Daiqing Liao

Small-molecule inhibitors of acetyltransferase p300 identified by high-throughput screening are potent anticancer agents

Acetyltransferase p300 (KAT3B) plays key roles in signaling cascades that support cancer cell survival and sustained proliferation. Thus, p300 represents a potential anticancer therapeutic target. To discover novel anticancer agents that target p300, we conducted a high-throughput screening campaign. A library of 622,079 compounds was assayed for cytotoxicity to the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line MDA-MB-231 but not to the human mammary epithelial cells. The resulting compounds were tested in a biochemical assay for inhibiting the enzymatic activity of p300. One compound (L002, NSC764414) displayed an IC50 of 1.98 μmol/L against p300 in vitro, inhibited acetylation of histones and p53, and suppressed STAT3 activation in cell-based assays. L002 could be docked to the active site of the p300 catalytic domain. Biochemical tests of a series of related compounds revealed functional groups that may impact inhibitory potency of L002 against p300. Interestingly, these analogs showed inhibitory activities against the cellular paralog of p300 (CBP), p300/CBP-associated factor, and GCN5, but not to other acetyltransferases (KAT5, KAT6B, and KAT7), histone deacetylases, and histone methyltransferases. Among the NCI-60 panel of cancer cell lines, leukemia and lymphoma cell lines were extremely sensitive to L002, whereas it is toxic to only a limited number of cell lines derived from solid tumors. Notably, breast cancer cell lines, especially those derived from TNBC, were highly susceptible to L002. In vivo, it potently suppressed tumor growth and histone acetylation of MDA-MB-468 xenografts. Thus, these new acetyltransferase inhibitors are potential anticancer therapeutics. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(5); 610–20. ©2013 AACR.

Emerging roles of the EBF family of transcription factors in tumor suppression.

Alterations in various developmental pathways are common themes in cancer. The early B-cell factors (EBF) are a family of four highly conserved DNA-binding transcription factors with an atypical zinc-finger and helix-loop-helix motif. They are involved in the differentiation and maturation of several cell lineages including B-progenitor lymphoblasts, neuronal precursors, and osteoblast progenitors. During B-cell development, EBF1 is required for the expression of Pax5, an essential factor for the production of antibody-secreting cells. Accumulating evidence indicates that genomic deletion of the EBF1 gene contributes to the pathogenesis, drug resistance, and relapse of B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Epigenetic silencing and genomic deletion of the EBF3 locus in chromosome 10q are very frequent in glioblastoma (GBM). Strikingly, the frequency of EBF3 loss in GBM is similar to that of the loss of Pten, a key suppressor of gliomagenesis. Cancer-specific somatic mutations were detected in EBF3 in GBM and in both EBF1 and EBF3 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. These missense mutations occur in the DNA-binding domain or the conserved IPT/TIG domain, suggesting that they might disrupt the functions of these two proteins. Functional studies revealed that EBF3 represses the expression of genes required for cell proliferation [e.g., cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK)] and survival (e.g., Mcl-1 and Daxx) but activates those involved in cell cycle arrest (e.g., p21 and p27), leading to growth suppression and apoptosis. Therefore, EBFs represent new tumor suppressors whose inactivation blocks normal development and contributes to tumorigenesis of diverse types of human cancer. (Mol Cancer Res 2009;7(12):1893–901)

p53 SUMOylation promotes its nuclear export by facilitating its release from the nuclear export receptor CRM1

p53 SUMOylation promotes its nuclear export. The SIM-binding groove of a SUMO moiety linked to p53 and a SIM in CRM1 regulates their interaction. CRM1 binds to tetrameric p53 with a properly folded core domain, and CRM1 with a mutated SIM in the HEAT9 loop accumulates with SUMOylated p53 at NPCs and cytoplasmic aggregates.

In pursuit of new anti-angiogenic therapies for cancer treatment

Despite advances in surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, patients with cancer have a poor prognosis. Sustained aberrant tumor angiogenesis and metastasis is a major obstacle for effective cancer treatment. Just a few years ago, few would argue that one of the key success stories of the modern cancer medicine were the anti-angiogenic drugs targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway approved by FDA. This initial success inspired many researchers to search for new anti-angiogenic targets and drugs with the hope that one day, anti-angiogenic therapy might really become the panacea for cancer patients. Unfortunately, the limited clinical benefits achieved with anti-angiogenic drugs conflicts with the widely accepted notion that angiogenesis is a key event in tumor progression. Emerging data indicate that unique characteristics of the tumor vasculature within the tumor microenvironment may hold the key for success of anti-angiogenic therapy. In particular, the molecular and cellular alterations that sustain aberrant tumor angiogenesis in the face of angiogenic inhibitors represents novel targets for rationally designing and improving current anti-angiogenic strategies.

