasslands: An Irish Case Study

Agustin del Prado; L. Brown; R.P.O. Schulte; Michael Ryan; D. Scholefield

Because of current environmental legislation in European grass-based farming, there is a need to develop tools that can link nitrogen (N) production with losses to the environment. A mass balance empirical model (NCYCLE) is proposed to fulfil this role. This study describes the principles and stages to develop a mass balance N cycle model for Irish grasslands using the basis of the existing NCYCLE model. The model was reconstructed and validated using empirical data from herbage cutting experiments in different Irish conditions and new functions were incorporated to improve the predictions. Irish data on agroclimatic regions and atmospheric deposition were used to provide site specific calculations. Outputs from the model are presented and appear to agree reasonably well with measured data from Ireland.


Environmental Pollution | 1995

Nutrient run-off following application of livestock wastes to grassland

T.H. Misselbrook; B.F. Pain; A.C. Stone; D. Scholefield

Three types of farm waste (cattle slurry, dirty water and farm yard manure (FYM)) were applied to hydrologically isolated grassland plots on a sloping poorly draining soil. Two applications were made, the first in October and the second in February. Application rates were 50 m(3) ha(-1) of slurry and dirty water and 50 t ha(-1) of FYM. Volumes of run-off following rainfall events and concentrations of N, P and K in run-off were measured. Losses of nutrients were higher following applications made with the soil at field capacity and rainfall soon after application. In terms of percentage loss of applied nutrients, losses were generally low. Concentration of N in run-off from the dirty water and FYM treated plots following the first application and the slurry treated plots following the second application exceeded 11.3 mg dm(-3) (a recommended limit for drinking water) although the maximum concentration recorded was 15 mg dm(-3) following FYM application. Concentration of P in run-off only exceeded 1 mg dm(-3) following the second application of cattle slurry. Concentration of K exceeded 10 mg dm(-3) following the first application of FYM and the second application of cattle slurry.


Science of The Total Environment | 2011

Cost effectiveness of nitrate leaching mitigation measures for grassland livestock systems at locations in England and Wales

Laura Cardenas; Steve P. Cuttle; B. Crabtree; A. Hopkins; Anita Shepherd; D. Scholefield; A. del Prado

As much as 60% of the nitrate in water in England is thought to derive from agriculture. Legislation aims to improve water quality by limiting nitrate concentration in surface and groundwaters to 50 mg l(-1). The UK Government responded to the requirements of the EC Nitrate Directive by delineating Nitrate Vulnerable Zones (NVZs) to cover 55% of England in 2002 and increased it to 70% in 2009. In this study we assessed the cost-effectiveness of measures for implementation in livestock systems to mitigate nitrate leaching in the UK. These estimates were prepared for a range of hypothetical farms representative of typical dairy, beef and sheep farms at different locations in England and Wales and for a list of mitigation measures identified to reduce leaching. The NGAUGE and NFixCycle models were used to estimate leaching from these systems. The costs of implementation of the mitigation measures were also assessed in order to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these measures. In general, the most effective measures to reduce leaching for all systems were the ones that involved a reduction in stocking rates and grazing time, followed by those involving improvements in fertiliser and crop management. Only in the case of the dairy system was effectiveness affected by location of the farm. The costs for implementation in the sheep system were relatively low compared with beef and dairy systems. Implementation of some of the measures with high cost-effectiveness would need to be incentivised financially or with legislation due to the high costs involved.


Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems | 2002

A model of ammonia volatilisation from a dairy farm: an examination of abatement strategies

C. A. Ross; D. Scholefield; S. C. Jarvis

A model (MAST) to calculate the mass flow of NH3 through amodel dairy farm has been developed. Updated emission factors for UKagriculturewere used to examine different abatement strategies available for a typicaldairy farm. A range of annual NH3 emissions was calculated for bothslurry and FYM based dairy systems. Emission for the slurry based system ranged between 27 kg NH3-N ha−1 yr−1, achieved using a combination of abatementstrategies, and 107 kg NH3-N ha−1 yr−1, calculated for a ‘worst case’scenario. For FYM, this range was between 33 and 86 kg NH3-Nha−1 yr−1. The greatest reductionswereachieved by manipulating options linked to fertiliser usage and manureapplication.


Soil Science and Plant Nutrition | 2013

Potential mineralization and nitrification in volcanic grassland soils in Chile

Laura Cardenas; D. J. Hatch; D. Scholefield; Deveraj Jhurreea; Ian Clark; Penny R. Hirsch; F. Salazar; S. Rao-Ravella; M. Alfaro

Abstract A proportion of the nitrogen (N) applied to grasslands as organic or inorganic fertilizers can be lost to water courses as nitrate and to the atmosphere as nitrous and nitric oxides. Volcanic soils from Chile are not generally prone to leaching, possibly due to net immobilization of nitrate and/or ammonium, and/or due to inhibition of nitrification by either chemical or physical processes. In laboratory studies we found large mineralization potentials in soils from three different Chilean soils after 17 weeks of incubation, totalling 215 and 254 mg kg−1 dry soil for two Andisols and 127 mg kg−1 dry soil in an Ultisol. Nitrification occurred after a short period, and was lowest in the Ultisol. In addition, microbial analysis showed nitrifiers to be present in all three soils. Adsorption of ammonium was two-fold stronger than for nitrate, ranging from 29 to 180 kg N ha−1. The highest potential for N adsorption in the 0–60 cm soil profile was with the Ultisol (398 kg N ha−1), but was similar in both Andisols (193 and 172 kg N ha−1, respectively). The combination of ammonium retention together with delayed nitrification could account for the low leaching rates in these soils.


Sixth International Workshop on Modelling Nutrient Utilization in Farm Animals, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 6-8 September 2004. | 2005

25 A Model to Simulate the Effects of Different Dietary Strategies on the Sustainability of a Dairy Farm System

A. del Prado; D. Scholefield; L. Brown; E. Kebreab; J. Dijkstra; A. Bannink; W. J. J. Gerrits

A new model is being developed to study the main elements that affect sustainability within a dairy farm by using multiple goal programming. In this work, we describe the main characteristics of this modelling approach and we evaluate, via optimization, the effect of different dietary strategies and some component attributes such as plant nitrogen (N) uptake and cow N intake on milk and N losses.


Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment | 2010

Quantifying annual N2O emission fluxes from grazed grassland under a range of inorganic fertiliser nitrogen inputs

Laura Cardenas; Rachel Thorman; N. Ashlee; M. Butler; David Chadwick; B. Chambers; S. Cuttle; N. Donovan; H. Kingston; S. Lane; M. S. Dhanoa; D. Scholefield

Collaboration


Dive into the D. Scholefield's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. del Prado

University of the Basque Country

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

U. Dragosits

University of Edinburgh

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

A. del Prado

University of the Basque Country

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge