Randall E. Millikan

Phase I Trial of the Proteasome Inhibitor Bortezomib in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors With Observations in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE To determine the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib administered intravenously weekly for 4 every 5 weeks; to determine the bortezomib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics using plasma levels and an assay for 20S proteasome inhibition (PI) in whole blood; to correlate toxicity with bortezomib dose and degree of 20S PI; and to conduct a preliminary determination of the antitumor activity of bortezomib in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-three patients (48 with AIPCa) received 128 cycles of bortezomib in doses ranging from 0.13 to 2.0 mg/m(2)/dose, utilizing a careful escalation scheme with a continuous reassessment method. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed in 24 patients (at 1.45 to 2.0 mg/m(2)). RESULTS A dose-related 20S PI was seen, with dose-limiting toxicity at 2.0 mg/m(2) (diarrhea, hypotension) occurring at an average 1-hour post-dose of >/= 75% 20S PI. Other side effects were fatigue, hypertension, constipation, nausea, and vomiting. No relationship was seen between body-surface area and bortezomib clearance over the narrow dose range tested. There was evidence of biologic activity (decline in serum prostate-specific antigen and interleukin-6 levels) at >/= 50% 20S PI. Two patients with AIPCa had prostate-specific antigen response and two patients had partial response in lymph nodes. CONCLUSION The maximum-tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose of bortezomib in this schedule is 1.6 mg/m(2). Biologic activity (inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B-related markers) and antitumor activity is seen in AIPCa at tolerated doses of bortezomib. This agent should be further explored with chemotherapy agents in advanced prostate cancer.

Bone-targeted therapy for advanced androgen-independent carcinoma of the prostate: a randomised phase II trial

BACKGROUND Prostate carcinoma is linked to osteoblastic metastasis. We therefore investigated the value of bone-targeted consolidation therapy in selected patients with advanced androgen-independent carcinoma of the prostate. METHODS 103 patients received induction chemotherapy, consisting of ketoconazole and doxorubicin alternating with estramustine and vinblastine. After two or three cycles of induction chemotherapy, we randomly assigned 72 patients who were clinically stable or responders to receive doxorubicin with or without strontium-89 (Sr-89) every week for 6 weeks. FINDINGS Overall 62 of the 103 (60%, 95% CI 50-70) patients had a 50% or greater reduction in serum prostate-specific antigen concentration that was maintained for at least 8 weeks, and 43 (42%, 32-52) had an 80% or greater reduction. 49 (52%) patients with bone pain at registration had complete resolution of pain. After follow-up of 67 patients until death, the estimated median survival for all 103 patients was 17.5 months (range 0.5-37.7). For the 36 patients randomly assigned to receive Sr-89 and doxorubicin, the median survival time was 27.7 months (4.9-37.7), and for the 36 who received doxorubicin alone it was 16.8 months (4.4-34.2) (p=0.0014). The hazard ratio was 2.76 (95% CI 1.44-5.29). INTERPRETATION Bone-targeted consolidation therapy consisting of one dose of Sr-89 plus doxorubicin once a week for 6 weeks, when given to patients with stable or responding advanced androgen-independent carcinoma of the prostate after induction chemotherapy, improved overall survival.

Integrated Therapy for Locally Advanced Bladder Cancer: Final Report of a Randomized Trial of Cystectomy Plus Adjuvant M-VAC Versus Cystectomy With Both Preoperative and Postoperative M-VAC

PURPOSE We conducted a phase III trial to investigate the timing of chemotherapy with respect to surgery for patients with resectable but high-risk urothelial cancer. The trial was also designed to evaluate the accuracy of clinical staging in patients with locally advanced cancer and the prognostic significance of chemotherapy-induced downstaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 140 uniformly evaluated patients with locally advanced urothelial cancer were studied. Planned treatment was five cycles of chemotherapy (M-VAC: methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) plus radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either two courses of neoadjuvant M-VAC followed by surgery plus three additional cycles of chemotherapy, or, alternatively, to have initial cystectomy followed by five cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS There were no significant differences in outcome between the two groups. By intent-to-treat, 81 patients (58%) remain disease-free, with median follow-up of 6.8 years. We confirmed a high rate of clinical understaging in this cohort, especially among patients showing lymphovascular invasion on biopsy. Patients with no residual muscle-invasive disease at cystectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were likely to be cured. CONCLUSION These results lend further support to the impression from small randomized trials that, in a high-risk cohort, there is an improved cure fraction by the combination of multiagent chemotherapy and surgery, although we found no preferred sequence. Importantly, it is possible to select appropriate patients for such therapy on the basis of clinical staging information. These results establish a benchmark of outcome for this cohort.

