Daniel Dalos

Diastolic Pressure Gradient Predicts Outcome in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Approximately 50% of patients presenting with clinical signs of heart failure are diagnosed with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) [(1)][1]. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common feature of HFpEF and predicts poor outcome. According to the diastolic pressure gradient (DPG),

Modes of death in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND Recent studies suggest that reduced right ventricular function is an important predictor of outcome in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Because affected patients suffer from a broad spectrum of non-cardiac co-morbidities, it remains unclear, whether they actually die from right heart failure (RHF) or as a consequence of other conditions. METHODS Consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of HFpEF were enrolled in this prospective registry. Local and external medical records, as well as telephone interviews with relatives were used to ascertain modes of death. RHF was accepted as a mode of death, if the following criteria were met: 1. right ventricular dysfunction assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, and 2. clinical signs of right heart decompensation at the time of death. RESULTS Out of 230 patients with complete follow-up, 16.5% (n=38) died after a mean of 30±17months. 60.5% deaths were classified as cardiovascular and 34.2% as non-cardiovascular. In 5.3% patients, the reason for death remained unknown. Of the cardiovascular cases (n=23), 91.4% of deaths were attributed to RHF, 4.3% died from stroke and 4.3% from sudden cardiac death. Of the non-cardiovascular deaths (n=13), 46.2% of deaths were attributed to major infections and 38.4% deaths were related to cancer. Other reasons for death included ileus (7.7%) and major bleeding (7.7%). CONCLUSION In our well-characterised HFpEF cohort, more than half of all deaths could directly be attributed to RHF. The right ventricle seems to be a meaningful therapeutic target in a subset of patients.

Fluid status and outcome in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND Most heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients, at some point, present to an emergency department with typical symptoms of volume overload. Clinically, most respond well to standard diuretic therapy, sometimes at the cost of renal function. The study sought to define the prognostic significance of fluid status versus renal function in patients with HFpEF. METHODS One hundred sixty-two consecutive patients with HFpEF were enrolled in our prospective registry. Twelve patients with clinically overt decompensation were excluded. Fluid status at baseline was determined by bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy. The primary outcome measure was a combined end point consisting of hospitalization for heart failure and/or death for cardiac reason. RESULTS Mean age was 74.4±8.4years. Ninety-one (61%) patients were hypo- or normovolemic (relative fluid overload [Rel. FO] -0.7±5.7%) while 59 (39%) patients presented with fluid overload (Rel. FO 11.5±2.7%). During a median follow-up of 24.3months (interquartile range: 19.8-33.2), 34% of patients reached the combined end point. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis identified fluid overload (hazard ratio: 3.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.68-5.68; p<0.001) as an independent predictor of adverse outcome. Patients with fluid overload and normal renal function showed a worse event-free survival compared to the subgroup with normohydration and impaired renal function (log-rank: p=0.042). CONCLUSION HFpEF patients with measurable fluid overload face a dismal prognosis as compared to euvolemic patients. Our data, while preliminary, suggest that patients with fluid overload may face a better outcome under continued fluid removal irrespective of changes in eGFR.

Cardiac extracellular matrix is associated with adverse outcome in patients with chronic heart failure

Accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) is known to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF). However, its prognostic relevance is poorly investigated.

Outcome after Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Depends on Age in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease - An Analysis of Relative Survival in a Multicenter Cohort and an OCT Substudy.