Identification of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors with Benzoylhydrazide Scaffold that Selectively Inhibit Class I Histone Deacetylases

Inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDACi) hold considerable therapeutic promise as clinical anticancer therapies. However, currently known HDACi exhibit limited isoform specificity, off-target activity, and undesirable pharmaceutical properties. Thus, HDACi with new chemotypes are needed to overcome these limitations. Here, we identify a class of HDACi with a previously undescribed benzoylhydrazide scaffold that is selective for the class I HDACs. These compounds are competitive inhibitors with a fast-on/slow-off HDAC-binding mechanism. We show that the lead compound, UF010, inhibits cancer cell proliferation via class I HDAC inhibition. This causes global changes in protein acetylation and gene expression, resulting in activation of tumor suppressor pathways and concurrent inhibition of several oncogenic pathways. The isotype selectivity coupled with interesting biological activities in suppressing tumor cell proliferation support further preclinical development of the UF010 class of compounds for potential therapeutic applications.

Overexpression of histone deacetylases in cancer cells is controlled by interplay of transcription factors and epigenetic modulators

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) that deacetylate histone and nonhistone proteins play crucial roles in a variety of cellular processes. The overexpression of HDACs is reported in many cancer types and is directly linked to accelerated cell proliferation and survival. However, little is known about how HDAC expression is regulated in cancer cells. In this study, we found that HDAC1 and HDAC2 promoters are regulated through collaborative binding of transcription factors Sp1/Sp3 and epigenetic modulators, including histone H3K4 methyltransferase SET1 and histone acetyltransferase p300, whose levels are also elevated in colon cancer cell lines and patient samples. Interestingly, Sp1 and Sp3 differentially regulate HDAC1 and HDAC2 promoter activity. In addition, Sp1/Sp3 recruits SET1 and p300 to the promoters. SET1 knockdown (KD) results in a loss of the H3K4 trimethylation mark at the promoters, as well as destabilizes p300 at the promoters. Conversely, p300 also influences SET1 recruitment and H3K4me3 level, indicating a crosstalk between p300 and SET1. Further, SET1 KD reduces Sp1 binding to the HDAC1 promoter through the increase of Sp1 acetylation. These results indicate that interactions among transcription factors and epigenetic modulators orchestrate the activation of HDAC1 and HDAC2 promoter activity in colon cancer cells.—Yang, H., Salz, T., Zajac‐Kaye, M., Liao, D., Huang, S., and Qiu, Y., Overexpression of histone deacetylases in cancer cells is controlled by interplay of transcription factors and epigenetic modulators. FASEB J. 28, 4265–4279 (2014). www.fasebj.org

Inhibition of p53 by Adenovirus Type 12 E1B-55K Deregulates Cell Cycle Control and Sensitizes Tumor Cells to Genotoxic Agents

ABSTRACT Adenovirus E1B-55K represses p53-mediated transcription. However, the phenotypic consequence of p53 inhibition by E1B-55K for cell cycle regulation and drug sensitivity in tumor cells has not been examined. In HCT116 cells with constitutive E1B-55K expression, the activation of p53 target genes such as the p21, Mdm2, and Puma genes was attenuated, despite markedly elevated p53 protein levels. HCT116 cells with E1B-55K expression displayed a cell cycle profile similar to that of the isogenic HCT116p53−/− cells, including unhindered S-phase entry despite DNA damage. Surprisingly, E1B-55K-expressing cells were more sensitive to drug treatment than parental cells. Compared to HCT116 cells, HCT116p53−/− cells were more susceptible to both doxorubicin and etoposide, and E1B-55K expression had no effects on drug treatment. E1B-55K expression increased the rate of cell proliferation in HCT116 but not in HCT116p53−/− cells. Thus, deregulation of p53-mediated cell cycle control by E1B-55K probably underlies sensitization of HCT116 cells to anticancer drugs. Consistently, E1B-55K expression in A549, A172, and HepG2 cells, all containing wild-type (wt) p53, also enhanced etoposide-induced cytotoxicity, whereas in p53-null H1299 cells, E1B-55K had no effects. We generated several E1B-55K mutants with mutations at positions occupied by the conserved Phe/Trp/His residues. Most of these mutants showed no or reduced binding to p53, although some of them could still stabilize p53, suggesting that binding might not be essential for E1B-55K-induced p53 stabilization. Despite heightened p53 protein levels in cells expressing certain E1B-55K mutants, p53 activity was largely suppressed. Furthermore, most of these E1B-55K mutants could sensitize HCT116 cells to etoposide and doxorubicin. These results indicate that E1B-55K might have utility for enhancing chemotherapy.

Repression of p53-mediated transcription by adenovirus E1B 55-kDa does not require corepressor mSin3A and histone deacetylases.