The Case for Early Cystectomy in the Treatment of Nonmuscle Invasive Micropapillary Bladder Carcinoma

PURPOSE Micropapillary bladder carcinoma is a rare variant of UC. Due to paucity of data regarding treatment outcomes, patients with nonmuscle invasive micropapillary UC often receive intravesical therapy in an attempt at bladder preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the records of all patients evaluated at our institution who had micropapillary UC of the bladder. Of these, 44 had nonmuscle invasive disease at presentation and form the basis of this report. RESULTS Mean patient age was 64.3 years (range 45 to 81) with a male-to-female ratio of 13:1. Stage distribution at presentation was 5 Ta (11%), 4 CIS (9%) and 35 T1 (80%). Median CSS was 81 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5 and 10-year CSS rates were 64% and 26%, respectively. Intravesical BCG therapy was attempted in 27 patients (61%). Of these 27 patients, 67% (18 of 27) had progression (cT2 or greater), including 22% in whom metastatic disease developed. Only 19% of patients (5 of 27, all T1) remain disease-free with an intact bladder at a median followup of 30 months. A total of 30 patients (68%) underwent cystectomy. Among patients who underwent cystectomy after progression (18), median CSS was 61.7 months with no patient surviving 10 years, whereas among those undergoing cystectomy as initial therapy (12), median survival was not reached and the 10-year CSS rate was 72%. CONCLUSIONS Intravesical BCG therapy appears to be ineffective against micropapillary UC. Our results suggest that the optimal treatment strategy for nonmuscle invasive micropapillary UC is radical cystectomy performed before progression.

Platinum-Based Chemotherapy for Variant Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Purpose: Clinical features characteristic of small-cell prostate carcinoma (SCPC), “anaplastic,” often emerge during the progression of prostate cancer. We sought to determine the efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients meeting at least one of seven prospectively defined “anaplastic” clinical criteria, including exclusive visceral or predominantly lytic bone metastases, bulky tumor masses, low prostate-specific antigen levels relative to tumor burden, or short response to androgen deprivation therapy. Experimental Design: A 120-patient phase II trial of first-line carboplatin and docetaxel (CD) and second-line etoposide and cisplatin (EP) was designed to provide reliable clinical response estimates under a Bayesian probability model with early stopping rules in place for futility and toxicity. Results: Seventy-four of 113 (65.4%) and 24 of 71 (33.8%) were progression free after four cycles of CD and EP, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 16 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6–19.0 months]. Of the seven “anaplastic” criteria, bulky tumor mass was significantly associated with poor outcome. Lactic acid dehydrogenase strongly predicted for OS and rapid progression. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration strongly predicted OS but not rapid progression. Neuroendocrine markers did not predict outcome or response to therapy. Conclusion: Our findings support the hypothesis that patients with “anaplastic” prostate cancer are a recognizable subset characterized by a high response rate of short duration to platinum-containing chemotherapies, similar to SCPC. Our results suggest that CEA is useful for selecting therapy in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and consolidative therapies to bulky high-grade tumor masses should be considered in this patient population. Clin Cancer Res; 19(13); 3621–30. ©2013 AACR.

Incidence of downstaging and complete remission after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high‐risk upper tract transitional cell carcinoma

The authors evaluated the incidence of pathologic downstaging and complete remission (CR) in patients with high‐grade ureteral and renal pelvic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) (upper tract TCC) who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.