Background Age is a strong predictor of survival in patients with coronary artery disease. In elder patients with increasing co-morbidities percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with more complications and worse outcome. The calculation of relative survival rates adjusts for the “background” mortality in the general population by correcting for age and gender. We analyzed if elder patients after elective PCI have a worse relative survival compared to younger patient groups. Methods A total of 8,342 patients who underwent elective PCI at two high volume centers between 1998 and 2009 were analyzed. Results The survival of our patients after PCI (observed survival) was slightly lower compared to the general population (expected survival) resulting in a slightly decreasing relative survival curve. In a multivariate Cox regression model age amongst others was a strong predictor of survival. Stratifying patients according to their age the relative survival curves of younger patients (Quartile 1: <58 years; 2,046 patients), elder patients (Quartile 3: 66–73 years; 2,090 patients) and very old patients (Quartile 4: >73 years; 2,307 patients) were similar. The relative survival of mid-aged patients (Quartile 2: 58–65 years; 1,899 patients) was better than that of all other patient groups. The profile of cardiovascular risk factors differs between the various groups resulting in different composition and burden of coronary plaques in an optical coherence tomography sub-study. Conclusion Patients after elective PCI have a slightly worse long-term survival compared to the age- and sex-matched general population. This is also true for different groups of age except for mid-aged patients between 58 and 63 years. Elder patients between 66 and 73 years and above 73 years have a similar relative survival compared to younger patients below 58 years, and might therefore have similar benefit from elective PCI.

Presence of ´isolated´ tricuspid regurgitation should prompt the suspicion of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Background Diastolic dysfunction of the left ventricle is common but frequently under-diagnosed. Particularly in advanced stages affected patients may present with significant functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) as the most prominent sign on echocardiography. The underlying left ventricular pathology may eventually be missed and symptoms of heart failure are attributed to TR, with respective therapeutic consequences. The aim of the present study was to determine prevalence and mechanisms underlying TR evolution in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods and results Consecutive HFpEF patients were enrolled in this prospective, observational study. Confirmatory diagnostic tests including echocardiography and invasive hemodynamic assessments were performed. Of the 175 patients registered between 2010 and 2014, 51% had significant (moderate or severe) TR without structural abnormalities of the tricuspid valve. Significant hemodynamic differences between patients with and without relevant TR were encountered. These included elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (p = 0.038), reduced pulmonary arterial compliance (PAC, p = 0.005), and elevated left ventricular filling pressures (p = 0.039) in the TR group. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis revealed diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (p = 0.029) and PAC (p = 0.048) as independent determinants of TR. Patients were followed for 18.1±14.1 months, during which 32% had a cardiac event. While TR was associated with outcome in the univariable analysis, it failed to predict event-free survival in the multivariable model. Conclusions The presence of ´isolated´ functional TR should prompt the suspicion of HFpEF. Our data show that significant TR is a marker of advanced HFpEF but neither an isolated entity nor independently associated with event-free survival.

Specific indications and clinical outcome in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) – A nationwide multicentre registry

Background Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are an innovative and less invasive alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) in selected patients. We aimed to investigate the underlying diseases and the specific indications for implanting S-ICD in clinical practice, as well as the prevalence of shock delivery and complications.BACKGROUND Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are an innovative and less invasive alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) in selected patients. We aimed to investigate the underlying diseases and the specific indications for implanting S-ICD in clinical practice, as well as the prevalence of shock delivery and complications. METHODS AND RESULTS From December 2012, data of 236 patients (30,5% female; age 48,6±16,8years) were gathered from 12 centres in Austria. Follow-up data over a period of 1,7±1,1years were available for 231 patients (in total 359,2 patient-years). Predominant underlying diseases were ischemic cardiomyopathy (iCMP; 32,0%), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (22,6%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (dCMP; 17,3%). The most frequent indications for implantation were sudden cardiac death survival (27,4%), primary prevention for iCMP (23,9%) and for dCMP (12,8%), and previous explantation of TV-ICD (12,4%). Appropriate shocks were documented in 16 patients (6,9%), iCMP being the predominant underlying disease. Arrhythmia conversion was successful in all patients, efficacy of the first shock was 96%. Inappropriate shock rate was 5,2%, predominantly caused by oversensing of T wave or artefacts. A device upgrade to an ICD system with pacing function was necessary in <1%. Clinical complications needing surgical revision occurred in 8 patients (3,5%). CONCLUSIONS S-ICD were mostly implanted for primary prevention, one fourth of our cases were sudden death survivors. Clinical and functional complication rate was relatively low. In conclusion, S-ICD is a safe and efficient alternative in a larger population of ICD candidates, when no cardiac pacing is needed. EC-number: C-136-17.

