D. Trippanera
Roma Tre University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by D. Trippanera.
Geological Society of America Bulletin | 2014
D. Trippanera; Massimiliano Porreca; J. Ruch; A Pimentel; Valerio Acocella; J Pacheco; M. Salvatore
The relationships between tectonics and hotspot-related magmatism in transform/transtensive settings are poorly known. The Azores archipelago, lying where the transform plate boundary between the Nubian and Eurasian plates meets the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, is a rare site to investigate these relationships. The distinct tectono-magmatic features of Faial make it the ideal island to focus the study. Here, we analyze the relationships between tectonics and magmatism, using remote-sensing, field, and paleomagnetic analyses. Dominant WNW-ESE–trending lineaments correspond to major faults with transtensive dextral motion and NE-SW opening, probably related to the nearby transtensive Terceira Rift. Most (∼60%) dikes, vent elongations, and alignments are parallel to this system. The lavas forming the basement of the distinctive WNW-ESE–trending Pedro Miguel graben strike parallel to the graben axis, dipping outward with a tilt consistent with that of paleomagnetic data. These lavas are dissected by the WNW-ESE–trending transtensive faults. Therefore, the graben consists of outward-tilted fault-bounded blocks, forming two opposite-verging dominoes. Its estimated stretching factor (β = 1.35) and mean extension rate (between 3.4 and 8.2 mm/yr) are similar or slightly larger than those of Terceira Rift, to the east. Part of the graben extension may be magma induced, via diking. We suggest that: (1) Faial, along with the nearby Pico Island, is a major locus of extension within the Azores, directly above the imaged hotspot; and (2) the Faial-Pico magmatic segment constitutes the offset, westward magmatic continuation of the Terceira Rift. The segment opening highlights the importance of extensional strain along magmatic transtensive plate boundaries.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2015
D. Trippanera; J. Ruch; V. Acocella; Eleonora Rivalta
The shallow transport of magma occurs through dikes causing surface deformation. Our understanding of the effects of diking at the surface is limited, especially on the long term, for repeated intrusive episodes. We use analogue models to study the upper crustal deformation induced by dikes. We insert metal plates within cohesive sand with three setups: in setup A, the intrusion rises upward with constant thickness and in setups B and C, the intrusion thickens at a fixed depth, with final rectangular (setup B) or triangular (setup C) shape in section. Setup A creates a doming delimited by reverse faults, with secondary apical graben, without close correspondence in nature. In setups B and C, a depression flanked by two uplifted areas is bordered by inward dipping normal faults propagating downward and, for deeper intrusions in setup B, also by inner faults, reverse at the surface; this deformation is similar to what is observed in nature, suggesting a consistent physical behavior. Dikes in nature initially propagate developing a mode I fracture at the tip, subsequently thickened by magma intrusion, without any host rock translation in the propagation direction (as in setup A). The deformation pattern in setups B and C depends on the intrusion depth and thickness, consistently to what is observed along divergent plate boundaries. The early deformation in setups B and C is similar to that from a single rifting episode (i.e., Lakagigar, Iceland, and Dabbahu, Afar), whereas the late stages resemble the structure of mature rifts (i.e., Krafla, Iceland), confirming diking as a major process in shaping divergent plate boundaries.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2014
D. Trippanera; Valerio Acocella; J. Ruch
The axis of divergent plate boundaries shows extension fractures and normal faults at the surface. Here we present evidence of contraction along the axis of the oceanic ridge of Iceland and the continental Main Ethiopian Rift. Contraction is found at the base of the tilted hanging wall of dilational normal faults, balancing part of their extension. Our experiments suggest that these structures result from dike emplacement. Multiple dike injection induces subsidence above and uplift to the sides of the dikes; the transition in between is accommodated by reverse faults and subsequent peripheral inward dipping normal faults. Our results suggest that contraction is a direct product of magma emplacement along divergent plate boundaries, at various scales, marking a precise evolutionary stage and initiating part of the extensional structures (extension fractures and normal faults).
Tectonics | 2015
D. Trippanera; V. Acocella; J. Ruch; Bekele Abebe
Recent studies highlight the importance of annual-scale dike-induced rifting episodes in developing normal faults and graben along the active axis of magmatic divergent plate boundaries (MDPB). However, the longer-term (102–105 years) role of diking on the cumulative surface deformation and evolution of MDPB is not yet well understood. To better understand the longer-term normal faults and graben along the axis of MDPB, we analyze fissure swarms in Iceland and Ethiopia. We first focus on the simplest case of immature fissure swarms, with single dike-fed eruptive fissures; these consist of a <1 km wide graben bordered by normal faults with displacement up to a few meters, consistent with theoretical models and geodetic data. A similar structural pattern is found, with asymmetric and multiple graben, within wider mature fissure swarms, formed by several dike-fed eruptive fissures. We then consider the lateral termination of normal faults along these grabens to detect their upward or downward propagation. Most faults terminate as open fractures on flat surface, suggesting downward fault propagation; this is consistent with recent experiments showing dike-induced normal faults propagating downward from the surface. However, some normal faults also terminate as open fractures on monoclines, which resemble fault propagation folds; this suggests upward propagation of reactivated buried faults, promoted by diking. These results suggest that fault growth and graben development, as well as the longer-term evolution of the axis of MDPB, may be explained only through dike emplacement and that any amagmatic faulting is not necessary.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2015
Stefano Urbani; D. Trippanera; M. Porreca; Catherine Kissel; Valerio Acocella
Recent rifting episodes highlight the role of magmatic systems with propagating dikes on crustal spreading. However, our knowledge of magmatic systems is usually limited to surface observations and geophysical data. Eastern Iceland allows direct access to extinct and eroded deeper magmatic systems. Here we collected field structural and AMS (anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility) data on 187 and 19 dikes, respectively, in the 10–12 Ma old Alftafjordur magmatic system. At a paleodepth of ~1.5 km, the extension due to diking is at least 1–2 orders of magnitude larger than that induced by regional tectonics, confirming magmatism as the key mechanism for crustal spreading. This magma-induced extension, inferred from the aspect ratio of the magmatic system, was of ~8 mm/yr, lower than the present one. AMS data suggest that most of dikes have geometrically normal fabric, at least at the margins, consistent with prevalent subvertical magma flow and propagation.
Geosphere | 2016
Valerio Acocella; D. Trippanera
Recent diking episodes along slow spreading boundaries included the generation of normal faults, showing that extension is accommodated, on a scale of a few years or less, by both magma intrusion and fault movement. Here we aim to define how diking may affect the overall rift structure on the longer term (≥100 yr). We first summarize the main features of the transient diking episodes as obtained from geological, geophysical, geodetic, and modeling studies. We then put these episodes into a broader context, considering the overall longer term shallow and deep structure of the plate boundaries. The synthesis of the data shows that in Iceland crustal extension at depth largely occurs by means of dikes, with negligible normal faulting; faults focus toward the surface (
Bulletin of Volcanology | 2018
D. Trippanera; J. Ruch; V. Acocella; T. Thordarson; Stefano Urbani
Activity within magmatic divergent plate boundaries (MDPB) focuses along both regional fissure swarms and central volcanoes. An ideal place to investigate their mutual relationship is the Askja central volcano in Iceland. Askja consists of three nested calderas (namely Kollur, Askja and Öskjuvatn) located within a hyaloclastite massif along the NNE-SSW trending Icelandic MDPB. We performed an extensive field-based structural analysis supported by a remote sensing study of tectonic and volcanic features of Askja’s calderas and of the eastern flank of the hyaloclastite massif. In the massif, volcano-tectonic structures trend N 10° E to N 40° E, but they vary around the Askja caldera being both parallel to the caldera rim and cross-cutting on the Western side. Structural trends around the Öskjuvatn caldera are typically rim parallel. Volcanic vents and dikes are preferentially distributed along the caldera ring faults; however, they follow the NNE-SSW regional structures when located outside the calderas. Our results highlight that the Askja volcano displays a balanced amount of regional (fissure-swarm related) and local (shallow-magma-chamber related) tectonic structures along with a mutual interaction among these. This is different from Krafla volcano (to the north of Askja) dominated by regional structures and Grímsvötn (to the South) dominated by local structures. Therefore, Askja represents an intermediate tectono-magmatic setting for volcanoes located in a slow divergent plate boundary. This is also likely in accordance with a northward increase in the spreading rate along the Icelandic MDPB.
Archive | 2015
Joel Ruch; Sigurjón Jónsson; Teng Wang; Wenbin Xu; D. Trippanera
The EGU General Assembly | 2015
Stefano Urbani; D. Trippanera; Massimiliano Porreca; Valerio Acocella; C: Kissel
Tectonics | 2015
D. Trippanera; V. Acocella; J. Ruch; Bekele Abebe