Dose-finding with two agents in phase I oncology trials

We propose an adaptive two-stage Bayesian design for finding one or more acceptable dose combinations of two cytotoxic agents used together in a Phase I clinical trial. The method requires that each of the two agents has been studied previously as a single agent, which is almost invariably the case in practice. A parametric model is assumed for the probability of toxicity as a function of the two doses. Informative priors for parameters characterizing the single-agent toxicity probability curves are either elicited from the physician(s) planning the trial or obtained from historical data, and vague priors are assumed for parameters characterizing two-agent interactions. A method for eliciting the single-agent parameter priors is described. The design is applied to a trial of gemcitabine and cyclophosphamide, and a simulation study is presented.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant Alternating Doublet Chemotherapy With Ifosfamide/Doxorubicin and Etoposide/Cisplatin in Small-Cell Urothelial Cancer

PURPOSE Currently, treatment recommendations for small-cell urothelial cancer (SCUC) are based on anecdotal case reports and small retrospective series. We now report results from the first phase II clinical trial developed exclusively for SCUC, to our knowledge. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2001 to 2006, 30 patients with SCUC provided consent and were treated with alternating doublet chemotherapy. Patients with surgically resectable disease (< or = cT4aN0M0) received a total of four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with unresectable disease (> or = cT4b, N+, or M+) received two cycles beyond maximal response. RESULTS Eighteen patients with surgically resectable SCUC received neoadjuvant treatment with a median overall survival (OS) of 58 months; 13 of these patients remain alive and cancer free. For patients with cT2N0M0 SCUC, the 5-year OS rate is 80%; only one of four patients with cT3b-4aN0M0 remains alive (median OS, 37.8 months). For 12 patients with unresectable or metastatic SCUC, the median OS was 13.3 months. Chemotherapy was well tolerated, with transfusion, neutropenic fever, and infection remaining the most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities. There was only one postsurgical death. Brain metastases were strongly associated with more advanced-stage disease, developing in eight of 16 patients with either bulky tumors (> or = cT3b) or metastatic disease (P = .004). CONCLUSION These clinical trial results are consistent with previously reported retrospective data demonstrating long-term survival with four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for surgically resectable SCUC. Once metastases develop, the prognosis remains poor. The strong positive association between disease stage and brain metastases highlights a patient subset that may potentially benefit from prophylactic cranial irradiation.

Refining Patient Selection for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy before Radical Cystectomy

PURPOSE We evaluated the survival of patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy to confirm the utility of existing clinical tools to identify low risk patients who could be treated with radical cystectomy alone and a high risk group most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution between 2000 and 2010. Patients were considered high risk based on the clinical presence of hydroureteronephrosis, cT3b-T4a disease, and/or histological evidence of lymphovascular invasion, micropapillary or neuroendocrine features on transurethral resection. We evaluated survival (disease specific, progression-free and overall) and rate of pathological up staging. An independent cohort of patients from another institution was used to confirm our findings. RESULTS We identified 98 high risk and 199 low risk patients eligible for analysis. High risk patients exhibited decreased 5-year overall survival (47.0% vs 64.8%) and decreased disease specific (64.3% vs 83.5%) and progression-free (62.0% vs 84.1%) survival probabilities compared to low risk patients (p <0.001). Survival outcomes were confirmed in the validation subset. On final pathology 49.2% of low risk patients had disease up staged. CONCLUSIONS The 5-year disease specific survival of low risk patients was greater than 80%, supporting the distinction of high risk and low risk muscle invasive bladder cancer. The presence of high risk features identifies patients with a poor prognosis who are most likely to benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while many of those with low risk disease can undergo surgery up front with good expectations and avoid chemotherapy associated toxicity.

The Effectiveness of Off-Protocol Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder

Purpose: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is not well defined. Here we address the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for UCB in an off-protocol routine clinical setting. Experimental Design: We collected and analyzed data from 11 centers contributing retrospective cohorts of patients with UCB treated with radical cystectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were grouped into quintiles based on their risk of disease progression using estimates from a fitted multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. The association of adjuvant chemotherapy with survival was explored across separate quintiles. Results: The cohort consisted of 3,947 patients, 932 (23.6%) of whom received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.97%, P = 0.017). However, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly modified by the individuals risk of disease progression such that an increasing benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy was seen across higher-risk subgroups (P < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in survival between the treated and nontreated patients in the highest-risk quintile (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.90; P = 0.002). This group was characterized by an estimated 32.8% 5-year probability of cancer-specific survival, with 86.6% of patients having both advanced pathologic stage (≥T3) and nodal involvement. Conclusion: Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a significant improvement in survival for patients treated in an off-protocol clinical setting. Selective administration in patients at the highest risk for disease progression, such as those with advanced pathologic stage and nodal involvement, may optimize the therapeutic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 16(17); 4461–7. ©2010 AACR.