The Ad E1B 55-kDa protein (E1B) is a potent transcriptional repressor. In vitro biochemical studies revealed that direct p53-E1B interaction is essential for E1B to block p53-activated transcription and a corepressor may be involved. To understand how E1B represses p53-mediated transcription in vivo, we expressed E1B in several tumor cell lines that express wild type p53. Here we show that E1B strongly suppresses the expression of p53 target genes such as p21 and Puma-α in normal growth conditions or after cells were treated with p53-activating chemotherapeutic agents, suggesting that E1B-mediated gene repression is dominant and cannot be reversed via p53 activation. Interestingly, we found that E1B binds to corepressor mSin3A. Mutagenesis analysis indicated that the sequence motif “LHLLA” near the NH2 terminus of E1B is responsible for mSin3A binding, and this motif is conserved among E1B proteins from different Ad serotypes. The conserved paired amphipathic helix domain 1 of mSin3A is critical for mSin3A-E1B interaction. Surprisingly, E1B mutants that cannot bind to mSin3A can still repress p53 target genes, indicating that it is not the corepressor required for E1B-mediated gene repression. In support of this notion, repression of p53 target genes by E1B is insensitive to HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A. We further show that both the NH2- and COOH-terminal domains of E1B are required for the repression function. Therefore, E1B employs a unique repression mechanism to block p53-mediated transcription.

Downregulation of Mdm2 and Mdm4 enhances viral gene expression during adenovirus infection

Successful viral replication entails elimination or bypass of host antiviral mechanisms. Here, we show that shRNA-mediated knockdown of murine double minute (Mdm2) and its paralog Mdm4 enhanced the expression of early and late viral gene products during adenovirus (HAdV) infection. Remarkably, whereas the expression of HAdV genes was low in p53-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts (p53KO MEFs), the HAdV early gene products were efficiently expressed in Mdm2/p53 double-knockout (DKO) and Mdm4/p53 DKO MEFs, and viral capsid proteins were produced in Mdm2/p53 DKO MEFs. Thus, Mdm2 and Mdm4 seem to have potent antiviral property. In cells infected with wt HAdV or a mutant virus lacking the E1B-55K gene (dl1520), both Mdm2 and Mdm4 were rapidly depleted, whereas replication-deficient mutant viruses (Ad-GFP) or ΔpTP with deletions within the coding sequence of preterminal binding protein failed to induce their downregulation. Reduced expression of Mdm2 and Mdm4 was not due to general shutoff of host protein synthesis. Additionally, expression of a dominant-negative mutant of Cul5 did not affect Mdm2/Mdm4 downregulation. Thus, viral replication but not the presence of E1B-55K is required for Mdm2/Mdm4 degradation. Surprisingly, treatment of HAdV-infected cells with proteasome inhibitor MG132 only partially restored the protein levels of Mdm2 and Mdm4, suggesting that they may also be downregulated through an additional mechanism independent of proteasome. Interestingly, cyclin D1 and p21 appear to be downregulated similarly during HAdV infection. Collectively, our work provides the first biochemical evidence for antiviral function of Mdm2 and Mdm4 and that viruses employ efficient countermeasure to ensure viral replication.

Intrinsic cellular signaling mechanisms determine the sensitivity of cancer cells to virus-induced apoptosis.

Cancer cells of epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes exhibit different sensitivities to apoptosis stimuli, but the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon remain partly understood. We constructed a novel recombinant adenovirus expressing Ad12 E1A (Ad-E1A12) that can strongly induce apoptosis. Ad-E1A12 infection of epithelial cancer cells displayed dramatic detachment and apoptosis, whereas cancer cells of mesenchymal phenotypes with metastatic propensity were markedly more resistant to this virus. Notably, forced detachment of epithelial cells did not further sensitize them to Ad-E1A12-induced apoptosis, suggesting that cell detachment is a consequence rather than the cause of Ad-E1A12-induced apoptosis. Ad-E1A12 increased phosphorylation of AKT1 and ribosomal protein S6 through independent mechanisms in different cell types. Ad-E1A12–induced AKT1 phosphorylation was PI3K-dependent in epithelial cancer cells, and mTOR-dependent in mesenchymal cancer cells. Epithelial cancer cells upon Ad-E1A12-induced detachment could not sustain AKT activation due to AKT1 degradation, but AKT1 activation was maintained in mesenchymal cancer cells. Expression of epithelial cell-restricted miR-200 family in mesenchymal cells limited mTOR signaling and sensitized them to Ad-E1A12-induced cell killing. Thus, epithelial cancer cells rely on the canonical PI3K-AKT signaling pathway for survival, while mesenchymal cancer cells deploy the PI3K-independent mTORC2-AKT axis in response to strong death stimuli.