THE COURSE OF NT-PROBNP IN REAL-LIFE PATIENTS UNDERGOING TRANSFEMORAL AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION

NT-proBNP has been reported as predictor of survival in severe aortic stenosis (AS). Aim of this study was to examine the change in NT-proBNP levels over time and its value as predictor of outcome after treatment with transfemoral aortic valve implantation (TAVI). From May 2007 until June 2013, 142

Specific indications and clinical outcome in patients with subcutaneous ICD – A nationwide multicentre registry

Background Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are an innovative and less invasive alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) in selected patients. We aimed to investigate the underlying diseases and the specific indications for implanting S-ICD in clinical practice, as well as the prevalence of shock delivery and complications.BACKGROUND Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are an innovative and less invasive alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) in selected patients. We aimed to investigate the underlying diseases and the specific indications for implanting S-ICD in clinical practice, as well as the prevalence of shock delivery and complications. METHODS AND RESULTS From December 2012, data of 236 patients (30,5% female; age 48,6±16,8years) were gathered from 12 centres in Austria. Follow-up data over a period of 1,7±1,1years were available for 231 patients (in total 359,2 patient-years). Predominant underlying diseases were ischemic cardiomyopathy (iCMP; 32,0%), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (22,6%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (dCMP; 17,3%). The most frequent indications for implantation were sudden cardiac death survival (27,4%), primary prevention for iCMP (23,9%) and for dCMP (12,8%), and previous explantation of TV-ICD (12,4%). Appropriate shocks were documented in 16 patients (6,9%), iCMP being the predominant underlying disease. Arrhythmia conversion was successful in all patients, efficacy of the first shock was 96%. Inappropriate shock rate was 5,2%, predominantly caused by oversensing of T wave or artefacts. A device upgrade to an ICD system with pacing function was necessary in <1%. Clinical complications needing surgical revision occurred in 8 patients (3,5%). CONCLUSIONS S-ICD were mostly implanted for primary prevention, one fourth of our cases were sudden death survivors. Clinical and functional complication rate was relatively low. In conclusion, S-ICD is a safe and efficient alternative in a larger population of ICD candidates, when no cardiac pacing is needed. EC-number: C-136-17.

Original ArticleSpecific indications and clinical outcome in patients with subcutaneous ICD – A nationwide multicentre registry

Background Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are an innovative and less invasive alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) in selected patients. We aimed to investigate the underlying diseases and the specific indications for implanting S-ICD in clinical practice, as well as the prevalence of shock delivery and complications.BACKGROUND Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) are an innovative and less invasive alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) in selected patients. We aimed to investigate the underlying diseases and the specific indications for implanting S-ICD in clinical practice, as well as the prevalence of shock delivery and complications. METHODS AND RESULTS From December 2012, data of 236 patients (30,5% female; age 48,6±16,8years) were gathered from 12 centres in Austria. Follow-up data over a period of 1,7±1,1years were available for 231 patients (in total 359,2 patient-years). Predominant underlying diseases were ischemic cardiomyopathy (iCMP; 32,0%), idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (22,6%) and dilated cardiomyopathy (dCMP; 17,3%). The most frequent indications for implantation were sudden cardiac death survival (27,4%), primary prevention for iCMP (23,9%) and for dCMP (12,8%), and previous explantation of TV-ICD (12,4%). Appropriate shocks were documented in 16 patients (6,9%), iCMP being the predominant underlying disease. Arrhythmia conversion was successful in all patients, efficacy of the first shock was 96%. Inappropriate shock rate was 5,2%, predominantly caused by oversensing of T wave or artefacts. A device upgrade to an ICD system with pacing function was necessary in <1%. Clinical complications needing surgical revision occurred in 8 patients (3,5%). CONCLUSIONS S-ICD were mostly implanted for primary prevention, one fourth of our cases were sudden death survivors. Clinical and functional complication rate was relatively low. In conclusion, S-ICD is a safe and efficient alternative in a larger population of ICD candidates, when no cardiac pacing is needed. EC-number: C-136-17.