Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Dan Ingold is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Dan Ingold.


international conference on software and system process | 2012

Modeling kanban processes in systems engineering

Richard Turner; Raymond J. Madachy; Dan Ingold; Jo Ann Lane

Systems engineering processes using pull scheduling methods (kanban) are being evaluated with hybrid modeling and simulation. We are assessing integrated systems and software engineering at the enterprise level, where rapid response software development projects incrementally evolve capabilities of existing systems and/or systems of systems. A kanban-based scheduling system was defined and implemented with connected discrete, continuous and agent-based models. We are simulating the process performance vs. traditional methods of sharing systems engineering services across projects, and whether the overall value of the systems of systems over time is increased.


Procedia Computer Science | 2012

Effectiveness of kanban approaches in systems engineering within rapid response environments

Richard Turner; Dan Ingold; Jo Ann Lane; Raymond J. Madachy; David Anderson

Abstract Effective application of systems engineering in rapid response environments has been difficult, particularly those where large, complex brownfield systems or systems of systems exist and are constantly being updated with both short and long term software enhancements. This paper proposes a general case for solving this problem by combining a services approach to systems engineering with a kanban-based scheduling system. It provides the basis for validating the approach with agent-based simulations.


international conference on software and system process | 2012

Improving systems engineering effectiveness in rapid response development environments

Richard Turner; Raymond J. Madachy; Dan Ingold; Jo Ann Lane

Systems engineering is often ineffective in development environments where large, complex, brownfield systems of systems are evolved through parallel development of new capabilities in response to external, time-sensitive requirements. This paper defines a conceptual framework to improve that effectiveness and better integrate the systems engineering and software engineering processes. The framework is based on a services approach to systems engineering and the use of kanban techniques to schedule scarce enterprise systems engineering resources across multiple related systems and software development projects. The framework also addresses the differing value of work items to multiple stakeholders in the scheduling and coordination processes. Models and simulations are being used to capture, refine and validate the framework prior to in vivo experimentation.


international conference on software and system process | 2013

A model for estimating agile project process and schedule acceleration

Dan Ingold; Barry W. Boehm; Supannika Koolmanojwong

Accelerating development schedules is increasingly important in a competitive world. Reduced time-to-market is a key response to competitive threats in the commercial sphere, and rapid response in deploying military systems may save lives in a geopolitical environment characterized by rapidly emerging and ever-changing physical threats. Agile/lean development methodologies show promise in providing the desired schedule acceleration, but it can be difficult for planners to determine the effects of these factors on schedule duration, and to make appropriate choices to optimize project performance. The Constructive Rapid Application Development Model (CORADMO) attempts to quantify the effects of key schedule drivers, and thus enable planners to estimate the relative schedule that will result from varying these parameters.


2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition | 2011

Investigating an Innovative Approach for Developing Systems Engineering Curriculum: The Systems Engineering Experience Accelerator

Alice Squires; Jon Wade; Douglas A. Bodner; Masataka Okutsu; Dan Ingold; Peter G. Dominick; Richard R. Reilly; William R. Watson; Don Gelosh


Archive | 2009

Early Identification of SE-Related Program Risks

Barry W. Boehm; Dan Ingold; Winsor Brown; JoAnn Lane; George Friedman; Kathleen Dangle; Linda Esker; Forrest Shull; Rich Turner; Jon Wade


INCOSE International Symposium | 2008

8.3.1 The Macro Risk Model: An Early Warning Tool for Software‐Intensive Systems Projects

Barry W. Boehm; Dan Ingold; Raymond J. Madachy


Archive | 2013

Agile-Lean Software Engineering (ALSE) Evaluating Kanban in Systems Engineering

Richard Turner; Raymond J. Madachy; Jo Ann Lane; Dan Ingold; Laurence Levine


ieee systems conference | 2012

An event-driven, value-based, pull systems engineering scheduling approach

Richard Turner; Raymond J. Madachy; Jo Ann Lane; Dan Ingold; David Anderson


INCOSE International Symposium | 2013

5.6.2 A Lean Approach to Improving SE Visibility in Large Operational Systems Evolution

Richard Turner; Jo Ann Lane; Dan Ingold; Raymond J. Madachy

Collaboration


Dive into the Dan Ingold's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jo Ann Lane

San Diego State University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Richard Turner

Stevens Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Barry W. Boehm

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Jon Wade

Stevens Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alice Squires

Stevens Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Don Gelosh

Science Applications International Corporation

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Winsor Brown

University of Southern California

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Douglas A. Bodner

Georgia Institute of Technology

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge