Dallas Williams

Integrated Therapy for Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer: Final Report of a Randomized Trial of Cystectomy Plus Adjuvant M-VAC Versus Cystectomy With Both Preoperative and Postoperative M-VAC

PURPOSE We conducted a phase III trial to investigate the timing of chemotherapy with respect to surgery for patients with resectable but high-risk urothelial cancer. The trial was also designed to evaluate the accuracy of clinical staging in patients with locally advanced cancer and the prognostic significance of chemotherapy-induced downstaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 140 uniformly evaluated patients with locally advanced urothelial cancer were studied. Planned treatment was five cycles of chemotherapy (M-VAC: methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) plus radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either two courses of neoadjuvant M-VAC followed by surgery plus three additional cycles of chemotherapy, or, alternatively, to have initial cystectomy followed by five cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS There were no significant differences in outcome between the two groups. By intent-to-treat, 81 patients (58%) remain disease-free, with median follow-up of 6.8 years. We confirmed a high rate of clinical understaging in this cohort, especially among patients showing lymphovascular invasion on biopsy. Patients with no residual muscle-invasive disease at cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were likely to be cured. CONCLUSION These results lend further support to the impression from small randomized trials that, in a high-risk cohort, there is an improved cure fraction by the combination of multiagent chemotherapy and surgery, although we found no preferred sequence. Importantly, it is possible to select appropriate patients for such therapy on the basis of clinical staging information. These results establish a benchmark of outcome for this cohort.

Neoadjuvant Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Metastatic Penile Cancer: A Phase II Study

PURPOSE Men with penile squamous cell carcinoma and regional lymph node involvement have a low probability of survival with lymphadenectomy alone. A multimodal approach to treatment is desirable for such patients. We performed a phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with the objective of determining the response rate, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) among patients with bulky adenopathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had stage N2 or N3 (stage III or stage IV) penile cancer without distant metastases. Neoadjuvant treatment (four courses every 3-4 weeks) consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) administered over 3 hours on day 1; ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3; and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3. Clinical and pathologic responses were assessed, and patient groups were compared for TTP and OS. RESULTS Thirty men received chemotherapy of whom 15 (50.0%) had an objective response and 22 (73.3%) subsequently underwent surgery. Three patients had no remaining tumor on histopathology. Nine patients (30.0%) remained alive and free of recurrence (median follow-up, 34 months; range, 14-59 months), and two patients died of other causes without recurrence. Improved TTP and OS were significantly associated with a response to chemotherapy (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively), absence of bilateral residual tumor (P = .002 and P = .017, respectively), and absence of extranodal extension (P = .001 and P = .004, respectively) or skin involvement (P = .009 and P = .012, respectively). CONCLUSION The neoadjuvant regimen of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin induced clinically meaningful responses in patients with bulky regional lymph node metastases from penile cancer.

Repeated intravesical instillations of an adenoviral vector in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer: A phase I study of p53 gene therapy

PURPOSE We investigated the feasibility, safety, and biologic activity of adenovirus-mediated p53 gene transfer in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable, locally advanced transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder who were not candidates for cystectomy were eligible. On a 28-day cycle, intravesical instillations of INGN 201 (Ad5CMV-p53) were administered on days 1 and 4 at three dose levels (10(10) particles to 10(12) particles) or on either 4 or 8 consecutive days at a single dose level (10(12) particles). RESULTS Thirteen patients received a total of 22 courses without dose-limiting toxicity. Specific transgene expression was detected by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in bladder biopsy tissue from two of seven assessable patients. There were no changes in p53, p21waf1/cip1, or bax protein levels in bladder epithelium evident from immunohistochemical analysis of 11 assessable patients. Outpatient administration of multiple courses was feasible and well tolerated. A patient with advanced superficial bladder cancer showed evidence of tumor response. CONCLUSION Intravesical instillation of Ad5CMV-p53 is safe, feasible, and biologically active when administered in multiple doses to patients with bladder cancer. Observations from this study indicate that this treatment has an antitumor effect in superficial transitional-cell carcinoma. Improvements in the efficiency of gene transfer and the levels of gene expression are required to develop more effective gene therapy for bladder cancer.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant Alternating Doublet Chemotherapy With Ifosfamide/Doxorubicin and Etoposide/Cisplatin in Small-Cell Urothelial Cancer

