Daniel Lefebvre
McGill University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Daniel Lefebvre.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2011
D.E. Santschi; Daniel Lefebvre; R.I. Cue; Christiane L. Girard; D. Pellerin
A total of 850 cows distributed among 13 commercial Holstein herds were involved in this study to compare the effects of 2 different dry period (DP) management strategies on milk and component yields as well as body condition score (BCS) over complete lactations. Within each herd and every 2 mo, cows were assigned to a short (35 d dry; SDP) or conventional (60 d dry; CDP) DP management based on previous lactation 305-d milk yield, predicted calving interval, and parity: primiparous (n=414) and multiparous (n=436). Cows assigned to CDP were fed a far-off dry cow ration from dry-off until 21 d prepartum, and were then switched to a precalving ration. Cows assigned to SDP were fed the precalving ration throughout their DP. Rations were different across herds, but the late-lactation, precalving, and early lactation rations were identical for both treatment groups within each herd. Additional milk was obtained at the end of lactation from cows assigned to SDP due to the extended lactation. Average daily milk yield in the following lactation was not different between treatments for third- or greater-lactation cows, but was significantly decreased in second-lactation SDP cows. However, when expressed as energy-corrected milk, this difference was not significant. Although lower for primiparous than multiparous cows, body weight and BCS were not affected by DP management strategy. Milk production and BCS responses to treatments varied among herds. Results from the present study suggest that a short DP management strategy could be more appropriate for todays dairy cows, although not suitable for all cows or all herds.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2011
D.E. Santschi; Daniel Lefebvre; R.I. Cue; Christiane L. Girard; D. Pellerin
A total of 850 Holstein cows from 13 commercial dairy herds were involved in the present study to compare the effects of 2 different dry period (DP) management strategies on health and reproductive parameters. Cows were assigned to either a short (SDP; 35-d) or a conventional (CDP; 60-d) DP management within each herd, based on previous 305-d milk yield, parity (414 primiparous and 436 multiparous), and estimated calving interval. Cows assigned to CDP were fed a dry cow ration from dry-off until 21 d prepartum, and were then switched to a precalving ration. Cows assigned to SDP were fed the precalving ration throughout their DP. Rations were specific to each herd. A significant treatment × parity interaction was found for culling rate. Dry period management did not affect culling rate for second-lactation cows but a significantly higher culling rate occurred in multiparous CDP cows compared with SDP (42.6 vs. 31.6% ± 3.7 for CDP and SDP, respectively). Management used in the DP did not affect incidence of severe ketosis, displaced abomasum, milk fever, and mastitis, although incidence of these metabolic disorders were lower in second-lactation than third- or greater-lactation cows. The incidence of mild ketosis (evaluated by milk ketone concentration) was lower following SDP, probably as a result of better energy balance. On the other hand, the incidence of retained placenta was higher in multiparous cows assigned to SDP, but the reason for this increase remains unclear. Nevertheless, this did not lead to increased incidence of metritis. Moreover, DP management did not influence reproductive measures, including days in milk at first breeding, number of breedings per conception, as well as conception rates at first and second services. Regarding days open, overall, all 13 herds were not significantly affected by treatment, but 1 herd clearly showed opposite results to the 12 others. Our results indicate that a short DP management strategy could facilitate transition from one lactation to the next by decreasing the incidence of mild ketosis, with no major negative effects on other health parameters and reproduction. The variation in results observed among herds suggests that other management practices influence the response observed following a short or conventional DP, emphasizing the need for other field studies.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2011
D.E. Santschi; Daniel Lefebvre; R.I. Cue; Christiane L. Girard; D. Pellerin
The Canadian dairy industry operates under a supply management system with production quotas (expressed in kilograms of butterfat per day) owned by dairy producers. Any management strategy influencing production responses must, therefore, be evaluated to estimate its effects on quota needed to sell the milk produced. In the present study, half of the cows from 13 commercial herds (850 cows, average of 70 cows per herd) were assigned to be managed for a short dry period (SDP; 35 d dry) and the other half was managed for a conventional dry period (CDP; 60 d dry) to evaluate the economic impact of a steady state involving either CDP or SDP. Economic variables included in the partial budget were: variations in revenues from milk and components as well as animals sold; costs related to feeding, reproduction, replacement, housing, and treatments. All variables were first estimated on a cow basis for each herd individually, and average results were used to calculate the partial budget for an average herd. Yearly milk and component yields per cow increased, which implies that fewer cows are required to produce the same amount of quota. Accordingly, 2 scenarios were investigated: in the first one, available quota was kept constant, and herd size was adjusted to avoid over-quota production. Consequently, the partial budget was calculated considering that 5 fewer cows were present in the herd. In this situation, switching to an SDP management increased net annual income for the farm by
Applied Engineering in Agriculture | 1998
R. Lacroix; J. Huijbers; R. Tiemessen; Daniel Lefebvre; D. Marchand; K.M. Wade
2,677 (Can
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture | 2003
D. Pietersma; R. Lacroix; Daniel Lefebvre; K.M. Wade
), which represents
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture | 2003
D. Pietersma; R. Lacroix; Daniel Lefebvre; K.M. Wade
41.38 per cow. In the second scenario, the number of cows was kept constant, but additional quota (5.5 kg/d,
Journal of Dairy Science | 2014
M.S. Jolicoeur; A.F. Brito; D.E. Santschi; D. Pellerin; Daniel Lefebvre; R. Berthiaume; Christiane L. Girard
25,000/kg) was bought to allow selling all of the milk produced. In this case, net farm income was increased by
Journal of Dairy Science | 2016
D.E. Santschi; R. Lacroix; J. Durocher; M. Duplessis; R.K. Moore; Daniel Lefebvre
17,132 annually with SDP, which represents
Canadian Journal of Animal Science | 2006
D. Pietersma; R. Lacroix; Daniel Lefebvre; R.I. Cue; K.M. Wade
245.18 per cow. This budget includes interest on the purchase of quota. A comparison of partial budgets for individual herds involved in the study revealed considerable variation among herds. Switching from a CDP to a SDP management would be beneficial for average dairy herds in eastern Canada.
Journal of Dairy Science | 2015
M. Duplessis; R.I. Cue; D.E. Santschi; Daniel Lefebvre; R. Lacroix
Dairy producers receive large amounts of data from Dairy Herd Improvement agencies on a monthly basis, not only for the purpose of supplying summary statistics, but also as an aid in the detection of management weaknesses. The latter task can be carried out more efficiently by producers and their advisors if aided by decision-support systems, the role of which is to do preliminary data processing. Two software programs were developed to carry out such pre-processing for individual cows in terms of milk yield and persistency. Specifically, these programs analyze both traits as a function of parity, stage of lactation, and herd average production level, and are based on fuzzy sets, which furnish qualitative assessments of the deviations from standard values. This approach has proved to work well, and may be extended to other factors such as peak yield, body condition score and somatic cell count.