PURPOSE Currently, treatment recommendations for small-cell urothelial cancer (SCUC) are based on anecdotal case reports and small retrospective series. We now report results from the first phase II clinical trial developed exclusively for SCUC, to our knowledge. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2001 to 2006, 30 patients with SCUC provided consent and were treated with alternating doublet chemotherapy. Patients with surgically resectable disease (< or = cT4aN0M0) received a total of four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with unresectable disease (> or = cT4b, N+, or M+) received two cycles beyond maximal response. RESULTS Eighteen patients with surgically resectable SCUC received neoadjuvant treatment with a median overall survival (OS) of 58 months; 13 of these patients remain alive and cancer free. For patients with cT2N0M0 SCUC, the 5-year OS rate is 80%; only one of four patients with cT3b-4aN0M0 remains alive (median OS, 37.8 months). For 12 patients with unresectable or metastatic SCUC, the median OS was 13.3 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with transfusion, neutropenic fever, and infection remaining the most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities. There was only one postsurgical death. Brain metastases were strongly associated with more advanced-stage disease, developing in eight of 16 patients with either bulky tumors (> or = cT3b) or metastatic disease (P = .004). CONCLUSION These clinical trial results are consistent with previously reported retrospective data demonstrating long-term survival with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resectable SCUC. Once metastases develop, the prognosis remains poor. The strong positive association between disease stage and brain metastases highlights a patient subset that may potentially benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Phase III Trial of Fluorouracil, Interferon Alfa-2b, and Cisplatin Versus Methotrexate, Vinblastine, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin in Metastatic or Unresectable Urothelial Cancer

PURPOSE Previously, we developed a novel biochemotherapy regimen combining interferon alpha-2b with fluorouracil and cisplatin (FAP). We now report the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing FAP with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC), the standard chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the response rates and overall survival of patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial cancer treated with these two chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between October 1992 and September 1999, 172 previously untreated patients were registered and randomly assigned to treatment with either FAP or M-VAC. Patients were followed until their death. RESULTS The pretreatment clinical characteristics of the groups were similar except for sex (P <.01). Sex did not affect prognosis or survival. The objective response rate for patients assigned to FAP was 42% (35 of 83 patients), with complete response observed in eight (10%) of 83 patients. Among the patients assigned to M-VAC, 51 (59%) of 86 had an objective response, with complete response observed in 21 (24%) of 86. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival was 12.5 months for both groups. Both regimens were quite toxic, with more mucocutaneous toxicity in the FAP arm and more myelosuppression in the M-VAC arm. CONCLUSION Although overall survival was not significantly different, patients assigned to M-VAC had a much better chance of responding to front-line therapy. Thus, FAP is very likely to be inferior to M-VAC and is certainly no less toxic. FAP cannot be recommended as part of the standard armamentarium for urothelial cancer.

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide as weekly therapy: A feasibility and phase II study of salvage treatment for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma

PURPOSE We investigated the feasibility, safety, and antitumor activity of weekly gemcitabine given in combination with low doses of cisplatin and ifosfamide in previously treated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable, metastatic or unresectable TCC who had received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. On a 28-day course, doses of cisplatin 30 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 1 g/m(2) were given on day 1 and then repeated on day 8 and day 15 unless there was dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. RESULTS Fifty-one patients were registered; 10 patients participated in a pilot study, after which 41 patients were registered onto the phase II protocol. Forty-eight patients (94.1%) had dose-limiting hematologic toxicity on day 8 or day 15. Nonhematologic toxicity of grade 3 or greater consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting (seven patients, 13.7%) and infection (seven patients, 13.7%). Responses could be assessed in 49 of 51 eligible patients; two complete responses (4.1%) and 18 partial responses (36.7%) were observed for an overall response rate of 40.8% (exact 95% confidence interval, 27% to 56%). CONCLUSION This regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide is not feasible for weekly administration because of hematologic toxicity. Nevertheless, there was promising activity with only two doses per 28-day cycle. On the basis of these results, we have initiated a phase II trial of this combination given as a single dose every 14 days in patients with untreated, metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

A phase 2 clinical trial of sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy with ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine followed by cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide in locally advanced urothelial cancer: final results.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with high‐risk urothelial cancer. However, the lack of curative alternatives to cisplatin‐based chemotherapy is limiting for patients with neuropathy or hearing loss. Sequential chemotherapy also has not been well studied in the neoadjuvant setting. The authors explored sequential neoadjuvant ifosfamide‐based chemotherapy in a patient cohort at high risk of noncurative cystectomy.

Neoadjuvant Platelet Derived Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Therapy Combined With Docetaxel and Androgen Ablation for High Risk Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE Platelet derived growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy improves the efficacy of taxane chemotherapy in preclinical models of prostate cancer. Men with high risk localized prostate cancer were treated with platelet derived growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy, docetaxel and hormone ablation in the preoperative setting, and clinicopathological outcomes were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 36 men with cT2 or greater disease, Gleason grade 8-10, serum prostate specific antigen more than 20 ng/ml or cT2b and prostate specific antigen more than 10 ng/ml and Gleason 7 disease, without radiological evidence of metastases, were scheduled to receive intramuscular leuprolide, 600 mg daily oral imatinib and 30 mg/m(2) weekly docetaxel x 4 every 42 days for 3 cycles before radical prostatectomy (beta [0.02, 1.98] prior on the possibility of pathological complete remission). Unresectable disease, postoperative prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater, or administration of postoperative radiation or hormones were defined as treatment failure. RESULTS A total of 39 men were registered over 15 months. Median patient age was 57 years (range 44 to 71). Risk factors included T3 disease (22 of 39), Gleason 8-10 disease (31 of 39) and prostate specific antigen more than 20 ng/ml (12 of 39). Three men were ineligible or declined therapy, 29 of 36 (81%) received 3 cycles of therapy and 7 of 36 (19%) discontinued therapy related to toxicity. Grades 3-4 toxicity included rash (4), diarrhea (4), fatigue (6) and neutropenia (1). The surgical approach was feasible, without excessive or unusual complications such as wound dehiscence. No pathological complete remissions were defined. At a median followup of 39 months 53% were free from progression. CONCLUSIONS Evidence for a favorable impact of platelet derived growth factor receptor inhibitor therapy on the efficacy of neoadjuvant docetaxel and hormonal ablation in high risk localized prostate cancer was not obtained.

Gemcitabine modulation of alkylator therapy: a phase I trial of escalating gemcitabine added to fixed doses of ifosfamide and doxorubicin.

The authors investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicity (DLT) associated with the addition of a biomodulating dose of gemcitabine to an established regimen of ifosfamide and doxorubicin as part of a program to explore the potential of low‐dose gemcitabine to modulate the activity of alkylating agents.

Treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma with alternating paclitaxel, methotrexate, cisplatin (TMP) and 5-fluorouracil, α-interferon, cisplatin (FAP)

We assessed the activity and safety of a biochemotherapy regimen in which courses of paclitaxel, methotrexate, and cisplatin were alternated with courses of 5-fluorouracil, alpha-interferon, and cisplatin in the treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. In the phase I portion, 15 patients were treated according to an escalating dosage regimen designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose. A total of 30 patients received treatment according to the maximum tolerated dose regimen: methotrexate (30 mg/m(2)) given iv on days 1 and 22; paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given iv over 3 h on day 1; cisplatin (70 and 25 mg/m(2)) administered iv on days 1 and 22, respectively; 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) given iv by continuous infusion daily for 5 days beginning on day 22; and alpha-interferon (4 mIU/m(2)) given SC daily for 5 days simultaneously with the 5-fluorouracil infusions. The regimen was repeated at 42-day intervals. The 40 treated patients had an overall response rate of 43%, a complete response rate of 18%, and a median survival time of 44 weeks. Most of the toxic effects were hematologic: Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 30% of patients (12 patients) and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 20% (8 patients). Even though this alternating biochemotherapy regimen was active for patients with refractory urothelial carcinoma, its activity was not better than that of certain single cytotoxic agents. Furthermore, the complicated dosing schedule and toxic effects of the regimen precluded its routine use in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.